Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

pierre

Simple = Smart??

Recommended Posts

Why are some traders able to trade successfully with simple methods while others use complex strategies?

 

Just because a trader uses advanced and complicated methodologies, does this make him smarter than a trader who uses a simple method?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here are some of my thoughts on this topic...

 

To develop a simple, yet effective (read as profitable), trading strategy takes time, knowledge, and experience. Developing a "simple method" that works is a very difficult thing to do! It is the end result of a very long process. On average, how long does it take for a trader to become consistently profitable? For most traders that eventually succeed, it's years. So I would say that to develop a profitable "simple method" requires one to be "smart".

 

However, if a "simple method" is defined as using the same old trite indicators in the same old tired way that most traders do, as described in most books, than that won't lead to success either and is not that "smart". Successful traders do not follow the crowd, they carve out their own path and devise a unique system that works for them. I also doubt that most successful traders use indicators (operative word here is "most'). But that's a topic for another thread.

 

On the contrary, a "complex strategy" does not imply that the trader is "smart". I believe most traders make their trading complex because they throw everything, and the kitchen sink, into their strategy thinking that more is better. They do not know how to discriminate between the good and bad information/ideas that's out there. As discussed in another thread, higher education is probably not required to be a successful trader, but intelligence certainly is. To me, being intelligent means being able to learn how to frame out or structure the markets in a way that makes sense (i.e., doesn't appear random or chaotic), filter out the truly useful ideas, and then use a few key ideas in a unique and clever way that allows you to extract money from the markets. More often then not, when discussing most traders at large, a complex strategy usually indicates that the trader is "not so smart". I'll get off my soapbox now. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Here are some of my thoughts on this topic...

 

To develop a simple, yet effective (read as profitable), trading strategy takes time, knowledge, and experience. Developing a "simple method" that works is a very difficult thing to do! It is the end result of a very long process. On average, how long does it take for a trader to become consistently profitable? For most traders that eventually succeed, it's years. So I would say that to develop a profitable "simple method" requires one to be "smart".

 

However, if a "simple method" is defined as using the same old trite indicators in the same old tired way that most traders do, as described in most books, than that won't lead to success either and is not that "smart". Successful traders do not follow the crowd, they carve out their own path and devise a unique system that works for them. I also doubt that most successful traders use indicators (operative word here is "most'). But that's a topic for another thread.

 

On the contrary, a "complex strategy" does not imply that the trader is "smart". I believe most traders make their trading complex because they throw everything, and the kitchen sink, into their strategy thinking that more is better. They do not know how to discriminate between the good and bad information/ideas that's out there. As discussed in another thread, higher education is probably not required to be a successful trader, but intelligence certainly is. To me, being intelligent means being able to learn how to frame out or structure the markets in a way that makes sense (i.e., doesn't appear random or chaotic), filter out the truly useful ideas, and then use a few key ideas in a unique and clever way that allows you to extract money from the markets. More often then not, when discussing most traders at large, a complex strategy usually indicates that the trader is "not so smart". I'll get off my soapbox now. :)

 

Interesting comment ant. I completely agree with your statement on "Developing a "simple method" that works is a very difficult thing to do! It is the end result of a very long process."

 

New traders may have trouble grasping this idea but it is as true as it can get. Professional traders appear to trade calm and with simple methods. But this is because they are on auto pilot taking setups that they have designed. They are comfortable with their methodologies and can take trades easily. New traders on the other hand have yet to develop rules and setups. This causes fear and overtrading.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmm.. I would have to say there was definitely some market wisdom in those comments by Ant.

 

Let me very strongly suggest to you however that much of the long period of struggle is perhaps unnecessary because it is foolishly spent looking for the Holy Grail of indicators, systems or strategies. Yes, you have been told this numerous times before, but did you really pay attention?

 

New traders seldom take the time to learn the lay of the land (the real underlying structure of the market they wish to trade) or find a trusted guide to this treacherous territory, until such time as they have totally exhausted themselves and their trading capital in their useless search for what others told them (on day one) did not exist. Would they listen? Absolutely not! Thus the actions of most traders, in their early years, cause them to appear to be "dumber than a tree stump" until they have finally reached that exhaustion point. It seems only then that they will begin to listen to the wisdom of those who have gone before them rather than thinking they will somehow come up with that one right combination of magic indicators that works almost every time.

 

Here's a (really important) little hint: It is more about observation of market movements and also harnessing your own emotions than it is about strategies, indicators, methods and systems. Don't be blinded by the B.S. comments bandied about by the 95% who can't trade to save their lives but who still love to read their own opinions in print! I wholeheartedly assure you that there are traders successfully trading many of the methods and/or strategies that you have already tried and discarded as useless. It is far more about you than it is about the individual method.

 

Some compare the markets to a dangerous jungle, others to a battering trip down the rapids. Either way, if you don't understand the lay of the land and act accordingly you will either get eaten or bashed upon the rocks in very short order.

 

If you were suddenly uprooted from your quaint, comfortable and cozy little home environment one day and suddenly forced to make your living in the jungle wilds (with no realistic possibilities of escape) would you take the time to survey things and get a lay of the land or perhaps even search out an experienced and trustworthy guide to help assure your survival?

 

Would you perhaps begin to look for the tell-tale signs of all the treacherous snakepits, quicksand, crocodile haunts, lion and tiger dens, etc. or would you boldly stride through the jungle with only your fancy new hip-boots, trusty multi-function pocketknife and some newfangled high-tech compass and just hope for the best?

 

I daresay that although the right answer to the question above seems obvious, 95% of newbie traders choose the second alternative almost every time. They have already firmly and unflinchingly bought into the hyped idea that trading the markets is going to be their financial savior. That it is going to be easy and the one sure way to an eventual fortune if they just open an account, select a robust charting system that offers enough of those amazing indicators and pay attention. They feel they are already "smart" and thus quite capable of pairing the right indicators and strategies together to make this thing totally "easy peasy" so they can soon be "rolling in the dough" (celebrating their huge winnings.)

 

If you are going to ride the rapids of a river for the first time, I daresay you had best either hire yourself a damn good guide or else you had better find out where it is deepest, which way the currents flow at different points, where the bends and treacherous twists and turns might be, how fast it moves across these key points of danger (and whether there might just be an undertow at some of those points that could suck you under never to be seen again) whether the time of day makes any difference in the flow of those rapids, and even what type of boat and paddles migh best serve you on your trip as you finally set out to navigate that river.

 

If you cannot find an acceptable guide, then yes, you will have to do all that surveying and planning work on your own, through observation and more than a little testing BEFORE you just jump in and wing it. The same holds true for navigating a trip through the markets. [by the way, for those of you who did not quite understand all that.. the jungle and the river rapids=the markets, and the professionals (who eat, sleep and breathe these markets) are the snakes, crocs, lions, tigers, etc.] Once you jump into the markets you are already in the jungle or the rapids and your job is to get through each day reasonably unscathed while slowly but steadily improving your long term survival skills based on what you learn from each outing (trade.)

 

Perhaps truly "smart" new traders would best be served by taking an initial period of 6 months or so to simply observe the price action in the markets day to day. They should perhaps also give up most, if not all of those fancy and mostly useless lagging indicators. I mean who in their right mind would dare risk driving their car down the high-speed freeways while focusing almost entirely on the view in their rearview mirror for guidance and direction?

 

Also, just as a side issue since we are speaking of "smart" here, why do you think that the reportedly best "analysts" in the market invariably make some of the absolutely worst traders? Is it possibly that they get too caught up in the trees to see the forest and keep running directly into huge trees right in front of them? Is it perhaps also because they are used to playing a safe and emotion free game as analysts and thus are not prepared for the real battle of the trading those same markets with real money, a battle which is mostly fought between themselves and their own emotions?

 

Nobody but nobody knows exactly what is going to happen next in the markets, so don't invest your extremely valuable time and hard earned money into trying to come up with indicators and fancy, complex methods to predict it. A firm called Long Term Capital Management tried that already and failed quite miserably. Mind you, they had more computing power than almost God himself, a large group of some of the very brightest minds in the business,etc and yet they still lost so much capital that their failure almost sent the whole U.S. economy into a tailspin.

 

If you wish to be truly "smart" about trading then I'd say you should have precious few indicators and instead should focus on becoming a Master of the Obvious. That means focus intently upon what is happening right now, right in front of you on your screen in the form of price movement and the reactions that repeat themselves over and over again as movement comes to value points, S/R or Fib points that lie in its path. Otherwise, you will become little more than an impulsive gambler and likely a very poor one at that. That is the best advice I think I can come up with for potentially acting "smart" in today's markets.

 

Thanks for reading and I hope I didn't totally bore you with all that.

 

Happy Trading ;)

 

P.S. For those who felt the above was a little off topic, please do not confuse "simple" with "easy". Trading is simple, meaning price can only go up, down or sideways. However, even though it is simple at first glance, it is anything but easy. The trick is to learn how to jump in as price moves up or down (not sideways) and then jump back out with a profit before it changes its mind. If you think that is easy then you clearly have never traded real money for more than a few days. Will you be one of the not so smart traders who needs loads of indicator based, after the fact confirmations before you jump in or will you be one of the very few smart traders who has learned market structure and price flow and uses market profile, volume profile, support and resistance pivots or other real time buy and sell pressure information to time your trades? The choice is up to you and it can be as simple or as complex as you wish to make it. The real pros swear that simple strategies are best and I happen to think they are right.

 

Good luck to you ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good post ezduzzit,

 

Two little added bits of wisdom borrowed from others, one about risk and the other about approach.

 

Risk: Its important to distinguish the type of risk when entering a position. Risk can relate to the certainty that price will move where you expect it if you anticipate at prior support and resistance. Risk can relate to how much room you have to give a position to chop back and forth if you wait for confirmation from either a breakout or an indicator. Bigger traders tend to have to take the first type of risk.

 

Approach (from Lescor on ET): The three goals of trading, in order of importance.

1. Preserve capital

2. Earn consistent returns

3. Earn large returns.

The 'rule' part is - don't try to skip any steps.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Great post like always ezduzzit. Alot of experience in your words. Very powerful.

 

I myself have committed every possible mistake when I was struggling as a new trader. I tried applying complex strategies using multiple indicators, memorized every single price pattern known to man. I even studied about exit points based on the height of formation: example... the height of the neckline to the head (in a head-n-shoulders pattern) is the projected target point after the break of the neckline.

 

After confusing myself tenfolds and losing thousands of dollars I finally decided to stick with one simple method and stick to it. I found pivots and market profile but could not trade profitably for quite some time. This was because I did not understand how to use them successfully. After thorough practice I was able to find my own style using these tools. This has worked for me which is why I tend to get carried away about saying lagging indicators are useless.

 

Trading should be simple. Most professional traders I know will even say trading is easy. But what pro's forget at times is the amount of hours of observation and practice spent to make trading easy. A professional trader and a new trader see the same information. We just process it differently. This only comes from years of trading.

 

Soultrader

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Date: 29th March 2024. GBPUSD Analysis: The Pound Trades Higher But For How Long? The global Stocks Markets are closed due to Easter Friday (Good Friday). The NASDAQ continued to follow the sideways trend while other indices again rose. The SNP500 reaches an all-time high, but the NASDAQ remains under pressure from Tesla, Meta and Apple. The Euro continues to trade lower against all major currencies including the US Dollar, Euro and Japanese Yen. The British Pound is the best performing currency during this morning’s Asian session. However, investors are largely fixing their attention on this afternoon’s Core PCE Price Index. GBPUSD – The Pound Trades Higher but For How Long? The GBPUSD is slightly higher than the day’s open and is primary due to the Pound’s strong performance. At the moment, the British Pound is increasing in value against all major currencies. However, the US Dollar Index is also trading 0.10% higher and for this reason there is a slight conflict here. If investors wish to avoid this conflict, the EURUSD is a better option. This is because, the Euro depreciating against the whole currency market avoiding the “tug-of-war” scenario. The GBPUSD is trading slightly lower than the 2-month’s average price and is trading at 49.10 on the RSI. For this reason, the price of the exchange is at a “neutral” level and is signalling neither a buy nor a sell. The day’s price action and future signals are possibly likely to be triggered by this afternoon’s Core PCE Price Index. Analysts expect the Core PCE Price Index to read 0.3% which is slightly lower than the previous month but will result in the annual figure remaining at 2.85%. The PCE rate is different to the inflation rate and the Fed aims for a rate between 1.5% to 2.00%. Therefore, even if the annual rate remains at 2.85%, as analysts expect, it would be too high for the Fed. If the rate increases, even if only slightly, the US Dollar can again renew bullish momentum and the stock market can come under pressure. This includes the SNP500. Investors are focused on the publication of data on the UK’s gross domestic product (GDP) for the last quarter of 2023: the quarterly figures decreased by 0.3%, and 0.2% over the past 12-months. This confirms the state of a shallow recession and the need for stimulation. The data, combined with a cooling labor market and a steady decline in inflation, increase the likelihood that the Bank of England will soon begin interest rate cuts. In the latest meeting the Bank of England representatives did not see any members vote for a hike. USA500 – The SNP500 Rises to New Highs, But Cannot Hold Onto Gains! The price of the SNP500 rises to an all-time high, before correcting 0.33% and ending the day slightly lower than the open price. Nonetheless, the index performs better than the NASDAQ which came under pressure from Tesla, Meta and Apple which hold a higher weight compared to the SNP500. For the SNP500, these 3 stocks hold a weight of 9.25%, whereas the 3 stocks make up 14.63% of the NASDAQ. The SNP500 is also supported by ExxonMobil’s gains due to higher energy prices. The market will remain closed on Friday due to Easter. However, the market will reopen on Monday for the US and investors can expect high volatility. Investors will also need to take into consideration how the PCE Price Index and the changed value of the US Dollar is likely to affect the stock market next week. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business. Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar. Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding on how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE! Click HERE to READ more Market news. Michalis Efthymiou Market Analyst HFMarkets Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in FX and CFDs products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • MT4 is good and will be good until their parent company keep updating the software, later mt4 users will have to switch to mt5.
    • $SOUN SoundHound AI stock at 5.91 support area , see https://stockconsultant.com/?SOUN
    • $ELEV Elevation Oncology stock bull flag breakout watch , see https://stockconsultant.com/?ELEV
    • $AVDX AvidXchange stock narrow range breakout watch above 13.32 , see https://stockconsultant.com/?AVDX
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.