Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Ingot54

To Arm or to Disarm.

Recommended Posts

"controlling" ?

 

"not done" ?

 

... "done"

 

On the surface of this post the apparent assumption is 'they' did something, anything to "control violence" which caused lower violence = hubris + more argumentum ad populum et ad nauseam

 

...meanwhile the number of illegal guns is as high as ever...

'Case in point NYC' - more likely the violent aspects of the culture in NYC changed on their own... not because of tough mayors or any of the other typical exciting stories told about how things change...

More incoherant babble from your part.

 

As Joe Pesci would say "Ad this". :) I am from NYC originally and know it was and is a change in how they police the streets.

 

The culture change was in the thinking of those who govern. Booting out those who were incompetent and/or corrupt.

 

But again it was not from the spread of more, more, more guns. Just the opposite.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You’re projecting again… the ‘leadership’ word was used alone in my post… if we must qualify it, ‘strong and mean’ leadership would be a much better qualifier than ‘good’ …

 

Not projecting; instead, just having a good time. I thought it funny to envision tattooed skin heads singing choral tunes.

 

clarifying points for anyone who can follow… murders in a prison have a much higher “clear” rate than in a city… leadership must control occurrences more because, it is vastly easier to follow the chain of a gang kill in prison back up the hierarchy in prison than it is on the ‘outside’ ... and for individually or gang planned murders, it is much ‘easier’ get implicated and have sentence extended, etc, etc.

 

This may account for some of the reason why the homicide rate is low, but I doubt that it is all the reason.

 

 

… and instead of "chorus" and other activities, the leadership is busy on the ‘control’ of the (much tighter supplies of) objects and less reliable / harder to 'reinforce' human agents

 

It sounds like you agree that weapon control works in prison. Perhaps tighter supply and control of supply would work outside of prison too.

 

 

It is not comical to watch you focus all this energy into trying to stop future lanza’s that might “suddenly upset” you - by falsely associating those incidents with the all the violence in this culture, by trying to blame regular people for murders because some of us have guns, by thinking that taking our weapons would improve things “a little bit ”, and assert that would cause the murdering to fade away...

 

 

I might have argued against some of the reasons for you to want a gun, but I never once said that I want to take your gun away. If you are a nut, then sure I would want your gun taken away.

 

Meanwhile, while you stay energized by driving by Sandy H and fixated on all the wonderful things you could fix if you could get 1 gun off the streets, you drive by and don’t do a dam thing about incredible damage done to women, children, and other family members every day by those who would use force to get what they want… go away.

 

This is a thread on arming or disarming. I am not thinking about how many different things happen to people. Yes I was stirred to action by Sandyhook.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Before you endorse policies, I implore you, consider a few questions:

 

1. What will this policy actually accomplish?

 

2. Who could conceivably benefit? I.e., cui bono?

 

3. What are the second-order effects of this policy? Is there any way it can be exploited or gamed?

 

I await your response.

 

If you don't mind, please list which proposed policy(ies) you would like me to share my opinion on.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Not projecting; instead, just having a good time. I thought it funny to envision tattooed skin heads singing choral tunes.

 

 

:)

 

I might have argued against some of the reasons for you to want a gun, but I never once said that I want to take your gun away. If you are a nut, then sure I would want your gun taken away.

 

 

that mouse speak with forked tongue

 

 

 

It sounds like you agree that weapon control works in prison. Perhaps tighter supply and control of supply would work outside of prison too.

 

 

That is a very unrealistic “Perhaps”

… in our real world outside of prison “tighter supply and control of supply” is a TOTAL impossibility – unless you could and would extend the same strictures on movement of goods and people as are imposed inside, but then that would no longer be outside of prison, would it?

 

See where you’re really going with this?

Peep–control- freakn yet?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

...it was not from the spread of more, more, more guns. .

 

more twisted reasoning in you ...and more word twisting from you...

 

I didn't claim it was from the spread of more guns...

I said the cultural changes - of which the factors we both mentioned are but a part - all occurred while the gun count (especially the illegal gun count) stayed relatively unchanged and high.

ie a "safer apple" was from a cultural change and not the spread of less, less, and less guns

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I didn't claim it was from the spread of more guns...

I didn't say you did. I was making a point. And you as usual are not making a point - that is reality based anyway.

 

From a couple of years ago - and things have only gotten better since:

 

NYPD Press Release | NY Safest Big City

 

“The data reflects in no small measure the dedication and hard work of New York City Police officers, and the Mayor's commitment to keeping New Yorkers safe, year after year,” said Commissioner Kelly."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
more twisted reasoning in you ...and more word twisting from you...

 

I didn't claim it was from the spread of more guns...

I said the cultural changes - of which the factors we both mentioned are but a part - all occurred while the gun count (especially the illegal gun count) stayed relatively unchanged and high.

ie a "safer apple" was from a cultural change and not the spread of less, less, and less guns

 

The changes were for multiple reasons. The changes occurred across the country in other large cities during that time too. David Dinkins, knowing that he would be running against Guilianni, who had a reputation of being a tough crime fighter, increased the ranks of the police force. Over time, the added protection paid off. Guilianni came to office and he employed the "broken window" theory. Simply it is based on the idea that 80% of crime is committed by 20% of the people. It was an effective approach which helped too. The US economy had been improving for a period which generally means that there is less reason to steal. At the same time a tough gun policy was enforced.

 

Unconventionally, the author of Freakonomics makes a really good case that the overall drop in the crime rates was due to roe v wade. R v W had the impact of removing unwanted children from our planet. The argument is, loosely, that unwanted children are generally the children of poor people who would have a baby because they couldn't afford the procedure. Wealthy people could still afford to have abortions so the truly unwanted wealthy children would be disposed of in spite of abortion being illegal prior to R v W.

 

18 or so years after R v W the crime rate started dropping. Go figure. Freakonomics is a good read if anyone has not read it. I am only giving you a part of the story. Read it if you want to argue with me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The changes were for multiple reasons.

 

 

Thank you.

 

Unconventionally, the author of Freakonomics makes a really good case that the overall drop in the crime rates was due to roe v wade. R v W had the impact of removing unwanted children from our planet. The argument is, loosely, that unwanted children are generally the children of poor people who would have a baby because they couldn't afford the procedure. Wealthy people could still afford to have abortions so the truly unwanted wealthy children would be disposed of in spite of abortion being illegal prior to R v W.

 

18 or so years after R v W the crime rate started dropping. Go figure. Freakonomics is a good read if anyone has not read it. I am only giving you a part of the story. Read it if you want to argue with me.

 

 

Actually “R v W” is just as good of one of those ‘multiple reasons’ as the other stories and opinions being thrown up as the truth. We could also factor in the ease with which the ‘dependency class’ was allowed to grow, etc etc...

 

SunGunner was pushing a single variable “point” that it was a shift in gov’t and law enforcement (while sneaking in as much ‘gun control’ propaganda as possible of course) that turned the crime tide in NYC. His opinions are not facts. ... he was not the only one "there" ...

I don’t discount those gov't and enforcement variables one bit…but, a point he doesn’t seem to want to allow is that a leading, independent, top down shift in the criminal element culture also occurred – many crime orgs ‘matured’, went into ‘legit bidnes’ , etc etc etc.

 

... and, meanwhile - the argumentum ad populum used by the to Disarms that urban US is “safer” because of gun control is false. Through the whole period being discussed – all the pertinant gun counts stayed relatively stable.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Another way of seeing it wasn’t all about a new ‘special’ mayors and ‘new attitude’ police, etc. in town:

> daily life in a (temporarily) less violent ‘NYC’ = the stealthy ascendance of

1) institutionalized, unprosecuted “accounting fraud” and

2) first gubmnt carried the hedge ‘expenses’ for risks taken, then proceeded on to transferring the risks to taxpayers... etc

These and other easy buttons in ‘tricking’ drastically reduced the need for ‘criminals’ to use force, violence, and weapons in taking .

 

( meanwhile

> daily life in amerika = they drive to walmart… again…and again…’forever’...:doh: )

 

 

 

_______________________________

 

 

"Don’t seek truth… "

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Zdo - do you deliberately miss spell government etc;?

Is that so that when the UN 50 shades of grey helicopters come snooping around your internet posts will either not show up in the scans, or show up as someone who cant even spell hence is not a concern?

:)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Another way of seeing it wasn’t all about a new ‘special’ mayors and ‘new attitude’ police, etc. in town:

> daily life in a (temporarily) less violent ‘NYC’ = the stealthy ascendance of

1) institutionalized, unprosecuted “accounting fraud” and

2) first gubmnt carried the hedge ‘expenses’ for risks taken, then proceeded on to transferring the risks to taxpayers... etc

.....

 

So now it is .... well violent crime is down but white collar crime isn't.

 

This is the arm or disarm thread. Not white or blue collar thread.

 

And 50 YEAR record low is not temporarily.

 

:haha:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
So now it is .... well violent crime is down but white collar crime isn't.

 

This is the arm or disarm thread. Not white or blue collar thread.

 

And 50 YEAR record low is not temporarily.

 

 

ya'll brought this cultural sht up in the thread, not me ... and you tried to use it as 'reasons' to Disarm

 

the (temporary) low is great ...

 

meanwhile, non correlated gun count is still high - ( thankfully )

 

so, you've been making a fruitless gun control argument...

parroting the corporate media shills...

arguments published as 'truth'... ass nauseam

they need you and your just special little dittos.

 

 

 

 

 

_________________

 

"Don't seek truth...."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

( thankfully ) here and there, others are starting to catch on

 

Washington State Democrats have sponsored Senate Bill 5737, which has a little provision that apparently was to go unnoticed that would have said that police have a right to search a private citizen’s home once per year if they own certain types of firearms.

 

According to the legislation:

In order to continue to possess an assault weapon that was legally possessed on the effective date of this section, the person possessing shall … safely and securely store the assault weapon. The sheriff of the county may, no more than once per year, conduct an inspection to ensure compliance with this subsection.

 

Yes, that means liberal Democrats pushed forward this legislation in open and defiance of the Fourth Amendment. But that’s not all. When they were caught with their hands in the cookie jar, they exclaimed it wasn’t their fault and that they made mistake.

 

“I have to admit it shouldn’t be in there,” said Sen. Ed Murray (D-Seattle). “I made a mistake,” said Sen. Adam Kline (D-Seattle). “I frankly should have vetted this more closely.”

 

Yeah, there was no mistake. This was deliberate. Murray and Kline were sponsors of the bill. They knew exactly what was in it. This is just more BS from the Left.

Murray also told a gun-control rally in January, “We will only win if we reach out and continue to change the hearts and minds of Washingtonians. We can attack them, or start a dialogue.”

 

Interestingly, Danny Westneat at the Seattle Times writes about Lance Palmer, a Seattle trial lawyer and self-described liberal. “I’m a liberal Democrat — I’ve voted for only one Republican in my life,” Palmer told me. “But now I understand why my right-wing opponents worry about having to fight a government takeover.”

 

He added: “It’s exactly this sort of thing that drives people into the arms of the NRA.”

 

Now this part is actually somewhat encouraging. If a self professed liberal Democrat, a trial lawyer at that, understands why we believe a real danger of government takeover and abandonment of the law of the land is genuine, then that is at least one guy who is thinking.

 

 

Dems Sponsor Bill To Violate Fourth Amendment Rights Of Gun Owners : Freedom Outpost

 

 

 

_________________

 

 

"Don't seek truth...."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

...

 

the (temporary :rofl: ) low is great ...

 

so, you've been making a fruitless gun control argument...

parroting the corporate media shill..

 

 

There are corporations against guns, huh? Which ones are those. Maybe a shyster lawyer or two. But what corporation has a financial benefit from guns not being sold.

 

I know about the corporations for guns. Such as Smith&Wesson etc and your favorite retailer Walmart.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Zdo - do you deliberately miss spell government etc;?

Is that so that when the UN 50 shades of grey helicopters come snooping around your internet posts will either not show up in the scans, or show up as someone who cant even spell hence is not a concern?

:)

 

"50 shades of grey" is already when

 

I "deliberately " don't edit for spelling, readability, sentence run on's and on's and on's... I don't have time. Often makes for difficult reading. If it ain't worth it to you... push the bignore button

and SunGun continually reminds us of how senseless my writing is... he's welcome to edit it for readabilty... for the forums' sake

He has also pointed out that I can’t make a point… yet I just made four

Here's two more .

Fish are becoming easier to catch 'because traces of anti-depressants are getting into water supply and making them more relaxed' | Mail Online

:)

 

 

 

 

"Doctor, my eyes have seen the years

And the slow parade of fears without crying

Now I want to understand

I have done all that I could

To see the evil and the good without hiding

You must help me if you can

Doctor, my eyes

Tell me what is wrong

Was I unwise to leave them open for so long

'Cause I have wandered through this world

And as each moment has unfurled

I've been waiting to awaken from these dreams

People go just where there will

I never noticed them until I got this feeling

That it's later than it seems

Doctor, my eyes

Tell me what you see

I hear their cries

Just say if it's too late for me

Doctor, my eyes

Cannot see the sky

Is this the prize for having learned how not to cry "

Jackson Browne

 

 

 

( meanwhile

> daily life in amerika = they drive to walmart… again…and again…’forever’... )

 

whoops maybe not 'forever'

Retail Apocalypse: Why Are Major Retail Chains All Over America Collapsing?

 

:haha: good to know that at least SunGun's 50 year low is forever ...

 

:spam: warning

Self-inflicted psy-ops: Are you a victim of your own 'false flag' operation?

 

 

 

__________________

 

"Don't seek truth. ..."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Gun ban would protect more than 2,200 firearms

 

Gun ban would protect more than 2,200 firearms - Yahoo! News

 

What a joke," said former FBI agent John Hanlon, who survived the 1986 shootout in Miami. He was shot in the head, hand, groin and hip with a Ruger Mini-14 that had a folding stock. Two FBI agents died and five others were wounded.

 

+ + +

 

Indeed. What a joke. Well except the dying part.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

:haha: good to know that at least SunGun's 50 year low is forever ...

 

 

"Don't seek truth. ..."

 

You should seek math.

 

50 year trend is closer to forever in a city 200+ years old (which unlike you I didn't mention) than temporary.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Read at your own risk

 

 

 

SunTwister,

 

re "math" dang you're right. 2013 - 1625 does = 200 +

 

while we'd hope this "trend" does go on 'forever', some of us would also have to be realistic and see the possibility that it might gradually, or even suddenly, reverse...

 

and some of us would also have to be realistic and see the possibility that its continuation or reversal might not be caused by guns at all - like you and the completely in the tank to Disarm media 'corporations' try to keep telling us to believe...

 

 

 

You quote Jackson Browne to make a point about guns. He is a libber, don't you know.

 

:doh:

 

And it is SunNoGun to you mister. :)

 

SunNoPoint ;)

 

The random Jackson Browne quote from a libber with a history of domestic abuse was not one of the points at all... The two points were made before the quote... you missed them (again).

sht, bud, I'd put my record of 'making' points up against your record of 'missing' them anyday. :rofl:

 

Just for you, I'll make another one - in bold this time

 

.

 

 

 

You're either 'twisting' points or you are 'missing' points

Example: when I added more to the very incomplete list of multiple variables (that all far outshine gun control as factors, btw) that contributed to the cultural changes in NYC you reply with

"So now it is .... well violent crime is down but white collar crime isn't."

as if I'm making an exclusive, one item assertion about "crime" or causation.

For what?

You're either 'twisting' points or you are 'missing' points

 

 

 

 

 

 

__________________

 

"Don't seek truth. ..."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

SunTwister,

 

re "math" dang you're right. 2013 - 1625 does = 200 +

...

 

Dang after you get edumaketd with math go on to history.

 

Nu Yawk Shity is 200+ years old. New Amsterdam and also the period after the Dutch got booted when there was only some of Manhattan and nothing to do with the Bronx, Brooklyn, Queens and Staten Island is not the "city" that I am talking about.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • also ... and barely on topic... Winners (always*) overpay. Buying the dips is a subscription to the belief that winners win by underpaying - when in actuality winners (inevitably/always*) win by overpaying... it’s amazing the percentage of traders who think winners win by underpaying ... “Winners (always*) overpay.” ...  One way to implement this ‘belief’ is to only reenter when prices have emphatically resumed the 'trend' .   (Fwiw, While “Winners (always*) overpay.” holds true in most endeavors (relationships, business, sports, etc...) - “Winners (always*) overpay.”  is especially true for auctions... continuous auctions included.)
    • re:  "Does it make sense to always buy the dips?  “Buy the dip.”  You hear this all the time in crypto investing trading speculation gambling. [zdo taking some liberties] It refers, of course, to buying more bitcoin (or digital assets) when they go down in price: when the price “dips.” Some people brag about “buying the dip," showing they know better than the crowd. Others “buy the dip” as an investment strategy: they’re getting a bargain. The problem is, buying the dip is a fallacy. You can’t buy the dip, because you can't see the total dip until much later. First, I’ll explain this in a way that will make it simple and obvious to you; then I’ll show you a better way of investing. You Only Know the Dip in Hindsight When people talk about “buying the dip,” what they’re really saying is, “I bought when the price was going down.” " ... example of a dip ... 
    • Date: 19th April 2024. Weekly Commodity Market Update: Oil Prices Correct and Supply Concerns Persist.   The ongoing developments in the Middle East sparked a wave of risk aversion and fueled supply concerns and investors headed for safety. Hopes for imminent rate cuts from the Federal Reserve diminish while attention is now turning towards the demand outlook. The Gold price hit a high of $2417.89 per ounce overnight. Sentiment has already calmed down again and bullion is trading at $2376.50 per ounce as haven flows ease. Oil prices initially moved higher as concern over escalating tensions with the WTI contract hit a session high of $85.508 per barrel overnight, before correcting to currently $81.45 per barrel. Oil Prices Under Pressure Amid Middle East Tensions Last week, commodity indexes showed little movement, with Oil prices undergoing a slight correction. Meanwhile, Gold reached yet another record high, mirroring the upward trend in cocoa prices. Once again today, USOil prices experienced a correction and has remained under pressure, retesting the 50-day EMA at $81.00 as we moving into the weekend. Hence, despite the Israel’s retaliatory strike on Iran, sentiments stabilized following reports suggesting a measured response aimed at avoiding further escalation. Brent crude futures witnessed a more than 4% leap, driven by concerns over potential disruptions to oil supplies in the Middle East, only to subsequently erase all gains. Similarly with USOIL, UKOIL hovers just below $87 per barrel, marginally below Thursday’s closing figures. Nevertheless, volatility is expected to continue in the market as several potential risks loom:   Disruption to the Strait of Hormuz: The possibility of Iran disrupting navigation through the vital shipping lane, is still in play. The Strait of Hormuz serves as the Persian Gulf’s primary route to international waters, with approximately 21 million barrels of oil passing through daily. Recent events, including Iran’s seizure of an Israel-linked container ship, underscore the geopolitical sensitivity of the region. Tougher Sanctions on Iran: Analysts speculate that the US may impose stricter sanctions on Iranian oil exports or intensify enforcement of existing restrictions. With global oil consumption reaching 102 million barrels per day, Iran’s production of 3.3 million barrels remains significant. Recent actions targeting Venezuelan oil highlight the potential for increased pressure on Iranian exports. OPEC Output Increases: Despite the desire for higher prices, OPEC members such as Saudi Arabia and Russia have constrained output in recent years. However, sustained crude prices above $100 per barrel could prompt concerns about demand and incentivize increased production. The OPEC may opt to boost oil output should tensions escalate further and prices surge. Ukraine Conflict: Amidst the focus on the Middle East, markets overlooking Russia’s actions in Ukraine. Potential retaliatory strikes by Kyiv on Russian oil infrastructure could impact exports, adding further complexity to global oil markets.   Technical Analysis USOIL is marking one of the steepest weekly declines witnessed this year after a brief period of consolidation. The breach below the pivotal support level of 84.00, coupled with the descent below the mid of the 4-month upchannel, signals a possible shift in market sentiment towards a bearish trend reversal. Adding to the bearish outlook are indications such as the downward slope in the RSI. However, the asset still hold above the 50-day EMA which coincides also with the mid of last year’s downleg, with key support zone at $80.00-$81.00. If it breaks this support zone, the focus may shift towards the 200-day EMA and 38.2% Fib. level at $77.60-$79.00. Conversely, a rejection of the $81 level and an upside potential could see the price returning back to $84.00. A break of the latter could trigger the attention back to the December’s resistance, situated around $86.60. A breakthrough above this level could ignite a stronger rally towards the $89.20-$90.00 zone. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business. Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar. Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding on how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE! Click HERE to READ more Market news. Michalis Efthymiou Market Analyst HMarkets Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past perfrmance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in FX and CFDs products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • Date: 18th April 2024. Market News – Stock markets benefit from Dollar correction. Economic Indicators & Central Banks:   Technical buying, bargain hunting, and risk aversion helped Treasuries rally and unwind recent losses. Yields dropped from the recent 2024 highs. Asian stock markets strengthened, as the US Dollar corrected in the wake of comments from Japan’s currency chief Masato Kanda, who said G7 countries continue to stress that excessive swings and disorderly moves in the foreign exchange market were harmful for economies. US Stockpiles expanded to 10-month high. The data overshadowed the impact of geopolitical tensions in the Middle East as traders await Israel’s response to Iran’s unprecedented recent attack. President Joe Biden called for higher tariffs on imports of Chinese steel and aluminum.   Financial Markets Performance:   The USDIndex stumbled, falling to 105.66 at the end of the day from the intraday high of 106.48. It lost ground against most of its G10 peers. There wasn’t much on the calendar to provide new direction. USDJPY lows retesting the 154 bottom! NOT an intervention yet. BoJ/MoF USDJPY intervention happens when there is more than 100+ pip move in seconds, not 50 pips. USOIL slumped by 3% near $82, as US crude inventories rose by 2.7 million barrels last week, hitting the highest level since last June, while gauges of fuel demand declined. Gold strengthened as the dollar weakened and bullion is trading at $2378.44 per ounce. Market Trends:   Wall Street closed in the red after opening with small corrective gains. The NASDAQ underperformed, slumping -1.15%, with the S&P500 -0.58% lower, while the Dow lost -0.12. The Nikkei closed 0.2% higher, the Hang Seng gained more than 1. European and US futures are finding buyers. A gauge of global chip stocks and AI bellwether Nvidia Corp. have both fallen into a technical correction. The TMSC reported its first profit rise in a year, after strong AI demand revived growth at the world’s biggest contract chipmaker. The main chipmaker to Apple Inc. and Nvidia Corp. recorded a 9% rise in net income, beating estimates. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business. Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar. Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding on how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE! Click HERE to READ more Market news. Andria Pichidi Market Analyst HFMarkets Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in FX and CFDs products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • Date: 17th April 2024. Market News – Appetite for risk-taking remains weak. Economic Indicators & Central Banks:   Stocks, Treasury yields and US Dollar stay firmed. Fed Chair Powell added to the recent sell off. His slightly more hawkish tone further priced out chances for any imminent action and the timing of a cut was pushed out further. He suggested if higher inflation does persist, the Fed will hold rates steady “for as long as needed.” Implied Fed Fund: There remains no real chance for a move on May 1 and at their intraday highs the June implied funds rate future showed only 5 bps, while July reflected only 10 bps. And a full 25 bps was not priced in until November, with 38 bps in cuts seen for 2024. US & EU Economies Diverging: Lagarde says ECB is moving toward rate cuts – if there are no major shocks. UK March CPI inflation falls less than expected. Output price inflation has started to nudge higher, despite another decline in input prices. Together with yesterday’s higher than expected wage numbers, the data will add to the arguments of the hawks at the BoE, which remain very reluctant to contemplate rate cuts. Canada CPI rose 0.6% in March, double the 0.3% February increase BUT core eased. The doors are still open for a possible cut at the next BoC meeting on June 5. IMF revised up its global growth forecast for 2024 with inflation easing, in its new World Economic Outlook. This is consistent with a global soft landing, according to the report. Financial Markets Performance:   USDJPY also inched up to 154.67 on expectations the BoJ will remain accommodative and as the market challenges a perceived 155 red line for MoF intervention. USOIL prices slipped -0.15% to $84.20 per barrel. Gold rose 0.24% to $2389.11 per ounce, a new record closing high as geopolitical risks overshadowed the impacts of rising rates and the stronger dollar. Market Trends:   Wall Street waffled either side of unchanged on the day amid dimming rate cut potential, rising yields, and earnings. The major indexes closed mixed with the Dow up 0.17%, while the S&P500 and NASDAQ lost -0.21% and -0.12%, respectively. Asian stock markets mostly corrected again, with Japanese bourses underperforming and the Nikkei down -1.3%. Mainland China bourses were a notable exception and the CSI 300 rallied 1.4%, but the MSCI Asia Pacific index came close to erasing the gains for this year. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business. Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar. Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding on how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE! Click HERE to READ more Market news. Andria Pichidi Market Analyst HFMarkets Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in FX and CFDs products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.vvvvvvv
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.