Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

daedalus

Range Bar Errors in OEC?

Recommended Posts

I'm new to range bars and to be honest i've never used them on another platform so I don't know if this is normal and how they work or if there is some kind of algo problem in OEC trader.

 

My question is this: Is it normal for say a 5 pip range bar chart (4 tick bars, the 5th tick in a given direction should start the new bar right?) to have some bars that are 4 ticks in legnth and others that are 5? Doesn't that kind of defeat the purpose?

 

I've attached a picture of what I mean. Is this just typical range chart behavior or is it an OEC bug?

 

Thanks for the help gents!

1.jpg.06a6dae99d6b829e38569e6c3e0bc363.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If a bar is forming and has range of 4 pips and a trade suddenly happens outside the 5 range then it isn't possible to have a 6 or 7 pip bar because the cutoff is 5 and so it has to be a new bar.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Daedalus you are correct. I've been after OEC for months to fix this. Last I heard from Chris at OEC was, "I am still working with our development team and project manager to see if we can implement the same functionality as eSignal and Sierra Chart. I do not see this being implemented in the immediate future as this project needs approval first."

 

If more people make OEC aware of this, maybe it will get fixed sooner. The beauty of range bars is you know exactly where the opening tick of the next bar will be once current bar has traded it's full range (next tick above current bar high or next tick below current bar low will start the next bar). But with this bug, you have no idea if current bar will end a tick short or go the specified range. :crap:

 

A couple months ago in early communications, OEC said that according to the development team, this is not a bug. The range bars in the OEC platform can have varying lengths. I then asked if the developers could explain the logic to me how bars are currently created but I've not heard back on this.

 

Attached are a couple examples of OEC vs. eSignal charts I have sent them. The best one has 4 charts in 1 picture showing a 1-min and 4-tick range chart side by side with eSignal data.

CLRangeChart.thumb.jpg.9ce35b6a10a92e234fff75dee8fa420d.jpg

DataDiscrepancies.thumb.png.ec7ba83fd02582cdd9f6c88bd270339a.png

RangeChart.JPG.7e99fe736b9de54662999027b2dd6d14.JPG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Tresor
If more people make OEC aware of this, maybe it will get fixed sooner.

 

If OEC's improper charting is given priority over other issues reported to them earlier, then they will never fix their data feed.

 

I hope OEC give priority to fixing their data feed first so that traders who use professional third party charting software could trade via them.

 

If the data is fixed they might focus on fixing their charting, which sucks indeed not only when it comes to range or tick bars.

 

Regards

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll send OEC a nice email requesting this be addressed. I thought I might have been understanding the logic wrong but if its a platform issue that's unacceptable. I mean, this isn't a beta release of some functionality or something, its their full release and their charts don't even function as they should.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As with many things in data reporting, there isn't always a standard is looks like.

 

Here's what I was able to get regarding this issue:

 

Bottom line: It is not a bug. There are several implementations of range bars. It seems OEC is using one that differs from eSignal and Sierra.

 

Is OEC's implementation correct? That is open for discussion as pointed out here.

 

Could OEC conform to how eSignal and Sierra reports? Yes, if approved.

 

One other thing to note is OEC doesn’t fill gaps with fake ticks.

I would suggest that if you would like the data represented according to how eSignal and Sierra presents the data, send a support ticket expressing your desire.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If OEC's improper charting is given priority over other issues reported to them earlier, then they will never fix their data feed.

 

I hope OEC give priority to fixing their data feed first so that traders who use professional third party charting software could trade via them.

 

If the data is fixed they might focus on fixing their charting, which sucks indeed not only when it comes to range or tick bars.

 

Regards

 

I am not sure why you would bother dealing at all with OEC if you weren't satisfied with their service/charts/etc. If the current value I find in using OEC wasn't there, I would go find one of the other many brokers out there. No reason to waste time fighting with a broker when there is money to be made.

 

Brownsfan, you are consistently willing to provide feedback and help with people's OEC issues including my own. Thanks for the free help.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
As with many things in data reporting, there isn't always a standard is looks like.

 

Here's what I was able to get regarding this issue:

 

Bottom line: It is not a bug. There are several implementations of range bars. It seems OEC is using one that differs from eSignal and Sierra.

 

Is OEC's implementation correct? That is open for discussion as pointed out here.

 

Could OEC conform to how eSignal and Sierra reports? Yes, if approved.

 

One other thing to note is OEC doesn’t fill gaps with fake ticks.

I would suggest that if you would like the data represented according to how eSignal and Sierra presents the data, send a support ticket expressing your desire.

 

 

There are several different implementations of range bars? Are there several different implementations of minute bars as well? Would it make sense to load a 5 minute chart, and have some bars that are 4 minutes and others that are 6? Range bars are understood everywhere in the world to be a chart where each bar is the same number of ticks. OEC doesn't use "fake ticks" to fill gaps? Well there is part of the problem. The other part seems to be a technological incompetence. Range bars such as those in the examples above are useless. If range bars are important to you, daedalus, then do as Dinero suggested and move on.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
There are several different implementations of range bars? Are there several different implementations of minute bars as well? Would it make sense to load a 5 minute chart, and have some bars that are 4 minutes and others that are 6? Range bars are understood everywhere in the world to be a chart where each bar is the same number of ticks. OEC doesn't use "fake ticks" to fill gaps? Well there is part of the problem. The other part seems to be a technological incompetence. Range bars such as those in the examples above are useless. If range bars are important to you, daedalus, then do as Dinero suggested and move on.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

 

Once again, I am simply the messenger.

 

There was a question/problem, I took time out of my day to get the answer and then came back here to present it to the forum. I even offered a suggestion of what to do if the current construction is not suitable.

 

And I do all of this out of the generosity of my heart (ie for FREE) b/c there are some good people here that I try to get information to. I realize that some guys are on sim or have small accounts that perhaps getting to the bottom of a technical issue like this may take awhile or may not get resolved. I sent a few emails and then came back w/ the answer for you guys.

 

If the answer is not suitable, you as a trader have a decision to make.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Once again, I am simply the messenger.

 

No problem, Brownie. I wasn't criticizing you, and I understood that you were simply relaying OEC's explanation. I just find their explanation ridiculous. A range bar chart is constructed of bars of equal tick counts. OEC's explanation seems to imply that the definition of a range bar chart is one of opinion rather than fact. I agree with you, and said as much when I said that if range bars are important to a trader, OEC is not the place for that trader to trade.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Edited by thalestrader

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
No problem, Brownie. I wasn't criticizing you, and I understood that you were simply relaying OEC's explanation. I just find their explanation ridiculous. A range bar chart is constructed of bars of equal tick counts. OEC's explanation seems to imply that the definition of a range bar chart is one of opinion rather than fact. I agree with you, and said as much when I said that if range bars are important to a trader, OEC is not the place for that trader to trade.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

 

Right. I do not use range bars, so it's a non-issue for myself. But if it's a deal breaker and OEC is not constructing them as you expect, then you have a choice to make - use them as is or find a new place to trade.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All ! I have that problem with range bar : If I choose 4pips bar for example the chart make 4pips but it doesn't one bar As it should be it chart 3 of 4 bar in the same price range. The problem start to appearance before at 28/03/10. after I reinstalled my windows XP. Was anybody experience same problem ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If a new bar needs a price a level that is gapped over, of course the range charts will have one less than what the user specified. How do you expect the chart to show a price level that hasn't been traded at?

 

Happens more than you think. If you are trading oil and you need 80.10 to trade and make a new bar and it goes from 80.09 to 80.11, what would you really like the chart to do?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

have just looked at a few charts on mine - looks AOK at a simple check using ten pips range bar on a few charts - 6E, 6A, using the latest version updated on Monday.

The only thing I noticed (as I have just closed down) is that some bars are equal, in which case I would have thought a new bar should NOT have been drawn if the highs and lows of two bars next to each other are the same?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear trader273 ! Thanks for the attention !

Ok maybe I was not enough understandably but there are the picture. In addition as I mentioned this problem didn't appear in the past ,it began appear now after re-installation my windows . So The example with OIL is not exactly appropriate

Range22.doc

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Dear trader273 ! Thanks for the attention !

Ok maybe I was not enough understandably but there are the picture. In addition as I mentioned this problem didn't appear in the past ,it began appear now after re-installation my windows . So The example with OIL is not exactly appropriate

 

Ok, I see now. People were talking about two different things.

 

I understand your problem and the chart that you have isnt correct, that's for sure. As to why it's wrong, I have no idea. I think I found the same time frame as your chart and mine looks correct. Don't know if its a computer issue on your end or a sim vs live data feed thing. Best bet is to ask OEC directly.

 

augoyt.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yea i just confirmed with a friend that there seems to be a different data feed going out from the demo vs. live.

 

on 3.4.0.8 demo there are constant range bars, live feeds its different.

 

This only pisses me off for the fact that as traders we try and keep things consistent in our approaches and the data feed's OEC is providing aren't even all the same in house? WTF?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It must be a different feed as the problem is affecting the demo accounts only and demo 3.4 didn’t update lately.

Hard to tell what’s going on, it’ll take time before OEC make it right, in the meantime I can’t use the demos anymore.

 

Shouldn’t be so hard to get it right:

Range Bar charts have the following characteristics:

• Each bar is the same height because the range is constant.

• The close of a bar is always at the high or low of the bar.

• The open of a bar is always one tick below or above the close of the preceding bar.

• The time period covered by each bar varies. As based on range.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Couple things here fellas:

 

1) Demo is just that - demo. It's there to test the software out. It's not meant to replicate production verbatim.

 

2) As was stated previously, OEC has taken the stance of NOT filling bad ticks on range bars. Which means....

 

You have a 10 range chart on the CL.

Your high is 80.10.

So would assume your low is 80.00.

And when price is moving from point A to point B, it will be.

HOWEVER, when price is at 80.01 and the NEXT print is 79.99 there is an 'issue'. OEC has chosen to not give you a fake print that never happened (80.00 in this example).

This is why you will see range bars that are not always equal in size on OEC.

 

And to be honest, I can't fault them in this after researching this more. Do you want them to give you fake prints? I can just imagine what the forums would say when it would be found out that OEC is backfilling w/ non-existent prints on range bars for the sake of making the range bars even...

 

So the range bars are set this way in OEC and if that is unacceptable, you have alternatives out there. You just have to decide do you want true prints only or fake, back filling prints as well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

All that is going to get very complicated and painfull for those who use constant range bar charts.

1- I use range bars everyday and even if the display seems to be faulty using some symbols and/or timeframes

( as reported by post #1) I am quite happy to use 2pips and 8pis range bars for the ES in the current format.

2- The demo (3.4) is the program I’m paying for and I’m not supposed to play the guinea pig to implement any change. The demo must be as good as the production as it is the one I use for strategies.

3- I don’t mind if 3.5 is not perfect as in development.

4- A change (in 3.4) could be needed to fix the current problem as described in the previous posts re: bars not having the same length.

5- the fault I reported in post #19 describe a different story where you can see that there is multiplication of bars that clogged the chart and as the result stuffed up your chart and indicators so badly that it is unpraticable. If ‘1pips’ is selected the platform crashes.

6- I’ve reported the demo bug to OEC the answer is:

The range bars have been modified to match Trade Stations "momentum" range bars. This will be released in the live environment in the near future.

 

My point is: The range bar should be as stated in post #21

Range Bar charts have the following characteristics:

• Each bar is the same height because the range is constant.

• The close of a bar is always at the high or low of the bar.

• The open of a bar is always one tick below or above the close of the preceding bar.

• The time period covered by each bar varies. As based on range.

 

If OEC wants to add something and give the choice to their customers I’m very pleased with that approach. But OEC should not implement any replacements that can affect the trading methodology of their clients without warning or consultation.

 

I look at the Demo and my charts were so weird I nearly fall over, something is very wrong here the sooner OEC realise it, the better for everybody.

I’ve been supportive to OEC; in this case I must admit I’m very disappointed.

Edited by Trendup_

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is there a way to build your own range bars as an indicator in OEC?

(I have not investigated its programing capabilities yet)

 

I think both BF and trendup make good points either way for and against OEC policies.

 

The important thing is consistency - if OEC change their calculation of range bars, they should give it another name, and let users determine which they want to use.....there is nothing worse than not being able to trust a system from upgrade to upgrade.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • also ... and barely on topic... Winners (always*) overpay. Buying the dips is a subscription to the belief that winners win by underpaying - when in actuality winners (inevitably/always*) win by overpaying... it’s amazing the percentage of traders who think winners win by underpaying ... “Winners (always*) overpay.” ...  One way to implement this ‘belief’ is to only reenter when prices have emphatically resumed the 'trend' .   (Fwiw, While “Winners (always*) overpay.” holds true in most endeavors (relationships, business, sports, etc...) - “Winners (always*) overpay.”  is especially true for auctions... continuous auctions included.)
    • re:  "Does it make sense to always buy the dips?  “Buy the dip.”  You hear this all the time in crypto investing trading speculation gambling. [zdo taking some liberties] It refers, of course, to buying more bitcoin (or digital assets) when they go down in price: when the price “dips.” Some people brag about “buying the dip," showing they know better than the crowd. Others “buy the dip” as an investment strategy: they’re getting a bargain. The problem is, buying the dip is a fallacy. You can’t buy the dip, because you can't see the total dip until much later. First, I’ll explain this in a way that will make it simple and obvious to you; then I’ll show you a better way of investing. You Only Know the Dip in Hindsight When people talk about “buying the dip,” what they’re really saying is, “I bought when the price was going down.” " ... example of a dip ... 
    • Date: 19th April 2024. Weekly Commodity Market Update: Oil Prices Correct and Supply Concerns Persist.   The ongoing developments in the Middle East sparked a wave of risk aversion and fueled supply concerns and investors headed for safety. Hopes for imminent rate cuts from the Federal Reserve diminish while attention is now turning towards the demand outlook. The Gold price hit a high of $2417.89 per ounce overnight. Sentiment has already calmed down again and bullion is trading at $2376.50 per ounce as haven flows ease. Oil prices initially moved higher as concern over escalating tensions with the WTI contract hit a session high of $85.508 per barrel overnight, before correcting to currently $81.45 per barrel. Oil Prices Under Pressure Amid Middle East Tensions Last week, commodity indexes showed little movement, with Oil prices undergoing a slight correction. Meanwhile, Gold reached yet another record high, mirroring the upward trend in cocoa prices. Once again today, USOil prices experienced a correction and has remained under pressure, retesting the 50-day EMA at $81.00 as we moving into the weekend. Hence, despite the Israel’s retaliatory strike on Iran, sentiments stabilized following reports suggesting a measured response aimed at avoiding further escalation. Brent crude futures witnessed a more than 4% leap, driven by concerns over potential disruptions to oil supplies in the Middle East, only to subsequently erase all gains. Similarly with USOIL, UKOIL hovers just below $87 per barrel, marginally below Thursday’s closing figures. Nevertheless, volatility is expected to continue in the market as several potential risks loom:   Disruption to the Strait of Hormuz: The possibility of Iran disrupting navigation through the vital shipping lane, is still in play. The Strait of Hormuz serves as the Persian Gulf’s primary route to international waters, with approximately 21 million barrels of oil passing through daily. Recent events, including Iran’s seizure of an Israel-linked container ship, underscore the geopolitical sensitivity of the region. Tougher Sanctions on Iran: Analysts speculate that the US may impose stricter sanctions on Iranian oil exports or intensify enforcement of existing restrictions. With global oil consumption reaching 102 million barrels per day, Iran’s production of 3.3 million barrels remains significant. Recent actions targeting Venezuelan oil highlight the potential for increased pressure on Iranian exports. OPEC Output Increases: Despite the desire for higher prices, OPEC members such as Saudi Arabia and Russia have constrained output in recent years. However, sustained crude prices above $100 per barrel could prompt concerns about demand and incentivize increased production. The OPEC may opt to boost oil output should tensions escalate further and prices surge. Ukraine Conflict: Amidst the focus on the Middle East, markets overlooking Russia’s actions in Ukraine. Potential retaliatory strikes by Kyiv on Russian oil infrastructure could impact exports, adding further complexity to global oil markets.   Technical Analysis USOIL is marking one of the steepest weekly declines witnessed this year after a brief period of consolidation. The breach below the pivotal support level of 84.00, coupled with the descent below the mid of the 4-month upchannel, signals a possible shift in market sentiment towards a bearish trend reversal. Adding to the bearish outlook are indications such as the downward slope in the RSI. However, the asset still hold above the 50-day EMA which coincides also with the mid of last year’s downleg, with key support zone at $80.00-$81.00. If it breaks this support zone, the focus may shift towards the 200-day EMA and 38.2% Fib. level at $77.60-$79.00. Conversely, a rejection of the $81 level and an upside potential could see the price returning back to $84.00. A break of the latter could trigger the attention back to the December’s resistance, situated around $86.60. A breakthrough above this level could ignite a stronger rally towards the $89.20-$90.00 zone. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business. Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar. Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding on how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE! Click HERE to READ more Market news. Michalis Efthymiou Market Analyst HMarkets Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past perfrmance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in FX and CFDs products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • Date: 18th April 2024. Market News – Stock markets benefit from Dollar correction. Economic Indicators & Central Banks:   Technical buying, bargain hunting, and risk aversion helped Treasuries rally and unwind recent losses. Yields dropped from the recent 2024 highs. Asian stock markets strengthened, as the US Dollar corrected in the wake of comments from Japan’s currency chief Masato Kanda, who said G7 countries continue to stress that excessive swings and disorderly moves in the foreign exchange market were harmful for economies. US Stockpiles expanded to 10-month high. The data overshadowed the impact of geopolitical tensions in the Middle East as traders await Israel’s response to Iran’s unprecedented recent attack. President Joe Biden called for higher tariffs on imports of Chinese steel and aluminum.   Financial Markets Performance:   The USDIndex stumbled, falling to 105.66 at the end of the day from the intraday high of 106.48. It lost ground against most of its G10 peers. There wasn’t much on the calendar to provide new direction. USDJPY lows retesting the 154 bottom! NOT an intervention yet. BoJ/MoF USDJPY intervention happens when there is more than 100+ pip move in seconds, not 50 pips. USOIL slumped by 3% near $82, as US crude inventories rose by 2.7 million barrels last week, hitting the highest level since last June, while gauges of fuel demand declined. Gold strengthened as the dollar weakened and bullion is trading at $2378.44 per ounce. Market Trends:   Wall Street closed in the red after opening with small corrective gains. The NASDAQ underperformed, slumping -1.15%, with the S&P500 -0.58% lower, while the Dow lost -0.12. The Nikkei closed 0.2% higher, the Hang Seng gained more than 1. European and US futures are finding buyers. A gauge of global chip stocks and AI bellwether Nvidia Corp. have both fallen into a technical correction. The TMSC reported its first profit rise in a year, after strong AI demand revived growth at the world’s biggest contract chipmaker. The main chipmaker to Apple Inc. and Nvidia Corp. recorded a 9% rise in net income, beating estimates. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business. Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar. Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding on how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE! Click HERE to READ more Market news. Andria Pichidi Market Analyst HFMarkets Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in FX and CFDs products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • Date: 17th April 2024. Market News – Appetite for risk-taking remains weak. Economic Indicators & Central Banks:   Stocks, Treasury yields and US Dollar stay firmed. Fed Chair Powell added to the recent sell off. His slightly more hawkish tone further priced out chances for any imminent action and the timing of a cut was pushed out further. He suggested if higher inflation does persist, the Fed will hold rates steady “for as long as needed.” Implied Fed Fund: There remains no real chance for a move on May 1 and at their intraday highs the June implied funds rate future showed only 5 bps, while July reflected only 10 bps. And a full 25 bps was not priced in until November, with 38 bps in cuts seen for 2024. US & EU Economies Diverging: Lagarde says ECB is moving toward rate cuts – if there are no major shocks. UK March CPI inflation falls less than expected. Output price inflation has started to nudge higher, despite another decline in input prices. Together with yesterday’s higher than expected wage numbers, the data will add to the arguments of the hawks at the BoE, which remain very reluctant to contemplate rate cuts. Canada CPI rose 0.6% in March, double the 0.3% February increase BUT core eased. The doors are still open for a possible cut at the next BoC meeting on June 5. IMF revised up its global growth forecast for 2024 with inflation easing, in its new World Economic Outlook. This is consistent with a global soft landing, according to the report. Financial Markets Performance:   USDJPY also inched up to 154.67 on expectations the BoJ will remain accommodative and as the market challenges a perceived 155 red line for MoF intervention. USOIL prices slipped -0.15% to $84.20 per barrel. Gold rose 0.24% to $2389.11 per ounce, a new record closing high as geopolitical risks overshadowed the impacts of rising rates and the stronger dollar. Market Trends:   Wall Street waffled either side of unchanged on the day amid dimming rate cut potential, rising yields, and earnings. The major indexes closed mixed with the Dow up 0.17%, while the S&P500 and NASDAQ lost -0.21% and -0.12%, respectively. Asian stock markets mostly corrected again, with Japanese bourses underperforming and the Nikkei down -1.3%. Mainland China bourses were a notable exception and the CSI 300 rallied 1.4%, but the MSCI Asia Pacific index came close to erasing the gains for this year. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business. Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar. Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding on how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE! Click HERE to READ more Market news. Andria Pichidi Market Analyst HFMarkets Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in FX and CFDs products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.vvvvvvv
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.