Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

ckait

Why Not Just Get in !

Recommended Posts

Since I am a profile trader entries can be a little obscure a times. Trying to initiate a trade based on a developing profile can be a difficult thing, take it at the edge or the poc every day is a little different. After saying that, if you have a set up that is is as much gut as structure, lets say because of a price action or order flow type of pattern, whos to say you cant just jump in. Now I'm not talking sbout blind throwing money at the market, but sometimes pattterns show up in different ways, like in a gut feeling. So if you have a defined amount your willing to risk and and a pretty good idea of your first target, why not take the trade? This question I guess is more geared to those who actually make a living doing this, and i have a feeling a lot of the most sucsessful traders have something like this in their arsenal. Hope this can start something .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One problem with "Just getting in" is that it is not a trading strategy that lends itself to performance measurement. Without a rules based concept, how are you going to know the probabilities associated with the entry.

 

If you are studying profiles, I have noticed that when 3 or more contiguous letters occur, you can safely play the breakout from either side of this "box". This concept is discussed further at Cisco futures.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

“Uncertainty, shifting quality of information, high risk, and ever changing conditions…”

Aren’t you ultimately saying you are considering lowering your certainty threshold slightly? Foregoing a little bit of ‘confirmation’, etc.

… continuing to keep the odds on your side while missing fewer opportunities?

Do it! But plan to do it first. Granted significant projections may be going on, but in the memories of when I asked the same kind of questions of myself I was almost, but not quite, ready to do it. Keep in mind - Every tweak to a system, be it a random or discretionary or highly structured system, is not really a tweak. It's actually a whole new system!

What else do you need to do to prepare for this minor (but major) shift in tactics?

hth

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.