Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Ingot54

To Arm or to Disarm.

Recommended Posts

Well it looks like the proposals for gun control are all weak and, therefore, worthless. The US may have won back the right to fund research, but that too is a waste since common knowledge is that a gun is dangerous. It is an unfortunate byproduct of our representative form of government.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Well it looks like the proposals for gun control are all weak and, therefore, worthless. The US may have won back the right to fund research, but that too is a waste since common knowledge is that a gun is dangerous.

 

"This is a victory for the U.S. Constitution - NOT the NRA" Damn Yankee

 

since forming a 'commission' or a 'committee' won't work

or doing research won't work

let's just continue on throwing out the occasional 'example' case...

and of course...the lies, dam lies, and statistics ... like -

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N9efqhGBHZI]Ben Swann REALITY CHECK for Piers Morgan Gun Stats - YouTube[/ame]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am way behind in trotting out ( :haha: harmonizing ) examples of specific incidents

(counterparts to the examples of the occasional “dummies with guns” examples that categorically prove that no one should be allowed to choose to be armed, etc … )

 

this following valuable example proves the point that if belgium* had fewer guns (maybe just one fewer gun! ) that this event would have never happened.

Armed robbers snatch $50m in uncut diamonds from Brussels airport - Telegraph

 

* Guns in Belgium: Facts, Figures and Firearm Law

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
"This is a victory for the U.S. Constitution - NOT the NRA" Damn Yankee

 

since forming a 'commission' or a 'committee' won't work

or doing research won't work

let's just continue on throwing out the occasional 'example' case...

and of course...the lies, dam lies, and statistics ... like -

 

I think you are hard pressed to suggest that the UK has a gun homicide issue with tough gun laws. If you want to split hairs over numbers which might be a time period reporting issue, so be it. It is lower, it is lower, it is lower no matter which way you look at it.

 

It remains that a male in the United States is safer from homicide, gun or otherwise, in prison than not in prison. Yes, a victory for the constitution.

 

Smoking does not cause cancer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

mous, That's not very good job of refuting what was admitted to be "lies, dam lies, and statistics"...

For one, I'm wasn't "pressed" at all to make points about UK US comparisons. No attempts were even made to "split hairs" or get into those ever crucial "reporting periods", etc. Again, you missed the point or you are twisting.

But I was easy "pressed" to point out a couple lies, dam lies, and statistics the talking heads are tasked to disseminate... Again, you missed the point or you are twisting.

Also, smoking really does not cause cancer. Just another meme that you don't understand... and haven't really chosen to explore beyond what 'they' told you...

 

Yes, all is well in the UK

After all, guns were legally banned.

Weapons threat on the rise in UK schools

 

oh wait, near the end of the vid they played the script about how the politicians are getting “ready to sit up and take notice”, so this ‘problem’ should be completely a thing of the past by next semester…

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In the running…

 

“Sir, you can see it!? Show us. I still don’t see what’s left of my grandparents’ America - even through this magnifying glass”

 

“Little girl, I need you to loan me another trillion.”

 

“But, mr. presmident, we don’t want to be your human shield anymore!”

5aa711bf3e8ed_captioncontest.JPG.34eee297acbb1e059300ccc5ba525d7c.JPG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
...It remains that a male in the United States is safer from homicide... in prison than not in prison.

 

Yes we must protect our males. They are the very core reason of this whole thread – even though it was ‘suddenly’ set off by a madman who killed children … omg.

 

and…it’s ironic that in your community you still walk around with “no fear”… your own words.

We might suspect that you’re so mighty you carry a cop around with you to respond to any threats … who needs a gun when you can carry a cop?

Oh - you can’t carry a cop ?!

sht boy, if we can’t control them guns everywhere, your ass is homicided grass.

 

 

 

“…in prison than not in prison.”

Still working these ungrounded, unrealistic ‘cabin’ theories to explain things?

Sounds like you're pulling another sneaky “guns cause criminals” …

or one of your other dreamlike causes for the murders.

Quickly now! Deny it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

MM, you’re the only to Disarm poster in here who thinks. All the rest of the gun grabbers are just minions parroting the memes, or are just going ad hominem, etc. etc.

You think about how to leverage your statistics and how to discredit any other statistics. You think about ways to infer from your lies, dam lies, and statistics how many males we might save and what we might achieve if, essentially, we somehow had “fewer” guns.

You think about how to take our weapons without appearing to take our weapons… attempting to snuff our rights to self defense parity while denying it etc.

(

:helloooo:

...and even though you 'think' - we even have to consider that you want to take our weapons... but you don't believe you want to take our weapons. whoa! what ?)

 

…You have said how wonderful “one less gun ”might be many, many times over...

 

But one more gun might make a difference.

Every year, guns are used over 80x more often to protect a life than to take one!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

But one more gun might make a difference.

Every year, guns are used over 80x more often to protect a life than to take one!

 

You are 2.7 times more likely to die by a gun if you own a gun than if you don't own a gun. Oddly, you protection comes at a cost.; an increased chance of dying.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You are 2.7 times more likely to die by a gun if you own a gun than if you don't own a gun. Oddly, you protection comes at a cost.; an increased chance of dying.

 

MM, think and peel back some layers in those stats, (unlike StunGun who can only muster derisive ;) )

Most gun murders are from perp on perp, or repeat offender on family (hurt to death that one last time), or... etc. – and both parties are likely to ‘own’ the guns…

big stat warper – you’re conveniently lumping the normals in where they don’t belong.

Those with degrees in lying via statistics have a word for this...

 

 

 

 

 

You are 2.7 times more likely to die by a gun if you own a gun than if you don't own a gun. Oddly, you protection comes at a cost.; an increased chance of dying.

 

Big whoop.

 

Lies, dam lies, and statistics

You are 2.7 times more likely to die financially if you have a leveraged trading account than if you don't have a leveraged trading account. Oddly, your security comes at a cost; an increased chance of financial death.

Yet here we all are .... ~80,000 up here on TL, etc etc ... dangerous accts freaking everywhere...all over the world...all lumped together...

 

Let's co-track your logic. If those "leveraged trading accounts " cause all those financial deaths - and not the account holders - what we need to do is legally reduce the number of these lethal leveraged trading accounts and there will certainly be fewer financial deaths

... lies, dam lies, and statistics have a use. Truth is not part of it. It's sad to see a 'wounded rescuer' like you sink to ...

 

Every year, guns are used over 80x more often to protect a life than to take one!

Hell yeh it’s probably a lie. Maybe it’s a dam lie. Possibly, it’s even a statistic.

Whack the fk away at it all you want… I couldn’t care less... bcse

 

Personally, I’m good as long as the ‘real’ stat is remains greaterthan/or/equal to

“Every year, guns are used over 1.618x more often to protect a life than to take one! ”

… weethart, you got some serious statistical “analysis”/disparaging to do to move this stat from 80x to below 1.618x ;}

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
MM, think and peel back some layers in those stats, (unlike StunGun who can only muster derisive ;) )

Most gun murders are from perp on perp, or repeat offender on family (hurt to death that one last time), or... etc. – and both parties are likely to ‘own’ the guns…

big stat warper – you’re conveniently lumping the normals in where they don’t belong.

Those with degrees in lying via statistics have a word for this...

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Big whoop.

 

Lies, dam lies, and statistics

You are 2.7 times more likely to die financially if you have a leveraged trading account than if you don't have a leveraged trading account. Oddly, your security comes at a cost; an increased chance of financial death.

Yet here we all are .... ~80,000 up here on TL, etc etc ... dangerous accts freaking everywhere...all over the world...all lumped together...

 

Let's co-track your logic. If those "leveraged trading accounts " cause all those financial deaths - and not the account holders - what we need to do is legally reduce the number of these lethal leveraged trading accounts and there will certainly be fewer financial deaths

... lies, dam lies, and statistics have a use. Truth is not part of it. It's sad to see a 'wounded rescuer' like you sink to ...

 

 

Hell yeh it’s probably a lie. Maybe it’s a dam lie. Possibly, it’s even a statistic.

Whack the fk away at it all you want… I couldn’t care less... bcse

 

Personally, I’m good as long as the ‘real’ stat is remains greaterthan/or/equal to

“Every year, guns are used over 1.618x more often to protect a life than to take one! ”

… weethart, you got some serious statistical “analysis”/disparaging to do to move this stat from 80x to below 1.618x ;}

 

Your need for guns is probably a result of you watching too many scary movies. Go see a psychiatrist, your need for a gun will miraculously go away.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Your need for guns is probably a result of you watching too many scary movies. Go see a psychiatrist, your need for a gun will miraculously go away.

 

Be very careful what you are saying … :haha: If I go to a psychiatrist, he will most likely prescribe one of the meds which trigger violent and suicidal ideation in a percentage of the patients who take it … plus I already have guns – legal and illegal…( that I currently hope I don't need... but have the god given right to if I do need them... ) but under the influence of those drugs... like a large group of the triggering lanza of the last two decades have been...

You better steer it back to taking guns bud… you’re getting dangerously ::n(lanza)topic:

We don’t want to push to quickly while you’re working through your PTSD ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Be very careful what you are saying … :haha: If I go to a psychiatrist, he will most likely prescribe one of the meds which trigger violent and suicidal ideation in a percentage of the patients who take it … plus I already have guns – legal and illegal…( that I currently hope I don't need... but have the god given right to if I do need them... ) but under the influence of those drugs... like a large group of the triggering lanza of the last two decades have been...

You better steer it back to taking guns bud… you’re getting dangerously ::n(lanza)topic:

We don’t want to push to quickly while you’re working through your PTSD ;)

 

It's a shame. Sometimes you have to make choices. Do you get meds for a hard on or do you forego the hard on and maintain a decent blood pressure level? Personally, If I had a hard on for 4 hours, I would call everyone, but my doctor would probably be the last one on the list.

 

I'll change gods if my god is the same god as yours. Mine does not advocate the right to have weapons. In fact, quite the opposite. I think your god might be Charlton Hesston. Like I said, too many movies

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'll change gods if my god is the same god as yours. Mine does not advocate the right to have weapons.

 

Change gods if you need… that’s btwn you and god…

 

To Arm is additive … Psalm 23:4, etc. PLUS+ matching lethality PLUS individual responsibility…

 

to Disarm is ‘subtractive’ … Psalm 23:4 minus- …. minus- … minus-

Edited by zdo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Gun grabbers love to use skewed statistics and false assumptions to draw 2nd Amendment advocates into irrelevant tangents and muddle the bottom line.

 

In the end, there is only one question that needs to be asked and answered:

What would YOU do when faced with clockwork like armed attackers threatening harm or death to you and your loved ones?

 

If you had it, would you’ use’ a gun?

Or would you run and leave your family behind?

Or, die on your knees begging for mercy (while waiting for the cops, if you got the chance to dial out)?

 

It’s a very simple gun control question

 

 

 

 

I think only paid government trolls and syncopaths in a state of obedient slumber that is not sleep would argue that firearms are not worth the risks in such “suddenly” events...

 

In real events ( not in statistical studies, or in theories about prisoners, or... ) any HONEST gun control activist with any capacity for valour at all would at least have the sense to admit that they would want the best possible protection for themselves and their family

– which, in such situations, is a gun

- and for multiple attackers, would be a high capacity semi-automatics... (like the gun grabbing senator’s body guards carry...)

 

 

 

 

You, individually, cannot legally take guns from other persons that you have decided should not have guns.

You, as a vigilante, won’t get very far in identifying other persons that you have decided should not have guns, nor in ‘prosecuting’ your (morally sound) private confiscations.

You cannot realistically depend on an increasingly insane and dysfunctional government to come anywhere close to adequately taking the guns from people that you would determine should not have guns.

 

Folks, your best options – until the real, current world we live in is outlier free – go To Arm

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you had it, would you’ use’ a gun?

Or would you run and leave your family behind?

Or, die on your knees begging for mercy (while waiting for the cops, if you got the chance to dial out)?

 

It’s a very simple gun control question

 

 

 

That is exactly the fear that the gun advocates want you to possess. It makes it easier to sell guns. It also has close to nothing to do with the 2nd amendment, but your god is a movie star so your bible is just another screenplay that you have learned line by line.

 

As if there were no other way to take down an intruder than with a gun?

If the intruder has a gun? then what? if the intruder is holding the gun or a knife to your wife's or child's head then what?

 

A gun might make you feel good as long as an intruder doesn't appear, but if he appears and he has a gun, you got a mess especially if he knows you have a gun. At this instance, I am not saying that it is not worth it to have a gun, but a gun doesn't really provide the security that you hoped for by possessing a gun.

 

 

Your protection comes at a very large cost.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
As if ...

If the intruder has ...?

then what?

if the intruder is ...then what?

 

.

 

Typical scenario twisting... instead of answering the question. I keep the faith that you and others have secretly and simply answered it for yourself.

 

A gun might make you feel good as long as an intruder doesn't appear, .

 

Your memory is short... I've told you several times now guns do not make me "feel good" at all... explosions, controlled or not, huge or micro, are aversive to me, etc etc etc.

 

...a gun doesn't really provide the security that you hoped for by possessing a gun...

 

 

More accurately - a gun doesn't really provide the security that you hoped I hoped for ...

check your projections.

 

 

 

Your protection comes at a very large cost.

My "protection" does come at a very large cost.

You and yours have no "protection" at all.

 

I have a stop placed.

You don't.

 

...wishing whatever god you settle on blesses you and yours with no such sudden instants

 

all the best,

 

zdo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My "protection" does come at a very large cost.

You and yours have no "protection" at all.

 

I have a stop placed.

You don't.

 

...wishing whatever god you settle on blesses you and yours with no such sudden instants

 

all the best,

 

zdo

 

I think it is you projecting that if you do not have a gun you do not have protection. I will project that you have learned this flawed thought from your flawed bible/screenplay. My family is protected when I am there or not.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

..

To Arm is additive … Psalm 23:4, etc.

More like addictive.

 

So does that make you a Pro-Lifer quoting bible verses.

 

Along with arms, lots of arms and more arms then I guess you are in favor of the DEATH penalty.

 

Might be misreading you but sounds like a pro-lifer :roll eyes: to me.

 

We get any more pro-lifers in this world we might just become extinct as a species.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I think it is you projecting that if you do not have a gun you do not have protection.

 

and twist the scenarios that you must represent to yourself any way you like.. from limb to limb… from six ways to wednesdy… from what if this…? to what if that…? twist them any way your imagination will let you.

Any way you twist these inner scenarios though - with an available weapon you have more options…

not necessarily pretty options

or what under normal circumstances would be considered desirable options -

But, the better armed you are, the MORE options you have.

The more prepared you are, the MORE options you have.

In such “suddenly” life and death events, MORE options do matter

 

I am only one, but I am one.

I cannot do everything, but I can do something.

And because I cannot do everything,

I will not refuse to do the something that I can do.

What I can do, I should do.

And what I should do, by the grace of God, I will.

Edward Everett Hale

 

 

I will project that you have learned this flawed thought from your flawed bible/screenplay.

 

It is actually your own inner flawed bible/screenplay, bub. In reality you simply do not have enough knowledge or exposure to me, the man, to know my scripts

It not quite worth it to try and guess what "flawed bible/screenplay" you're talking about or where you are getting this stuff...

Still - Project all the shadowy sht you can on me ... it will ultimately help you heal.

 

My family is protected when I am there or not.

 

just yours?

no one else's family is protected when they are "there or not" ?...

you've attempted to put yourself in a position to determine who should be allowed to have arms.

now you're attempting to put yourself in a position to decide which families 'god' protects.

? are you really qualified ?

 

In gratitude that you and your family are "protected" - at that level,

In sadness that you and your family are not "protected" at the level where your physical role and preparation for "suddenly" is concerned,

You think you're "there". You're not. You've obviously got a long training and experiential ordeal ahead of you to a place where an almost imperceptible but authentic shift happens inside where you start to protect your would-be assailant from the imminent jeopardy he faces with his violent intents.

 

All the best,

 

zdo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
and twist the scenarios that you must represent to yourself any way you like.. from limb to limb… from six ways to wednesdy… from what if this…? to what if that…? twist them any way your imagination will let you.

Any way you twist these inner scenarios though - with an available weapon you have more options…

not necessarily pretty options

or what under normal circumstances would be considered desirable options -

But, the better armed you are, the MORE options you have.

The more prepared you are, the MORE options you have.

In such “suddenly” life and death events, MORE options do matter

 

Edward Everett Hale

 

 

 

 

It is actually your own inner flawed bible/screenplay, bub. In reality you simply do not have enough knowledge or exposure to me, the man, to know my scripts

It not quite worth it to try and guess what "flawed bible/screenplay" you're talking about or where you are getting this stuff...

Still - Project all the shadowy sht you can on me ... it will ultimately help you heal.

 

 

 

just yours?

no one else's family is protected when they are "there or not" ?...

you've attempted to put yourself in a position to determine who should be allowed to have arms.

now you're attempting to put yourself in a position to decide which families 'god' protects.

? are you really qualified ?

 

In gratitude that you and your family are "protected" - at that level,

In sadness that you and your family are not "protected" at the level where your physical role and preparation for "suddenly" is concerned,

You think you're "there". You're not. You've obviously got a long training and experiential ordeal ahead of you to a place where an almost imperceptible but authentic shift happens inside where you start to protect your would-be assailant from the imminent jeopardy he faces with his violent intents.

 

All the best,

 

zdo

 

The more arms, the more death.

 

Should an innocent life be taken to spare many? Your answer is yes.

Should the lives of many innocent people be taken to spare a few? Again, your answer is yes.

 

Think it through.

 

You probably don't like the way these feel, sound, or look. Get used to the suit. You'll wear it for as long as you stay.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
.

 

Should an innocent life be taken to spare many?...

Should the lives of many innocent people be taken to spare a few? ....

 

You're still busy 'twisting' ... Every post I have made in this thread is about dealing with NON "innocence"...

 

 

What would YOU do when faced with clockwork like armed attackers threatening harm or death to you and your loved ones?

If you had it, would you’ use’ a gun?

Or would you run and leave your family behind?

Or, die on your knees begging for mercy (while waiting for the cops)?

It’s a very simple gun control question

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You're still busy 'twisting' ... Every post I have made in this thread is about dealing with NON "innocence"...

 

 

What would YOU do when faced with clockwork like armed attackers threatening harm or death to you and your loved ones?

If you had it, would you’ use’ a gun?

Or would you run and leave your family behind?

Or, die on your knees begging for mercy (while waiting for the cops)?

It’s a very simple gun control question

 

I do believe I would use a gun. I am not too sure that many people would answer no to your question. Especially on a website.

 

Are you properly trained to use a gun in the circumstances you describe?

If the assailant is holding a knife or piece of cut glass to your child's throat and demands that you drop the gun, do you shoot or drop it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • also ... and barely on topic... Winners (always*) overpay. Buying the dips is a subscription to the belief that winners win by underpaying - when in actuality winners (inevitably/always*) win by overpaying... it’s amazing the percentage of traders who think winners win by underpaying ... “Winners (always*) overpay.” ...  One way to implement this ‘belief’ is to only reenter when prices have emphatically resumed the 'trend' .   (Fwiw, While “Winners (always*) overpay.” holds true in most endeavors (relationships, business, sports, etc...) - “Winners (always*) overpay.”  is especially true for auctions... continuous auctions included.)
    • re:  "Does it make sense to always buy the dips?  “Buy the dip.”  You hear this all the time in crypto investing trading speculation gambling. [zdo taking some liberties] It refers, of course, to buying more bitcoin (or digital assets) when they go down in price: when the price “dips.” Some people brag about “buying the dip," showing they know better than the crowd. Others “buy the dip” as an investment strategy: they’re getting a bargain. The problem is, buying the dip is a fallacy. You can’t buy the dip, because you can't see the total dip until much later. First, I’ll explain this in a way that will make it simple and obvious to you; then I’ll show you a better way of investing. You Only Know the Dip in Hindsight When people talk about “buying the dip,” what they’re really saying is, “I bought when the price was going down.” " ... example of a dip ... 
    • Date: 19th April 2024. Weekly Commodity Market Update: Oil Prices Correct and Supply Concerns Persist.   The ongoing developments in the Middle East sparked a wave of risk aversion and fueled supply concerns and investors headed for safety. Hopes for imminent rate cuts from the Federal Reserve diminish while attention is now turning towards the demand outlook. The Gold price hit a high of $2417.89 per ounce overnight. Sentiment has already calmed down again and bullion is trading at $2376.50 per ounce as haven flows ease. Oil prices initially moved higher as concern over escalating tensions with the WTI contract hit a session high of $85.508 per barrel overnight, before correcting to currently $81.45 per barrel. Oil Prices Under Pressure Amid Middle East Tensions Last week, commodity indexes showed little movement, with Oil prices undergoing a slight correction. Meanwhile, Gold reached yet another record high, mirroring the upward trend in cocoa prices. Once again today, USOil prices experienced a correction and has remained under pressure, retesting the 50-day EMA at $81.00 as we moving into the weekend. Hence, despite the Israel’s retaliatory strike on Iran, sentiments stabilized following reports suggesting a measured response aimed at avoiding further escalation. Brent crude futures witnessed a more than 4% leap, driven by concerns over potential disruptions to oil supplies in the Middle East, only to subsequently erase all gains. Similarly with USOIL, UKOIL hovers just below $87 per barrel, marginally below Thursday’s closing figures. Nevertheless, volatility is expected to continue in the market as several potential risks loom:   Disruption to the Strait of Hormuz: The possibility of Iran disrupting navigation through the vital shipping lane, is still in play. The Strait of Hormuz serves as the Persian Gulf’s primary route to international waters, with approximately 21 million barrels of oil passing through daily. Recent events, including Iran’s seizure of an Israel-linked container ship, underscore the geopolitical sensitivity of the region. Tougher Sanctions on Iran: Analysts speculate that the US may impose stricter sanctions on Iranian oil exports or intensify enforcement of existing restrictions. With global oil consumption reaching 102 million barrels per day, Iran’s production of 3.3 million barrels remains significant. Recent actions targeting Venezuelan oil highlight the potential for increased pressure on Iranian exports. OPEC Output Increases: Despite the desire for higher prices, OPEC members such as Saudi Arabia and Russia have constrained output in recent years. However, sustained crude prices above $100 per barrel could prompt concerns about demand and incentivize increased production. The OPEC may opt to boost oil output should tensions escalate further and prices surge. Ukraine Conflict: Amidst the focus on the Middle East, markets overlooking Russia’s actions in Ukraine. Potential retaliatory strikes by Kyiv on Russian oil infrastructure could impact exports, adding further complexity to global oil markets.   Technical Analysis USOIL is marking one of the steepest weekly declines witnessed this year after a brief period of consolidation. The breach below the pivotal support level of 84.00, coupled with the descent below the mid of the 4-month upchannel, signals a possible shift in market sentiment towards a bearish trend reversal. Adding to the bearish outlook are indications such as the downward slope in the RSI. However, the asset still hold above the 50-day EMA which coincides also with the mid of last year’s downleg, with key support zone at $80.00-$81.00. If it breaks this support zone, the focus may shift towards the 200-day EMA and 38.2% Fib. level at $77.60-$79.00. Conversely, a rejection of the $81 level and an upside potential could see the price returning back to $84.00. A break of the latter could trigger the attention back to the December’s resistance, situated around $86.60. A breakthrough above this level could ignite a stronger rally towards the $89.20-$90.00 zone. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business. Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar. Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding on how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE! Click HERE to READ more Market news. Michalis Efthymiou Market Analyst HMarkets Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past perfrmance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in FX and CFDs products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • Date: 18th April 2024. Market News – Stock markets benefit from Dollar correction. Economic Indicators & Central Banks:   Technical buying, bargain hunting, and risk aversion helped Treasuries rally and unwind recent losses. Yields dropped from the recent 2024 highs. Asian stock markets strengthened, as the US Dollar corrected in the wake of comments from Japan’s currency chief Masato Kanda, who said G7 countries continue to stress that excessive swings and disorderly moves in the foreign exchange market were harmful for economies. US Stockpiles expanded to 10-month high. The data overshadowed the impact of geopolitical tensions in the Middle East as traders await Israel’s response to Iran’s unprecedented recent attack. President Joe Biden called for higher tariffs on imports of Chinese steel and aluminum.   Financial Markets Performance:   The USDIndex stumbled, falling to 105.66 at the end of the day from the intraday high of 106.48. It lost ground against most of its G10 peers. There wasn’t much on the calendar to provide new direction. USDJPY lows retesting the 154 bottom! NOT an intervention yet. BoJ/MoF USDJPY intervention happens when there is more than 100+ pip move in seconds, not 50 pips. USOIL slumped by 3% near $82, as US crude inventories rose by 2.7 million barrels last week, hitting the highest level since last June, while gauges of fuel demand declined. Gold strengthened as the dollar weakened and bullion is trading at $2378.44 per ounce. Market Trends:   Wall Street closed in the red after opening with small corrective gains. The NASDAQ underperformed, slumping -1.15%, with the S&P500 -0.58% lower, while the Dow lost -0.12. The Nikkei closed 0.2% higher, the Hang Seng gained more than 1. European and US futures are finding buyers. A gauge of global chip stocks and AI bellwether Nvidia Corp. have both fallen into a technical correction. The TMSC reported its first profit rise in a year, after strong AI demand revived growth at the world’s biggest contract chipmaker. The main chipmaker to Apple Inc. and Nvidia Corp. recorded a 9% rise in net income, beating estimates. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business. Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar. Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding on how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE! Click HERE to READ more Market news. Andria Pichidi Market Analyst HFMarkets Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in FX and CFDs products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • Date: 17th April 2024. Market News – Appetite for risk-taking remains weak. Economic Indicators & Central Banks:   Stocks, Treasury yields and US Dollar stay firmed. Fed Chair Powell added to the recent sell off. His slightly more hawkish tone further priced out chances for any imminent action and the timing of a cut was pushed out further. He suggested if higher inflation does persist, the Fed will hold rates steady “for as long as needed.” Implied Fed Fund: There remains no real chance for a move on May 1 and at their intraday highs the June implied funds rate future showed only 5 bps, while July reflected only 10 bps. And a full 25 bps was not priced in until November, with 38 bps in cuts seen for 2024. US & EU Economies Diverging: Lagarde says ECB is moving toward rate cuts – if there are no major shocks. UK March CPI inflation falls less than expected. Output price inflation has started to nudge higher, despite another decline in input prices. Together with yesterday’s higher than expected wage numbers, the data will add to the arguments of the hawks at the BoE, which remain very reluctant to contemplate rate cuts. Canada CPI rose 0.6% in March, double the 0.3% February increase BUT core eased. The doors are still open for a possible cut at the next BoC meeting on June 5. IMF revised up its global growth forecast for 2024 with inflation easing, in its new World Economic Outlook. This is consistent with a global soft landing, according to the report. Financial Markets Performance:   USDJPY also inched up to 154.67 on expectations the BoJ will remain accommodative and as the market challenges a perceived 155 red line for MoF intervention. USOIL prices slipped -0.15% to $84.20 per barrel. Gold rose 0.24% to $2389.11 per ounce, a new record closing high as geopolitical risks overshadowed the impacts of rising rates and the stronger dollar. Market Trends:   Wall Street waffled either side of unchanged on the day amid dimming rate cut potential, rising yields, and earnings. The major indexes closed mixed with the Dow up 0.17%, while the S&P500 and NASDAQ lost -0.21% and -0.12%, respectively. Asian stock markets mostly corrected again, with Japanese bourses underperforming and the Nikkei down -1.3%. Mainland China bourses were a notable exception and the CSI 300 rallied 1.4%, but the MSCI Asia Pacific index came close to erasing the gains for this year. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business. Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar. Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding on how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE! Click HERE to READ more Market news. Andria Pichidi Market Analyst HFMarkets Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in FX and CFDs products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.vvvvvvv
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.