Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

r4bb1t

Does Divergence Signals Really Work?

Does Divergence Signals really work?  

163 members have voted

  1. 1. Does Divergence Signals really work?

    • Yes.
      119
    • No.
      44


Recommended Posts

when you start learning of technical analysis.

you had to hear 'Divergence Signal' hundred of times that says those are powerful reversal signal.

you know what?

all the oscillators that has Divergence signals are calculated by exponential moving average. such as famous MACD, RSI.

but what if replacing EMA to SMA from the equation?

divergence signals are gone.

this implies that divergence signals are not from the oscillator calculation. exponential moving average generates them.

it is just that the power of movement doesn't increasing or decreasing 'exponentially'

do you believe that a Trend must have exponential movement?

in my opinion divergence signal is most overestimate technique. and it makes critical trading failure.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You don't seem to know at all what you are talking about. Divergence is not always computed in only the way you seem to suggest. Divergence behavior of bounded oscillator-type indicators does appear on many different indicators. Is it useful? It can be very powerful. Does it fail? Of course it does. But perfection is not something attainable anyway in any indicator. It is a matter of proportion of its successes. How you decide to classify the occurrence of divergence requires many decisions..how long is the lookback period, are equal indicator extremes gong to be included, how many bars apart are accceptable, what about situations where a third less extreme point follows the two..this usually implies that the first divergence trade will be somewhat underwater, but this next extreme will often work. The less lag, the greatest smoothness and the retention of sharpness at the turn in the indicator assists in the divergence signal being timely and usefull. Classifying divergence in real-time manually by the trader is difficult in the heat of battle. The computer algorithms hae improved over the years to perform this classification. This presents an objective rule-base way to do this but it still requires all the preceeding decisions to be made and coded or entered as inputs by the user. Important tops and bottoms often are accompanied by clear divergence; it is a matter of filtering out the erroneous signals by some means...which is pretty much the problem we face with every trading approach.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I personally found that I erased a lot of my trading mistakes when I stopped using divergence to assist with trading decisions. Like with most things that are trading related, the context of when the divergence occurs is key, and I didn't get that when I was exploring using divergence as an entry trigger. I'm sure it works great for the people that have done the research and fit it into their trading plan, but I'm definitely not there with it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Divergence is nothing more that price rejection faster at certain level,so if you can identify other indications of where to expect price to have this type of action(sop/resist) then you dont even need the indicator to find it.

All you need to do is watch what happen there and price action would tell you if a divergence pattern is likely to ocurr before the indicator shows it.

i wich i was smarter to post some chart but I'm not.

:crap:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For my analysis I use Divergences. I use a hierarchy system when evaluating a stock. However, divergences are certainly not a buy dont buy issue. They simply help me stack the odds more in my favor.

 

I also wonder which divergences people like and which divergences people dont like.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it does. One has just to study specific examples to prove this. I have studied both macd and rsi indicators and i have found out that divergence really exists. In an up trend, higher highs are made, and so with the macd and rsi levels. However, when the trend is about to reverse, on the next high (which would be the last), the macd or rsi will not show higher high. The next macd or rsi high will be lower than the previous. This is what is called divergence. It is now time to reverse trend.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My :2c: is that divergences can work. Far from the holy grail so you either have to trade the all and have good risk mgmt in place or filter the losing ones out. Some considerations in trading divergences is that they will show in trending moves, how quickly do you want to get in or do you wait for confirmation... among many other things. Adding divergences to your trading plan can be addition but I think you'll need more than just divergences.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Right, exactly. At the risk of sounding like a broken record, if you have an understanding of longer term support and resistance, and you wait for those levels to trade, I would say that divergence can help give confidence in getting in. Going long on the first RSI divergence after only wave 1 of a selloff after longer term support has failed is probably not the best of ideas :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For your consideration: http://thepatternsite.com/DivergenceTest.html

 

First, tests show that divergence between price and the Wilder relative strength index (RSI) beat the performance of the S&P 500 index consistently only in a bull market using bullish divergence. The other combinations of bull/bear markets and bullish/bearish divergence underperform the market index.

 

For the winning combination, bullish divergence in a bull market, I found that it wins between 45% and 48% of the time. In other words, the performance of the index beats stocks showing bullish divergence more often than not.

 

Second, I read that when the indicator makes a shallow dip or rise between the end points in divergence, it means a more powerful move. That turns out to be true but only in a bear market.

 

Third, it's best to ignore divergence when the first peak or valley occurs between 30 and 70. Including that range hurts performance in nearly all categories.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Divergences work like a champ when they are used on counter trend tests (ie counter trend double bottoms) while trying to enter on a resumption of the trend.

 

They are not so effective when trying to pick market bottoms or tops.

 

 

Luv,

Phantom

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(MACD) divergence really shines during counter trend tests such as a-b-c consolidations. You'll see the divergence between the a and c legs and the corresponding macd peaks/valleys very clearly in most cases.

 

 

Luv,

Phantom

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
for every divergence that works,

I can find you at least a divergence that does not.

the score is probably 50-50 at best

 

Hi Tams,

 

It's pretty much like saying do chart patterns work. Mostly subjective. They work if someone reads them in correct context.

 

:2c:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

:confused::confused:

‘mathematically’, seems many divergences are, in large part, created/made possible by the form, extent and duration of the most recent correction before the current thrust which is exhibiting indicator divergence …

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
:confused::confused:

‘mathematically’, seems many divergences are, in large part, created/made possible by the form, extent and duration of the most recent correction before the current thrust which is exhibiting indicator divergence …

 

Divergences using RSI

 

They can be quantified to a good extent (the analysis can be automated). but the problem is that coding them requires more than just familiarity with ninja/tradestation. I personally know people who have automated their discretionary trading systems and their code runs into thousand of lines.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I personally know people who have automated their discretionary trading systems and their code runs into the thousands of lines.

 

Do you have any idea what sort of trading these people are doing, ie ultra short term v. position trading?

 

 

Phantom

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Phantom,

 

I was referring to discretionary short-term trading (holding time 30 mins to 3 days).

 

Since last year I have been working on automating my strategies. I'm a Amibroker user- and believe it or not- it took me almost 6 months to get a 'satisfactory' support/resistance code. I'm talking about basic S/R which any discretionary trader will be able to mark. When we mark these levels we are quick to adjust for gaps, spikes, stagnated prices. I'm talking about stuff which may appear common sense to a discretionary trader; but when coding everything need to be quantified. It's a little over 100 lines.

 

Take the divergences for example for which I gave a link in previous post. There is a method for ranking these based on the conditions which make them occur, and related to how accurate they may be. If you go through that post I factor several things like previous trend and price shocks for ranking them. The ranking method alone will receive quotes around 1000$ from programmers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a theory why the MACD will show divergence during corrective moves in a trend.

 

Using the a-b-c correction as an example, I submit that as the market approaches the "c" point of the correction, which is usually a test of some degree of the "a" point in the correction, the market reacts with a rejection of price that usually does not occur during the formation of the "a" point.

 

One can oftentimes see indication of price rejection (dependent upon the time frame one is looking at, of course) in the form of hammer bars while no such indication of price rejection exists around the "a" point.

 

Since these price rejection bars have closing prices located near the extremes of their bars, the moving average of these bars will start to move in the direction of the trend earlier than the moving average of the bars that formed the "a" test point.

 

This, of course, creates the divergence between the test points and the moving averages.

 

Do or Die, in your days as a floor trader were you able to witness this phenomenon of price rejection during the consolidation phase of a trend move?

 

 

Phantom

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • $DXCM (DXCM) DexCom stock top of range breakout watch above 75.61,



      analysis http://chart.st/DXCM
       
    • Date : 24th April 2018.

      MACRO EVENTS & NEWS OF 24th April 2018.



      FX News Today

      European Outlook: Asian markets moved mostly higher overnight, following on from a positive session on Wall Street and amid ongoing USD strength with a weaker Yen underpinning a 0.75% rise in the Nikkei. The Hang Seng is up 0.94%, the CSI 300 rallied 1.75% amid speculation that the government is considering easing some policies put in to limit the credit boom. The absence of any negative news on the trade front seems to have given stock markets some breathing space and U.S. futures are also up in tandem with U.K. futures. Oil prices are also up and the front end Nymex future is trading at USD 69.14 per barrel. For now though bonds are getting a boost and stock markets are also higher, with most European futures posting gains in tandem with U.S. futures and after a positive session in Asia. Today’s calendar focuses on confidence data out of France, Germany and the U.K.. The U.K. also has public finance data and Germany auctions 2-year Schatz notes.

      FX Update: The dollar posted fresh highs against the euro and yen, and many other currencies after a bout of demand in Asia, which extending a broad rally the greenback has been seeing against for over a week now. The narrow trade-weighted USD index (DXY) posted its highest level since the first week of January, at 91.07. EURUSD logged a 10-week low at 1.2184, though euro demand has subsequently fuelled a rebound to the 1.2220 area. USDJPY lifted for a sixth consecutive session, making a 10-week high at 108.87. EURJPY is also firmer, though has so far remained below the two-month high it saw last week. The gains in USDJPY have been concomitant with the U.S. T-note yield nearing the 3.0% level, which has been generating headlines, which comes with the BoJ continuing to peg JGB 10-year yields near 0.0%. The Nikkei 225 closed 0.86% for the better, more than reversing the moderate loss seen yesterday. North Korea’s Kim said that he would be willing to accept IAEA inspections of nuclear facilities.

      Charts of the Day



      Main Macro Events Today
        German IFO – The German Ifo business confidence indicator, due Tuesday, comes in a new format this month, which includes the services sector now. For the new indicator a dip is expected to 102.8 from 103.2, and a decline in the expectations reading to 99.5 from 100.1 in the previous month. However, after the better than expected PMI readings there is a bias to the upside to the numbers. In any case, we don’t expect the April round of survey indicators to really change the outlook for the ECB, which is seen on hold this week, with officials seeing scope to leave the final decision on the future of the QE program open until July, when the risks to the global outlook may have become a bit clearer and the decision is becoming urgent. UK Public Borrowing – Expectations – at 1.6B pounds from -0.272B pounds last month. US Consumer confidence – likely declined to 126.0 in April, from March’s 127.7. US New home sales – expected to rise to 0.630 mln in April from 0.618 mln in February. Support & Resistance Levels



      Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.

      Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report.

      Click HERE to access the full HotForex Economic calendar.

      Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding on how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!

      Click HERE to READ more Market news. 


      Andria Pichidi
      Market Analyst
      HotForex


      Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in FX and CFDs products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • Addendum:
      http://www.thedailybell.com/news-analysis/if-you-limit-any-free-speech-this-is-what-you-get/  
      ...
      Anar  Chicagoans, etc, etc, -  wake up !
      This -> https://www.mintpressnews.com/cheran-mexicos-indigenous-community-that-rebelled-against-narcos-thieves-and-politicians-and-won/240979/
      instead of this -> http://massprivatei.blogspot.com/2018/04/smart-city-projects-are-really-police.html
       
    • $WD (WD) Walker & Dunlop stock nice bull flag breakout watch,



      analysis http://chart.st/WD
       
    • $BOFI (BOFI) stock narrow range breakout watch above 42.54,



      analysis http://chart.st/BOFI
       
×

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.