Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

lbj

BLACKLIST of Brokers

Recommended Posts

TOS, at least for futures. Their ES data is skewed, often shows incorrect closes, and long data gaps where none should be.

 

As is par for the course, being bought out by a Canadian Bank is the deathknell of any decent platform.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
TOS, at least for futures. Their ES data is skewed, often shows incorrect closes, and long data gaps where none should be.

 

....

 

LOL... TOS is primarily an options broker.

A few years back they added futures to their offering because many clients need to use futures contract to hedge their positions. It was never intended as a futures daytrading broker.

 

You don't use a Forex broker for stocks the same way you don't use an options broker for ES scalping...

but I won't call it a black list.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
TOS, at least for futures. Their ES data is skewed, often shows incorrect closes, and long data gaps where none should be.

 

As is par for the course, being bought out by a Canadian Bank is the deathknell of any decent platform.

 

I have to agree. TOS is good for options, but terrible for futures and stocks. Especially so these days. They used to be an outstanding platform but since they were acquired by TDAmeritrade, their customer service, platform stability and technology has declined steeply.....almost off the cliff.

 

If you trade for a living, and need a stable platform, avoid TOS. I use it, but only for certain indicators which I can't find coded in EasyLanguage...and it is not my primary trading rig.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have only used Forex Brokers, so here's my 2 pips.

 

Forex.com and Gain are the same broker. Ok, no complaints

 

FXCM Ok, no complaints.

 

Oanda Great, I love them.... Best of the "Bucket Shops".

 

Dukascopy Ok, no complaints. Not very impressed either considering They have commission, and Oanda has better spreads.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Traded with Ameritrade about 8 yrs ago. Fills were always worse off by a few cents because they routed orders to MM's (Knight) ECN who quoted off the best bid/ask of the exchange. Legal and within SFA regs. Sometimes they'd rebate the difference if I pushed on asking why they didnt route to the best price execution point (which in fairness I did have the option to specify). Mostly happened on the open.

 

If you trade FX, look at SEC regs that now specify FX bucket shops have to declare the % of profitable customers. Most come out at 20%, but Oanda come out at 50%, but this is skewed because of other business lines like FX transactions for those who need to take delivery of currency for asset purchase rather than speculate.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
What do people think of any of these:

 

FXCM

IB

MBT

Dukascopy

dbFX

Gain

Forex.com

Oanda

AmeriTrade

DeltaStock

 

...???

I am currently using Forex.com MT4 platform, and only in demo mode. My live trades are done with the Australian branch of IG Index - IG Markets.

 

But I would not recommend Forex.com for live trades given that all, and I mean ALL of my trades have:

 

* An undue pause prior to the response from their end (no, it is not my computer's latency) This pause can be up to 5 seconds sometimes.

* 8 out of 10 trades are requoted

* While watching price ticks on IG Markets streaming data, Forex.com data does not change.

 

By that I mean I have seen prices change by up to 10 pips, before Forex.com data catches up. Usually prices are tick-for-tick but on occasions when I am very close to an entry, the forex.com platform appears unresponsive. In fact if I had not been stalking the price I wanted on the live platform of IG markets, I would occasionally have missed my entry by around ten pips.

 

That to me is a warning - take your marbles and look for another game.

Don't play with Forex.com

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
...

* While watching price ticks on IG Markets streaming data, Forex.com data does not change.

 

By that I mean I have seen prices change by up to 10 pips, before Forex.com data..

 

A few years ago I noticed that Gain data was very responsive to market moves, while the data of another bucket shop broker lagged terribly, sometimes by a minute or more. I made quite a bit from that lagging broker. Their data feed was slow, but the quotes were executable. Talk about an edge - I was basically able to use Gain as a Time Machine to travel to the future to see where prices were going to be, and then use the lagging broker to travel back in time to buy or sell accordingly. This lasted for about seven trading days. What a good time that was!

 

-optiontimer

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If trading futures, you have more choice: Dorman, IB, PFG, Zaner, Mirus, AMP, Optimus if you are trading systems, etc.

If trading forex, stick to an ECN like IB which trades in the interbank market, with 16 banks. All the others - you trade against your broker and that could be a smart webpage designer, taking the other side of your trades, from his garage! Even FXCM, which is the biggest bucket shop (they trade AGAINST you), does not have a lot of volume. If you trade forex, it is probably because of volume. But you won't find much volume with a bucket shop. Only if you trade in the interbank market. Most "brokers" in forex are not interbank.

Stocks and options: also IB (Interactive Brokers). Interactive brokers incidentally has some of the lowest costs too. However, no tick data with them. Only from 1 minute up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I used for a short period Oanda and FXCM and was fairly satisfied but it was not enough for me to move from UWCFX. I am not a high volume trader but am trading on a regular basis with some months better than the other ones!

 

Best of luck!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If trading futures, you have more choice: Dorman, IB, PFG, Zaner, Mirus, AMP, Optimus if you are trading systems, etc. Interactive brokers incidentally has some of the lowest costs too. However, no tick data with them. Only from 1 minute up.
Anyone can answer this if you are an IB client:

 

Have you found any gapping issues with IB?

 

I am just asking, because of the comment that there is no tick data with IB.

Price can move a long way in 60 seconds - limit up / down for example. If this is not shown on the chart for 60 seconds (maybe I misunderstood) then traders are not to know if their stop -loss / take-profit has been hit or not.

 

A gap may be an uncommon event in any case, but can be costly. It may not make any difference to whether I use IB or not - it's just something I need to understand a little better than I do. After all, one minute is not much when trading dailies.

 

Thanks

 

Ingot

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If trading futures,

.... Interactive brokers incidentally has some of the lowest costs too. However, no tick data with them. Only from 1 minute up.

 

where did you get that information?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Anyone can answer this if you are an IB client:

If this is not shown on the chart for 60 seconds (maybe I misunderstood) then traders are not to know if their stop -loss / take-profit has been hit or not.

 

Their charts are horrible so you wouldn't use them anyway...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For charting with IB, you have 2 free excellent choices:

 

Ninjatrader and MultiCharts DT.

 

With MDT, you can trade directly on the chart or through their price ladder.

 

With NT, you can only chart. Trading off of the chart is not free.

 

IB real-time data is snapshot-based, not transaction-based. In simple terms, this means that you cannot use tick charts or volume charts. However, you will have no problems trading off of minute-based charts. You've got historical price retrieval capability.

 

The smallest price bar you can receive is 5 seconds and real-time data updates about every 0.2 seconds. Another way of thinking about it is that when a bid, ask or last price changes then you will see that price change. What you don't see are all of the trades which occur on an instrument.

 

IB is a one-stop shop for trading virtually any instrument in the world. Getting a real-time tick feed with good charting will set you back around $500 to $1300 a year. The ones yelling the loudest who think that paying between $2 to $5.50 a day to trade using tick or volume charts is expensive should probably ask this question:

 

Name me a small business other than trading which can generate 6 and 7 figure annual incomes and can exist on less than $10 of overhead per business day?

 

Really, you can't beat IB as a charting data provider if you use minute-based charts. If you want another good charting package which works with IB and has a fixed cost ( i.e., no monthly leasing), then Amibroker is an excellent choice.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

IB is a one-stop shop for trading virtually any instrument in the world. Getting a real-time tick feed with good charting will set you back around $500 to $1300 a year.

 

which instruments have you traded with ib? i'm looking to start with equities and then futures. still deciding between ninja or multicharts. can you share more of your experiences about those? really appreciate any info you can provide - thanks.

-mslk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Anyone here trade with MF Global for Futures Fx and Spot Fx.

Maybe you would like to share your exprerience with them here.

 

ive used mfg for futures for years. they are pretty good as youll get institutional service levels - although they may not be the cheapest - they will fight your corner for you at the exchange should something go wrong like on the wrong side of a busted trade.

 

couldnt comment on fx - but then i think 90% of fx 'brokers' are bucket shops

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Do not use AMP brokerage they are low life thieves and they have a bad customer service

 

I had an account with them for only two months they stole $1700 from me

 

If you want a good descent brokerage firm use TransAct

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am referring here futures brokers. I am looking for a new online broker with multiple platforms. By the way just to alert others, I used farr financial who use many names and sites to lure customers with their 99 cent commission gimmick but they are unreliable and plain morons. For example they will charge randomly for platform or for any other imaginable service without any information. They will never ever stick to any fixed rule or contract.

 

So beware of their tricks. Farr financial is based in San Jose CA and use names like go futures, ironbeam and probably more.

 

You will end up getting frustrated with them and their unethical and unruly customer service that will change their stand each time they charge you for no reason.

They will give nonsensical and stupid excuses for the charges. So beware of farr financial and other services offered by them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess there are fewer offerings in the field of futures brokerage. Most are geared for large scale institutionals or CTAs. For individual pro traders there are fewer offerings but now luckily there are many platforms to choose from.

 

I think as long as you have a clear idea n a good plan with experience we can work on any good and fast functioning platform. I have tested many but most are not easy to operative with nimbleness.

Among all firetip was a pretty good platform so any one trading scalp minis etc. may like to try that.

It is now offered by many brokerage houses.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ive used mfg for futures for years. they are pretty good as youll get institutional service levels - although they may not be the cheapest - they will fight your corner for you at the exchange should something go wrong like on the wrong side of a busted trade.

 

couldnt comment on fx - but then i think 90% of fx 'brokers' are bucket shops

 

Thank you for the information :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • also ... and barely on topic... Winners (always*) overpay. Buying the dips is a subscription to the belief that winners win by underpaying - when in actuality winners (inevitably/always*) win by overpaying... it’s amazing the percentage of traders who think winners win by underpaying ... “Winners (always*) overpay.” ...  One way to implement this ‘belief’ is to only reenter when prices have emphatically resumed the 'trend' .   (Fwiw, While “Winners (always*) overpay.” holds true in most endeavors (relationships, business, sports, etc...) - “Winners (always*) overpay.”  is especially true for auctions... continuous auctions included.)
    • re:  "Does it make sense to always buy the dips?  “Buy the dip.”  You hear this all the time in crypto investing trading speculation gambling. [zdo taking some liberties] It refers, of course, to buying more bitcoin (or digital assets) when they go down in price: when the price “dips.” Some people brag about “buying the dip," showing they know better than the crowd. Others “buy the dip” as an investment strategy: they’re getting a bargain. The problem is, buying the dip is a fallacy. You can’t buy the dip, because you can't see the total dip until much later. First, I’ll explain this in a way that will make it simple and obvious to you; then I’ll show you a better way of investing. You Only Know the Dip in Hindsight When people talk about “buying the dip,” what they’re really saying is, “I bought when the price was going down.” " ... example of a dip ... 
    • Date: 19th April 2024. Weekly Commodity Market Update: Oil Prices Correct and Supply Concerns Persist.   The ongoing developments in the Middle East sparked a wave of risk aversion and fueled supply concerns and investors headed for safety. Hopes for imminent rate cuts from the Federal Reserve diminish while attention is now turning towards the demand outlook. The Gold price hit a high of $2417.89 per ounce overnight. Sentiment has already calmed down again and bullion is trading at $2376.50 per ounce as haven flows ease. Oil prices initially moved higher as concern over escalating tensions with the WTI contract hit a session high of $85.508 per barrel overnight, before correcting to currently $81.45 per barrel. Oil Prices Under Pressure Amid Middle East Tensions Last week, commodity indexes showed little movement, with Oil prices undergoing a slight correction. Meanwhile, Gold reached yet another record high, mirroring the upward trend in cocoa prices. Once again today, USOil prices experienced a correction and has remained under pressure, retesting the 50-day EMA at $81.00 as we moving into the weekend. Hence, despite the Israel’s retaliatory strike on Iran, sentiments stabilized following reports suggesting a measured response aimed at avoiding further escalation. Brent crude futures witnessed a more than 4% leap, driven by concerns over potential disruptions to oil supplies in the Middle East, only to subsequently erase all gains. Similarly with USOIL, UKOIL hovers just below $87 per barrel, marginally below Thursday’s closing figures. Nevertheless, volatility is expected to continue in the market as several potential risks loom:   Disruption to the Strait of Hormuz: The possibility of Iran disrupting navigation through the vital shipping lane, is still in play. The Strait of Hormuz serves as the Persian Gulf’s primary route to international waters, with approximately 21 million barrels of oil passing through daily. Recent events, including Iran’s seizure of an Israel-linked container ship, underscore the geopolitical sensitivity of the region. Tougher Sanctions on Iran: Analysts speculate that the US may impose stricter sanctions on Iranian oil exports or intensify enforcement of existing restrictions. With global oil consumption reaching 102 million barrels per day, Iran’s production of 3.3 million barrels remains significant. Recent actions targeting Venezuelan oil highlight the potential for increased pressure on Iranian exports. OPEC Output Increases: Despite the desire for higher prices, OPEC members such as Saudi Arabia and Russia have constrained output in recent years. However, sustained crude prices above $100 per barrel could prompt concerns about demand and incentivize increased production. The OPEC may opt to boost oil output should tensions escalate further and prices surge. Ukraine Conflict: Amidst the focus on the Middle East, markets overlooking Russia’s actions in Ukraine. Potential retaliatory strikes by Kyiv on Russian oil infrastructure could impact exports, adding further complexity to global oil markets.   Technical Analysis USOIL is marking one of the steepest weekly declines witnessed this year after a brief period of consolidation. The breach below the pivotal support level of 84.00, coupled with the descent below the mid of the 4-month upchannel, signals a possible shift in market sentiment towards a bearish trend reversal. Adding to the bearish outlook are indications such as the downward slope in the RSI. However, the asset still hold above the 50-day EMA which coincides also with the mid of last year’s downleg, with key support zone at $80.00-$81.00. If it breaks this support zone, the focus may shift towards the 200-day EMA and 38.2% Fib. level at $77.60-$79.00. Conversely, a rejection of the $81 level and an upside potential could see the price returning back to $84.00. A break of the latter could trigger the attention back to the December’s resistance, situated around $86.60. A breakthrough above this level could ignite a stronger rally towards the $89.20-$90.00 zone. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business. Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar. Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding on how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE! Click HERE to READ more Market news. Michalis Efthymiou Market Analyst HMarkets Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past perfrmance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in FX and CFDs products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • Date: 18th April 2024. Market News – Stock markets benefit from Dollar correction. Economic Indicators & Central Banks:   Technical buying, bargain hunting, and risk aversion helped Treasuries rally and unwind recent losses. Yields dropped from the recent 2024 highs. Asian stock markets strengthened, as the US Dollar corrected in the wake of comments from Japan’s currency chief Masato Kanda, who said G7 countries continue to stress that excessive swings and disorderly moves in the foreign exchange market were harmful for economies. US Stockpiles expanded to 10-month high. The data overshadowed the impact of geopolitical tensions in the Middle East as traders await Israel’s response to Iran’s unprecedented recent attack. President Joe Biden called for higher tariffs on imports of Chinese steel and aluminum.   Financial Markets Performance:   The USDIndex stumbled, falling to 105.66 at the end of the day from the intraday high of 106.48. It lost ground against most of its G10 peers. There wasn’t much on the calendar to provide new direction. USDJPY lows retesting the 154 bottom! NOT an intervention yet. BoJ/MoF USDJPY intervention happens when there is more than 100+ pip move in seconds, not 50 pips. USOIL slumped by 3% near $82, as US crude inventories rose by 2.7 million barrels last week, hitting the highest level since last June, while gauges of fuel demand declined. Gold strengthened as the dollar weakened and bullion is trading at $2378.44 per ounce. Market Trends:   Wall Street closed in the red after opening with small corrective gains. The NASDAQ underperformed, slumping -1.15%, with the S&P500 -0.58% lower, while the Dow lost -0.12. The Nikkei closed 0.2% higher, the Hang Seng gained more than 1. European and US futures are finding buyers. A gauge of global chip stocks and AI bellwether Nvidia Corp. have both fallen into a technical correction. The TMSC reported its first profit rise in a year, after strong AI demand revived growth at the world’s biggest contract chipmaker. The main chipmaker to Apple Inc. and Nvidia Corp. recorded a 9% rise in net income, beating estimates. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business. Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar. Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding on how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE! Click HERE to READ more Market news. Andria Pichidi Market Analyst HFMarkets Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in FX and CFDs products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • Date: 17th April 2024. Market News – Appetite for risk-taking remains weak. Economic Indicators & Central Banks:   Stocks, Treasury yields and US Dollar stay firmed. Fed Chair Powell added to the recent sell off. His slightly more hawkish tone further priced out chances for any imminent action and the timing of a cut was pushed out further. He suggested if higher inflation does persist, the Fed will hold rates steady “for as long as needed.” Implied Fed Fund: There remains no real chance for a move on May 1 and at their intraday highs the June implied funds rate future showed only 5 bps, while July reflected only 10 bps. And a full 25 bps was not priced in until November, with 38 bps in cuts seen for 2024. US & EU Economies Diverging: Lagarde says ECB is moving toward rate cuts – if there are no major shocks. UK March CPI inflation falls less than expected. Output price inflation has started to nudge higher, despite another decline in input prices. Together with yesterday’s higher than expected wage numbers, the data will add to the arguments of the hawks at the BoE, which remain very reluctant to contemplate rate cuts. Canada CPI rose 0.6% in March, double the 0.3% February increase BUT core eased. The doors are still open for a possible cut at the next BoC meeting on June 5. IMF revised up its global growth forecast for 2024 with inflation easing, in its new World Economic Outlook. This is consistent with a global soft landing, according to the report. Financial Markets Performance:   USDJPY also inched up to 154.67 on expectations the BoJ will remain accommodative and as the market challenges a perceived 155 red line for MoF intervention. USOIL prices slipped -0.15% to $84.20 per barrel. Gold rose 0.24% to $2389.11 per ounce, a new record closing high as geopolitical risks overshadowed the impacts of rising rates and the stronger dollar. Market Trends:   Wall Street waffled either side of unchanged on the day amid dimming rate cut potential, rising yields, and earnings. The major indexes closed mixed with the Dow up 0.17%, while the S&P500 and NASDAQ lost -0.21% and -0.12%, respectively. Asian stock markets mostly corrected again, with Japanese bourses underperforming and the Nikkei down -1.3%. Mainland China bourses were a notable exception and the CSI 300 rallied 1.4%, but the MSCI Asia Pacific index came close to erasing the gains for this year. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business. Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar. Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding on how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE! Click HERE to READ more Market news. Andria Pichidi Market Analyst HFMarkets Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in FX and CFDs products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.vvvvvvv
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.