Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

agon

Volume Splitter

Recommended Posts

This kind of error could cause a trader to enter or exit based on incorrect information and just one mistake could cost more than the subscription to Market Delta & IQFeed!

 

Absolutely correct, so trying to make broker supplied feeds work for BID/ASK differential duties is an exercise in futility. Use a proper data feed (with a ticker plant and available historical BID/ASK data) for a few bucks more a day and then focus your efforts on your trading set ups.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Here is a ladder comparison between Ninjatrader with GOM Ladder & Zen-Fire & Market Delta with IQFeed. Look at the circled area. IQFeed & Ninja have totally different results. Interestingly enough, the price above and below they are almost the same.

 

This kind of error could cause a trader to enter or exit based on incorrect information and just one mistake could cost more than the subscription to Market Delta & IQFeed!

The exceptionally well built GomLadder (another excellent job by supper Gomi!) in NT connected to DTN.IQ feed will give you results that you can at least trust.

 

BTW, did I mention that Gomi rocks! :cool:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yes....a $2,000 a month feed.

 

DTN.IQ feed passes the verification test on a week by week basis......none of the broker supplied feeds do from all the various testing done.

 

I dunno this still sounds rather blanket :): I am not after a detailed test plan just a couple of sentences on how you test and with what.

 

Which feed? I am not sure why the secrecy tbh :) Is it NxCore? Thompson/Reuter? Do you check that the cumulative total matches day to day? That would seem to be a fairly good 'checksum'. Do they tally exactly? Does it vary day to day? Are you using the same client software to test? Just a couple of sentences would elevate this from being a blanket statement.

 

Edit I am not disagreeing with your conclusions (thoughwith broker supplied feeds infrastructure plays a big part) just wondered how you arrived at them :)

Edited by BlowFish

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Now, in the data feed, that low level of trade stuff does not need to be reflected, but... It seems quite reasonable to show book updates prior to transactions. It could go either way--so long as you are consistent and always do it one way or the other.

 

I would be interested... in the low level data of dtn.iq--are book updates always given before transactions? So a trade of 10 at bid will be always immediately preceded by a reduction in the bid size by 10?

 

I agree. I saw the same thing with the TT feed. Book updates always came before trades. I assume that this is also the case with IQFeed because if trades came before book updates then you wouldn't have the issue with trades between the inside market.

 

I have looked at event data for zen-fire and can say that there are definitely things that don't add up. Something like bid is at 19, there's a trade at same bid price of 25 and next update is bid is at 43 at same price. Obviously, there should have been some updates in the middle in order for that to have happened but they didn't show up in the feed I received.

 

I saw the same thing with TT's feed. Most likely they just drop the book updates in favour of showing you the most recent inside market. I've talked about his earlier. The feed providers have to decide whether speed or complete data is more important and in most cases it's speed. DTN claim that they don't filter anything. Even their API documentation says that you they can't guarantee that all the data you get is valid because they don't filter anything.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I always thought filtering was a cop out, a throw back to a bygone era. It is using a band aid rather than curing the wound. Put another way with robust error checking filtering should be unnecessary. I have also wondered how an electronic exchange can be designed that can generate 'bad ticks'. Sure some fat fingered human might accidentally sell 100,000 rather than 100 but that's a different matter altogether.

 

I guess when people talk of filtering they might mean coalescing or aggregation? Filtering to me implies purposely removing data.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I dunno this still sounds rather blanket :): I am not after a detailed test plan just a couple of sentences on how you test and with what.

 

Which feed? I am not sure why the secrecy tbh :) Is it NxCore? Thompson/Reuter? Do you check that the cumulative total matches day to day? That would seem to be a fairly good 'checksum'. Do they tally exactly? Does it vary day to day? Are you using the same client software to test? Just a couple of sentences would elevate this from being a blanket statement.

 

Edit I am not disagreeing with your conclusions (though with broker supplied feeds infrastructure plays a big part) just wondered how you arrived at them :)

Yes on a day to day basis the Cumulative Delta plots/data match up exactly when the feeds are compared together....we are not finding any data discrepancies.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You raise a good point about bid/ask in that is it really worth it to have bid/ask instead of the more reliable uptickd/downtick?

 

I'm pretty sure I remember reading at the Neoticker forum that Lawrence Chan (long time system developer, trader, and owner/creator of TickQuest, the makers of Neoticker -- What a mouth full that was!) always recommends using up/dn tick on any data feed due to its higher reliability across data sources.

 

With kind regards,

MK

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm pretty sure I remember reading at the Neoticker forum that Lawrence Chan (long time system developer, trader, and owner/creator of TickQuest, the makers of Neoticker -- What a mouth full that was!) always recommends using up/dn tick on any data feed due to its higher reliability across data sources.

 

With kind regards,

MK

Yes, back in the day it was not easy to get clean BID/ASK differential data (or charting software that even knew how to show that data.....INCLUDING NeoTicker). Also, after all these years you can see not even Neoticker has any decent off the shelf Cumulative Delta tracking tools. LC does not at all seem interested in CD, so I am never surprised when he makes comments like that. ;)

 

Well now we have MarketDelta, Investor RT, NT7, Sierra Charts, and soon TradeVec and the next Tradestation summer release that will have Cumulative Delta tools.....COOL! :cool:

 

Traders who want to pay attention to the order flow are asking for these bid/ask differential tools everywhere, so I wonder how good LC is at spotting a trend? ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yes, back in the day it was not easy to get clean BID/ASK differential data (or charting software that even knew how to show that data.....INCLUDING NeoTicker). Also, after all these years you can see not even Neoticker has any decent off the shelf Cumulative Delta tracking tools. LC does not at all seem interested in CD, so I am never surprised when he makes comments like that. ;)

 

Well now we have MarketDelta, Investor RT, NT7, Sierra Charts, and soon TradeVec and the next Tradestation summer release that will have Cumulative Delta tools.....COOL! :cool:

 

Traders who want to pay attention to the order flow are asking for these bid/ask differential tools everywhere, so I wonder how good LC is at spotting a trend? ;)

 

That's pretty harsh coming from someone who has been calling the top since last April.(ES - 879, wasn't it?)

 

Prolly going to be right this April. You should start a thread. lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
That's pretty harsh coming from someone who has been calling the top since last April.(ES - 879, wasn't it?)

 

Prolly going to be right this April. You should start a thread. lol

I never called any top last April....you seem confused. I have traded 9 longer term ES trades since this time last year and all were profitable (some LONG and some SHORT). Had some very nice longer term LONG trades this past year too. ;)

 

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yQpQ6OZCyZA]YouTube - Delta Zone for the BUY![/ame]

 

 

 

Three very good longer term LONG trades in the ES this past year.....LONG off the 866/867's.....off the 977/978's....and was just recently in a longer term LONG ES trade off the 1040.75's bounce. I trade BOTH directions as I see longer term set ups form. ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
That's pretty harsh coming from someone who has been calling the top since last April.(ES - 879, wasn't it?)

 

Prolly going to be right this April. You should start a thread. lol

Being harsh is very different from stimulating some competition in the vendor charting industry. ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yes, back in the day it was not easy to get clean BID/ASK differential data (or charting software that even knew how to show that data.....INCLUDING NeoTicker). Also, after all these years you can see not even Neoticker has any decent off the shelf Cumulative Delta tracking tools. LC does not at all seem interested in CD, so I am never surprised when he makes comments like that. ;)

 

Well now we have MarketDelta, Investor RT, NT7, Sierra Charts, and soon TradeVec and the next Tradestation summer release that will have Cumulative Delta tools.....COOL! :cool:

 

Traders who want to pay attention to the order flow are asking for these bid/ask differential tools everywhere, so I wonder how good LC is at spotting a trend? ;)

 

Hiya FT,

 

I can't entirely speak for how LC trades, but I know he has done extensive work on market internals, and that is why neobreadth exists. He is a trader, and what you see in Neoticker is what tools he and the TickQuest traders need - not necessarily what others want. The model is more about giving you the tool to make anything you want in any language you want.

 

Delta tools are available from the forum or one can code it up however they like in whatever language they like.

 

Yes, I am a Neoticker fan :)

 

With kind regards,

MK

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hiya FT,

 

I can't entirely speak for how LC trades, but I know he has done extensive work on market internals, and that is why neobreadth exists. He is a trader, and what you see in Neoticker is what tools he and the TickQuest traders need - not necessarily what others want. The model is more about giving you the tool to make anything you want in any language you want.

 

Delta tools are available from the forum or one can code it up however they like in whatever language they like.

 

Yes, I am a Neoticker fan :)

 

With kind regards,

MK

Right, I am familiar with Neoticker (used it for a while in the past) and I do like the charting application overall. I have also followed the CD tools discussions at the NT forum in the past........... CVD (Cumulative Volume Delta) Indicator - Page 3 - NeoTicker Forums

 

I have several trader friends who use NT so I know you get some workable flexibility in the use of their charting app. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

With regards to data feeds. I talked to the API guy of IQFeed yesterday and he couldn't tell me whether inside market updates come before trades or not. He said it depends on how the exchanges report it because they just forward it. I just called Eurex to find out and they told me they'll get back to me with an answer on how they report trades to the feed providers.

 

I compared IQFeed with TT's feed today and IQFeed serves more trades. There was even a point where MD Trader showed a low of the day without any volume having traded there, which means that they somehow filtered out that trade.

 

I've said before that ideally you want two different feeds. One that reports all information and is possibly a bit slower (used for charting and data processing) and one that reports only the most recent information and is really fast (used for execution/DOM). I do have the impression that IQFeed is the former and TT's feed is the later.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I've said before that ideally you want two different feeds. One that reports all information and is possibly a bit slower (used for charting and data processing) and one that reports only the most recent information and is really fast (used for execution/DOM). I do have the impression that IQFeed is the former and TT's feed is the later.

 

This makes a lot of sense. I am using IQFeed for Market Delta charting and Zen-fire for Ninjatrader for the DOM.

 

I don't know if it's the Market Delta software or the IQFeed but when I compare the ninja DOM to the Market Delta Time & Sales and charts, the Ninja DOM moves faster. There is maybe 1/4 to 1/2 second lag in Market Delta. This is why I think it's important to keep an eye on the DOM.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yes on a day to day basis the Cumulative Delta plots/data match up exactly when the feeds are compared together....we are not finding any data discrepancies.

 

Thanks, matching exactly is pretty conclusive and that alone would add weight to the whole procedure.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm pretty sure I remember reading at the Neoticker forum that Lawrence Chan (long time system developer, trader, and owner/creator of TickQuest, the makers of Neoticker -- What a mouth full that was!) always recommends using up/dn tick on any data feed due to its higher reliability across data sources.

 

With kind regards,

MK

 

As an aside Neoticker (in theory, I have not used NT for quite a while) would be a good option for this type of work (with its 'tick precise' technology).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm pretty sure I remember reading at the Neoticker forum that Lawrence Chan always recommends using up/dn tick on any data feed due to its higher reliability across data sources.

 

With kind regards,

MK

Try and plot CVD as Fulcrum does alongside with cummulative up/down tick volume delta... and look at it - can you figure out anything from it? Tell us if you could.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Try and plot CVD as Fulcrum does alongside with cummulative up/down tick volume delta... and look at it - can you figure out anything from it? Tell us if you could.

 

Hi there,

 

I have indeed done this for quite some time on Asian futures. I'm not sure I understand your question though. Figure anything out?

 

With kind regards,

MK

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OK. I thought you havent done... because cum delta up/dn ticks makes no sense whatsoever. while cvd on bid/ask volume makes sense most of the time...

 

i tried it for iqfeed and barchart.... perhaps your experience varies... good for you! :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Both are methods to try to detect 'trade direction'. Lots of studies have been done on how efficacious these methods are (I mentioned these earlier in the thread). Broadly speaking most conclude that V@B/A is about 10% more efficacious than uptick/downtick though results do vary. None of it is precise however they did convince me that it is a 'good enough' metric to be useful.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

from my personal use of CVD - B/A has 25% efficience (which is high) and up/dn tick = 00000000... which for me doesnt mean up/dn tick 25% less efficient :) for me that mean - useless ;)

 

P.S. I use very few indicators (2-3 at a time). so may be I am not the one to argue on this :helloooo:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
from my personal use of CVD - B/A has 25% efficience (which is high) and up/dn tick = 00000000... which for me doesnt mean up/dn tick 25% less efficient :) for me that mean - useless ;)

 

P.S. I use very few indicators (2-3 at a time). so may be I am not the one to argue on this :helloooo:

 

That's odd most studies have 60%-65% (ish) for up/down and 70-80% (maybe a wee bit more) for V@B/A. Of course whether trade direction is a precursor to directional change in price is another matter. This is in markets where there is an audited database of trades (e.g. specialist markets) so it is possible that they behave a little differently. I wonder whether it is your testing methodology? Of the dozen or so papers that I have found or purchased I cant recall it ever been tested below 60%. Most of the studies have very rigorous testing methodologies. I am trying to imagine where the discrepancy could come form? What data are you using? How are you determining the actual trade direction of each trade?

 

Edit: A thought occurs to me, maybe you are talking about efficacy of using Lee & Ready to determine short term price direction? The studies are concerned with using the algorithm to determine the trade direction (order flow if you like) on each individual trade. Whether this can be used to aid trading decisions is a different matter altogther.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • also ... and barely on topic... Winners (always*) overpay. Buying the dips is a subscription to the belief that winners win by underpaying - when in actuality winners (inevitably/always*) win by overpaying... it’s amazing the percentage of traders who think winners win by underpaying ... “Winners (always*) overpay.” ...  One way to implement this ‘belief’ is to only reenter when prices have emphatically resumed the 'trend' .   (Fwiw, While “Winners (always*) overpay.” holds true in most endeavors (relationships, business, sports, etc...) - “Winners (always*) overpay.”  is especially true for auctions... continuous auctions included.)
    • re:  "Does it make sense to always buy the dips?  “Buy the dip.”  You hear this all the time in crypto investing trading speculation gambling. [zdo taking some liberties] It refers, of course, to buying more bitcoin (or digital assets) when they go down in price: when the price “dips.” Some people brag about “buying the dip," showing they know better than the crowd. Others “buy the dip” as an investment strategy: they’re getting a bargain. The problem is, buying the dip is a fallacy. You can’t buy the dip, because you can't see the total dip until much later. First, I’ll explain this in a way that will make it simple and obvious to you; then I’ll show you a better way of investing. You Only Know the Dip in Hindsight When people talk about “buying the dip,” what they’re really saying is, “I bought when the price was going down.” " ... example of a dip ... 
    • Date: 19th April 2024. Weekly Commodity Market Update: Oil Prices Correct and Supply Concerns Persist.   The ongoing developments in the Middle East sparked a wave of risk aversion and fueled supply concerns and investors headed for safety. Hopes for imminent rate cuts from the Federal Reserve diminish while attention is now turning towards the demand outlook. The Gold price hit a high of $2417.89 per ounce overnight. Sentiment has already calmed down again and bullion is trading at $2376.50 per ounce as haven flows ease. Oil prices initially moved higher as concern over escalating tensions with the WTI contract hit a session high of $85.508 per barrel overnight, before correcting to currently $81.45 per barrel. Oil Prices Under Pressure Amid Middle East Tensions Last week, commodity indexes showed little movement, with Oil prices undergoing a slight correction. Meanwhile, Gold reached yet another record high, mirroring the upward trend in cocoa prices. Once again today, USOil prices experienced a correction and has remained under pressure, retesting the 50-day EMA at $81.00 as we moving into the weekend. Hence, despite the Israel’s retaliatory strike on Iran, sentiments stabilized following reports suggesting a measured response aimed at avoiding further escalation. Brent crude futures witnessed a more than 4% leap, driven by concerns over potential disruptions to oil supplies in the Middle East, only to subsequently erase all gains. Similarly with USOIL, UKOIL hovers just below $87 per barrel, marginally below Thursday’s closing figures. Nevertheless, volatility is expected to continue in the market as several potential risks loom:   Disruption to the Strait of Hormuz: The possibility of Iran disrupting navigation through the vital shipping lane, is still in play. The Strait of Hormuz serves as the Persian Gulf’s primary route to international waters, with approximately 21 million barrels of oil passing through daily. Recent events, including Iran’s seizure of an Israel-linked container ship, underscore the geopolitical sensitivity of the region. Tougher Sanctions on Iran: Analysts speculate that the US may impose stricter sanctions on Iranian oil exports or intensify enforcement of existing restrictions. With global oil consumption reaching 102 million barrels per day, Iran’s production of 3.3 million barrels remains significant. Recent actions targeting Venezuelan oil highlight the potential for increased pressure on Iranian exports. OPEC Output Increases: Despite the desire for higher prices, OPEC members such as Saudi Arabia and Russia have constrained output in recent years. However, sustained crude prices above $100 per barrel could prompt concerns about demand and incentivize increased production. The OPEC may opt to boost oil output should tensions escalate further and prices surge. Ukraine Conflict: Amidst the focus on the Middle East, markets overlooking Russia’s actions in Ukraine. Potential retaliatory strikes by Kyiv on Russian oil infrastructure could impact exports, adding further complexity to global oil markets.   Technical Analysis USOIL is marking one of the steepest weekly declines witnessed this year after a brief period of consolidation. The breach below the pivotal support level of 84.00, coupled with the descent below the mid of the 4-month upchannel, signals a possible shift in market sentiment towards a bearish trend reversal. Adding to the bearish outlook are indications such as the downward slope in the RSI. However, the asset still hold above the 50-day EMA which coincides also with the mid of last year’s downleg, with key support zone at $80.00-$81.00. If it breaks this support zone, the focus may shift towards the 200-day EMA and 38.2% Fib. level at $77.60-$79.00. Conversely, a rejection of the $81 level and an upside potential could see the price returning back to $84.00. A break of the latter could trigger the attention back to the December’s resistance, situated around $86.60. A breakthrough above this level could ignite a stronger rally towards the $89.20-$90.00 zone. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business. Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar. Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding on how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE! Click HERE to READ more Market news. Michalis Efthymiou Market Analyst HMarkets Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past perfrmance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in FX and CFDs products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • Date: 18th April 2024. Market News – Stock markets benefit from Dollar correction. Economic Indicators & Central Banks:   Technical buying, bargain hunting, and risk aversion helped Treasuries rally and unwind recent losses. Yields dropped from the recent 2024 highs. Asian stock markets strengthened, as the US Dollar corrected in the wake of comments from Japan’s currency chief Masato Kanda, who said G7 countries continue to stress that excessive swings and disorderly moves in the foreign exchange market were harmful for economies. US Stockpiles expanded to 10-month high. The data overshadowed the impact of geopolitical tensions in the Middle East as traders await Israel’s response to Iran’s unprecedented recent attack. President Joe Biden called for higher tariffs on imports of Chinese steel and aluminum.   Financial Markets Performance:   The USDIndex stumbled, falling to 105.66 at the end of the day from the intraday high of 106.48. It lost ground against most of its G10 peers. There wasn’t much on the calendar to provide new direction. USDJPY lows retesting the 154 bottom! NOT an intervention yet. BoJ/MoF USDJPY intervention happens when there is more than 100+ pip move in seconds, not 50 pips. USOIL slumped by 3% near $82, as US crude inventories rose by 2.7 million barrels last week, hitting the highest level since last June, while gauges of fuel demand declined. Gold strengthened as the dollar weakened and bullion is trading at $2378.44 per ounce. Market Trends:   Wall Street closed in the red after opening with small corrective gains. The NASDAQ underperformed, slumping -1.15%, with the S&P500 -0.58% lower, while the Dow lost -0.12. The Nikkei closed 0.2% higher, the Hang Seng gained more than 1. European and US futures are finding buyers. A gauge of global chip stocks and AI bellwether Nvidia Corp. have both fallen into a technical correction. The TMSC reported its first profit rise in a year, after strong AI demand revived growth at the world’s biggest contract chipmaker. The main chipmaker to Apple Inc. and Nvidia Corp. recorded a 9% rise in net income, beating estimates. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business. Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar. Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding on how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE! Click HERE to READ more Market news. Andria Pichidi Market Analyst HFMarkets Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in FX and CFDs products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • Date: 17th April 2024. Market News – Appetite for risk-taking remains weak. Economic Indicators & Central Banks:   Stocks, Treasury yields and US Dollar stay firmed. Fed Chair Powell added to the recent sell off. His slightly more hawkish tone further priced out chances for any imminent action and the timing of a cut was pushed out further. He suggested if higher inflation does persist, the Fed will hold rates steady “for as long as needed.” Implied Fed Fund: There remains no real chance for a move on May 1 and at their intraday highs the June implied funds rate future showed only 5 bps, while July reflected only 10 bps. And a full 25 bps was not priced in until November, with 38 bps in cuts seen for 2024. US & EU Economies Diverging: Lagarde says ECB is moving toward rate cuts – if there are no major shocks. UK March CPI inflation falls less than expected. Output price inflation has started to nudge higher, despite another decline in input prices. Together with yesterday’s higher than expected wage numbers, the data will add to the arguments of the hawks at the BoE, which remain very reluctant to contemplate rate cuts. Canada CPI rose 0.6% in March, double the 0.3% February increase BUT core eased. The doors are still open for a possible cut at the next BoC meeting on June 5. IMF revised up its global growth forecast for 2024 with inflation easing, in its new World Economic Outlook. This is consistent with a global soft landing, according to the report. Financial Markets Performance:   USDJPY also inched up to 154.67 on expectations the BoJ will remain accommodative and as the market challenges a perceived 155 red line for MoF intervention. USOIL prices slipped -0.15% to $84.20 per barrel. Gold rose 0.24% to $2389.11 per ounce, a new record closing high as geopolitical risks overshadowed the impacts of rising rates and the stronger dollar. Market Trends:   Wall Street waffled either side of unchanged on the day amid dimming rate cut potential, rising yields, and earnings. The major indexes closed mixed with the Dow up 0.17%, while the S&P500 and NASDAQ lost -0.21% and -0.12%, respectively. Asian stock markets mostly corrected again, with Japanese bourses underperforming and the Nikkei down -1.3%. Mainland China bourses were a notable exception and the CSI 300 rallied 1.4%, but the MSCI Asia Pacific index came close to erasing the gains for this year. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business. Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar. Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding on how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE! Click HERE to READ more Market news. Andria Pichidi Market Analyst HFMarkets Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in FX and CFDs products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.vvvvvvv
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.