Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Guest Tresor

Looking for Oscillator That Does NOT Diverge

Recommended Posts

Guest Tresor
But it still needs optimization? And that's exactly the point where the system fails :doh:

 

Forget about optimization, curvefitting etc. Create a system that looks at different scenarios, weights them and then take the most accurates one at that particular moment in time ;)

 

januson,

 

My system looks at different scenarios. No, I will not forget about optimization. Each system MUST be optimized. If you created a system, never did you optmize it at least for the best resolution? 1 minute / 3 minute / 1 hour / 5,000 contracts / 10,000 contracts?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If you created a system, never did you optmize it at least for the best resolution? 1 minute / 3 minute / 1 hour / 5,000 contracts / 10,000 contracts?

 

No I would never optimize/ curvefit a system, I would however be very careful to choose the right resolution, for instance 5000 contracts instead of 30.000 and so forth, as that would depend at the average volume in the particular equity!

 

You can't optimize for a bad chosen resolution, resolution adjustments isn't curvefitting, it's something that's necessary to get the swings clear and cut.

 

Bump:

How is that different than optimization?

 

Optimization is a process that tests different parameter values as indicator input and one (person) can then choose which one that satisfies a certain risk/ reward.

 

I'm referring to a inside process in the indicator which weights past values and then dynamically chooses the best at the current moment.

Edited by januson

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Optimization is a process that tests different parameter values as indicator input and one (person) can then choose which one that satisfies a certain risk/ reward.

 

I'm referring to a inside process in the indicator which weights past values and then dynamically chooses the best at the current moment.

 

So, you are just doing optimization on the fly. This is practically the same than optimizing over the last 30 days and repeat this every day for example. There is no way to pick the best value at the current moment without looking at the past. Just because you do it dynamically and doesn't want to call it optimization, does not mean it is not.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.