Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

maxima

High End Data Feeds... Anybody?

Recommended Posts

In other thread I tried to ask Urma on what his experiense with data feeds above retail quality is... However the answer was Bite me!... I chose not to bite but rather ask around. I know Urma is not the only trader who saw real trading desks. Also I have a suspicion that he has no idea what am I asking about.... Anyway.

 

What I am trying to find out is - how CME distributes the market data - trades and quotes.

 

Is there one single level of quantity/quality of data distribution or there might be several tiers?

 

Do companies like CQG, TT and DTN for instance have the same input data on their servers as say Lehman or Merrill?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
In other thread I tried to ask Urma on what his experiense with data feeds above retail quality is... However the answer was Bite me!... I chose not to bite but rather ask around. I know Urma is not the only trader who saw real trading desks. Also I have a suspicion that he has no idea what am I asking about.... Anyway.

 

What I am trying to find out is - how CME distributes the market data - trades and quotes.

 

Is there one single level of quantity/quality of data distribution or there might be several tiers?

 

Do companies like CQG, TT and DTN for instance have the same input data on their servers as say Lehman or Merrill?

 

What a great way to start a post, by dragging non-sense from another thread. This isn't ET, maybe you got confused :roll eyes:

 

As to your question, I think it depends on what you want to do. CQG is definitely one of the best, and an old member (not sure if he still posts, I forgot his name) used CQG at his firm and loved it. As far as quality goes, I think you already know the answer to that, you won't get the same level feed from Zen-Fire as you would TS or E-Signal.

 

As far as data input goes, I'm not really sure what you mean by that. As far as big shops that do a lot of HFT and provide liquidity - they will obviously get their data directly from the CME since it all comes down to speed at that point. I don't think the CME would limit that information.

 

You can check out this link and it might be of some help if by "input" you mean something completely different.

 

Information for Distributors

 

And then theres this...

 

CME E-quotes

 

 

Hope it helps.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
What a great way to start a post, by dragging non-sense from another thread. This isn't ET, maybe you got confused :roll eyes:

 

As to your question, I think it depends on what you want to do. CQG is definitely one of the best, and an old member (not sure if he still posts, I forgot his name) used CQG at his firm and loved it. As far as quality goes, I think you already know the answer to that, you won't get the same level feed from Zen-Fire as you would TS or E-Signal.

 

As far as data input goes, I'm not really sure what you mean by that. As far as big shops that do a lot of HFT and provide liquidity - they will obviously get their data directly from the CME since it all comes down to speed at that point. I don't think the CME would limit that information.

 

You can check out this link and it might be of some help if by "input" you mean something completely different.

 

Information for Distributors

 

And then theres this...

 

CME E-quotes

 

 

Hope it helps.

 

How can you possibly know that James?

 

As a matter of fact, just last weekend or the weekend before Zenfire was showing trades on their data on a Saturday on the CL (when the market is closed)...

 

Please show some evidence of Zenfire's feed being superior to others; otherwise you are just giving an opinion w/ no basis of fact.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In my experience. Zenfire is far far far far superior to Tradestation. Far superior. Esignal I have not used for a while (probably a couple of years) last time I did it could seriously lag in fast markets. Guess it islikely improved now.. Zen does use UDP but that is not really an issue if your infrastructure is good and poor infrastructure will effect any feed. Zen and ninja I am not so sure about. Sadly seems like the ball has been dropped with NT7.0 so I guess I wont be looking at it again until 7.5 whenever that is.

 

I guess it all depends what you mean by "high end"The two big things are timeliness and completeness. The method I am currently using (and have used in the past) are fairly robust (robust in respect to the quality of the data that they require). Having said that I am thinking about rolling in a couple of extras (order flow and inventory type stuff) for this I am leaning towards Zen or TT for live data with DTNIQ for history.

 

Edit brown I think James was saying Zen is inferior. I did not keep my test results I just monitored in real time with code that recorded differences in feeds. Zen was clearly the most timely and complete. Multicharts is quite a good platform to compare feeds.

 

Edit2 if you use different platforms for different feeds you obviously have another variable. For example if using ninja/zen and .net does garbage collection that will cause a hiccup that is clearly not due to the feed.

Edited by BlowFish

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Inferior or superior, doesn't matter - just curious how anyone would know this. If the issue is based on lag, that's one thing but not necessarily what defines a feed better than others as it could purely be on your end.

 

I'm just curious how one defines a feed better than others and substantiate it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry guys... I didnt ask who is superior or not. And I am certainly not interested in Zen nor IQFeed nor eSignal less of all in TS.

 

Let me put it simple - will Thompson or eSpeed have MORE data than DTN NxCore or CQG...

 

Can one have MORE granular ticks or SOONER than others from CME ....

 

The other version of the question - do some shops have advantage over others?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Inferior or superior, doesn't matter - just curious how anyone would know this. If the issue is based on lag, that's one thing but not necessarily what defines a feed better than others as it could purely be on your end.

 

I'm just curious how one defines a feed better than others and substantiate it.

 

As I said before the criteria I used was timeliness and completeness. I also gave an idea of how I tested those (some rudimentary code to measure delta time). My end is pretty good though only 20 meg (cant justify 50 meg beyond bragging rights) having said that the lag across it will be the same for the data feeds I am comparing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
How can you possibly know that James?

 

As a matter of fact, just last weekend or the weekend before Zenfire was showing trades on their data on a Saturday on the CL (when the market is closed)...

 

Please show some evidence of Zenfire's feed being superior to others; otherwise you are just giving an opinion w/ no basis of fact.

 

It comes from experience, I always felt TS was terrible. Maybe it was my connection, but I was never too happy with it. If you'd like, I'm sure I can find some data to back it up. Also, from various posts I've read on this site I don't seem to be the only one with this opinion.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

dont worry they wont. cos they dont know....

 

I found the answers anyway. at the degree I needed of course (nobody knows everything in these muddy waters)...

 

But I wont tell :haha: I must be Urma twin brother! :rofl:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
sorry guys... I didnt ask who is superior or not. And I am certainly not interested in Zen nor IQFeed nor eSignal less of all in TS.

 

Let me put it simple - will Thompson or eSpeed have MORE data than DTN NxCore or CQG...

 

Can one have MORE granular ticks or SOONER than others from CME ....

 

The other version of the question - do some shops have advantage over others?

 

Almost certainly some shops will, but you would have to look at their overall infrastructure. I guess you are talking about execution engine also? With the direct connections that you mention location will start to be a factor too. I am not sure how circuits are typically delivered in the USA nowadays? Quite a while since I did work there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
According to the official CME response they wont.

 

Then that information is incorrect. One of the largest factors in latency is location, it is proportional to distance. That is why the HFT guys put there kit in the same data centre as the exchange. You have been mislead. The CME does have a policy of using the same length cable to colo partners regardless of where there rack is physically located within the data centre, perhaps that is what they are talking about? (I still bet goldman have a shorter link)

 

Edit: Another thought, what can the CME possibly know about a shops infrastructure? At best they can say that they make the trade data available to the data providers at the same time. You certainly have been mislead or misunderstand what you have been told.

Edited by BlowFish

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I just noticed you are in London, trade Liffe (or maybe Eurex), The boutiques in London are going to be way behind anyway (until data can travel faster than the speed of light through glass).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No I have not. You were too involved in discussion of superiority that missed the question completely.

 

The question was - if any one have an advantage in receiving data from CME. There are none.

 

I have response from CME and it can be challenged in court. I hope you dont think that complete retards work at CME that they will spread false information.

 

The short story is : everyone who has direct connect through FIX/FAST has equal capabilities.

 

What you are talking is how the connected entity handle the connection. If you have no money you will get your data later than those who has better hardware. But you CAN have it same fast as them... This is already outside of CME and this was not the question.

 

If you imagine CME as water distributor then all pipes for users are identical. If user brought a hose from garden to connect he will get less water per hour than thouse who brought large metal pipes..

 

I hope this will explain...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I just noticed you are in London, trade Liffe (or maybe Eurex), The boutiques in London are going to be way behind anyway (until data can travel faster than the speed of light through glass).
even if I was in Zimbabwe it doesnt change the question.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You are wrong. The size of the pipes between CME data providers, brokers etc. that are colocated are the same. The latency will come between the data provider and the shop. How can the CME guarantee infrastructure between Thompson and the prop firms they have contracts with? They can not. I am staggered.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
even if I was in Zimbabwe it doesnt change the question.

 

Yes it does. I answered it a few posts back. It depends on the infrastructure that you employ and your data provider employ.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok.. One last try.. the question was - is there a possibility that one shop as you call them CAN have better connection (in quality / quantity) that other CAN NOT.

 

I never asked about latency between CME and SHOP.... And less of all I am interested in latency between shop and customers.

 

And if I were archbishop of Zimbabwe what does the difference between connections latencies in whole world make to me personally??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

BlowFish, please try to understand that you are answering to a question which maxima never asked ! He is not interested in what you are telling.

 

He just wanted to know -

Can one have MORE granular ticks or SOONER than others from CME ....

 

I think if maxima would have highlighted the "FROM" CME part, then you would have got the point.

 

CME is giving equal opportunity from its end, now what kind of infrastructure you have arranged for taking advantage of that, depends entirely upon you. But CME is not favoring any particular party here.

 

maxima, if I am wrong in my understanding then please correct.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
BlowFish, please try to understand that you are answering to a question which maxima never asked ! He is not interested in what you are telling.

 

He just wanted to know -

Can one have MORE granular ticks or SOONER than others from CME ....

I think if maxima would have highlighted the "FROM" CME part, then you would have got the point.

 

CME is giving equal opportunity from its end, now what kind of infrastructure you have arranged for taking advantage of that, depends entirely upon you. But CME is not favoring any particular party here.

 

maxima, if I am wrong in my understanding then please correct.

 

That is exactly what I endeavoured to answer. Let me try one more time. Yes you can. It depends on the infrastructure of the data provider, and the infrastructure of the shop. (That was one of his questions will different shops be better for data timeliness and the answer is yes, definitely)

 

CME provide data to the data providers all is equal to that point of distribution. The data providers differentiate themselves by there infrastructure.

 

Put as simply as I can .....Latency α (Data provider & shop infrastructure).

 

Latency is what determines 'sooner'. It is measured in units of time. Latency is determined by infrastructure. Different providers (and shops) infrastructure are certainly not the same.

 

When you are looking at millisecond magnitudes there are lots of factors. Location of equipment is every bit as important as 'capacity'. All other things being equal (they wont be) then a shop next to where the exchange/data providers ticker plant is will have an advantage over one further afield.

 

Just trying to help here, I do have experience of these things (though this being the internet everyone is an expert aren't they :))

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry BlowFish... this is all my fault...

 

I had to clarify = by "one"/"you" etc I meant not end-user and not literally you, I meant companies accessing CME with direct access through FIX/FAST connection.

 

I am sorry again I am going to unsubscribe from this thread because I have my answers and this discussion is not helping anyone.

 

If you need some latency calculations for practical use just PM...

 

Cheers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
sorry BlowFish... this is all my fault...

 

I had to clarify = by "one"/"you" etc I meant not end-user and not literally you, I meant companies accessing CME with direct access through FIX/FAST connection.

 

I am sorry again I am going to unsubscribe from this thread because I have my answers and this discussion is not helping anyone.

 

If you need some latency calculations for practical use just PM...

 

Cheers

 

Glad you are sorted :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • also ... and barely on topic... Winners (always*) overpay. Buying the dips is a subscription to the belief that winners win by underpaying - when in actuality winners (inevitably/always*) win by overpaying... it’s amazing the percentage of traders who think winners win by underpaying ... “Winners (always*) overpay.” ...  One way to implement this ‘belief’ is to only reenter when prices have emphatically resumed the 'trend' .   (Fwiw, While “Winners (always*) overpay.” holds true in most endeavors (relationships, business, sports, etc...) - “Winners (always*) overpay.”  is especially true for auctions... continuous auctions included.)
    • re:  "Does it make sense to always buy the dips?  “Buy the dip.”  You hear this all the time in crypto investing trading speculation gambling. [zdo taking some liberties] It refers, of course, to buying more bitcoin (or digital assets) when they go down in price: when the price “dips.” Some people brag about “buying the dip," showing they know better than the crowd. Others “buy the dip” as an investment strategy: they’re getting a bargain. The problem is, buying the dip is a fallacy. You can’t buy the dip, because you can't see the total dip until much later. First, I’ll explain this in a way that will make it simple and obvious to you; then I’ll show you a better way of investing. You Only Know the Dip in Hindsight When people talk about “buying the dip,” what they’re really saying is, “I bought when the price was going down.” " ... example of a dip ... 
    • Date: 19th April 2024. Weekly Commodity Market Update: Oil Prices Correct and Supply Concerns Persist.   The ongoing developments in the Middle East sparked a wave of risk aversion and fueled supply concerns and investors headed for safety. Hopes for imminent rate cuts from the Federal Reserve diminish while attention is now turning towards the demand outlook. The Gold price hit a high of $2417.89 per ounce overnight. Sentiment has already calmed down again and bullion is trading at $2376.50 per ounce as haven flows ease. Oil prices initially moved higher as concern over escalating tensions with the WTI contract hit a session high of $85.508 per barrel overnight, before correcting to currently $81.45 per barrel. Oil Prices Under Pressure Amid Middle East Tensions Last week, commodity indexes showed little movement, with Oil prices undergoing a slight correction. Meanwhile, Gold reached yet another record high, mirroring the upward trend in cocoa prices. Once again today, USOil prices experienced a correction and has remained under pressure, retesting the 50-day EMA at $81.00 as we moving into the weekend. Hence, despite the Israel’s retaliatory strike on Iran, sentiments stabilized following reports suggesting a measured response aimed at avoiding further escalation. Brent crude futures witnessed a more than 4% leap, driven by concerns over potential disruptions to oil supplies in the Middle East, only to subsequently erase all gains. Similarly with USOIL, UKOIL hovers just below $87 per barrel, marginally below Thursday’s closing figures. Nevertheless, volatility is expected to continue in the market as several potential risks loom:   Disruption to the Strait of Hormuz: The possibility of Iran disrupting navigation through the vital shipping lane, is still in play. The Strait of Hormuz serves as the Persian Gulf’s primary route to international waters, with approximately 21 million barrels of oil passing through daily. Recent events, including Iran’s seizure of an Israel-linked container ship, underscore the geopolitical sensitivity of the region. Tougher Sanctions on Iran: Analysts speculate that the US may impose stricter sanctions on Iranian oil exports or intensify enforcement of existing restrictions. With global oil consumption reaching 102 million barrels per day, Iran’s production of 3.3 million barrels remains significant. Recent actions targeting Venezuelan oil highlight the potential for increased pressure on Iranian exports. OPEC Output Increases: Despite the desire for higher prices, OPEC members such as Saudi Arabia and Russia have constrained output in recent years. However, sustained crude prices above $100 per barrel could prompt concerns about demand and incentivize increased production. The OPEC may opt to boost oil output should tensions escalate further and prices surge. Ukraine Conflict: Amidst the focus on the Middle East, markets overlooking Russia’s actions in Ukraine. Potential retaliatory strikes by Kyiv on Russian oil infrastructure could impact exports, adding further complexity to global oil markets.   Technical Analysis USOIL is marking one of the steepest weekly declines witnessed this year after a brief period of consolidation. The breach below the pivotal support level of 84.00, coupled with the descent below the mid of the 4-month upchannel, signals a possible shift in market sentiment towards a bearish trend reversal. Adding to the bearish outlook are indications such as the downward slope in the RSI. However, the asset still hold above the 50-day EMA which coincides also with the mid of last year’s downleg, with key support zone at $80.00-$81.00. If it breaks this support zone, the focus may shift towards the 200-day EMA and 38.2% Fib. level at $77.60-$79.00. Conversely, a rejection of the $81 level and an upside potential could see the price returning back to $84.00. A break of the latter could trigger the attention back to the December’s resistance, situated around $86.60. A breakthrough above this level could ignite a stronger rally towards the $89.20-$90.00 zone. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business. Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar. Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding on how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE! Click HERE to READ more Market news. Michalis Efthymiou Market Analyst HMarkets Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past perfrmance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in FX and CFDs products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • Date: 18th April 2024. Market News – Stock markets benefit from Dollar correction. Economic Indicators & Central Banks:   Technical buying, bargain hunting, and risk aversion helped Treasuries rally and unwind recent losses. Yields dropped from the recent 2024 highs. Asian stock markets strengthened, as the US Dollar corrected in the wake of comments from Japan’s currency chief Masato Kanda, who said G7 countries continue to stress that excessive swings and disorderly moves in the foreign exchange market were harmful for economies. US Stockpiles expanded to 10-month high. The data overshadowed the impact of geopolitical tensions in the Middle East as traders await Israel’s response to Iran’s unprecedented recent attack. President Joe Biden called for higher tariffs on imports of Chinese steel and aluminum.   Financial Markets Performance:   The USDIndex stumbled, falling to 105.66 at the end of the day from the intraday high of 106.48. It lost ground against most of its G10 peers. There wasn’t much on the calendar to provide new direction. USDJPY lows retesting the 154 bottom! NOT an intervention yet. BoJ/MoF USDJPY intervention happens when there is more than 100+ pip move in seconds, not 50 pips. USOIL slumped by 3% near $82, as US crude inventories rose by 2.7 million barrels last week, hitting the highest level since last June, while gauges of fuel demand declined. Gold strengthened as the dollar weakened and bullion is trading at $2378.44 per ounce. Market Trends:   Wall Street closed in the red after opening with small corrective gains. The NASDAQ underperformed, slumping -1.15%, with the S&P500 -0.58% lower, while the Dow lost -0.12. The Nikkei closed 0.2% higher, the Hang Seng gained more than 1. European and US futures are finding buyers. A gauge of global chip stocks and AI bellwether Nvidia Corp. have both fallen into a technical correction. The TMSC reported its first profit rise in a year, after strong AI demand revived growth at the world’s biggest contract chipmaker. The main chipmaker to Apple Inc. and Nvidia Corp. recorded a 9% rise in net income, beating estimates. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business. Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar. Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding on how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE! Click HERE to READ more Market news. Andria Pichidi Market Analyst HFMarkets Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in FX and CFDs products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • Date: 17th April 2024. Market News – Appetite for risk-taking remains weak. Economic Indicators & Central Banks:   Stocks, Treasury yields and US Dollar stay firmed. Fed Chair Powell added to the recent sell off. His slightly more hawkish tone further priced out chances for any imminent action and the timing of a cut was pushed out further. He suggested if higher inflation does persist, the Fed will hold rates steady “for as long as needed.” Implied Fed Fund: There remains no real chance for a move on May 1 and at their intraday highs the June implied funds rate future showed only 5 bps, while July reflected only 10 bps. And a full 25 bps was not priced in until November, with 38 bps in cuts seen for 2024. US & EU Economies Diverging: Lagarde says ECB is moving toward rate cuts – if there are no major shocks. UK March CPI inflation falls less than expected. Output price inflation has started to nudge higher, despite another decline in input prices. Together with yesterday’s higher than expected wage numbers, the data will add to the arguments of the hawks at the BoE, which remain very reluctant to contemplate rate cuts. Canada CPI rose 0.6% in March, double the 0.3% February increase BUT core eased. The doors are still open for a possible cut at the next BoC meeting on June 5. IMF revised up its global growth forecast for 2024 with inflation easing, in its new World Economic Outlook. This is consistent with a global soft landing, according to the report. Financial Markets Performance:   USDJPY also inched up to 154.67 on expectations the BoJ will remain accommodative and as the market challenges a perceived 155 red line for MoF intervention. USOIL prices slipped -0.15% to $84.20 per barrel. Gold rose 0.24% to $2389.11 per ounce, a new record closing high as geopolitical risks overshadowed the impacts of rising rates and the stronger dollar. Market Trends:   Wall Street waffled either side of unchanged on the day amid dimming rate cut potential, rising yields, and earnings. The major indexes closed mixed with the Dow up 0.17%, while the S&P500 and NASDAQ lost -0.21% and -0.12%, respectively. Asian stock markets mostly corrected again, with Japanese bourses underperforming and the Nikkei down -1.3%. Mainland China bourses were a notable exception and the CSI 300 rallied 1.4%, but the MSCI Asia Pacific index came close to erasing the gains for this year. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business. Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar. Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding on how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE! Click HERE to READ more Market news. Andria Pichidi Market Analyst HFMarkets Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in FX and CFDs products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.vvvvvvv
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.