Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

UrmaBlume

The Evolution of Market Profile Theory

Recommended Posts

I don't gamble and never have. But I want to use a gambling analogy here. The house never loses. I don't mean that you can't profit as a trader because in effect you're never at odds with the exchange, but with other traders.

But for a minute just look at the real winner at all times, the CME. It wins when you win and it wins when you lose. Activity keeps it alive, and causes it to profit. The only kind of price activity that ensures it's wealth is the constant rotation of price.

Price rotation entices new activity back into the market and in doing so causes the exchange to profit. You can be assured that if rotation causes the exchange to profit than it is the only understanding of price activity that matters and that without a doubt will continue and should be what someone attempts to build a science upon.

Without price rotation across multiple time frames there is no opportunity / enticement for the next contract to be purchased based upon the conviction / philosophy of the new purchaser. The question for MP followers is does a traditional understanding of MP give you the edge you need to trade that rotation as it transforms into a reversal.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

itrade,

 

I don't have trouble with believing in some of the concepts uncovered by Mr. Steidlemayer, in particular imbalance to balance, and the philosophy of trapped money ( sort of the same thing I guess).

The part of MP that seems so strange is how much information is hidden by the Profile itself. Ultimately the reason you're using MP is to give yourself more of a clear picture of market internals through uncovering horizontal rotation. But that horizontal rotation could be rising support or falling resistance when viewed in the correct timeframe with a bar chart.

I guess what I'm trying to say is that support and resistance can be hidden by the profile if you're not really careful and that's what your trying to uncover in the end.

I'm looking forward to electroniclocal 's presentation this weekend but couldn't help but notice in his thread a quote which struck a cord with me, " A range bar that takes a long time to form is usually a result of no distinct direction of order flow." I don't want to make more of that than he did, but on a larger scale isn't that true concerning the value area, isn't that horizontal rotation proof of no "distinct direction" as well?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey Corey,

 

What do you mean when you say support/resistance is hidden? And I'm not sure what you are referring to when you say market internals?

 

Horizontal movement = balance = value = efficiency = support/resistance. That's how I look at it. The balance/value area is the support/resistance....it's right there in the profile. And it shows me where to do business.

 

Balance is relative to the timeframe you are looking on. You can have balance on a 60 minute timeframe, you can have balance on a weekly timeframe. If you are looking at balance on a weekly timeframe and you want to pin point entry and exit points drop down to a 60 minute profile to trade it. When value/condition is unclear to me on 1 time frame I look at another time frame until I find a clear value area that I can lean on. That becomes my backqround condition. Then as long as I can define acceptable risk and reward I drop down in time frame to manage the trade. As long as the market activity on the shorter timeframe is absorbed into the background condition of the higher timeframe then my trading idea for that particular instance will be profitable. If I don't have any clear information to work with then I don't do any business and I move on to something else to trade. Part of successful trading is knowing when not to trade. I don't pretend to know what is going on at every moment in the markets I trade. But I do know what areas I want to do business in and from there all I can do is define and accept my risk.

 

Again I'll pose the question to you...what exactly do you want MP to tell or show you?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

P.S.

I know I promised some charts...I will follow up on that. Been a busy week trading and family wise. I started to post over the weekend but I found myself going into detailed explanation of the way I trade the markets which takes some time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hey Corey,

 

What do you mean when you say support/resistance is hidden? And I'm not sure what you are referring to when you say market internals?

 

Horizontal movement = balance = value = efficiency = support/resistance. That's how I look at it. The balance/value area is the support/resistance....it's right there in the profile. And it shows me where to do business.

 

Balance is relative to the timeframe you are looking on. You can have balance on a 60 minute timeframe, you can have balance on a weekly timeframe. If you are looking at balance on a weekly timeframe and you want to pin point entry and exit points drop down to a 60 minute profile to trade it. When value/condition is unclear to me on 1 time frame I look at another time frame until I find a clear value area that I can lean on. That becomes my backqround condition. Then as long as I can define acceptable risk and reward I drop down in time frame to manage the trade. As long as the market activity on the shorter timeframe is absorbed into the background condition of the higher timeframe then my trading idea for that particular instance will be profitable. If I don't have any clear information to work with then I don't do any business and I move on to something else to trade. Part of successful trading is knowing when not to trade. I don't pretend to know what is going on at every moment in the markets I trade. But I do know what areas I want to do business in and from there all I can do is define and accept my risk.

 

Again I'll pose the question to you...what exactly do you want MP to tell or show you?

 

Thanks for the explanation of how you trade, itrade. I'm looking forward to your presentation. I think that instead of getting caught up in a verbal misunderstanding I'll simply wait for your presentation and then see where similarities or differences might exist between how you use MP and how I do.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thanks for the explanation of how you trade, itrade. I'm looking forward to your presentation. I think that instead of getting caught up in a verbal misunderstanding I'll simply wait for your presentation and then see where similarities or differences might exist between how you use MP and how I do.

 

Sounds good C! Hopefully in the next day or 2.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Answers are easy to find, it's the right questions that are hard to come by. Once you've figured out the right question finding the answer is just a matter of time.

Figuring out the right philosophy before applying yourself to study is incredibly important or you'll just burn yourself out over a period of time, continually and aggressively going in the wrong direction.

It was Tom Alexander who said that more time applied to studying the market in an out of context way leads you to nothing and gets you no further ahead.

MP helped me to begin seeing the markets horizontally no longer relying on trend or simply a vertical understanding of the market, for that alone I'm appreciative, but does it really give structure.

At this point if I could have an audience with UB I'm not sure if I'd have the right questions to ask or not. But I think it might be concerning market structure. Has he abandoned the idea that the market has structure as MP told us it did in the past, does he simply believe in the dynamic uncovering of commercial trade and does that itself prove the "now" of market structure.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
At this point if I could have an audience with UB I'm not sure if I'd have the right questions to ask or not. But I think it might be concerning market structure. Has he abandoned the idea that the market has structure as MP told us it did in the past, does he simply believe in the dynamic uncovering of commercial trade and does that itself prove the "now" of market structure.

 

Commercials...other time frame....composite operator.....traders from the beginning of time have been tracking the commercials. Look at Wyckoff and his tracking of the CO. But what came first the chicken or the egg. Do commercials trade around value or does value follow the commercials. Willing to bet its a little of both. In either case value = structure.

 

" It was Tom Alexander who said that more time applied to studying the market in an out of context way leads you to nothing and gets you no further ahead. "

 

Context = background = value on higher time frame.

 

 

""Answers are easy to find, it's the right questions that are hard to come by. Once you've figured out the right question finding the answer is just a matter of time.""

 

Question to ask yourself: will the vertical movement in the foreground get absorbed into the background or will it change the condition of the background.

 

Consider this from Steidylmayer:

 

Successful traders realize that the setup for both winning and losing trades look identical when looked at in the context of short term market activity. It's the longer term background condition that can distinguish between them. Using the background as the basis for your trade setups = upgraded opportunities. :2c:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know about you but personally I'm not equipped to compete on a nano second time frame like UB. But that doesn't mean I can't track the footprints of the commercials and use them to my advantage.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Commercials...other time frame....composite operator.....traders from the beginning of time have been tracking the commercials. Look at Wyckoff and his tracking of the CO. But what came first the chicken or the egg. Do commercials trade around value or does value follow the commercials. Willing to bet its a little of both. In either case value = structure.

 

" It was Tom Alexander who said that more time applied to studying the market in an out of context way leads you to nothing and gets you no further ahead. "

 

Context = background = value on higher time frame.

 

 

""Answers are easy to find, it's the right questions that are hard to come by. Once you've figured out the right question finding the answer is just a matter of time.""

 

Question to ask yourself: will the vertical movement in the foreground get absorbed into the background or will it change the condition of the background.

 

Consider this from Steidylmayer:

 

Successful traders realize that the setup for both winning and losing trades look identical when looked at in the context of short term market activity. It's the longer term background condition that can distinguish between them. Using the background as the basis for your trade setups = upgraded opportunities. :2c:

 

Again we are having misunderstandings with regards to terminology. You misunderstand what I mean by structure, it certainly is not simply and I quote "value = structure", there is far more to the market then simply value as I'm sure you'd agree. I've said before that if you would only post your said illustrations and your promised presentation than we can possibly understand each other. I'm looking forward to your presentation.

Moderated Message:
Moderated Message:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The hardest part is figuring out how to relate information from the background -- the longer term time frame to the present, shorter-term time frame. In other words, you can usually merge together the MP distributions many different ways. More and more, I am agreeing with UB that order flow and buying / selling pressure provide the strongest clues about where the market is going. I currently only use MP for identifying support / resistance levels, but maybe I will gain new insights and applications overtime.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I don't know about you but personally I'm not equipped to compete on a nano second time frame like UB. But that doesn't mean I can't track the footprints of the commercials and use them to my advantage.

 

You might be surprised. Geographical location (and the ceiling of the speed of light through glass) is going to be one of your biggest limiting factors. UB is located in Las Vegas and does OK. Of course data feed and execution engine are important too. I believe that he uses tradestation for data albeit with custom .dll's. Using Zenfire or TT will immediately put you on a better footing there too.

 

This is exactly why in another thread I pointed out why it was dangerous to use Hyperbole. People come away with completely the wrong idea idea about what is and what is not possible. It's a shame as in my view it diminishes what are thought provoking posts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Clmacdougall:

 

Would you mind sharing with us excerpts of your conversation with UB when you find time? If sharing such information would infringe upon UB's intellectual property rights, I can understand you not wanting to share that information.

 

Thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thanks for the call UB it helped me to see where the road was and what the next step is. You're the most public provider of in the now information concerning price movement. Thanks again.

 

Cory,

 

Thanks for the kind words.

 

I applaud your hard work and your forward looking and willingness to consider and explore beyond the SameO conventional understanding when it comes to the market profile in specific and technical analysis in general.

 

In my experience it has been those who are more interested in learning than trying to make a point that go the distance. I learn a lot from and welcome dialogue with smart, open, honest, hard-working, up and comers like yourself.

 

Again thanks for your time today and thanks for the kind words.

 

cheers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The hardest part is figuring out how to relate information from the background -- the longer term time frame to the present, shorter-term time frame. In other words, you can usually merge together the MP distributions many different ways. More and more, I am agreeing with UB that order flow and buying / selling pressure provide the strongest clues about where the market is going. I currently only use MP for identifying support / resistance levels, but maybe I will gain new insights and applications overtime.

 

Order flow is what moves the market...no question there.

 

Support / resistance is the main thing I use MP for.

 

Actually I can boil it down to 3 main things that I glean from MP:

 

1) Shows me the areas where I want to do business and my bias for trading within those areas.

2) Helps me define my risk by showing me where the market shouldn't go if my trade idea is correct.

3) Keeps me out of noise.

 

Idea: why not use MP as your back gound to enter trades and order flow to manage?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

hi,

 

I think the MP is more than just Supports / Resistances.

IB, the Profile, the VA and their respective position of MP are more than just a graphic representation (even if I use my own word).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I just happened to come across something on the James Dalton Trading website confirms my earler statement that Market Profile is NOT an Indicator. This is a quote from Mr. Dalton (author of :Mind over Markets") himself...

 

"Market Profile® is not an indicator in the technical sense nor does it provide buy and sell signals but rather it is a decision support-tool. It provides a composite view much different from other charting tools available and as a result, gives a trader the opportunity to form a broader perspective. The Profile organizes the market’s continual two-way auction (race after race after race) so that you can advance your trading and decision-making abilities."

 

The posting created a lot of opinions that it was an indicator... but I believe Mr. Dalton has the correct

and only correct answer. I rest my case.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Perhaps its because I was not trading in the 1980's but I have different perspective --- one that never started with idea that Market Profile was a trading method, as many MP disciples probably did. I think of market profile as 'theory only' and always have done so. How you interpret the developing intraday chart is about order flow and this is achieved through 'multi-timeframe' analysis -- where a bias is created based on higher timeframe order flow and is executed on lower timeframe to enhance the reward/risk relationship.

 

One thing that is enduring though -- is that the resulting intraday histogram seeks value --- and price 'overlaps' when it reaches that level of value. How you want to define/interpret this is up to the trader. It is not that the profile gives you a heads-up on what WILL happen, it is the underlying concepts that accompany Market Profile that allows you to make a FORECAST about what will happen (and quite often entirely separate from the existing histogram at that point in time). And then it is the correlation between your execution -- relative to what actually happens that drives your profit and loss.

 

On the one hand, you say market profile taught you all the theory you know -- then go on to say you have moved on. I guess for many of us who never used it as a trading method in the first place -- saying you have 'moved on' comes as no surprise.

 

comments welcome

 

I agree.

 

It does seem a bit of a waste attending all those seminars and asking for a refund when the attendee didn't grasp/listen to the basic premise of what was being taught.

 

As for the indicators that have been developed since, I can't help feel that the amount of thought and time that it inevitably took to develop them would have been better spent 'in the zone' focusing on the market at how it behaves at key reference points. I'd rather rely on my intuition than a binary indicator. In my opinion, the brain can understand context way better than a multitude of indicators (or 'intelligent agents' if you prefer).

 

Of course, we're all different and we must respect that.

 

Interesting approach.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Very well said and right on. As far as this forum goes, I thought I was all alone with an understanding and past exposure to this type of trading.

 

 

 

..... that operate on a data feed that costs more than a thousand dollars a day and that is just for the data - nothing to the infrastructure and the people to maintain the operation.

 

Your comments are most astute, thank you.

 

Don't worry Urma, you're not alone.

 

BTW, I have NEVER come across any feed that costs as much as this in the professional market. I don't know where you get your info, but I think someones trying to scare you with how big and powerful the bogey men are! At most, a direct feed from an exchange may cost towards a thousand PER MONTH for a small handful of users/licenses. Co-Lo is typically around 8-10k per 1/2 cage per month, and that's where the real money is for the exchange. Not the data. I hope that's useful info for you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

UrmaBlume, I have several neural net programs that I would like to run your data on. Would you be willing post your data from your indicators and charts to do some testing on?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
UrmaBlume, I have several neural net programs that I would like to run your data on. Would you be willing post your data from your indicators and charts to do some testing on?

 

Thank you for the consideration.

 

We also have several neural network development tools but find that we often get better results from MARS (Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines) from Salford Systems.

 

If you will refer to this thread on the Practical Application of Intelligent Agents and several others I have written on this subject you will note the value we place on preprocessing.

 

As to sharing our data - It wouldn't do you much good without the code for the preprocessing algorithms that produced it. Also it is the preprocessing that is the primary key to success in any such modeling endeavor and ours is proprietary.

 

You will find many clues to the types of inputs we use from my threads on this board but as to the work of preprocessing that will have to be up to you.

 

Running the data through the neural networks and building the algorithm is the easy party. What separates the models that work and those that don't is the preprocessing before and the optimizations and rules generation after.

 

good luck

 

UB

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • How's about other crypto exchanges? Are all they banned in your country or only Binance?
    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.