[Soultrader]

For those of you that missed it. Check out the interview on trading psychology with Jason Jankovsky through our TL! Audio. It's given me new insights on my trading. What fascinating is his setups are based on trader mistakes. I have yet to completely organize my thoughts but will keep this thread updated on some new ideas and trading strategies.

[notouch]

Listening to that made me remember that I've thought in the past about developing a strategy to take the opposite side of common losing trading strategies. We all know that a lot of traders will use MA crossover strategies on 5 minute charts and that these strategies are always losing strategies. A consistent losing strategy is just as good as a consistent winning strategy as long as you buy when the strategy is telling you to sell and sell when it's telling you to buy. It's difficult to find a way to incorporate that into a trading strategy though.

[wsam29]

Jason Jankovsky is the man!

Mark Douglas' stuff is great as well!

JAJ has three great CBOT webinars.

its scary to hear JAJ took 10 years to understand this stuff.

Just survive the learning process everyone the end of the tunnel is your pot of gold.

[GCB]

I wish he would have shared something more specific on how to exploit what he was talking about. He basically said losers move the market (a variation on JC's "the market's move because they have to"), but he didn't say anything on how to know when this is happening. I sensed this frustration in the interviewer as well.

Is the answer in his book?


I'm not sure I buy his point about zero-sum markets either. The cash market is not zero-sum, the futures market is. But the index futures market is based on the cash market. If trade SPY or I trade ES I'm trading essentially the same price movement. So if I'm trading SPY is it not zero-sum and if I trade ES it is zero-sum? If I buy an index mutual fund or a future contract and keep rolling it over I'm basically doing the same thing. Is one zero-sum and the other not? That makes no sense.

Technically an index future contract is "zero-sum." But it's based on something which is not. The whole zero-sum thing is a carnard. Everyone gets something out of the markets. The winners get money and the losers get lessons. It's win-win if you want it to be. The problem is losers don't gain anything from losing, that's why it seems like an ultimate loss.

[Soultrader]

Perhaps we can ask him the next time he stops by in the chat room. I am also very interested in picking up his book as I have not yet read it myself. I have decided to take a deeper look in understanding the psychology behind price action. I am slowly starting to realize that all these pivots, fibs, etc.. may not be the ideal way to trade. They only work because of the imbalance of supply vs demand at these levels. I figured the heck with them... might as well keep a chart naked with volume only and determine supply vs demand and the psychology behind the losers. (of course I am not ready to do so yet but perhaps in the near future?)

[GCB]

Looking at the chapter names of his book, its mostly pretty standard stuff. Solid, but nothing spectacular.

Soul, see my points about zero-sum below and tell me what you think if you are of a mind.

[wsam29]

Originally Posted by Soultrader »

Perhaps we can ask him the next time he stops by in the chat room. I am also very interested in picking up his book as I have not yet read it myself. I have decided to take a deeper look in understanding the psychology behind price action. I am slowly starting to realize that all these pivots, fibs, etc.. may not be the ideal way to trade. They only work because of the imbalance of supply vs demand at these levels. I figured the heck with them... might as well keep a chart naked with volume only and determine supply vs demand and the psychology behind the losers. (of course I am not ready to do so yet but perhaps in the near future?)

He sees the light, sort off.

[wsam29]

Originally Posted by GCB »

I wish he would have shared something more specific on how to exploit what he was talking about. He basically said losers move the market (a variation on JC's "the market's move because they have to"), but he didn't say anything on how to know when this is happening. I sensed this frustration in the interviewer as well.

Is the answer in his book?

Its an intangible skill in my opinion.

If you've ever had a losing trade get out of hand, you'll know what he's talking about. If you've never had one trade get out of hand, you'll never understand what one goes through mentally.