Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

UrmaBlume

Trade Intensity

Recommended Posts

Tooker apparently mimicked the programming in another program platform, however the platform in his screen capture isn't familiar to me and I wanted to know what he was using.

 

Tooker used MarketDelta, specifically the volume breakdown indicator to mimick the programming.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Tooker used MarketDelta, specifically the volume breakdown indicator to mimick the programming.

 

That's interesting. If it consistently functions in the same fashion as Urma's, that's good enough for me. I could care less about the guts of this thing or how its created. I'm a trader, not a programmer.

 

After all, it's just one additional tool to get more edge.;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
As for slicing and dicing hiding activity, the very fact that most peoples tools don't have the granularity to see the slices or they haven't set them up to doesn't that have the effect of 'unslicing' the salami in their eyes?

 

No, for a few reasons. A lot of programs, some widely available, can filter for trades of a certain size and above - e.g., 200+ cars. Not too many traders can swing that kind of stick. So, say you're a big commercial trader and need to buy 2000 cars in x-y price range. If you bid 2000, other big traders are going to game you. If you lift 2000, you will sweep the book, maybe not get the execution you want, and might get gamed anyway, depending. There's a whole level to the game the big guys play with each other that we just aren't involved with - those big traders are hiding from other big traders, they couldn't care less if you or I ride their coattails.

 

However, an algo can allow you to shove that size through diced up into random pieces - say, a 4 lot trade, 3, 8, and so on. So you wouldn't tip your hand with a huge bid or lift, and it wouldn't be so obvious as 2000 one lot trades done over a minute of time. It's like the biblical proverb of shoving the rope through the eye of the needle. (Camel is a mistranslation)

 

In the cash stocks, they use those algos as well, and additionally will go to dark pools to do really large block trades.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

By coincidence, I was reading about what sdoma is talking about just yesterday. Specifically, I came across something called Guerrilla from Credit Suisse, but I can't really find any information about other than the fact that its purpose is to hide activity. Does anyone have any information on programs like this? I'm guessing it isn't just as simple as splitting the order into random increments as sdoma mentioned above, because it seems like that would be relatively easy to do.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It would seem that hiding orders is an important part of the game if you are trading size. Here's what OEC offers: icebergs

 

And that's what is tucked into a retail platform. I can just imagine what algo's the big boys are using.

 

Anyways, if you can detect those hidden large orders, that should provide an edge to your trading. I'm not nearly as programming gifted as some of you here, so I wish those that chase this down luck and best wishes. It would be nice to see someone crack the 'code' and give it to the forum, but I won't hold my breath. ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Tooker used MarketDelta, specifically the volume breakdown indicator to mimick the programming.

 

As far as I know, MarketDelta functions down to the second resolution. The Volume Breakdown Indicator has settings for Vol per sec, delta per sec, etc. This gets you close, but not exactly down to ms precision as UB describes.

 

The VB indicator does have something called "trade intensity" which will register a 100 (max) value if the ticks come in one on top of the other. Market Delta recommends this ind. to be used on 1-tick charts for best results.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the additional info MtnDog regarding MarketDelta. I've been watching the spikes on the VB indicator, using tick momentum for total trades/ticks on a 1000 volume chart. Today, for example, there were spikes at 5:30 and 7:00 pacific time. My overall impression is that this is just not that close to Urmablume's indicator - unfortunately.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The hidden orders do not bother me much. But I find the big trades that show up on a one minute chart that are calculated to run the dome highly indicative of direction.

 

They show up on the one minute chart as normal activity plus 1000, 5000, or 15000 contracts and 1500 contract buys HAVE showed up in the middle of the night driving up the price for months.

 

But

 

This morning there was the dogi in ESZ9 8:30 AM Eastern that started at 1061, went down to 1058.

Check it out. Someone decided it was time for the market to go down and dumped 15,000 contracts on the market in a second. Someone else bought them back up. This one was like being caught in a crossfire. But made it look like the big boys were going to srugg off any bad news and support stocks as has become usual.

Then today, they hit it with a series of sell orders totaling 5 to 10K in a minute whenever it showed signs of breaking back up outside of the channel. A message that the market is being taken down about as subtle as a Mack truck.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
That's pretty much what I'm working on - wish I'd started maintaining my own database ages ago.

 

I am wondering about the utility of feeding it back into NT, though, as opposed to just using NT for time charts, and hard-coding the volume charts I'd want from the API data.

 

Named Pipes and WCF :) NT 7 will support .NET 3.5.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It would seem that hiding orders is an important part of the game if you are trading size. Here's what OEC offers: icebergs

 

And that's what is tucked into a retail platform. I can just imagine what algo's the big boys are using.

 

Anyways, if you can detect those hidden large orders, that should provide an edge to your trading. I'm not nearly as programming gifted as some of you here, so I wish those that chase this down luck and best wishes. It would be nice to see someone crack the 'code' and give it to the forum, but I won't hold my breath. ;)

 

Interesting BF, I didn't know OEC had that functionality, thanks for the info. I find all these tools that bigger traders have fascinating, especially since there seems to be so little information about them online.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i was curious if anyone has applied their trade intensity measurements to an index future and a cash equivalent like an ETF or basket of stocks to identify spikes that aren't pure position speculation?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder if there is any use in monitoring the Premium on the same chart as a way of filtering the Intensity readings that are due to arbitrage. A lot of the premium feeds from data providers are kind of slow though. High TICK levels might be another thing to look at. It might be helpful to know the context in which a spike in intensity occurs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for this amazing thread.

 

I am going to expose my point of view to focus the intensity trade. Maybe can be helpful for somebody.

 

I developed a NinjaTrader indicator to measure the intrabar pressure, some months ago. It looks like MD.

I added a summary at the bottom to measure the volatility of the volume and the volatility of the pressure.

Volume Volatility (w) = Bar's Volume / Time

Pressure Volatility (d) = Bar's pressure / Time

Bar's Pressure = Bar's Bid Volume - Bar's Ask Volume

 

At that moment, I didn't know about intensity trade. :cool:

 

When I finished reading this thread, I thought how I could implement this issue in my indicator.

So, I developed a custom bar type to display equisize bars, ie, all bars have the same size expresed in ticks (prints).

Hence, the shorter the time that has consumed the bar, the greater the intensity.

 

You can see in the attachment how took place an "ask intensity trade" at 17:30.

The price rose to 1,060.00 at 18:10. At this moment took place other intensity trade incident. It was an "ask intensity trade" also, however the price fell down.

 

Regards

intensity_trade_01.thumb.png.cc44e4ee1261ad53660e9d850e54540b.png

intensity_trade_02.thumb.png.64c6a50379d791ea16a46583569255a1.png

intensity_trade_03.thumb.png.d55f2d4bb36942589e10e640c300470e.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The markets turn for only one reason - a change in the balance/imbalance in the order flow.

 

 

what is this a new religion?

 

what about value

why is volume not expressing it self in amazon sending it to 3 gadzillion dollars

 

post the time and day stamp of those charts displaying intense volume activity and most likely (i dont want to be arrogant) i will explain to you why price has changed direction there..

 

volume only represents the perception of value beween market participants and value is inevidably corelated with price.

 

what do you do first when you by a house or a car? do you take a look at the price tag or do you ask how many where sold the last hour.

 

as for technical analysis dying because of computers..

check those pics and tell me what you think...

can you code a system that does that...

since you obviously cant then you are prone to start thinking entering the room from the back door

 

 

regards

 

 

Liquidity Rebate Orders

 

Some of these same “algo” (short for algorithm) institutional traders also receive payment for posting orders, further encouraging huge trading volumes and market volatility. The broker dealer doesn’t even have to make money on the trade itself, and if the order is filled, the broker dealer receives a rebate. These rebates are driving up the price that other institutional investors pay. Many other predatory practices are described in more detail in this Themis Trading White Paper. Bank of America/Merrill Lynch needs to recoup its losses so they just rolled out new options order algorithms as mentioned in Wall Street and Technology.

 

 

 

Flash Orders

 

Flash orders are orders that are sent briefly to a limited group of traders prior to displaying them to the public. The high speed computers described above take advantage of this millisecond period and allow their members to trade ahead of those orders and at better prices. NASDAQ and BATS (another equity market in addition to the NYSE and NASDAQ) argue that they’re trying to improve the orders. Even if the orders aren’t improved, they claim that they’re already reviewed by so many dark pools that there really isn’t an advantage to sending flash orders. So, if there isn’t an advantage, then why are they sending them? Flash orders aren’t regulated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), but according to The Washington Post, New York Senator Chuck Schumer wants to introduce legislation to prohibit their use if the SEC doesn’t take action soon. Some flash orders are sent to Dark Pools, another threat against individual investors.

banks.thumb.GIF.35bbce176f30ab4538fbb2357d71e739.GIF

5aa70fe66bc07_gdresistancedoubletop.thumb.png.478b16962f30bdf78520fd4fcd1aa0a6.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Interesting stuff and quite similar to some research ideas I have been playing with.

 

One interesting visualisation I showed a while back is a 1 tick constant range chart with a volume histogram below, that shows quite clear spikes.

 

Good stuff keep it coming :)

 

 

Quite right - whether 1 tick or more.

Plus a decent indicator and you have the same results.

After all you only trade 1 item - the ES - and not a bunch of underlyings or equities.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi UB,

As you are doing high frequency trading, I wonder - how do you deal spillage?

Are you watching the spread before taking a position? / Using Limit orders / Always have orders pending on the DOM (just in case you'll want to enter) / Other?...

 

thanks,

 

moon

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi UB,

As you are doing high frequency trading, I wonder - how do you deal spillage?

Are you watching the spread before taking a position? / Using Limit orders / Always have orders pending on the DOM (just in case you'll want to enter) / Other?...thanks,moon

 

Moon,

 

The short answer is a bit of all of the above.

 

We call the frequency done by both our bots and our point and click traders to be "higher" frequency trading as opposed to the uber high frequency trading done by some.

 

Our point and click traders usually adjust their entry orders to the time/volume/frequency they are trading. In the faster time frames where the whole trade might just be a couple of ticks they generally use Limit orders. Where a tick is not as important as getting onboard as in the slower/higher volume bars charts they are free to use either limit or Market if Touched entries.

 

At all times in all time frames they have the benefit of auto-posted text that eigher recommends "No Trade" or posts precise TradePoints for the current bar as shown in the graph below. These TradePoints are updated every tick for each of the 7 time frames we track for each market.

 

cheers

 

snap00521a.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Odd logic, I would be more inclined to conclude the opposite. :)

 

Having said that the principle seems sound (to me) and it is a pretty straightforward an indicator to write (though I can't comment on Sierra).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The markets turn for only one reason - a change in the balance/imbalance in the order flow.

The premise of the indicator is the intensity of the order flow often rises at these turning points. Of course all turns are not accompanied by increased intensity and all increases in intensity do not result in turns.....that is the nature of the beast though :)

 

post the time and day stamp of those charts displaying intense volume activity and most likely (i dont want to be arrogant) i will explain to you why price has changed direction there..

Not arrogant at all :) I am pretty sure you could find any one of four score and ten reasons. Of course the art is to identify it as it is happening.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The premise of the indicator is the intensity of the order flow often rises at these turning points. Of course all turns are not accompanied by increased intensity and all increases in intensity do not result in turns.....that is the nature of the beast though :)

 

 

Not arrogant at all :) I am pretty sure you could find any one of four score and ten reasons. Of course the art is to identify it as it is happening.

 

Exactly that is the point. To identify it as it is happening. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The premise of the indicator is the intensity of the order flow often rises at these turning points. Of course all turns are not accompanied by increased intensity and all increases in intensity do not result in turns.....that is the nature of the beast though :)

 

So far my observation is that the turning point is due more to exhaustion than it is traders fading the move. For a short, I see exhaustion by sellers and then price reverses. This seems to be more reliable than looking for an increase in intensity by longs. But I'm still investigating this.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just read this entire thread.

 

Has anyone adopted this indicator into their trading?

 

Has anyone coded it for SierraChart?

 

I have my version available on my blog for Ninja & Multicharts. I'm sure someone can port it to SierraChart. I'm hoping to get some collaboration from other developers.

 

Mine isn't done the same way as Urma's however I do get similar signals. My problem is I get too many signals.

 

Pace of Tape Indicator Trade With The Flow

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
So far my observation is that the turning point is due more to exhaustion than it is traders fading the move. For a short, I see exhaustion by sellers and then price reverses. This seems to be more reliable than looking for an increase in intensity by longs. But I'm still investigating this.

 

The bid is refreshed, absorbing the sellers without allowing price to move significantly lower.

 

Surges in buying intensity at the bottom of a move do occur, but are much rarer. They probably represent increased urgency, rather than just taking advantage of a 'normal' imbalance.

 

The indicator is more precise, but if you're looking for it you can basically read the same information from standard price-volume-velocity studies.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • also ... and barely on topic... Winners (always*) overpay. Buying the dips is a subscription to the belief that winners win by underpaying - when in actuality winners (inevitably/always*) win by overpaying... it’s amazing the percentage of traders who think winners win by underpaying ... “Winners (always*) overpay.” ...  One way to implement this ‘belief’ is to only reenter when prices have emphatically resumed the 'trend' .   (Fwiw, While “Winners (always*) overpay.” holds true in most endeavors (relationships, business, sports, etc...) - “Winners (always*) overpay.”  is especially true for auctions... continuous auctions included.)
    • re:  "Does it make sense to always buy the dips?  “Buy the dip.”  You hear this all the time in crypto investing trading speculation gambling. [zdo taking some liberties] It refers, of course, to buying more bitcoin (or digital assets) when they go down in price: when the price “dips.” Some people brag about “buying the dip," showing they know better than the crowd. Others “buy the dip” as an investment strategy: they’re getting a bargain. The problem is, buying the dip is a fallacy. You can’t buy the dip, because you can't see the total dip until much later. First, I’ll explain this in a way that will make it simple and obvious to you; then I’ll show you a better way of investing. You Only Know the Dip in Hindsight When people talk about “buying the dip,” what they’re really saying is, “I bought when the price was going down.” " ... example of a dip ... 
    • Date: 19th April 2024. Weekly Commodity Market Update: Oil Prices Correct and Supply Concerns Persist.   The ongoing developments in the Middle East sparked a wave of risk aversion and fueled supply concerns and investors headed for safety. Hopes for imminent rate cuts from the Federal Reserve diminish while attention is now turning towards the demand outlook. The Gold price hit a high of $2417.89 per ounce overnight. Sentiment has already calmed down again and bullion is trading at $2376.50 per ounce as haven flows ease. Oil prices initially moved higher as concern over escalating tensions with the WTI contract hit a session high of $85.508 per barrel overnight, before correcting to currently $81.45 per barrel. Oil Prices Under Pressure Amid Middle East Tensions Last week, commodity indexes showed little movement, with Oil prices undergoing a slight correction. Meanwhile, Gold reached yet another record high, mirroring the upward trend in cocoa prices. Once again today, USOil prices experienced a correction and has remained under pressure, retesting the 50-day EMA at $81.00 as we moving into the weekend. Hence, despite the Israel’s retaliatory strike on Iran, sentiments stabilized following reports suggesting a measured response aimed at avoiding further escalation. Brent crude futures witnessed a more than 4% leap, driven by concerns over potential disruptions to oil supplies in the Middle East, only to subsequently erase all gains. Similarly with USOIL, UKOIL hovers just below $87 per barrel, marginally below Thursday’s closing figures. Nevertheless, volatility is expected to continue in the market as several potential risks loom:   Disruption to the Strait of Hormuz: The possibility of Iran disrupting navigation through the vital shipping lane, is still in play. The Strait of Hormuz serves as the Persian Gulf’s primary route to international waters, with approximately 21 million barrels of oil passing through daily. Recent events, including Iran’s seizure of an Israel-linked container ship, underscore the geopolitical sensitivity of the region. Tougher Sanctions on Iran: Analysts speculate that the US may impose stricter sanctions on Iranian oil exports or intensify enforcement of existing restrictions. With global oil consumption reaching 102 million barrels per day, Iran’s production of 3.3 million barrels remains significant. Recent actions targeting Venezuelan oil highlight the potential for increased pressure on Iranian exports. OPEC Output Increases: Despite the desire for higher prices, OPEC members such as Saudi Arabia and Russia have constrained output in recent years. However, sustained crude prices above $100 per barrel could prompt concerns about demand and incentivize increased production. The OPEC may opt to boost oil output should tensions escalate further and prices surge. Ukraine Conflict: Amidst the focus on the Middle East, markets overlooking Russia’s actions in Ukraine. Potential retaliatory strikes by Kyiv on Russian oil infrastructure could impact exports, adding further complexity to global oil markets.   Technical Analysis USOIL is marking one of the steepest weekly declines witnessed this year after a brief period of consolidation. The breach below the pivotal support level of 84.00, coupled with the descent below the mid of the 4-month upchannel, signals a possible shift in market sentiment towards a bearish trend reversal. Adding to the bearish outlook are indications such as the downward slope in the RSI. However, the asset still hold above the 50-day EMA which coincides also with the mid of last year’s downleg, with key support zone at $80.00-$81.00. If it breaks this support zone, the focus may shift towards the 200-day EMA and 38.2% Fib. level at $77.60-$79.00. Conversely, a rejection of the $81 level and an upside potential could see the price returning back to $84.00. A break of the latter could trigger the attention back to the December’s resistance, situated around $86.60. A breakthrough above this level could ignite a stronger rally towards the $89.20-$90.00 zone. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business. Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar. Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding on how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE! Click HERE to READ more Market news. Michalis Efthymiou Market Analyst HMarkets Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past perfrmance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in FX and CFDs products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • Date: 18th April 2024. Market News – Stock markets benefit from Dollar correction. Economic Indicators & Central Banks:   Technical buying, bargain hunting, and risk aversion helped Treasuries rally and unwind recent losses. Yields dropped from the recent 2024 highs. Asian stock markets strengthened, as the US Dollar corrected in the wake of comments from Japan’s currency chief Masato Kanda, who said G7 countries continue to stress that excessive swings and disorderly moves in the foreign exchange market were harmful for economies. US Stockpiles expanded to 10-month high. The data overshadowed the impact of geopolitical tensions in the Middle East as traders await Israel’s response to Iran’s unprecedented recent attack. President Joe Biden called for higher tariffs on imports of Chinese steel and aluminum.   Financial Markets Performance:   The USDIndex stumbled, falling to 105.66 at the end of the day from the intraday high of 106.48. It lost ground against most of its G10 peers. There wasn’t much on the calendar to provide new direction. USDJPY lows retesting the 154 bottom! NOT an intervention yet. BoJ/MoF USDJPY intervention happens when there is more than 100+ pip move in seconds, not 50 pips. USOIL slumped by 3% near $82, as US crude inventories rose by 2.7 million barrels last week, hitting the highest level since last June, while gauges of fuel demand declined. Gold strengthened as the dollar weakened and bullion is trading at $2378.44 per ounce. Market Trends:   Wall Street closed in the red after opening with small corrective gains. The NASDAQ underperformed, slumping -1.15%, with the S&P500 -0.58% lower, while the Dow lost -0.12. The Nikkei closed 0.2% higher, the Hang Seng gained more than 1. European and US futures are finding buyers. A gauge of global chip stocks and AI bellwether Nvidia Corp. have both fallen into a technical correction. The TMSC reported its first profit rise in a year, after strong AI demand revived growth at the world’s biggest contract chipmaker. The main chipmaker to Apple Inc. and Nvidia Corp. recorded a 9% rise in net income, beating estimates. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business. Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar. Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding on how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE! Click HERE to READ more Market news. Andria Pichidi Market Analyst HFMarkets Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in FX and CFDs products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • Date: 17th April 2024. Market News – Appetite for risk-taking remains weak. Economic Indicators & Central Banks:   Stocks, Treasury yields and US Dollar stay firmed. Fed Chair Powell added to the recent sell off. His slightly more hawkish tone further priced out chances for any imminent action and the timing of a cut was pushed out further. He suggested if higher inflation does persist, the Fed will hold rates steady “for as long as needed.” Implied Fed Fund: There remains no real chance for a move on May 1 and at their intraday highs the June implied funds rate future showed only 5 bps, while July reflected only 10 bps. And a full 25 bps was not priced in until November, with 38 bps in cuts seen for 2024. US & EU Economies Diverging: Lagarde says ECB is moving toward rate cuts – if there are no major shocks. UK March CPI inflation falls less than expected. Output price inflation has started to nudge higher, despite another decline in input prices. Together with yesterday’s higher than expected wage numbers, the data will add to the arguments of the hawks at the BoE, which remain very reluctant to contemplate rate cuts. Canada CPI rose 0.6% in March, double the 0.3% February increase BUT core eased. The doors are still open for a possible cut at the next BoC meeting on June 5. IMF revised up its global growth forecast for 2024 with inflation easing, in its new World Economic Outlook. This is consistent with a global soft landing, according to the report. Financial Markets Performance:   USDJPY also inched up to 154.67 on expectations the BoJ will remain accommodative and as the market challenges a perceived 155 red line for MoF intervention. USOIL prices slipped -0.15% to $84.20 per barrel. Gold rose 0.24% to $2389.11 per ounce, a new record closing high as geopolitical risks overshadowed the impacts of rising rates and the stronger dollar. Market Trends:   Wall Street waffled either side of unchanged on the day amid dimming rate cut potential, rising yields, and earnings. The major indexes closed mixed with the Dow up 0.17%, while the S&P500 and NASDAQ lost -0.21% and -0.12%, respectively. Asian stock markets mostly corrected again, with Japanese bourses underperforming and the Nikkei down -1.3%. Mainland China bourses were a notable exception and the CSI 300 rallied 1.4%, but the MSCI Asia Pacific index came close to erasing the gains for this year. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business. Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar. Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding on how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE! Click HERE to READ more Market news. Andria Pichidi Market Analyst HFMarkets Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in FX and CFDs products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.vvvvvvv
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.