Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Trendup_

OEC Histogram, Faulty Volume

Recommended Posts

Guest Tresor

Brownie, any news on how OEC might succeed with the new and better data feed?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Any deadline / EPA for fixing this issue? 1 month / 2 months / 3 months / 6 months / 12 months?

I used to be an OEC customer. When their datafeed started costing me trades, I queried them. In fact, I was so pissed that I contacted their CEO and VP of operations via e-mail to express my opinion of them rolling-out a new product without sufficiently validating its reliability. I got a response from both but the problems continue.

 

Their datafeed is simply a deal breaker. I love OECs platform; it's more stable than NT in my opinion and their DOM is great but if you can't get reliable information or their servers are down, it's useless.

 

I received the same answers as posted here previously but that was back in Oct-Dec09.

 

Here's what they put on their website - it seems partially untrue based on my experience.

 

I have a Zen Fire connection now .... it's awesome. Unfiltered and reliable.

 

Active Traders

 

Active traders know their success is built on a foundation of Technology and Service. OEC was built on these principles. The OEC Trader was built by active traders for active traders.

 

OEC offers the keys to unlocking your successful trading strategy:

 

Speed – Our Direct Connections to the exchanges and cutting edge technology ensure the fastest executions and confirmations. We understand that for active traders, milliseconds matter.

 

Reliability – Our investment in our data center and infrastructure means you never have to worry about down-time and broken connections.

 

Functionality – The OEC Trader is the market leader in cutting edge functionality that gives you an edge in your trading with no software fees.

 

Support – OEC offers professional, efficient 24 Software Support and a 24 Hour Trade Desk to answer any questions you may have.

 

Technical Highlights

The OEC Trader provides a rich set of functionality not commonly found in one trading platform today. Learn more about our Electronic Trading System – OEC Trader

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just as a heads up......MANY broker supplied data feeds/platforms (Transact AT, OEC, NT with Zenfire, etc) have gone to the bottom of the dumpster since the recent CME data output increases.

 

It seems that many of the platform/charting/datafeed vendors/brokers were NOT properly prepared for the changes that were made in the CME data output per unit of time. It also seems that much of the platform/charting software architecture for these various vendors/brokers can't handle the increased data flow, and reliability issues have expanded in recent months for many.

 

Data drops from the data feed flow as it interfaces with a platform/charting application is a problem I see with many. It looks as if some in the broker and vendor world were not "ahead of the power curve" to make sure their platform/charting apps could handle the changes to the data flow from the CME. I have not heard of any reliability issues with XTrader 7 and CQG since the CME data flow increase......unfortunately, the once rock solid NT6.5 w/Zenfire feed has even at times been lacking in the reliabilty department.

 

My point in this matter is we all trade at our own risk, so think out all aspects of your operational trading requirements since the game has obviously changed again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Fulcrum do you think that this kind of "tricks" (in smaller volume sizes best hidden in the tap) can ,in some way,invalidate your Grab Inventory Strategy to read "The Market"?

In the last weeks do you confirm your methodology principles or there is some basic change In The Market microstructure?

Do you think there is a way to "track" this kind of events to eventually "sanitize" the data?

 

Thanks

 

 

 

Just as a heads up......MANY broker supplied data feeds/platforms (Transact AT, OEC, NT with Zenfire, etc) have gone to the bottom of the dumpster since the recent CME data output increases.

 

It seems that many of the platform/charting/datafeed vendors/brokers were NOT properly prepared for the changes that were made in the CME data output per unit of time. It also seems that much of the platform/charting software architecture for these various vendors/brokers can't handle the increased data flow, and reliability issues have expanded in recent months for many.

 

Data drops from the data feed flow as it interfaces with a platform/charting application is a problem I see with many. It looks as if some in the broker and vendor world were not "ahead of the power curve" to make sure their platform/charting apps could handle the changes to the data flow from the CME. I have not heard of any reliability issues with XTrader 7 and CQG since the CME data flow increase......unfortunately, the once rock solid NT6.5 w/Zenfire feed has even at times been lacking in the reliabilty department.

 

My point in this matter is we all trade at our own risk, so think out all aspects of your operational trading requirements since the game has obviously changed again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Fulcrum do you think that this kind of "tricks" (in smaller volume sizes best hidden in the tap) can ,in some way,invalidate your Grab Inventory Strategy to read "The Market"?

In the last weeks do you confirm your methodology principles or there is some basic change In The Market microstructure?

Do you think there is a way to "track" this kind of events to eventually "sanitize" the data?

 

Thanks

Market order flow distribution patterns are all the same as before....it is just the amount of DATA provided from the CME has changed. There is no change at all in the markets, just a change in the "retail" type tools to look at those markets (as a result of the increased amount of data granularity).

 

Markets trade between zones of resting inventory, and it will take some extremely drastic changes in the actual markets to ever change this on going fundamental.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Tresor
My point in this matter is we all trade at our own risk, so think out all aspects of your operational trading requirements since the game has obviously changed again.

 

Yes, we trade at our own risk, but the risks on a traders' side are much greater than on a broker's side. If you trade based on bad data like e.g. OEC's data the only thing you can do is to loose your money.

 

The broker always wins. If a broker knows it provides bad data (I never saw anyone won any money on bad data), it can simply bet against a trader (which the law joyfully allows for) and earn even more on a trader's stupidity / ignorance. I do not say OEC behaves such an unethical way on purpose. I do believe it is a technical problem rather than ethical on their end.

 

Guys, if there is a parallel world I hope that I am a broker in that world. And I hope I am smart enough to provide my clients / suckers with bad data and bet against them :rofl:

 

Best business in the (parallel) world to be a broker...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1-27-10 Update

 

I haven't forgotten about you guys, just wanted to get the information together.

 

The first issue apparently is how all of this is reported from the CME. This is from their website:

FOR PRODUCTS THAT ARE TRADED IN BOTH REGULAR TRADING HOURS (RTH) AND ELECTRONIC TRADING HOURS (ETH) THE INFORMATION REPRESENTED ON THIS PAGE FOR OPENING RANGE, HIGH, LOW, CLOSING RANGE, SETTLEMENT PRICE AND VOLUME REPRESENTS RTH ACTIVITY ONLY. NOTE: LIFE OF CONTRACT HIGH AND LOW REPRESENTS BOTH RTH AND ETH. RTH VOLUME REFLECTS PIT TRADING, BLOCK TRADES AND CASH-FOR-FUTURES ONLY.
ETH REPRESENTS GLOBEX VOLUME TRANSACTIONS FROM THE GLOBEX® ELECTRONIC SESSION ONLY. VOLUME OR OPEN INTEREST (BOTH BEFORE AND AFTER THE LAST DAY OF TRADING) MAY BE AFFECTED BY: CASH FOR FUTURES, SPREADS, AND PRIOR DAYS’ CLEARED TRADES (OUT-TRADES), POSITION ADJUSTMENTS, OPTION EXERCISES, POSITIONS IN DELIVERY, OR POSITIONS IN A CASH SETTLEMENT CYCLE
. PRODUCT LISTINGS REPRESENT CONTRACTS WITH PRICE/VOLUME ACTIVITY AND/OR HAVE ESTABLISHED OPEN INTEREST. PRODUCTS THAT ARE ELIGIBLE TO TRADE, BUT ARE INACTIVE, DO NOT APPEAR IN THIS REPORT. LEGEND: B=BID, A=ASK, N=NOMINAL, P=POST SETTLEMENT SESSION, #=NEW CONTRACT HIGH PRICE, *=NEW CONTRACT LOW PRICE, R=RECORD VOLUME OR OPEN INTEREST. SETTLEMENT PRICES ARE DETERMINED BY CME RULE 813.

So issue #1 is how the CME is handling all of this. You would think this would be simple and easy, but I'm guessing there's some neat reason why they do this...

 

:confused:

 

Now, back to OEC - here is what I was told directly from the source:

 

From our CME data connection we are using ticks to build Histograms and Charts, but a different source from the quote feed to update our Quotes. We are close to a decision point as to which number we want to standardize on. API and SIM have the most up-to-date changes. PROD will be next once we have made a final decision on what we standardize on.

The issue there appears to be that OEC is using 2 sources and b/c those sources view and handle the data from the CME a bit differently, which we can see has some issues, you are seeing the end result.

 

I'm assuming (and this is my opinion) that once OEC decides to use 1 source, then your issue presented here will go away.

 

With all that said, this all comes down to how the CME is reporting the data. In the simplest form, it's not crisp and clean. And unfortunately the data vendors go out and get the data, do whatever they do and then pass it on to us. And apparently there is not a standard on how to do this part either. It would be much easier on everyone if 1) the CME made this an easy process and/or 2) there was a standardized way to gather this data across the board.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Tresor
From our CME data connection we are using ticks to build Histograms and Charts, but a different source from the quote feed to update our Quotes.

 

And the different source (whatever it means) that is used to feed their Quotes is the correct one! I run tests with OEC paltform: I compared exchanges' official volume data (CME, Eurex and others) and ''the different'' source is the only correct one real-time and at day-end. E.g. I measured the real-time volume on selected instruments reported by Eurex and the volume reported by Eurex matched 100% the volume reported by OEC Quotes. Ergo (i) the data transmitted in Quotes is the correct one and (ii) the data tramsmitted in Charts and in OEC data feed for third party charting softwares is wrong!

 

We are close to a decision point as to which number we want to standardize on. API and SIM have the most up-to-date changes. PROD will be next once we have made a final decision on what we standardize on. The issue there appears to be that OEC is using 2 sources and b/c those sources view and handle the data from the CME a bit differently, which we can see has some issues, you are seeing the end result.

 

I'm assuming (and this is my opinion) that once OEC decides to use 1 source, then your issue presented here will go away.

 

Not that I am complaing but one source is obviously f**ked up and the other one is the correct one. I wonder how much time it takes to decide which one should be used accross the platform and standardized :crap:

 

Brownsfan, please make sure they also remember to fix other issues, e.g. incorrect time stamp (If I remember it well their time is shifted by 1 minute either backwards or forward) and missing bars.

 

Regards

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Tresor
You'll need to provide examples of the timestamp and missing bars issue b/c I have not seen those.

 

Missing bars' screenshot enclosed. Incorrect time stamp screenshot enclosed (OEC can check this issue when they connect their data feed to any third party charting platform).

 

I wouldn't like to get into details but OEC have full screenshot documentation and excel documentation (data) of what is wrong with their platform and their data feed).

5aa70fb7a98f6_FTSEmissing.thumb.png.97ce0faf7abaa806c2be2fc8f18fe010.png

5aa70fb7af9c8_Timediscrepancy.thumb.png.b9ee1f44a6633dbb2181a446da1289ac.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You do realize that OEC is showing the start of the bar; whereas some charting platforms show the close, right?

 

Could that explain the 1 min difference on a 1 minute chart?

 

If you hit refresh is that 1 min bar still not there?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Tresor
You do realize that OEC is showing the start of the bar; whereas some charting platforms show the close, right?

 

Could that explain the 1 min difference on a 1 minute chart?

 

No.

 

If you hit refresh is that 1 min bar still not there?

 

Still not there in OEC Charts, and still not here in MultiCharts after refreshing, from what I remember. I tested their demo in April last year. I reported OEC on the bugs. The bugs were acknowledged by their tech staff and I was told the bugs would be fixed soon.

 

If they somehow still lack the knowledge of what is wrong with their platform and data feed, my suggestion is that they announce a ''bug'' contest among their employees. The employee who finds the largest number of bugs will be awarded $1k or a handshake by CEO.

 

No sarcasm intended. This is the quickest and cheapest way for any company to find out what is wrong with their products.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
No.

 

So to clarify - your OEC chart shows a time of 16:23 and MC shows 16:24 and we know that OEC shows the START time of the candle and MC shows the END time of the candle... but there is another problem here?

 

Please explain how OEC's chart is incorrect with their timestamping knowing that they show the START of the candle.

 

Still not there in OEC Charts, and still not here in MultiCharts after refreshing, from what I remember. I tested their demo in April last year. I reported OEC on the bugs. The bugs were acknowledged by their tech staff and I was told the bugs would be fixed soon.

 

If they somehow still lack the knowledge of what is wrong with their platform and data feed, my suggestion is that they announce a ''bug'' contest among their employees. The employee who finds the largest number of bugs will be awarded $1k or a handshake by CEO.

 

No sarcasm intended. This is the quickest and cheapest way for any company to find out what is wrong with their products.

 

I run OEC charts daily and I rarely have any bars missing. When it does happen it usually backfills when it comes back online - whether it's my outage or theirs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Tresor
So to clarify - your OEC chart shows a time of 16:23 and MC shows 16:24 and we know that OEC shows the START time of the candle and MC shows the END time of the candle... but there is another problem here?

 

Please explain how OEC's chart is incorrect with their timestamping knowing that they show the START of the candle.

 

If you connect OEC data feed to any third party software that supports OEC data feed, you will see that with OEC data feed the session's start and the session's end are INCORRECT by 1 minute. Ergo (i) there is something wrong with the time stamping of this data feed and (ii) third party softwares are CORRECT (they can't be all wrong!).

 

If you connect any other data feed to any third party software, you will see that the session's start and the session's end are CORRECT, therefore (i) third party softwares are CORRECT and (ii) other data feeds are CORRECT too.

 

If OEC promotes its data feed it should stick to generally accepted standards of time stamping or they should cease to offer their data feed to third party platforms.

 

I run OEC charts daily and I rarely have any bars missing. When it does happen it usually backfills when it comes back online - whether it's my outage or theirs.

 

Then you have been lucky. I was not lucky during the period when I demo-tested OEC platform. And as far as my opinion goes, trading should not be about being lucky...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds like you've made your concerns known to OEC; therefore I shall let it be. You can't make everyone happy. Ergo a) wait to see if OEC can do what you need or 2) use a software that will meet your needs or iii) deal with the 1 minute off thing. If you understand how it's timestamped, then this is a moot point.

 

PS

You are welcome for the update too!

 

;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • also ... and barely on topic... Winners (always*) overpay. Buying the dips is a subscription to the belief that winners win by underpaying - when in actuality winners (inevitably/always*) win by overpaying... it’s amazing the percentage of traders who think winners win by underpaying ... “Winners (always*) overpay.” ...  One way to implement this ‘belief’ is to only reenter when prices have emphatically resumed the 'trend' .   (Fwiw, While “Winners (always*) overpay.” holds true in most endeavors (relationships, business, sports, etc...) - “Winners (always*) overpay.”  is especially true for auctions... continuous auctions included.)
    • re:  "Does it make sense to always buy the dips?  “Buy the dip.”  You hear this all the time in crypto investing trading speculation gambling. [zdo taking some liberties] It refers, of course, to buying more bitcoin (or digital assets) when they go down in price: when the price “dips.” Some people brag about “buying the dip," showing they know better than the crowd. Others “buy the dip” as an investment strategy: they’re getting a bargain. The problem is, buying the dip is a fallacy. You can’t buy the dip, because you can't see the total dip until much later. First, I’ll explain this in a way that will make it simple and obvious to you; then I’ll show you a better way of investing. You Only Know the Dip in Hindsight When people talk about “buying the dip,” what they’re really saying is, “I bought when the price was going down.” " ... example of a dip ... 
    • Date: 19th April 2024. Weekly Commodity Market Update: Oil Prices Correct and Supply Concerns Persist.   The ongoing developments in the Middle East sparked a wave of risk aversion and fueled supply concerns and investors headed for safety. Hopes for imminent rate cuts from the Federal Reserve diminish while attention is now turning towards the demand outlook. The Gold price hit a high of $2417.89 per ounce overnight. Sentiment has already calmed down again and bullion is trading at $2376.50 per ounce as haven flows ease. Oil prices initially moved higher as concern over escalating tensions with the WTI contract hit a session high of $85.508 per barrel overnight, before correcting to currently $81.45 per barrel. Oil Prices Under Pressure Amid Middle East Tensions Last week, commodity indexes showed little movement, with Oil prices undergoing a slight correction. Meanwhile, Gold reached yet another record high, mirroring the upward trend in cocoa prices. Once again today, USOil prices experienced a correction and has remained under pressure, retesting the 50-day EMA at $81.00 as we moving into the weekend. Hence, despite the Israel’s retaliatory strike on Iran, sentiments stabilized following reports suggesting a measured response aimed at avoiding further escalation. Brent crude futures witnessed a more than 4% leap, driven by concerns over potential disruptions to oil supplies in the Middle East, only to subsequently erase all gains. Similarly with USOIL, UKOIL hovers just below $87 per barrel, marginally below Thursday’s closing figures. Nevertheless, volatility is expected to continue in the market as several potential risks loom:   Disruption to the Strait of Hormuz: The possibility of Iran disrupting navigation through the vital shipping lane, is still in play. The Strait of Hormuz serves as the Persian Gulf’s primary route to international waters, with approximately 21 million barrels of oil passing through daily. Recent events, including Iran’s seizure of an Israel-linked container ship, underscore the geopolitical sensitivity of the region. Tougher Sanctions on Iran: Analysts speculate that the US may impose stricter sanctions on Iranian oil exports or intensify enforcement of existing restrictions. With global oil consumption reaching 102 million barrels per day, Iran’s production of 3.3 million barrels remains significant. Recent actions targeting Venezuelan oil highlight the potential for increased pressure on Iranian exports. OPEC Output Increases: Despite the desire for higher prices, OPEC members such as Saudi Arabia and Russia have constrained output in recent years. However, sustained crude prices above $100 per barrel could prompt concerns about demand and incentivize increased production. The OPEC may opt to boost oil output should tensions escalate further and prices surge. Ukraine Conflict: Amidst the focus on the Middle East, markets overlooking Russia’s actions in Ukraine. Potential retaliatory strikes by Kyiv on Russian oil infrastructure could impact exports, adding further complexity to global oil markets.   Technical Analysis USOIL is marking one of the steepest weekly declines witnessed this year after a brief period of consolidation. The breach below the pivotal support level of 84.00, coupled with the descent below the mid of the 4-month upchannel, signals a possible shift in market sentiment towards a bearish trend reversal. Adding to the bearish outlook are indications such as the downward slope in the RSI. However, the asset still hold above the 50-day EMA which coincides also with the mid of last year’s downleg, with key support zone at $80.00-$81.00. If it breaks this support zone, the focus may shift towards the 200-day EMA and 38.2% Fib. level at $77.60-$79.00. Conversely, a rejection of the $81 level and an upside potential could see the price returning back to $84.00. A break of the latter could trigger the attention back to the December’s resistance, situated around $86.60. A breakthrough above this level could ignite a stronger rally towards the $89.20-$90.00 zone. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business. Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar. Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding on how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE! Click HERE to READ more Market news. Michalis Efthymiou Market Analyst HMarkets Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past perfrmance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in FX and CFDs products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • Date: 18th April 2024. Market News – Stock markets benefit from Dollar correction. Economic Indicators & Central Banks:   Technical buying, bargain hunting, and risk aversion helped Treasuries rally and unwind recent losses. Yields dropped from the recent 2024 highs. Asian stock markets strengthened, as the US Dollar corrected in the wake of comments from Japan’s currency chief Masato Kanda, who said G7 countries continue to stress that excessive swings and disorderly moves in the foreign exchange market were harmful for economies. US Stockpiles expanded to 10-month high. The data overshadowed the impact of geopolitical tensions in the Middle East as traders await Israel’s response to Iran’s unprecedented recent attack. President Joe Biden called for higher tariffs on imports of Chinese steel and aluminum.   Financial Markets Performance:   The USDIndex stumbled, falling to 105.66 at the end of the day from the intraday high of 106.48. It lost ground against most of its G10 peers. There wasn’t much on the calendar to provide new direction. USDJPY lows retesting the 154 bottom! NOT an intervention yet. BoJ/MoF USDJPY intervention happens when there is more than 100+ pip move in seconds, not 50 pips. USOIL slumped by 3% near $82, as US crude inventories rose by 2.7 million barrels last week, hitting the highest level since last June, while gauges of fuel demand declined. Gold strengthened as the dollar weakened and bullion is trading at $2378.44 per ounce. Market Trends:   Wall Street closed in the red after opening with small corrective gains. The NASDAQ underperformed, slumping -1.15%, with the S&P500 -0.58% lower, while the Dow lost -0.12. The Nikkei closed 0.2% higher, the Hang Seng gained more than 1. European and US futures are finding buyers. A gauge of global chip stocks and AI bellwether Nvidia Corp. have both fallen into a technical correction. The TMSC reported its first profit rise in a year, after strong AI demand revived growth at the world’s biggest contract chipmaker. The main chipmaker to Apple Inc. and Nvidia Corp. recorded a 9% rise in net income, beating estimates. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business. Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar. Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding on how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE! Click HERE to READ more Market news. Andria Pichidi Market Analyst HFMarkets Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in FX and CFDs products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • Date: 17th April 2024. Market News – Appetite for risk-taking remains weak. Economic Indicators & Central Banks:   Stocks, Treasury yields and US Dollar stay firmed. Fed Chair Powell added to the recent sell off. His slightly more hawkish tone further priced out chances for any imminent action and the timing of a cut was pushed out further. He suggested if higher inflation does persist, the Fed will hold rates steady “for as long as needed.” Implied Fed Fund: There remains no real chance for a move on May 1 and at their intraday highs the June implied funds rate future showed only 5 bps, while July reflected only 10 bps. And a full 25 bps was not priced in until November, with 38 bps in cuts seen for 2024. US & EU Economies Diverging: Lagarde says ECB is moving toward rate cuts – if there are no major shocks. UK March CPI inflation falls less than expected. Output price inflation has started to nudge higher, despite another decline in input prices. Together with yesterday’s higher than expected wage numbers, the data will add to the arguments of the hawks at the BoE, which remain very reluctant to contemplate rate cuts. Canada CPI rose 0.6% in March, double the 0.3% February increase BUT core eased. The doors are still open for a possible cut at the next BoC meeting on June 5. IMF revised up its global growth forecast for 2024 with inflation easing, in its new World Economic Outlook. This is consistent with a global soft landing, according to the report. Financial Markets Performance:   USDJPY also inched up to 154.67 on expectations the BoJ will remain accommodative and as the market challenges a perceived 155 red line for MoF intervention. USOIL prices slipped -0.15% to $84.20 per barrel. Gold rose 0.24% to $2389.11 per ounce, a new record closing high as geopolitical risks overshadowed the impacts of rising rates and the stronger dollar. Market Trends:   Wall Street waffled either side of unchanged on the day amid dimming rate cut potential, rising yields, and earnings. The major indexes closed mixed with the Dow up 0.17%, while the S&P500 and NASDAQ lost -0.21% and -0.12%, respectively. Asian stock markets mostly corrected again, with Japanese bourses underperforming and the Nikkei down -1.3%. Mainland China bourses were a notable exception and the CSI 300 rallied 1.4%, but the MSCI Asia Pacific index came close to erasing the gains for this year. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business. Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar. Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding on how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE! Click HERE to READ more Market news. Andria Pichidi Market Analyst HFMarkets Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in FX and CFDs products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.vvvvvvv
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.