Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

TheNegotiator

SSDs for Charting Platforms

Do you use a Solid State Drive for charting PC?  

16 members have voted

  1. 1. Do you use a Solid State Drive for charting PC?

    • Yes, it's invaluable to performance
      9
    • No, I don't really need one for the charting I do
      4
    • What is a Solid State Drive?
      1
    • Zzzzzzzzzzzz
      2


Recommended Posts

I thought I'd put the question to our community of what you think about Solid State Drives (SSD) for data storage. I use a large databases for instrument data and having a drive with high performance is something that I feel is an extremely useful thing for me. Technical or not, I'd really like to here the opinions of other members.

 

If anything remotely technical simply puts you to sleep, I have sectioned the next part out :)

 

#################################################

Yesterday, saw the release of the new OCZ Vertex 4 drive and this is what prompted me to start a thread. You can see it here.

 

There are a few major considerations in selecting a quality SSD. Probably the two most important:- flash memory type and controller.

 

Without getting too technical, the flash memory type will affect the life and ability of memory chips on the drive. At the moment, Toshiba make the best "toggle" flash. The main thing I would say about it is compared to the other types, it does not get the same kind of performance degredation as the drive is filled up. A full drive using "asynchronous" flash memory won't be likely to achieve anywhere near the specified performance.

 

The controller is the other main factor. Recently a popular choice for drive manufacturers has been the latest Sandforce offerings. They give the highest headline read/write peformance with current generation drives using the latest controller topping 500MB/s read and write. The thing is, different controllers use different methods for transferring data. Specifically, the Sandforce controllers compress data, transfer it, the decompress it. What this means is that incompressible data (already compressed data amongst other types) does not transfer at the same kind of rates as other data. My data uses compression and so Sandforce based SSDs will lose read/write performance in this case.

 

The reason I mentioned the OCZ Vertex 4 is that it uses a new controller - Indilinx (controller manufacturer which OCZ purchased). The 128GB drive has a similar read but really low write speed (200MB/s compared to Sandforce ~ 500MB/s). So what is the point then? Well, the drive tends to get much better all around performance and does not suffer so much from the incompressible data issue.

 

There is another major controller make due to release a new model soon - Marvell. They should be able to show all around performance which I need like OCZ's Indilinx controller.

 

I'll be looking out for Plextor drives when the new Marvell chip comes out.

#######################################################################

 

Anyway, my point is that an SSD for charting is at least for me, a very useful thing. But, not all SSD's are made equal. What do you think?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I started with SSD's some time back and the thing about SSD's is they are fantastic for reading but not as fantastic for writing. The earlier one experienced bottlenecks and all SSDs have a fast wear out rate.

 

So I go a different way. I put my OS and common programs on an SSD. I also store old data files on the SSD if I'm going to be using them. But I put the things that get accessed frequently on a RAM disk. HD's store bulk items.

 

On the RAM disk (only 2G but RAM is cheap):

- Sierra Chart instances for day trading and their actively used data files

- IB TWS

- Temp files including browser temps

 

That way I get maximum read and write speed for my day trading apps, great read speed for most everything else and good speed for archives.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I started with SSD's some time back and the thing about SSD's is they are fantastic for reading but not as fantastic for writing. The earlier one experienced bottlenecks and all SSDs have a fast wear out rate.

 

So I go a different way. I put my OS and common programs on an SSD. I also store old data files on the SSD if I'm going to be using them. But I put the things that get accessed frequently on a RAM disk. HD's store bulk items.

 

On the RAM disk (only 2G but RAM is cheap):

- Sierra Chart instances for day trading and their actively used data files

- IB TWS

- Temp files including browser temps

 

That way I get maximum read and write speed for my day trading apps, great read speed for most everything else and good speed for archives.

 

Thanks for sharing Kiwi. I am currently looking at Sierra more thoroughly than I have before. I use IRT for the most part and the data files for my extended volume profiles(back from early 2007 right now) can be cumbersome. The space issue isn't such a big thing considering most SSD's(or even RAM) sizes. I hadn't considered the possibility of a RAM disk so perhaps need to look into it. I do think that the current SSD's are getting better and better though. One thing is that the provising is growing for the shrinking and more cost efficient manufacture. So you won't get as much "real" storage space per disk. I hope that while other companies are driving down the cost per gig, there will be a few companies driving quality innovation. That's why I will be on the lookout for offerings from plextor for example. Their last drives tested very well according to multiple sources.

 

Not totally sure which way to go yet so maybe when I have a better idea I will post again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yesterday, saw the release of the new OCZ Vertex 4 drive and this is what prompted me to start a thread. You can see it here. There are a few major considerations in selecting a quality SSD. Probably the two most important:- flash memory type and controller.

OCZ must have the WORST track record of drives in terms of reliability. You pretty much want to avoid any SandForce drive unless it's the Intel 520 series. The drives are fast, but they fail very quickly.

 

The new OCZ Vertex 4 you mentioned DOES use a different controller (thank god) and with the 5-year warranty it MIGHT be a safe bet. Based off OCZ's track record though, they have NEVER proven themselves to be reliable at all. Did OCZ finally get their act together with the Vertex 4? Maybe, only time will tell. Do you want to be their guinea pig? Probably not. There are already existing drives on the market that have proven themselves. Like Anandtech says, avoid new SSDs until they're validated.

 

If you're in the market for an SSD and want the best performance and reliability, the Intel 520 SSDs are your best bet. They come with a 5-year warranty as well but the drives have also been very thoroughly tested hence the price premium. For ultimate peace of mind, the 520 is a no-brainer.

 

The only other drive I would consider is the Samsung 830 series. This drive is even faster than the 520 in some areas and Samsung has an outstanding track record in terms of reliability. It only comes with a 3-year warranty, but I'd feel very confident using it. When the next gen Intel processors are released in a few weeks I'm making a new build. I will be choosing the Samsung 830.

 

Therefore, the Samsung 830 and Intel 520 should be your only two options on your shortlist. You can't really go wrong with either.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is an old link but here are some updated ideas:

 

If you are considering an SSD, a recent improvement in SSDs is in the Intel 520 series.

The problem with SSDs is that writing to the NAND memory in SSDs wears them out

over time. Another company invented a hard drive controller called SandForce.

It spreads the writes all over the hard drive like holographic memory in the

human brain. That evens the memory wear over time.

 

Intel gave in and licensed that technology. Intel also created additional

memory that can only be accessed by the SSD. When a memory

location wears out, it assigns that memory location to a new location in

that fresh unused memory.

Intel is confident enough to offer a 5 year warranty on this hard drive.

A 120 gigabyte drive is $200. (I don't work for Intel nor am I associated

in any to that company except a customer.)

Other companies' SSDs have the Sandforce controller, but not the warranty

that I am aware of.

 

I use my SSD by loading only my applications to it, not my Operating System.

I really don't care how fast my computer boots up. I want my trading

platforms to run fast. That would be Interactive Brokers TWS for 1 application.

I can tell that TWS runs faster, although the real bottleneck is my Interent

access speed.

 

Also, a securtiy consideration:

Password crackers run at 300 billion password crack attempts a second

on an SSD drive. But if your OS is on slow spinning hard drive, that's like

an eternity to a password cracker and it makes it hard to get that much

time to crack a password. Slow is more secure in this case.

 

Any other SSD insights specifically for running trading applications on an SSD

are appreciated.

 

coldrunner

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

N, what is the primary benefit of a SSD for your trading application--to reduce latency?

 

There are things which could potentially slow down my system during heavy market activity, but I wonder if my system performance would be greatly enhanced by a SSD? There are many barriers to low latency -- the data feed itself, internet connectivity, calculation of custom indicators, etc.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
but I wonder if my system performance would be greatly enhanced by a SSD? There are many barriers to low latency -- the data feed itself, internet connectivity, calculation of custom indicators, etc.

Anytime there is read or write I/O (aka when system wants to read/write data from the drive), and SSD will be ENORMOUSLY faster than even your fastest HDDs on the market. To answer your question, buying the right SSD WILL greatly enhance system performance. I don't know however how useful an SSD would be for charting because that relies on your internet provider's connection to your charting machine.

 

As for the charting software running on your local machine, I don't think an SSD would make any difference in charting performance because the application should be running in RAM. The only thing an SSD would speed up is the time it takes to START the charting application.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
OCZ must have the WORST track record of drives in terms of reliability. You pretty much want to avoid any SandForce drive unless it's the Intel 520 series. The drives are fast, but they fail very quickly.

 

Well, I have heard this about OCZ too. I also have run an original vertex turbo and although it is an indilinx based drive not sandforce, it has never been unreliable at all. As far as avoiding Sandforce goes, I disagree. Some of the fastest and more reliable drives use sandforce controllers. In any case you should be backing up mission critical data. I think you also need to qualify your statement that they fail very quickly. Maybe compared with a mechanical drive, but then if you run the same OS drive for 10 years without reinstalling you won't have a fast system anyway. Re-installing gives you the chance to put in a more up-to-date drive.

 

N, what is the primary benefit of a SSD for your trading application--to reduce latency?

 

There are things which could potentially slow down my system during heavy market activity, but I wonder if my system performance would be greatly enhanced by a SSD? There are many barriers to low latency -- the data feed itself, internet connectivity, calculation of custom indicators, etc.

 

Loading lots of data into memory is what an SSD is good for. So loading lots of locally stored chart data for example will be much quicker than a standard mechanical drive. If it's latency you have a problem with, big factors include the amount of charts and studies you have open, your cpu, your OS settings, your ISP, the time of day.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On the RAM disk (only 2G but RAM is cheap):

- Sierra Chart instances for day trading and their actively used data files

- IB TWS

- Temp files including browser temps

 

That way I get maximum read and write speed for my day trading apps, great read speed for most everything else and good speed for archives.

 

Sounds like a great idea. What software do you use to manage your ram disk? I saw one from DataRam that is free up to 4GB. Do you auto-save the disk every so often--basically, how do you preserve the data so it's available when you restart?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
As far as avoiding Sandforce goes, I disagree. Some of the fastest and more reliable drives use sandforce controllers.

SandForce is known for being the fastest but at the same time the most unreliable . The Intel 520 is the ONLY exception with the SF controller.

 

I think you also need to qualify your statement that they fail very quickly. Maybe compared with a mechanical drive, but then if you run the same OS drive for 10 years without reinstalling you won't have a fast system anyway. Re-installing gives you the chance to put in a more up-to-date drive.

Compared to other controllers on the market, SandForce has had more RMAs than you could wrap your head around. It's no secret. This knowledge is wide spread throughout tech and e-commerce web sites.

 

Your mention about running the same OS for 10 years has no relevance to the topic at hand. I'm comparing SandForce to other controllers on the market. If I was bashing SSD technology as a whole, I wouldn't be targeting only the SandForce controller as an issue...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
SandForce is known for being the fastest but at the same time the most unreliable . The Intel 520 is the ONLY exception with the SF controller.

 

 

Compared to other controllers on the market, SandForce has had more RMAs than you could wrap your head around. It's no secret. This knowledge is wide spread throughout tech and e-commerce web sites.

 

Your mention about running the same OS for 10 years has no relevance to the topic at hand. I'm comparing SandForce to other controllers on the market. If I was bashing SSD technology as a whole, I wouldn't be targeting only the SandForce controller as an issue...

 

I agreed in that I have heard about OCZ's reliability issues, but not so much sandforce- although I'm not saying this is untrue. But if it were so unreliable, it would have been dropped by manufacturer's pretty quickly rather than used more.

 

The comment about running the same OS drive for 10years was based on :-

 

OCZ must have the WORST track record of drives in terms of reliability. You pretty much want to avoid any SandForce drive unless it's the Intel 520 series. The drives are fast, but they fail very quickly.

 

It sounded like you were saying that these drives really don't last any time at all and that's just not true. I have been running a sandforce based drive for well over a year now and expect it to be a good performer for a good while yet. Admittedly it isnt an OCZ but it is sandforce and it has a three year warranty- just as OCZ. As you mentioned the OCZ Vertex 4 has 5yrs although that doesnt automatically make it better. However, I think that I will be looking more at drives with other controllers in future as I believe that there are some key areas where the sandforce controllers fall down as I have already mentioned. I don't know about the intel drives you mention from personal experience although I know some really hold them in high esteem. I don't think that's automatically going to be the case with the new 330 though looking at the price point. Who knows.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For the record my drive was from OCZ (as is half of my RAM) and both have been perfectly reliable. What's more it is pre-write distribution technology so it's old and reliable :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, so my Win7 performance score is 5.9 -- processor, ram, graphics all in the 7.4 range; HD is 5.9 .. I have a core i5 750 quad 2.67GHz, 8GB RAM, radeon 5700 which has I'm guessing 128MB ram. Basically, my computer is reasonably speedy, but I'm a sucker for fast hardware.

 

I am only using about 120GB in my current HD, and am considering either an Intel 520 or Samsung 830 SSD, at 256GB.

 

I know this is a blanket, non-technical question, but: generally, will my "experience" be rewarded by upgrading to a SSD, and if so, can you ballpark a "percentage increase" I might be looking at for "overall speed"? Very vague I know, but I'm just looking for a general idea of whether this will be a very low return on investment given the cost, or whether it will be easily noticeable?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
OK, so my Win7 performance score is 5.9 -- processor, ram, graphics all in the 7.4 range; HD is 5.9 .. I have a core i5 750 quad 2.67GHz, 8GB RAM, radeon 5700 which has I'm guessing 128MB ram. Basically, my computer is reasonably speedy, but I'm a sucker for fast hardware.

 

I am only using about 120GB in my current HD, and am considering either an Intel 520 or Samsung 830 SSD, at 256GB.

 

I know this is a blanket, non-technical question, but: generally, will my "experience" be rewarded by upgrading to a SSD, and if so, can you ballpark a "percentage increase" I might be looking at for "overall speed"? Very vague I know, but I'm just looking for a general idea of whether this will be a very low return on investment given the cost, or whether it will be easily noticeable?

 

Depends really. I think generally you will see the difference. I'd go for a 60-120gb OS/freq app (e.g. trading stuff) drive with a bigger mech storage drive (although thai floods have jacked the prices up on these), but then I will hazard a guess that you're memory is 1333mhz. Memory is a big performance driver. At the moment memory is dirt cheap so could be worth looking at an upgrade at the same time. :2c:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Kiwi, you said that you loaded your sierra and trading stuff onto a ram drive.

 

I tried loading IRT on a ramdrive, but strangely saw no noticeable improvement in speed on the load of the program at startup, as well as execution. It takes about 60 seconds to start my platform and load all my charts. Starting from a RAM drive it was about the same.

 

N, I did some memory benchmarks and have attached the screen shot. What do you think? The program is free from:

MaxxPI² - Download (MaxxMEM² - PreView)

MaxxMEM2_d3508.jpg.358e3dba379c07533179b55976e73b56.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Kiwi, you said that you loaded your sierra and trading stuff onto a ram drive.

 

I tried loading IRT on a ramdrive, but strangely saw no noticeable improvement in speed on the load of the program at startup, as well as execution. It takes about 60 seconds to start my platform and load all my charts. Starting from a RAM drive it was about the same.

 

N, I did some memory benchmarks and have attached the screen shot. What do you think? The program is free from:

MaxxPI² - Download (MaxxMEM² - PreView)

 

Not too good but not too bad either. Take a look at Technology content trusted by users around the world :: TweakTown USA Edition for reviews (lots of decent tech sites about but tweaktown's methodical reviewing nature is good for comparisons). For benchmarking memory, they use aida64 which used to be everest. I never got around to buying a copy but they have an evaluation version for free. $39.95 though is cheap and it's a very useful bit of software (esp if you build/overclock your own rig:D)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • also ... and barely on topic... Winners (always*) overpay. Buying the dips is a subscription to the belief that winners win by underpaying - when in actuality winners (inevitably/always*) win by overpaying... it’s amazing the percentage of traders who think winners win by underpaying ... “Winners (always*) overpay.” ...  One way to implement this ‘belief’ is to only reenter when prices have emphatically resumed the 'trend' .   (Fwiw, While “Winners (always*) overpay.” holds true in most endeavors (relationships, business, sports, etc...) - “Winners (always*) overpay.”  is especially true for auctions... continuous auctions included.)
    • re:  "Does it make sense to always buy the dips?  “Buy the dip.”  You hear this all the time in crypto investing trading speculation gambling. [zdo taking some liberties] It refers, of course, to buying more bitcoin (or digital assets) when they go down in price: when the price “dips.” Some people brag about “buying the dip," showing they know better than the crowd. Others “buy the dip” as an investment strategy: they’re getting a bargain. The problem is, buying the dip is a fallacy. You can’t buy the dip, because you can't see the total dip until much later. First, I’ll explain this in a way that will make it simple and obvious to you; then I’ll show you a better way of investing. You Only Know the Dip in Hindsight When people talk about “buying the dip,” what they’re really saying is, “I bought when the price was going down.” " ... example of a dip ... 
    • Date: 19th April 2024. Weekly Commodity Market Update: Oil Prices Correct and Supply Concerns Persist.   The ongoing developments in the Middle East sparked a wave of risk aversion and fueled supply concerns and investors headed for safety. Hopes for imminent rate cuts from the Federal Reserve diminish while attention is now turning towards the demand outlook. The Gold price hit a high of $2417.89 per ounce overnight. Sentiment has already calmed down again and bullion is trading at $2376.50 per ounce as haven flows ease. Oil prices initially moved higher as concern over escalating tensions with the WTI contract hit a session high of $85.508 per barrel overnight, before correcting to currently $81.45 per barrel. Oil Prices Under Pressure Amid Middle East Tensions Last week, commodity indexes showed little movement, with Oil prices undergoing a slight correction. Meanwhile, Gold reached yet another record high, mirroring the upward trend in cocoa prices. Once again today, USOil prices experienced a correction and has remained under pressure, retesting the 50-day EMA at $81.00 as we moving into the weekend. Hence, despite the Israel’s retaliatory strike on Iran, sentiments stabilized following reports suggesting a measured response aimed at avoiding further escalation. Brent crude futures witnessed a more than 4% leap, driven by concerns over potential disruptions to oil supplies in the Middle East, only to subsequently erase all gains. Similarly with USOIL, UKOIL hovers just below $87 per barrel, marginally below Thursday’s closing figures. Nevertheless, volatility is expected to continue in the market as several potential risks loom:   Disruption to the Strait of Hormuz: The possibility of Iran disrupting navigation through the vital shipping lane, is still in play. The Strait of Hormuz serves as the Persian Gulf’s primary route to international waters, with approximately 21 million barrels of oil passing through daily. Recent events, including Iran’s seizure of an Israel-linked container ship, underscore the geopolitical sensitivity of the region. Tougher Sanctions on Iran: Analysts speculate that the US may impose stricter sanctions on Iranian oil exports or intensify enforcement of existing restrictions. With global oil consumption reaching 102 million barrels per day, Iran’s production of 3.3 million barrels remains significant. Recent actions targeting Venezuelan oil highlight the potential for increased pressure on Iranian exports. OPEC Output Increases: Despite the desire for higher prices, OPEC members such as Saudi Arabia and Russia have constrained output in recent years. However, sustained crude prices above $100 per barrel could prompt concerns about demand and incentivize increased production. The OPEC may opt to boost oil output should tensions escalate further and prices surge. Ukraine Conflict: Amidst the focus on the Middle East, markets overlooking Russia’s actions in Ukraine. Potential retaliatory strikes by Kyiv on Russian oil infrastructure could impact exports, adding further complexity to global oil markets.   Technical Analysis USOIL is marking one of the steepest weekly declines witnessed this year after a brief period of consolidation. The breach below the pivotal support level of 84.00, coupled with the descent below the mid of the 4-month upchannel, signals a possible shift in market sentiment towards a bearish trend reversal. Adding to the bearish outlook are indications such as the downward slope in the RSI. However, the asset still hold above the 50-day EMA which coincides also with the mid of last year’s downleg, with key support zone at $80.00-$81.00. If it breaks this support zone, the focus may shift towards the 200-day EMA and 38.2% Fib. level at $77.60-$79.00. Conversely, a rejection of the $81 level and an upside potential could see the price returning back to $84.00. A break of the latter could trigger the attention back to the December’s resistance, situated around $86.60. A breakthrough above this level could ignite a stronger rally towards the $89.20-$90.00 zone. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business. Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar. Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding on how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE! Click HERE to READ more Market news. Michalis Efthymiou Market Analyst HMarkets Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past perfrmance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in FX and CFDs products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • Date: 18th April 2024. Market News – Stock markets benefit from Dollar correction. Economic Indicators & Central Banks:   Technical buying, bargain hunting, and risk aversion helped Treasuries rally and unwind recent losses. Yields dropped from the recent 2024 highs. Asian stock markets strengthened, as the US Dollar corrected in the wake of comments from Japan’s currency chief Masato Kanda, who said G7 countries continue to stress that excessive swings and disorderly moves in the foreign exchange market were harmful for economies. US Stockpiles expanded to 10-month high. The data overshadowed the impact of geopolitical tensions in the Middle East as traders await Israel’s response to Iran’s unprecedented recent attack. President Joe Biden called for higher tariffs on imports of Chinese steel and aluminum.   Financial Markets Performance:   The USDIndex stumbled, falling to 105.66 at the end of the day from the intraday high of 106.48. It lost ground against most of its G10 peers. There wasn’t much on the calendar to provide new direction. USDJPY lows retesting the 154 bottom! NOT an intervention yet. BoJ/MoF USDJPY intervention happens when there is more than 100+ pip move in seconds, not 50 pips. USOIL slumped by 3% near $82, as US crude inventories rose by 2.7 million barrels last week, hitting the highest level since last June, while gauges of fuel demand declined. Gold strengthened as the dollar weakened and bullion is trading at $2378.44 per ounce. Market Trends:   Wall Street closed in the red after opening with small corrective gains. The NASDAQ underperformed, slumping -1.15%, with the S&P500 -0.58% lower, while the Dow lost -0.12. The Nikkei closed 0.2% higher, the Hang Seng gained more than 1. European and US futures are finding buyers. A gauge of global chip stocks and AI bellwether Nvidia Corp. have both fallen into a technical correction. The TMSC reported its first profit rise in a year, after strong AI demand revived growth at the world’s biggest contract chipmaker. The main chipmaker to Apple Inc. and Nvidia Corp. recorded a 9% rise in net income, beating estimates. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business. Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar. Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding on how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE! Click HERE to READ more Market news. Andria Pichidi Market Analyst HFMarkets Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in FX and CFDs products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • Date: 17th April 2024. Market News – Appetite for risk-taking remains weak. Economic Indicators & Central Banks:   Stocks, Treasury yields and US Dollar stay firmed. Fed Chair Powell added to the recent sell off. His slightly more hawkish tone further priced out chances for any imminent action and the timing of a cut was pushed out further. He suggested if higher inflation does persist, the Fed will hold rates steady “for as long as needed.” Implied Fed Fund: There remains no real chance for a move on May 1 and at their intraday highs the June implied funds rate future showed only 5 bps, while July reflected only 10 bps. And a full 25 bps was not priced in until November, with 38 bps in cuts seen for 2024. US & EU Economies Diverging: Lagarde says ECB is moving toward rate cuts – if there are no major shocks. UK March CPI inflation falls less than expected. Output price inflation has started to nudge higher, despite another decline in input prices. Together with yesterday’s higher than expected wage numbers, the data will add to the arguments of the hawks at the BoE, which remain very reluctant to contemplate rate cuts. Canada CPI rose 0.6% in March, double the 0.3% February increase BUT core eased. The doors are still open for a possible cut at the next BoC meeting on June 5. IMF revised up its global growth forecast for 2024 with inflation easing, in its new World Economic Outlook. This is consistent with a global soft landing, according to the report. Financial Markets Performance:   USDJPY also inched up to 154.67 on expectations the BoJ will remain accommodative and as the market challenges a perceived 155 red line for MoF intervention. USOIL prices slipped -0.15% to $84.20 per barrel. Gold rose 0.24% to $2389.11 per ounce, a new record closing high as geopolitical risks overshadowed the impacts of rising rates and the stronger dollar. Market Trends:   Wall Street waffled either side of unchanged on the day amid dimming rate cut potential, rising yields, and earnings. The major indexes closed mixed with the Dow up 0.17%, while the S&P500 and NASDAQ lost -0.21% and -0.12%, respectively. Asian stock markets mostly corrected again, with Japanese bourses underperforming and the Nikkei down -1.3%. Mainland China bourses were a notable exception and the CSI 300 rallied 1.4%, but the MSCI Asia Pacific index came close to erasing the gains for this year. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business. Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar. Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding on how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE! Click HERE to READ more Market news. Andria Pichidi Market Analyst HFMarkets Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in FX and CFDs products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.vvvvvvv
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.