A special thanks to PivotProfiler for providing the code for VT, unfortunately I volunteered to translate it into tradestation. Three weeks later and I'm finally finished. Apologies for the delay but tradestation doesn't allow future referencing which the code did, so I had to individually make it backwards compatible.

For example VT code :

c>ref(c,+3) had to become c[3]>c in EasyLanguage............. ....and doing this for over 150 plots

Most of the plots require at least 1 bar for confirmation, so I've coded the indicator to show, for example, "No Demand3(1)" in the data window to let you know that it required 1 bar for confirmation before the indicator plotted ( handy for looking over previous charts as well ).

I've also coded in Alerts into each one, so all you have to do is format the indicator and enable the Alerts if desired.

I've split the code into two ELD's, one for No Demand/Supply and the other for squats.

I've also included an input so you can adjust the number of ticks above/below the high/low you want the indicator to plot. Here's a pic of some examples:

Hope this helps

Blu-Ray

[garp]

Originally Posted by dandxg »

Hi Blu Ray, thanks so much for converting them. I do plan to donate to your time if I use the code. I have a question for you. Since this is Easy Language will it work with both TS and Multi Charts? I have used neither so far, but looking at them. I would think so because both use EL? Currently I use Sierra Charts so I am attempting to do due diligence before making a forklift upgrade to a new charting platform. Thanks again.

Yes, it works well in Multicharts.

[januson]

hi again..

I'm using MultiCharts and I think the dots are misplaced, for some strange reason they are flying to high or to low. But it's nothing to do with your code, I've just created a support question at TS Support as it must be a bug in MC.

[Blu-Ray]

Originally Posted by januson »

hi again..

I'm using MultiCharts and I think the dots are misplaced, for some strange reason they are flying to high or to low. But it's nothing to do with your code, I've just created a support question at TS Support as it must be a bug in MC.

Hi januson

Yes I think you're right about MC, as I've had another member mention the same problem. Unfortunately I don't have MC to test out the fault, however it seems to be working fine in TS.

Cheers

Blu-Ray

[thrunner]

Originally Posted by Blu-Ray »

Yes I think you're right about MC, as I've had another member mention the same problem. Unfortunately I don't have MC to test out the fault, however it seems to be working fine in TS.Blu-Ray

Thanks for the indicator, BR. The problem with MC may be with scaling to symbol setting.
By default the scaling of a MC indicator is to screen, which is something TS doesn't do.

[SBGTrading]

Hi Blu-Ray,
I was looking through the code and I think I found a possible mistake. Can you verify for Plot21 and Plot22 in the file "VSA No Demand No Supply.txt". Both "if" statements for those plots contain the condition: (H[3]-L[3])<(H[3]-L[3]) which will always be evaluated as FALSE. Perhaps this is a typo???

Thanks,
Ben

Originally Posted by Blu-Ray »

Here you go Leonid, I've attached two text files, just from my observation, the majority of the signals fired are the NoDem/Supp 3 and 14.

[Blu-Ray]

Originally Posted by SBGTrading »

Hi Blu-Ray,
I was looking through the code and I think I found a possible mistake. Can you verify for Plot21 and Plot22 in the file "VSA No Demand No Supply.txt". Both "if" statements for those plots contain the condition: (H[3]-L[3])<(H[3]-L[3]) which will always be evaluated as FALSE. Perhaps this is a typo???

Thanks,
Ben

Thanks Ben for pointing that out, yes it is a mistake

the code should read " (H[3]-L[3])<(H[4]-L[4]) ".

I've attached the modified ELD ( Hopefully James or a Mod could move it to the front page )

Thanks again

Blu-Ray

[cosmic]

thanks blu-ray & ben for fixing this.

did anybody experiment with vsa patterns in a neural net like neuroshell?

good trades,
cosmic

[Soultrader]

Originally Posted by Blu-Ray »

Thanks Ben for pointing that out, yes it is a mistake

the code should read " (H[3]-L[3])<(H[4]-L[4]) ".

I've attached the modified ELD ( Hopefully James or a Mod could move it to the front page )

Thanks again

Blu-Ray

Fixed. Thanks.