Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

r4bb1t

Does Divergence Signals Really Work?

Does Divergence Signals really work?  

163 members have voted

  1. 1. Does Divergence Signals really work?

    • Yes.
      119
    • No.
      44


Recommended Posts

when you start learning of technical analysis.

you had to hear 'Divergence Signal' hundred of times that says those are powerful reversal signal.

you know what?

all the oscillators that has Divergence signals are calculated by exponential moving average. such as famous MACD, RSI.

but what if replacing EMA to SMA from the equation?

divergence signals are gone.

this implies that divergence signals are not from the oscillator calculation. exponential moving average generates them.

it is just that the power of movement doesn't increasing or decreasing 'exponentially'

do you believe that a Trend must have exponential movement?

in my opinion divergence signal is most overestimate technique. and it makes critical trading failure.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You don't seem to know at all what you are talking about. Divergence is not always computed in only the way you seem to suggest. Divergence behavior of bounded oscillator-type indicators does appear on many different indicators. Is it useful? It can be very powerful. Does it fail? Of course it does. But perfection is not something attainable anyway in any indicator. It is a matter of proportion of its successes. How you decide to classify the occurrence of divergence requires many decisions..how long is the lookback period, are equal indicator extremes gong to be included, how many bars apart are accceptable, what about situations where a third less extreme point follows the two..this usually implies that the first divergence trade will be somewhat underwater, but this next extreme will often work. The less lag, the greatest smoothness and the retention of sharpness at the turn in the indicator assists in the divergence signal being timely and usefull. Classifying divergence in real-time manually by the trader is difficult in the heat of battle. The computer algorithms hae improved over the years to perform this classification. This presents an objective rule-base way to do this but it still requires all the preceeding decisions to be made and coded or entered as inputs by the user. Important tops and bottoms often are accompanied by clear divergence; it is a matter of filtering out the erroneous signals by some means...which is pretty much the problem we face with every trading approach.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I personally found that I erased a lot of my trading mistakes when I stopped using divergence to assist with trading decisions. Like with most things that are trading related, the context of when the divergence occurs is key, and I didn't get that when I was exploring using divergence as an entry trigger. I'm sure it works great for the people that have done the research and fit it into their trading plan, but I'm definitely not there with it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Divergence is nothing more that price rejection faster at certain level,so if you can identify other indications of where to expect price to have this type of action(sop/resist) then you dont even need the indicator to find it.

All you need to do is watch what happen there and price action would tell you if a divergence pattern is likely to ocurr before the indicator shows it.

i wich i was smarter to post some chart but I'm not.

:crap:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For my analysis I use Divergences. I use a hierarchy system when evaluating a stock. However, divergences are certainly not a buy dont buy issue. They simply help me stack the odds more in my favor.

 

I also wonder which divergences people like and which divergences people dont like.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it does. One has just to study specific examples to prove this. I have studied both macd and rsi indicators and i have found out that divergence really exists. In an up trend, higher highs are made, and so with the macd and rsi levels. However, when the trend is about to reverse, on the next high (which would be the last), the macd or rsi will not show higher high. The next macd or rsi high will be lower than the previous. This is what is called divergence. It is now time to reverse trend.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My :2c: is that divergences can work. Far from the holy grail so you either have to trade the all and have good risk mgmt in place or filter the losing ones out. Some considerations in trading divergences is that they will show in trending moves, how quickly do you want to get in or do you wait for confirmation... among many other things. Adding divergences to your trading plan can be addition but I think you'll need more than just divergences.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Right, exactly. At the risk of sounding like a broken record, if you have an understanding of longer term support and resistance, and you wait for those levels to trade, I would say that divergence can help give confidence in getting in. Going long on the first RSI divergence after only wave 1 of a selloff after longer term support has failed is probably not the best of ideas :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For your consideration: http://thepatternsite.com/DivergenceTest.html

 

First, tests show that divergence between price and the Wilder relative strength index (RSI) beat the performance of the S&P 500 index consistently only in a bull market using bullish divergence. The other combinations of bull/bear markets and bullish/bearish divergence underperform the market index.

 

For the winning combination, bullish divergence in a bull market, I found that it wins between 45% and 48% of the time. In other words, the performance of the index beats stocks showing bullish divergence more often than not.

 

Second, I read that when the indicator makes a shallow dip or rise between the end points in divergence, it means a more powerful move. That turns out to be true but only in a bear market.

 

Third, it's best to ignore divergence when the first peak or valley occurs between 30 and 70. Including that range hurts performance in nearly all categories.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Divergences work like a champ when they are used on counter trend tests (ie counter trend double bottoms) while trying to enter on a resumption of the trend.

 

They are not so effective when trying to pick market bottoms or tops.

 

 

Luv,

Phantom

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(MACD) divergence really shines during counter trend tests such as a-b-c consolidations. You'll see the divergence between the a and c legs and the corresponding macd peaks/valleys very clearly in most cases.

 

 

Luv,

Phantom

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
for every divergence that works,

I can find you at least a divergence that does not.

the score is probably 50-50 at best

 

Hi Tams,

 

It's pretty much like saying do chart patterns work. Mostly subjective. They work if someone reads them in correct context.

 

:2c:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

:confused::confused:

‘mathematically’, seems many divergences are, in large part, created/made possible by the form, extent and duration of the most recent correction before the current thrust which is exhibiting indicator divergence …

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
:confused::confused:

‘mathematically’, seems many divergences are, in large part, created/made possible by the form, extent and duration of the most recent correction before the current thrust which is exhibiting indicator divergence …

 

Divergences using RSI

 

They can be quantified to a good extent (the analysis can be automated). but the problem is that coding them requires more than just familiarity with ninja/tradestation. I personally know people who have automated their discretionary trading systems and their code runs into thousand of lines.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I personally know people who have automated their discretionary trading systems and their code runs into the thousands of lines.

 

Do you have any idea what sort of trading these people are doing, ie ultra short term v. position trading?

 

 

Phantom

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Phantom,

 

I was referring to discretionary short-term trading (holding time 30 mins to 3 days).

 

Since last year I have been working on automating my strategies. I'm a Amibroker user- and believe it or not- it took me almost 6 months to get a 'satisfactory' support/resistance code. I'm talking about basic S/R which any discretionary trader will be able to mark. When we mark these levels we are quick to adjust for gaps, spikes, stagnated prices. I'm talking about stuff which may appear common sense to a discretionary trader; but when coding everything need to be quantified. It's a little over 100 lines.

 

Take the divergences for example for which I gave a link in previous post. There is a method for ranking these based on the conditions which make them occur, and related to how accurate they may be. If you go through that post I factor several things like previous trend and price shocks for ranking them. The ranking method alone will receive quotes around 1000$ from programmers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a theory why the MACD will show divergence during corrective moves in a trend.

 

Using the a-b-c correction as an example, I submit that as the market approaches the "c" point of the correction, which is usually a test of some degree of the "a" point in the correction, the market reacts with a rejection of price that usually does not occur during the formation of the "a" point.

 

One can oftentimes see indication of price rejection (dependent upon the time frame one is looking at, of course) in the form of hammer bars while no such indication of price rejection exists around the "a" point.

 

Since these price rejection bars have closing prices located near the extremes of their bars, the moving average of these bars will start to move in the direction of the trend earlier than the moving average of the bars that formed the "a" test point.

 

This, of course, creates the divergence between the test points and the moving averages.

 

Do or Die, in your days as a floor trader were you able to witness this phenomenon of price rejection during the consolidation phase of a trend move?

 

 

Phantom

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This was stupid....it breaks the compatibility with the much-more-superior platform known as Multicharts.  
    • all your algorithm are belong to us https://hackernoon.com/sundar-pichai-and-the-ethics-of-algorithms-7948226aa7f6
    • Date : 18th December 2018.

      MACRO EVENTS & NEWS OF 18th December 2018.



      FX News Today

      FX News Today The 20-year Treasury yields are down -1.3 bp at 2.814%, as the sell off in stock markets, continued during the Asian session. Topix and Nikkei are down -1.99% and -1.82% respectively. Dovish RBA minutes: No strong case for a change in monetary policy. China’s President Xi Jinping offered no fresh stimulus plans or a further opening of the economy in his keynote speech marking 40-years of Chinese reforms. Concern rises over the outlook for Chinese and World Growth amid ongoing trade tensions weighing on sentiment. US stock futures are slightly higher though as the Fed decision comes into view, with Powell expected to confirm that the central bank will switch from autopilot to data dependency on rate hikes after the widely expected move this week. USA500 closed at the lowest level in 14 months. Oil prices declined and the WTI future fell back to $48.93 per barrel, as risk of demand destruction hits prices. Charts of the Day



      Main Macro Events Today German Ifo Business Climate – Expectations – To fall back to 101.7 from 102.0 in November, with the expectations reading, in particular, under pressure. The manufacturing sector is looking shaky again amid fresh challenges for the automobile sector, which continues to struggle with emissions standards and the lingering diesel scandal, which has considerably undermined confidence, especially in Germany where consumers are facing driving bans without compensation from producers. US housing starts – Expectations – They are estimated slipping 0.2% to a 1.225 mln pace in November, after a 1.5% gain to 1.228 mln in October. Canadian Manufacturing shipments – Expectations – They are expected to rise 0.5% in October after the 0.2% gain in September. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.

      Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report.

      Click HERE to access the full HotForex Economic calendar.

      Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding on how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!

      Click HERE to READ more Market news.

      Andria Pichidi
      Market Analyst
      HotForex

      Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in FX and CFDs products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • Weekly Trading Forecasts for Major Pairs (December 17 - 21, 2018)          Here’s the market outlook for the week:   EURUSD Dominant bias: Bearish This is a bear market, although the bearishness is not that strong. Price has been going downwards gradually, targeting the support lines at 1.1300, 1.1250 and 1.1200. These targets may be reached soon, but price may not go seriously below them as a strong reversal is expected to happen anytime, which will accompany some form of weakness in USD. This is what might bring about a bullish bias.   USDCHF Dominant bias: Bullish USDCHF is bullish in the long-term, and neutral in the short-term. Nonetheless, looking more closely, it is revealed that price is a kind of rising gradually, and generating a “buy” signal, which would eventually become significant in case the market continues moving upwards. A meaningful bearish movement cannot be seen unless there is a considerable amount of loss on Greenback stamina.   GBPUSD Dominant bias: Bearish   There is a Bearish Confirmation Pattern on the Cable as bears continue to frustrate bulls’ effort to reverse the trend and push price upwards. Apart from Brexit and political news surrounding the UK, the US dollar stamina is preventing the market from going upwards. Once bears give way, there may be a significant rise in the market. Right now, the bearish bias remains in place and long positions are not currently recommended.     USDJPY Dominant bias: Bullish This currency trading instrument is bullish in the long-term, and neutral in the short-term. The bullishness is not that great as there has not been a significant directional movement in the market. A rise in volatility remains a possibility before the end of this week or next week. Further movement to the upside will result in more emphasis on bullish outlook while a significant drop from here would result in a bearish outlook.   EURJPY Dominant bias: Neutral The bias on this cross is generally neutral, as there has not been a significant directional movement for the past several weeks. It is possible that this neutrality would continue until the end of this year because trading activity is expected to thin out (unless there is a breakout between this week or next). For the neutrality to end, price would need to go above the supply zone at 131.00 or below the demand zone at 125.00, and this will no doubt, require a strong bullish momentum.   GBPJPY Dominant bias: Bearish   There is a confirmed bearishness (Bearish Confirmation Pattern) on this cross, because of the weakness in GBP. This trend will continue until it is clear that things are no longer bearish. That will be this week or next, and before that happens, there could still be at least, a movement of about 200 pips towards the south.   This forecast is concluded with the quote below:   “However, if a trading strategy has been proven to work over the long run, with a quality risk to reward profile, it needs to be adhered to no matter the way trades play out. Ask yourself a question: is it the trading strategy producing the results or the trader producing the results?” – Sam Evans     Source: www.tallinex.com        
    • Weekly trading signals for major cryptos - DECEMBER 17th   Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum (ETH), Monero (XMR), Ripple (XRP), Cardano (ADA), Stellar (XLM), EOS, Bitcoin SV (BCHSV), Tron (TRX), Litecoin (LTC) BTC/USD Dominant trend: Bearish
      Supply zone: $5000, $6000, $7000
      Demand zone: $2000, $1500, $1000   BTC/USD continues in a bearish trend in the long-term outlook. After breaking the predicted target at $3377 in the demand area of last week analysis on 13th December, the strong bearish pressure further pushed the cryptocurrency down to a new lower low at $3215 on 15th December ending the week in a bullish doji.   This suggests brief bullish pullback may be expected in the days ahead. The bears’ return may be around the 10-EMA, after exhaustion. Moreover, the price remains below the two EMAs, the stochastic oscillator is in the oversold region at 6%, and its signal points down. These suggest further downward movement in BTC/USD. $3000 in the demand area may be the bears targeted lower low.   ETH/USD Dominant trend: Bearish
      Supply zones: $250, $300, $350
      Demand zones: $50, $30, $10   The week just ended opened bullish on 9th December as ETH/USD was up at $102.50 in the supply area, but the bulls later lost momentum as the day closed as an inverted hammer. This was a signal that the bears were back. $85.94 was the initial low but increased momentum dropped ETH/USD down to $83.17 in the demand area on 15th December ending the week with a bullish hammer.   With a possible trend reversal, the bulls are gradually staging a return. ETH/USD was up at $91.46 in the supply area earlier today. Further upward movement was rejected by the 10-EMA which acted as a strong resistance. The bears still remain in control of the market and may return and push price further down south. With the price below the two EMAs and the stochastic oscillator signal at 8% in the oversold region, this suggests downward momentum. $50.00 in the demand area is still on the card as the trading week commences.   For more signals: https://www.cryptocomparer.com/news/bitcoin-news/bitcoin-btc-ethereum-eth-monero-xmr-ripple-xrp-cardano-ada-stellar-xlm-eos-bitcoin-sv-bchsv-tron-trx-litecoin-ltc-weekly-trading-signals-for-december-17th/
×

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.