Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Recommended Posts

My recommendation is Spydertrader only.

 

The good thing about Spyder is he is a man of few words and speaks in riddles. On the other hand Jack is a man of many words and waffles.

 

No disrespect to either.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The good thing about Spyder is he is a man of few words and speaks in riddles. On the other hand Jack is a man of many words and waffles.

 

No disrespect to either.

 

Speaking in riddles is a good thing? I don't think so.

 

Heisenberg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Speaking in riddles is a good thing? I don't think so.

 

Heisenberg

 

it is a riddle only if you try to look for a message that isn't there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
it is a riddle only if you try to look for a message that isn't there.

 

I got an expression for you: "The blind leading the blind".

Think a bit about that. And that is not a riddle, compared to what you try to write here.

 

No offense. Just trying to be realistic.

 

Heisenberg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Admire Spydertrader's clarity in annotation, the first two steps of MADA!

 

I want to throw out some "riddles" for Heisenberg based on the posted chart.

 

1. There is something critically important missing, without which one is more or less guessing the price move from Pt 1 to Pt 2 of a forming Red Traverse container.

 

2. Pt 3 of the Red Traverse container can not be known that we know until several bars later.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I want to throw out some "riddles" for Heisenberg based on the posted chart.

 

1. There is something critically important missing, without which one is more or less guessing the price move from Pt 1 to Pt 2 of a forming Red Traverse container.

 

2. Pt 3 of the Red Traverse container can not be known that we know until several bars later.

 

1. We need the first traverse in order to know Pt 1 of the next traverse? And its Pt 2 must be outside of the previous (first traverse) container.

 

2. We need to wait for increasing red before this Pt3 is "confirmed"?

 

Heisenberg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1. We need the first traverse in order to know Pt 1 of the next traverse? And its Pt 2 must be outside of the previous (first traverse) container.

 

2. We need to wait for increasing red before this Pt3 is "confirmed"?

 

Heisenberg

 

Your answer to second "riddle" is correct. Good. Use this answer to solve first "riddle" accurately.

 

What EVENT, specifically, do you have when this occurs on first "riddle"?

5aa711a12a60b_TraverseMissingPiece.thumb.jpg.2158e5750326b5828741c9466bca9477.jpg

Edited by SK0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Your answer to second "riddle" is correct. Good. Use this answer to solve first "riddle" accurately.

 

What EVENT, specifically, do you have when this occurs on first "riddle"?

 

We want to see R2R first?

 

Heisenberg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
For those having difficulty understanding the information gucci has attempted to convey, might I suggest continuing the discussion from a slightly different orientation (in an effort to 'fast-forward' the application of said information onto 'present day'). Doing so, allows everyone to 'set aside' that which provides them difficulty - with the goal being to return to reading gucci's words after having the ability to understand 'part' of what gucci hopes to get you to see. Once one solves part of a problem, by definition, one then has a different problem before them.

 

The market begins a new cycle (for all fractals) at 14:15 (Eastern Time) yesterday (10-13-2010). Start the annotation process from that point in time.

 

HTH.

 

- Spydertrader

 

"There is only one problem in life: How do you go about the process of solving problems."

 

One of my favorite exercises in this entire thread. In fact, I love this channel drill so much that I use it as part of the training for each of my students. There's a TON of information within this drill, and it may take you a long time to piece it all together, but it has a bit of everything that one uses in their daily decision making process...sub fractals, containers, ve's, pace accelerations, unobservable events, etc...this list goes on! If you have a problem maintaining fractal integrity, this drill will be a challenge.

 

I don't have time to lead a discussion on this exercise, but I thought it worthwhile for some of you to revisit this drill, and perhaps work through it together.

 

Spyder tells us that a new channel begins at 1415 on 10/13/10. The channel ends at 1030 on 10/15/10.

 

Good luck!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On Friday, Jack posted his open for today, and he was right.

Today he posted his open for tomorrow. Does your MADA agree with it?

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=34007&d=1358217351

 

Great question. My response to Jack in that thread indicated I thought we were forming a pt 3 at the end of the day (see chart snippet) and I anticipated a "long" on the open from pt 3 to ftt. This morning's open invalided my anticipation.

 

I'm still trying to annotate this time period to my satisfaction. How would you annotate the end of yesterday and today's gap adjusted open snippet?

 

-river

5aa711a164885_eod01142013.jpg.3e7158561a8b20e99b5dee342b3958ef.jpg

5aa711a168595_gapadjopen01152013.jpg.08e90ca1a468a4ea515dacd3bcfbd119.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
We want to see R2R first?

 

Heisenberg

We know R2R is a component of volume sequences that we don't think too much CONSCIOUSLY about what corresponds on the Traverse channel at the price pane. R2R is not an event on the Traverse channel. (Hint: Read my replies again. What event do you see concurrently on Traverse channel when you see Increasing Red? Pt 1, BO, Pt 2, Pt 3, VE, New Pt 2, New Pt 3, FTT, new FTT. Which one?)

 

I assume that you know the answer by now. Now, what else do you need to see on the price pane to know that you have the event? (Hint: See what I added on the amended chart.) See what I mean something is missing on the chart?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
One of my favorite exercises in this entire thread. In fact, I love this channel drill so much that I use it as part of the training for each of my students. There's a TON of information within this drill, and it may take you a long time to piece it all together, but it has a bit of everything that one uses in their daily decision making process...sub fractals, containers, ve's, pace accelerations, unobservable events, etc...this list goes on! If you have a problem maintaining fractal integrity, this drill will be a challenge.

 

I don't have time to lead a discussion on this exercise, but I thought it worthwhile for some of you to revisit this drill, and perhaps work through it together.

 

Spyder tells us that a new channel begins at 1415 on 10/13/10. The channel ends at 1030 on 10/15/10.

 

Good luck!

 

I found it. Thank you very much. I see what you mean it has the whole kit and kaboodle.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Great question. My response to Jack in that thread indicated I thought we were forming a pt 3 at the end of the day (see chart snippet) and I anticipated a "long" on the open from pt 3 to ftt. This morning's open invalided my anticipation.

 

I'm still trying to annotate this time period to my satisfaction. How would you annotate the end of yesterday and today's gap adjusted open snippet?

 

-river

I believe that lately Jack posts trades based on his price / volume / end effects approach.

5aa711a1c95a3_riverseod01142013.jpg.b723ecaa77661c31f42c00ad43ae60c6.jpg

5aa711a1cd506_riverssgapadjopen01152013.jpg.e00e23bd54af4467ced6a90355fb6414.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I believe that lately Jack posts trades based on his price / volume / end effects approach.

 

I have done a search on ET and cannot find those charts you have posted by Jack, or are they by Jack? I was under the impression Jack uses TN since he has mentioned it a number of times and recently went to their convention.

 

Below are all of Jacks latest post:

 

Forums - Volume

Forums - Did Robert Hoffman really lose 312K in a single TF trade? Yikes!

Forums - Jack Hershey in trading vs Srinivasa Ramanujan in mathematics

Forums - Volume

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I have done a search on ET and cannot find those charts you have posted by Jack, or are they by Jack? I was under the impression Jack uses TN since he has mentioned it a number of times and recently went to their convention.

 

Below are all of Jacks latest post:

 

Forums - Volume

Forums - Did Robert Hoffman really lose 312K in a single TF trade? Yikes!

Forums - Jack Hershey in trading vs Srinivasa Ramanujan in mathematics

Forums - Volume

Sorry for the confusion. My statement about Jack's recent posts is not related to the annotations I made on river's charts. Those annotations represent my view, and are in response to river's request.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm somewhat new to JH method.Currently i've a few basic queries :

(1)I read somewhere in ET Forum,where jack says:Both retrace n reversal occur with declining volume n BO of rtl occurs on low volume(middle part of b2b or r2r).Is it true in all context(Tape,traverse,channel)?

At other places some including spyder tells BO to be meaningful ,should occur on high volume .

(2)Again jack says : ftt or FTT doesn't occur in VE LTL.

Is it true even when a translation bar occurs on VE?

(3)Say-A tape ftt doesn't occur but a traverse or channel FTT occur.In this case do we have to reverse if dom volume is still showing an increasing tendency.

(4)Jack says : Internals(ftp,fbp,sym etc) do not indicate change mode.

suppose i'm trading at tape level,what would be best strategies in two scenarios - when we encounter an internal which occur on a relatively low n high volume(indicated byl PRV)

 

(5)Can SCT rules be applied on higher time frame(15/60/daily) for positional commodity trading,if i am unable to trade stocks using JH Equity method.

 

I currently trade crude oil on indian commodity market(MCX).I can use only few basic tools (price,volume,trendline,PRV) .Is it possible to trade JH method successfully at intermediate/expert level with these basic tools?

Thanks n regards

Ravi

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm somewhat new to JH method.Currently i've a few basic queries :

(1)I read somewhere in ET Forum,where jack says:Both retrace n reversal occur with declining volume n BO of rtl occurs on low volume(middle part of b2b or r2r).Is it true in all context(Tape,traverse,channel)?

At other places some including spyder tells BO to be meaningful ,should occur on high volume .

(2)Again jack says : ftt or FTT doesn't occur in VE LTL.

Is it true even when a translation bar occurs on VE?

(3)Say-A tape ftt doesn't occur but a traverse or channel FTT occur.In this case do we have to reverse if dom volume is still showing an increasing tendency.

(4)Jack says : Internals(ftp,fbp,sym etc) do not indicate change mode.

suppose i'm trading at tape level,what would be best strategies in two scenarios - when we encounter an internal which occur on a relatively low n high volume(indicated byl PRV)

 

(5)Can SCT rules be applied on higher time frame(15/60/daily) for positional commodity trading,if i am unable to trade stocks using JH Equity method.

 

I currently trade crude oil on indian commodity market(MCX).I can use only few basic tools (price,volume,trendline,PRV) .Is it possible to trade JH method successfully at intermediate/expert level with these basic tools?

Thanks n regards

Ravi

 

eyeamravi,

 

Welcome to the thread. I don’t consider myself an expert on the methodology but I am at least a few steps into the journey. Perhaps someone else will offer their answers to your questions while my post sits in queue to be moderated before it appears and hopefully if anyone finds any of my answers lacking they will post their comments.

 

1) A retrace and a reversal both occur on nondominant volume as price heads toward the RTL, a retrace becomes a reversal as price crosses the RTL on increasing volume. This is true on every fractal.

 

2) Perhaps Jack meant that if price has traversed its container how can it “fail to traverse”?

 

3) A Channel FTT would also be a traverse FTT and a tape FTT. I cannot envision the scenario you describe.

 

4) If we are not in “change” mode, then we must be in “continuation”.

 

5) I am not familiar with any concrete SCT rules. Spydertrader has repeatedly said that the methodology works on any instrument and any timeframe provided there is sufficient liquidity.

 

The tools you mentioned, price, volume, trendlines and PRV, are sufficient for the methodology. Of course, your level of success using the tools available to you depends on your journey.

 

HTH

 

-river

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I've had a lot of success with this method. While I'm grateful to spyder for his insights and guidance, most of my success came through self-discovery, using the basics described in this and other threads. I will upload a couple of recent Traverses in hopes that it might encourage others. Success will only come after you achieve complete understanding of how to build containers correctly and manage fractal nesting,

 

Jbarnby,thank you for posting your charts.10-3-2012 at 14:30 est i believe the market completed a down tape putting it at PT 2 of the down traverse.Then two black bars later you put the traverse level PT 3 and annotated a thicker traverse rtl.In this case there was a break of the down tape rtl on ibv on 14:40 est.I believe this increasing black volume bar coupled with the final push down on irv created the traverse fractal.Would this be correct? If in this exact same situation with the only difference being neither 14:35 or 14:40 est were on ibv would the market still create a down traverse or would the fractal stay a down tape (just be fanned)? Tia

5aa711a3bd913_10-3-12jbarnby.thumb.png.30f06bcb9cfa75c39dc1d3858b40b3b3.png

Edited by patrader

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Jbarnby,thank you for posting your charts.10-3-2012 at 14:30 est i believe the market completed a down tape putting it at PT 2 of the down traverse.Then two black bars later you put the traverse level PT 3 and annotated a thicker traverse rtl.In this case there was a break of the down tape rtl on ibv on 14:40 est.I believe this increasing black volume bar coupled with the final push down on irv created the traverse fractal.Would this be correct? If in this exact same situation with the only difference being neither 14:35 or 14:40 est were on ibv would the market still create a down traverse or would the fractal stay a down tape (just be fanned)? Tia

 

The question sounds simple enough but it's really a bit more complicated than i can fully explain here. When you're able to see all the fractals at play, even at the finest level, you can (as spyder said to me once) move everything down one fractal. He actually walked thru a sequence one time doing just that...which kinda rattled my mind at the time. But volume does play a keen role in our analysis. As has been pointed out in this and other threads, increasing dominant volume confirms pt 3. You will never have a tape/traverse/channel without confirming inc dominant vol after a pt 3.

 

One of the most consistent errors I see on charts is misinterpreting increasing volume, and how it relates to formations. I wish more folks would work hard to differentiate that relationship. Additionally, many of the answers to sequences and volume reside in the relationship of peaks & troughs.

 

I spent so many years playing with trendlines (which are important) but failing to realize all of the important elements of volume that really tell the story.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Jbarnby,thank you for posting your charts.10-3-2012 at 14:30 est i believe the market completed a down tape putting it at PT 2 of the down traverse.Then two black bars later you put the traverse level PT 3 and annotated a thicker traverse rtl.In this case there was a break of the down tape rtl on ibv on 14:40 est.I believe this increasing black volume bar coupled with the final push down on irv created the traverse fractal.Would this be correct? If in this exact same situation with the only difference being neither 14:35 or 14:40 est were on ibv would the market still create a down traverse or would the fractal stay a down tape (just be fanned)? Tia

 

patrader, it is probably worth your while re-reading this thread. Sypders constantly reminds us to focus on the volume pane. The price pane is where we like to look since that is where the profits reside, however the sequences lie in the volume pane.

 

HTH

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The question sounds simple enough but it's really a bit more complicated than i can fully explain here.

 

jbarnby,thanks again for your comments.I have many questions but will keep it to one question at a time.Hopefully they're not too complicated to answer here.10-3-2012 at 14:30 est i believe the market completed a down tape fractal (where you placed directly below this bar a purple "2"). Would this be correct?

5aa711a40f939_10-3-12jbarnby.thumb.png.1cd967a35f9b5c617052dbeaac2d0a57.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
When you're able to see all the fractals at play, even at the finest level, you can (as spyder said to me once) move everything down one fractal.

 

JBarnby, thanks for your posts and your commentary. Would you please explain what you mean "when you move everything down one fractal"?

Is it going from a tape to a traverse or a traverse to a tape?

 

Thank you for your help

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • also ... and barely on topic... Winners (always*) overpay. Buying the dips is a subscription to the belief that winners win by underpaying - when in actuality winners (inevitably/always*) win by overpaying... it’s amazing the percentage of traders who think winners win by underpaying ... “Winners (always*) overpay.” ...  One way to implement this ‘belief’ is to only reenter when prices have emphatically resumed the 'trend' .   (Fwiw, While “Winners (always*) overpay.” holds true in most endeavors (relationships, business, sports, etc...) - “Winners (always*) overpay.”  is especially true for auctions... continuous auctions included.)
    • re:  "Does it make sense to always buy the dips?  “Buy the dip.”  You hear this all the time in crypto investing trading speculation gambling. [zdo taking some liberties] It refers, of course, to buying more bitcoin (or digital assets) when they go down in price: when the price “dips.” Some people brag about “buying the dip," showing they know better than the crowd. Others “buy the dip” as an investment strategy: they’re getting a bargain. The problem is, buying the dip is a fallacy. You can’t buy the dip, because you can't see the total dip until much later. First, I’ll explain this in a way that will make it simple and obvious to you; then I’ll show you a better way of investing. You Only Know the Dip in Hindsight When people talk about “buying the dip,” what they’re really saying is, “I bought when the price was going down.” " ... example of a dip ... 
    • Date: 19th April 2024. Weekly Commodity Market Update: Oil Prices Correct and Supply Concerns Persist.   The ongoing developments in the Middle East sparked a wave of risk aversion and fueled supply concerns and investors headed for safety. Hopes for imminent rate cuts from the Federal Reserve diminish while attention is now turning towards the demand outlook. The Gold price hit a high of $2417.89 per ounce overnight. Sentiment has already calmed down again and bullion is trading at $2376.50 per ounce as haven flows ease. Oil prices initially moved higher as concern over escalating tensions with the WTI contract hit a session high of $85.508 per barrel overnight, before correcting to currently $81.45 per barrel. Oil Prices Under Pressure Amid Middle East Tensions Last week, commodity indexes showed little movement, with Oil prices undergoing a slight correction. Meanwhile, Gold reached yet another record high, mirroring the upward trend in cocoa prices. Once again today, USOil prices experienced a correction and has remained under pressure, retesting the 50-day EMA at $81.00 as we moving into the weekend. Hence, despite the Israel’s retaliatory strike on Iran, sentiments stabilized following reports suggesting a measured response aimed at avoiding further escalation. Brent crude futures witnessed a more than 4% leap, driven by concerns over potential disruptions to oil supplies in the Middle East, only to subsequently erase all gains. Similarly with USOIL, UKOIL hovers just below $87 per barrel, marginally below Thursday’s closing figures. Nevertheless, volatility is expected to continue in the market as several potential risks loom:   Disruption to the Strait of Hormuz: The possibility of Iran disrupting navigation through the vital shipping lane, is still in play. The Strait of Hormuz serves as the Persian Gulf’s primary route to international waters, with approximately 21 million barrels of oil passing through daily. Recent events, including Iran’s seizure of an Israel-linked container ship, underscore the geopolitical sensitivity of the region. Tougher Sanctions on Iran: Analysts speculate that the US may impose stricter sanctions on Iranian oil exports or intensify enforcement of existing restrictions. With global oil consumption reaching 102 million barrels per day, Iran’s production of 3.3 million barrels remains significant. Recent actions targeting Venezuelan oil highlight the potential for increased pressure on Iranian exports. OPEC Output Increases: Despite the desire for higher prices, OPEC members such as Saudi Arabia and Russia have constrained output in recent years. However, sustained crude prices above $100 per barrel could prompt concerns about demand and incentivize increased production. The OPEC may opt to boost oil output should tensions escalate further and prices surge. Ukraine Conflict: Amidst the focus on the Middle East, markets overlooking Russia’s actions in Ukraine. Potential retaliatory strikes by Kyiv on Russian oil infrastructure could impact exports, adding further complexity to global oil markets.   Technical Analysis USOIL is marking one of the steepest weekly declines witnessed this year after a brief period of consolidation. The breach below the pivotal support level of 84.00, coupled with the descent below the mid of the 4-month upchannel, signals a possible shift in market sentiment towards a bearish trend reversal. Adding to the bearish outlook are indications such as the downward slope in the RSI. However, the asset still hold above the 50-day EMA which coincides also with the mid of last year’s downleg, with key support zone at $80.00-$81.00. If it breaks this support zone, the focus may shift towards the 200-day EMA and 38.2% Fib. level at $77.60-$79.00. Conversely, a rejection of the $81 level and an upside potential could see the price returning back to $84.00. A break of the latter could trigger the attention back to the December’s resistance, situated around $86.60. A breakthrough above this level could ignite a stronger rally towards the $89.20-$90.00 zone. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business. Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar. Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding on how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE! Click HERE to READ more Market news. Michalis Efthymiou Market Analyst HMarkets Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past perfrmance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in FX and CFDs products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • Date: 18th April 2024. Market News – Stock markets benefit from Dollar correction. Economic Indicators & Central Banks:   Technical buying, bargain hunting, and risk aversion helped Treasuries rally and unwind recent losses. Yields dropped from the recent 2024 highs. Asian stock markets strengthened, as the US Dollar corrected in the wake of comments from Japan’s currency chief Masato Kanda, who said G7 countries continue to stress that excessive swings and disorderly moves in the foreign exchange market were harmful for economies. US Stockpiles expanded to 10-month high. The data overshadowed the impact of geopolitical tensions in the Middle East as traders await Israel’s response to Iran’s unprecedented recent attack. President Joe Biden called for higher tariffs on imports of Chinese steel and aluminum.   Financial Markets Performance:   The USDIndex stumbled, falling to 105.66 at the end of the day from the intraday high of 106.48. It lost ground against most of its G10 peers. There wasn’t much on the calendar to provide new direction. USDJPY lows retesting the 154 bottom! NOT an intervention yet. BoJ/MoF USDJPY intervention happens when there is more than 100+ pip move in seconds, not 50 pips. USOIL slumped by 3% near $82, as US crude inventories rose by 2.7 million barrels last week, hitting the highest level since last June, while gauges of fuel demand declined. Gold strengthened as the dollar weakened and bullion is trading at $2378.44 per ounce. Market Trends:   Wall Street closed in the red after opening with small corrective gains. The NASDAQ underperformed, slumping -1.15%, with the S&P500 -0.58% lower, while the Dow lost -0.12. The Nikkei closed 0.2% higher, the Hang Seng gained more than 1. European and US futures are finding buyers. A gauge of global chip stocks and AI bellwether Nvidia Corp. have both fallen into a technical correction. The TMSC reported its first profit rise in a year, after strong AI demand revived growth at the world’s biggest contract chipmaker. The main chipmaker to Apple Inc. and Nvidia Corp. recorded a 9% rise in net income, beating estimates. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business. Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar. Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding on how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE! Click HERE to READ more Market news. Andria Pichidi Market Analyst HFMarkets Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in FX and CFDs products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • Date: 17th April 2024. Market News – Appetite for risk-taking remains weak. Economic Indicators & Central Banks:   Stocks, Treasury yields and US Dollar stay firmed. Fed Chair Powell added to the recent sell off. His slightly more hawkish tone further priced out chances for any imminent action and the timing of a cut was pushed out further. He suggested if higher inflation does persist, the Fed will hold rates steady “for as long as needed.” Implied Fed Fund: There remains no real chance for a move on May 1 and at their intraday highs the June implied funds rate future showed only 5 bps, while July reflected only 10 bps. And a full 25 bps was not priced in until November, with 38 bps in cuts seen for 2024. US & EU Economies Diverging: Lagarde says ECB is moving toward rate cuts – if there are no major shocks. UK March CPI inflation falls less than expected. Output price inflation has started to nudge higher, despite another decline in input prices. Together with yesterday’s higher than expected wage numbers, the data will add to the arguments of the hawks at the BoE, which remain very reluctant to contemplate rate cuts. Canada CPI rose 0.6% in March, double the 0.3% February increase BUT core eased. The doors are still open for a possible cut at the next BoC meeting on June 5. IMF revised up its global growth forecast for 2024 with inflation easing, in its new World Economic Outlook. This is consistent with a global soft landing, according to the report. Financial Markets Performance:   USDJPY also inched up to 154.67 on expectations the BoJ will remain accommodative and as the market challenges a perceived 155 red line for MoF intervention. USOIL prices slipped -0.15% to $84.20 per barrel. Gold rose 0.24% to $2389.11 per ounce, a new record closing high as geopolitical risks overshadowed the impacts of rising rates and the stronger dollar. Market Trends:   Wall Street waffled either side of unchanged on the day amid dimming rate cut potential, rising yields, and earnings. The major indexes closed mixed with the Dow up 0.17%, while the S&P500 and NASDAQ lost -0.21% and -0.12%, respectively. Asian stock markets mostly corrected again, with Japanese bourses underperforming and the Nikkei down -1.3%. Mainland China bourses were a notable exception and the CSI 300 rallied 1.4%, but the MSCI Asia Pacific index came close to erasing the gains for this year. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business. Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar. Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding on how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE! Click HERE to READ more Market news. Andria Pichidi Market Analyst HFMarkets Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in FX and CFDs products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.vvvvvvv
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.