Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

bathrobe

Index Futures Risk Management

Recommended Posts

I trade only Index futures, and mostly the ES.

 

I thought it would be a good idea to discuss trade management (given recent price swings and volatility). On a trade where I am looking for more points (greater than 3 points) I do not use a hard stop, I exit when I believe I am wrong. I am comfortable trading this way now but it took a large amount of time to get there. When I am scalping (1.5 points or less) I use a fixed stop of 1 point and take off 80% of position at 1 point-and let the rest run.

 

I have shared this and started the thread to hear how others manage risk which is most important (IMO) to becoming profitable.

 

I thought this could maybe become a place where ideas could be shared and learned to those who are newer, in retrospect this was one of the most important keys to me becoming profitable.

 

I must stress that most traders should use hard stops

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
the market is dynamic,

so should the stop.

 

 

Yes, but I really don't think most retail traders can use (or know how to calculate or use) dynamic stops.

 

Most discussions I read regarding stops revolves around a 1:1 R/R ratio, some are more favorable but this is why I started the thread. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For me, keeping my drop dead stop out of the way is most important. I exit when the market tells me to. As far as Risk v Reward - it's a myth. The RISK part can be defined but the REWARD is unknown and depends on what the market gives you and what it does between entry and when it gets there. Two traders will exit the same trade differently. So much for calculating REWARD in advance unless you are scalping for smaller amounts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

this should be a good thread.

I have come to a number of conclusions in agreement with the previous posters on hard stops - :2c: -

1) you are new to trading and should have them in place to understand their importance, and to help you get used to taking them. Ideally when you first start it does not matter too much where you place them - this comes with time, practice and personal preferences

2) they are also good to use as a worst case - "stop my account from taking too much damage" - this should be used by every trader even old hands.

3) otherwise hard stops that are close to the market but not so close are not really helpful - these are the ones whereby you get stopped out by a tick and the market then goes the right way. Better to either have a very close stop, or really watch what occurs in the market.

4) too often these stops are used as a crutch, whereby traders become lazy and lean on them. This distracts from what is relevant, and that is the question - "is the market doing what I thought it would?" if not do I need to be there.....I am already wrong, so get out, dont wait for the stop..... this questioning also should help determine the type of stop you should be applying.

5) The reward element should also be asked in a similar fashion. Having a fixed R:R is nice but potentially lazy, and as mentioned is an interesting historical statistic. Otherwise the reward should be dependent on the market and the setup and be independent of the risk. (While the Dr Tharp books are interesting I am starting to think they do more harm than good in some respects as they distract from the real issue of the actual trade management)

6) context (watching the market and reacting to it - applying appropriate setups and triggers) and consistency is far more important. The measuring or R:R is really only a historical measurement of these two.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Every trade I place has a hard stop - ie it's on the DOM and sitting there as a market order ready to fire when I am wrong.

 

I do believe in risk-reward. If you risk 5 pts to make 1 pt, you will eventually go broke I have no doubt.

 

I do believe that your stops should be based on market conditions/formations whatever you want to call it - meaning that a random 1 pt stop does not make sense to me. The stop should go where if it triggers, it means you were wrong which to me means placing it out of the possible 'chop' stuff. As a reversal trader, that means my stops are usually just outside the HOD or LOD.

 

Hard stops force me to exit a losing trade and allows me to move on to the next trade w/o hesitation. A trade does not become an all day hope, multi-day prayer or my next investment. Simply I am not able to get emotionally attached to a trade or think that I have outsmarted the market.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Another item that traders should check is whether their stops are placed natively on the exchange, or held on the brokers server (or even worst, on your own platform) for queuing.

 

For instance, that hard stop with OEC isn't actually in the market, on the exchange, but resides instead on OEC servers for execution upon being hit.

 

Good luck with that in a fast moving market.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Another item that traders should check is whether their stops are placed natively on the exchange, or held on the brokers server (or even worst, on your own platform) for queuing.

 

For instance, that hard stop with OEC isn't actually in the market, on the exchange, but actually on OEC servers.

 

And never had 1 problem with it.

 

Good to see you are back to bashing OEC macd, been awhile. Do you and Tams take turns?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
When I am scalping (1.5 points or less) I use a fixed stop of 1 point and take off 80% of position at 1 point-and let the rest run.

 

Kind of meaningless without knowing the capital you are swinging...Assuming though you are trading 5 cars to take off 4/80% to leave a contract to run..i think this is -EV because you are not juicing big winners with taking all off at 1 point...Like your trying to build this steady equity curve by deleting the variance of losing vs random huge outlier wins(outlier wins that are juiced on 2 or 3 cars)....That seems to me to be a great strategy to make a break even equity curve.

Edited by natedredd10

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This thread is a great example of what is going on around here... I post about the topic, no mention of OEC or anything yet MACD wants to chime in and take it off topic.

 

:roll eyes:

 

Just another example of a thread that could be a good one to discuss but the personal attacks continue.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Another item that traders should check is whether their stops are placed natively on the exchange, or held on the brokers server (or even worst, on your own platform) for queuing.

 

For instance, that hard stop with OEC isn't actually in the market, on the exchange, but resides instead on OEC servers for execution upon being hit.

 

Good luck with that in a fast moving market.

 

Good example of why people that don't use the software should really just keep their comments to something they know - here's how OEC handles stops. Not quite the same picture you are attempting to paint here.

 

Next time maybe take the time to verify your information being presented here instead of just random guessing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Kind of meaningless without knowing the capital you are swinging...Assuming though you are trading 5 cars to take off 4/80% to leave a contract to run..i think this is -EV because you are not juicing big winners with taking all off at 1 point...Like your trying to build this steady equity curve by deleting the variance of losing vs random huge outlier wins(outlier wins that are juiced on 2 or 3 cars)....That seems to me to be a great strategy to make a break even equity curve.

 

I momentum scalp around news releases at levels. I should have included that this method is far better than 50% winners, making it profitable for me. I leave the 20% on with a stop loss at the theoretical average +1 tick

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.