Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.
Anglehall
-
Content Count
4 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by Anglehall
-
-
ShareW already is the total volume (which is what you want)each run through you are accumulating the total volume with.
ShareW = ShareW + (UpTicks+DownTicks) ;
I think the short answer is no (but I could be wrong)
This: /ShareW
was
This: /ShareW[Value1]
I don't believe the original formula attributed variance to the individual independent elements as a 'whole'.
If you use /ShareW you are not evaluating an individual independent element.
You are evaluating a summation of the individual independent element.
NOTE: I forgot to mention that I'm using the CLOSE and not the avgPrice.
-
Roughly NQ offers 2X the loss rate compared to the ES.
Begin with the NQ.
If you have a lot of money and after you master NQ, then TF the best to trade.
-
Shouldn't the cumulative volume be relevant to the volume total?
Original:
Value2 = ((UpTicks[Value1] + DownTicks[Value1])/ShareW) *
(Square(AvgPrice[Value1]-VolWAPValue)) ;
Modified:
Value2 = ((UpTicks[Value1] + DownTicks[Value1])/ShareW[Value1]) *
(Square(AvgPrice[Value1]-VolWAPValue)) ;
vars: PriceW ( 0 ), ShareW ( 0 ), Count ( 0 ), VolWAPValue ( 0 ), VolWAPVariance ( 0 ), VolWAPSD ( 0 ), Class ("PVP"), MyPVP ( 0 ) ; if date > date[1] then begin PriceW = 0 ; ShareW = 0; Count = -1 ; Value1 = 0 ; Value2 = 0 ; VolWAPValue = 0 ; end; PriceW = PriceW + (close {AvgPrice} * (UpTicks+DownTicks)) ; ShareW = ShareW + (UpTicks+DownTicks) ; Count = Count + 1 ; Value3 = 0 ; if ShareW > 0 then VolWAPValue = PriceW / ShareW ; For Value1 = 0 To Count Begin if 0 < ShareW[Value1] then Value2 = ((UpTicks[Value1] + DownTicks[Value1])/ShareW[Value1]) * (Square(AvgPrice[Value1]-VolWAPValue)) ; Value3 = Value3 + Value2 ; End; VolWAPVariance = Value3 ; VolWAPSD = round2fraction(SquareRoot(VolWAPVariance)) ; Plot1(VolWAPValue, "VWAP"); Plot2(VolWAPValue + VolWAPSD, "1Up"); Plot3(VolWAPValue - VolWAPSD, "1 Dn"); Plot4(VolWAPValue + (2*VolWAPSD), "2Up"); Plot5(VolWAPValue - (2*VolWAPSD), "2Dn"); Plot6(VolWAPValue + (1.5*VolWAPSD), "1.5 Up"); Plot7(VolWAPValue - (1.5*VolWAPSD), "1.5 Dn"); Plot8(VolWAPValue + (.5*VolWAPSD), ".5 Up"); Plot9(VolWAPValue - (.5*VolWAPSD), ".5 Dn");
TS Tick by Tick PVP Plotted with VWAP and SD Bands
in Trading Indicators
Posted
After further review for the more robust statistical approach, I believe that the individual elements should be weighted by the bar that is being evaluated total volume and not the accumulated volume of the population.