Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

nasdaq5048

Antonio: Please help me on MP for easylanguage

Recommended Posts

Antonio,

 

I am trying to write a EL to identify a tail on a 30 min chart on easylanguage. I cant seem to get started. Could you please help me a little bit on that?

 

I dont know how to use array. Do you need array?

 

 

Thank you!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi nasdaq5048,

 

An array is required to store the TPO count at each price.

 

The definition of a tail is at least two consecutive price levels with a TPO count equal to 1, either at the high or low of the Market Profile time period. This creates a selling tail or a buying tail. Tail is being defined here because this is what I would use to code the indicator.

 

Therefore, once you have an array with the TPO count at each price, check the two high prices in the array. If both prices have a TPO count equal to 1, then a selling tail exists. Reverse to identify a buying tail.

 

Attached is EL code that will display a number which indicates whether a tail exists in the Market Profile. This code will display one of the following values below the Market Profile:

 

0 = No Tails Exist

1 = Buying Tail Exists

2 = Selling Tail Exists

3 = Both a Buying Tail and a Selling Tail Exists

 

Apply the Market Profile indicator to your chart so that you can see the profile. Then apply the indicator attached. All of the code is unprotected so that you can make changes. This should get you started. Hope this helps.

MP_TAILS.ELD

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks a lot a lot. That really helps.

One question. Whether there is a tail is the variable tailsfound right? How come when i try to plot it using plot1, it doesnt show a value?

I am trying to use this on a radarscreen and see how many tails there were. So, i am trying to return a value if a tail exist.

So, i tried plot1(tailsfound,"Tail"); in the bottom of the code, and nothing shows up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

nasdaq,

 

The tailsfound value is printed so you can verify it by comparing it to the Market Profile. To plot tailsfound, place the Plot1(...) command under the Text_Style(...) command (shows up twice). Remember that tailsfound is computed at the end of the day. You'll see what I mean once you plot it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, i got it now.

I ran into this problem which the tailsexist function count the last bar as tail too. So, if they close on the high of the day of the last bar, the function count it as selling tail. I tried to modify the function but no luck.

 

I add 2 variables hi, lo on the tailexist function

if time = 1615 then hi = high;

if time = 1600 then lo = low;

and change

if NumTPOs[index] = 1 and NumTPOs[index+1] = 1 and lowd(0) <> lo then

begin

TailsFound = 1;

end;

if NumTPOs[index] = 1 and NumTPOs[index-1] = 1 then

begin

if TailsFound = 1 and highd(0) <> hi then

TailsFound = 3

else

TailsFound = 2;

end;

 

It doesnt seems to work. It still sees the last bar as a tail. I am just trying to ignore the tail if the high is made on the last bar or the low is made on the last bar. But no luck at all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here you go nasdaq... Use this code for the TailsExist function. It will disregard a tail if the high or low was made in the last bar of the day. I believe this is what you were trying to achieve, which makes sense. That was a good catch. Good Luck!

 

P.S. Nasdaq, you had the right idea in your code, just required a little tweaking. :)

 

inputs:
LL( NumericSimple ),
HH( NumericSimple ),
Offset( NumericSimple ),
PriceAtIndex( NumericSimple ),
TickSize( NumericSimple ),
NumTPOs[n]( NumericArrayRef );

variables:
Index( 0 ),
TailsFound( 0 ),
rc( 0 );

TailsFound = 0;

// Get the array index for the lowest price of the Market Profile range
rc = GetArrayIndex( LL, Offset, PriceAtIndex, TickSize, Index );

// Check if there is a buying tail
if NumTPOs[index] = 1 and NumTPOs[index+1] = 1 then
begin
if Date <> Date[1] then
begin
	// Was the last bar of the day also the low of the day?
	// If not, then mark it as a selling tail
	if Low[1] <> LowD(1) then
		TailsFound = 1;
end
else if LastBarOnChart then
begin
	// Was the last bar on chart also the low of the day? 
	// if not, then mark it as a selling tail
	if Low <> LowD(0) then
		TailsFound = 1;
end;	
end;

// Get the array index for the highest price of the Market Profile range
rc = GetArrayIndex( HH, Offset, PriceAtIndex, TickSize, Index );

// Check if there is a buying tail
if NumTPOs[index] = 1 and NumTPOs[index-1] = 1 then
begin
if Date <> Date[1] then
begin
	// Was the last bar of the day also the high of the day?
	// If not, then mark it as a buying tail
	if High[1] <> HighD(1) then
	begin
		if TailsFound = 1 then
			TailsFound = 3
		else
			TailsFound = 2;
	end;
end
else if LastBarOnChart then
begin
	// Was the last bar on chart also the high of the day? 
	// if not, then mark it as a buying tail
	if High <> HighD(0) then
	begin
		if TailsFound = 1 then
			TailsFound = 3
		else
			TailsFound = 2;
	end;
end;
end;

TailExists = TailsFound;

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think we have a problem with the new TS build with Ant's MP. I just installed a new 3247 build and got this chart with MP enabled. Is there a fix for this problem? Thanks.

MP-in-3247.gif.a55bc43e3583a1d23ff28e19a6a362fd.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Agreed since some of the new traders usually lose money in start and some loses more while chasing their lost money and eventually ends up blaming to their brokers part.
    • The crypto market are also in phase of maturing like the forex and other trading assets so we can do much more accurate analysis than before since early days it was purely a luck if the investments in crypto bears results because most of the coins or tokens never come to fruition. Some early birds were also able to make profits on these tokens or coins. e,g., like turtle coin starts with 1 satoshi and go up to 7 sathoshis, quite good rewards. another token lmgx now hovering at 10 started from 1, 
    • How's about other crypto exchanges? Are all they banned in your country or only Binance?
    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.