Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

walterw

The Chimp`s new "Futures Scalps"

Recommended Posts

Lucky last pix 13 and 14.

This was a pattern where all the majors move up at once.

The exception is USDCHF which is a inverted pair, it goes down when the rest go up. If you get access to the sensible pair CHFUSD it would be easier to use because it would go up when EURUSD goes up. Anyway thats the reason you may see me going short in USDCHF and long in everything else.

Trading is about working, there are no shortcuts.

Happy Hunting

Bruce

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oooops! I hope that The Chimp is not angered with us by to have soiled this subject of futures with forex, jeje. :embarassed: But your answers are very useful, PYenner, thank you very much. Excellent information in your post #94. :thumbs up:

 

I guess you should open a thread about these researches...

 

Agustín

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Cattus, Hi Pyenner... very interesting info... no problem with postings, we are not that strict, otherways it would be imposible to do all what we did so far... flexibility is a good policy sometimes...

 

Cattus : I DO trade centripetal trades, actually thats my expertise in futures, but I do it in a diferent graphic context, you may want to check this threads :

 

http://www.traderslaboratory.com/forums/f34/the-false-break-trade-1994.html

http://www.traderslaboratory.com/forums/f34/the-lazy-trade-1942.html

 

so far I trade with this charts, using keltners and regular cci.... Now this new graphic context looks good, so I may start doing some live trades with it, I actually already did some...

 

 

I share Bruce perspective in the selection of pairs for forex... so far I am on Eur/Jpy for my research as it has a nice range and at least with EFX, spread goes from 1 to 3 pips, so its a very nice pair to get a good scalping strategy runing...

 

take care Cattus and thanks Bruce for the good info ¡¡ Love to hear your scalping results ¡¡ cheers Walter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cattus

The results look better than they actually were, there was a lot of drawdown allowed in those trades which is how I avoided taking losses, but it is seriously stupid to allow big drawdown. So they are actually a bad example of how to trade. But I have wanted to post sometime for a long time that shows fx really can be traded, which many people doubt. So fx is for real and so is Walter a for real trader.

Unfortunately the market still has hard lessons to teach about defects in your thinking and in your understanding, so I still take too many losses in the real world. Thats why I am here learning better entry timing and better thinking from Walter.

 

Walter

Thanks for your tolerance. My live trades are done in Australian time which is 13 hrs ahead of gmt and further ahead of est, so its too much work to present the trades as examples, plus I mix a more aggressive style with your safer style, discretionary. But it has been going like 4 trades for 20 pips on a modest day, up to 12 or 20 trades when the markets are moving like the good old days and thats when it gets to be fun, in sync with the moves...

Your 5min/1min entry is a major asset that allows for clean fast low stress trading. I always assumed that later entry meant less profit but it is giving a far more consistent entry that also lets you stop out quick if it doesnt look to be developing as it should. Has me wondering why I ever wanted to trade any other way. Thank you.

 

Bruce

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Cattus

The results look better than they actually were, there was a lot of drawdown allowed in those trades which is how I avoided taking losses, but it is seriously stupid to allow big drawdown. So they are actually a bad example of how to trade. But I have wanted to post sometime for a long time that shows fx really can be traded, which many people doubt. So fx is for real and so is Walter a for real trader.

Unfortunately the market still has hard lessons to teach about defects in your thinking and in your understanding, so I still take too many losses in the real world. Thats why I am here learning better entry timing and better thinking from Walter.

 

Walter

Thanks for your tolerance. My live trades are done in Australian time which is 13 hrs ahead of gmt and further ahead of est, so its too much work to present the trades as examples, plus I mix a more aggressive style with your safer style, discretionary. But it has been going like 4 trades for 20 pips on a modest day, up to 12 or 20 trades when the markets are moving like the good old days and thats when it gets to be fun, in sync with the moves...

Your 5min/1min entry is a major asset that allows for clean fast low stress trading. I always assumed that later entry meant less profit but it is giving a far more consistent entry that also lets you stop out quick if it doesnt look to be developing as it should. Has me wondering why I ever wanted to trade any other way. Thank you.

 

Bruce

 

Hi Bruce.

 

I have experimented in forex something like you as described for it. The market always have the reason... it is hard to learn this...

 

I supposed that your results on that period occurred because you did not put stop losses, but it is very different in a real account, we fall in panic if we do not put them... anyway, you experimented with good systems, only you needed to optimize them... and the master to do that is here: hello Walter! I am experiencing much improvement in my operations with the lessons of Walter... thanks buddy :thumbs up:...

 

Anyway, you Bruce has a good inputs to us about the characteristics of the pairs that it is a good idea to hear it experiences of you...

 

 

And thanks for the tolerance Walter... I am thinking about speaking also a little of futbol here... you know, Boca, River, Tigres... jeje :o

 

Saludos....

 

Agustín

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Walter

Should have said that it is your expansion entries that seem to deliver the clean consistent trading, just as you say. Sometimes pullback or icon entries are good too but when the pullback is messy I tend not to trust them for a clean entry, so maybe one trade in 4 is a pullback type entry that looks clean, most are early expansion type entries, depends on the strength of the day.

Bruce

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I have experimented in forex something like you as described for it. The market always have the reason... it is hard to learn this...
Exactly. Having 10 pairs to make sense of is hard, when you get your wires crossed it hurts. Like you, I seek the reasons but I am only half way there, need to reduce the complexity before the trader can use it without shooting himself in the foot too easily.
I supposed that your results on that period occurred because you did not put stop losses, but it is very different in a real account, we fall in panic if we do not put them... anyway, you experimented with good systems, only you needed to optimize them... and the master to do that is here: hello Walter! I am experiencing much improvement in my operations with the lessons of Walter... thanks buddy :thumbs up:...

Exactly, it was an experiment done without stop losses to mess up the picture. It could only be done with a large demo account. It is unrealistic for a small live account, that is why it is not good to post those records. Thank you for understanding.

Bruce

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Exactly. Having 10 pairs to make sense of is hard, when you get your wires crossed it hurts. Like you, I seek the reasons but I am only half way there, need to reduce the complexity before the trader can use it without shooting himself in the foot too easily.

Exactly, it was an experiment done without stop losses to mess up the picture. It could only be done with a large demo account. It is unrealistic for a small live account, that is why it is not good to post those records. Thank you for understanding.

Bruce

 

 

Thank to you, Bruce. Good commentaries yours.... :)

 

Agustín

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

a nice indicator that shows very small lived divergences is BOP (Balance of Power) .

 

Hello Walter;

would you please post the BOP indicator, as implemented by ninja trader?

 

Take care.

Unicorn.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
And here some videos recapping some of todays trades... hope it brings more light...

 

Very nice presentation Walter; THANK YOU. :thumbs up::thumbs up::thumbs up:

 

By the way; on the charts you have adxvma(2,1,sma) and adxvma(6,1,ema)

 

I realize that the first number after the parenthesis is the adxperiods.

what is the second number, and what does the sma or the ema average?? :confused::confused:

 

And I do have a request for the video director and producer:

PLEASE let the time axis be shown in the chart window;

it is difficult to reproduce the chart if one does not know the time of day. :pc guru:

 

Looking forward to the next video;

 

cheers.

Unicorn.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Very nice presentation Walter; THANK YOU. :thumbs up::thumbs up::thumbs up:

 

By the way; on the charts you have adxvma(2,1,sma) and adxvma(6,1,ema)

 

I realize that the first number after the parenthesis is the adxperiods.

what is the second number, and what does the sma or the ema average?? :confused::confused:

 

And I do have a request for the video director and producer:

PLEASE let the time axis be shown in the chart window;

it is difficult to reproduce the chart if one does not know the time of day. :pc guru:

 

Looking forward to the next video;

 

cheers.

Unicorn.

 

Glad you like them Unicorn, the number 1 means I am not using the signal line there...

 

I will check on that area of the videos... take care, cheers Walter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Unicorn

I may be wrong but I think BOP was written for use on volume charts only, not for time charts. It may not be portable if ami does not have volume charts. Not sure sorry.

Bruce

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I attach NT formula...

 

Thank you Walter. The ninja trader uses sma smoothing of the raw BOP values.

 

I was using ema smoothing.

 

Now I will follow your BOP divergences better.

 

regards.

Unicorn.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I may be wrong but I think BOP was written for use on volume charts only, not for time charts. It may not be portable if ami does not have volume charts. Not sure sorry.

 

Thanks Bruce; I have not come across that point of view.

 

I have some additional information though;

 

given that the bop formula is

if (H>L) x = (C-O)/ (H-L) ; else x=0;

bop = ema( x, ema_periods); or bop = sma( x, sma_periods);

 

 

if you have volume data, you can compute the accumulation_distribution Oscillator

 

acc_dis_Osc = ema( (C-O)/ (H-L) * V, ema_periods) / sum(V, ema_periods);

 

Walter, could you plot that as well on your charts, to compare which one is better for spotting divergence, the BOP indicator or the accumulation-distribution Oscillator?

 

I know we do not want to be indicatorists, but the concept of divergence itself is based on comparison to an indicator's values, be it momentum, trend or volume indicator.

 

Take care.

Unicorn.

 

NB. Amibroker can handle volume charts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Walter, could you plot that as well on your charts, to compare which one is better for spotting divergence, the BOP indicator or the accumulation-distribution Oscillator? .

 

Hi Unicorn.

 

Did you ask to Walter for this kind of example?

 

I think that would be great that you download the NinjaTrader, because with your knowledge you could help to evaluate this software...

 

Regards.

 

 

Cattus

5aa70e236a9f4_ExDivEURJPY.thumb.png.c56f06b9231c4c3b74c8531d46a754a8.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thanks Bruce; I have not come across that point of view. Amibroker can handle volume charts.

Unicorn

MT4 does not have volume charts, so my thinking was that if emas are to be implemented properly with volume in MT4, then the ema step period has to be based on a 22 tick bar (say) not on a 1min bar interval.

If that is not done, some of the benefit of a volume chart gets lost when you use MAs. Now I don't know if the internal MA functions in either AMI or NT are smart enough to do that, change to volume bars when used on a volume chart. I get the impression that NT might be doing that. It was just a cautionary thought that went thru my head.

It may impact on the effectiveness of BOP in volume charts versus BOP on time charts, got the impression it was intended for volume charts.

 

Thanks for the info, as you say ema should be better than sma.

Bruce

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Cattus : I DO trade centripetal trades, actually thats my expertise in futures, but I do it in a diferent graphic context, you may want to check this threads :

 

http://www.traderslaboratory.com/forums/f34/the-false-break-trade-1994.html

http://www.traderslaboratory.com/forums/f34/the-lazy-trade-1942.html

 

Hi Walter.

 

I will read those threads.

 

Thanks.

 

Agustín

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It may impact on the effectiveness of BOP in volume charts versus BOP on time charts,

 

Good day Bruce;

only a test by Walter comparing the volume chart to the tick chart and the effectiveness of the BOP can tell that.

 

Thanks for the info, as you say ema should be better than sma.

 

I just pointed out that my using ema smoothing resulted in different values from Walter's BOP values (using sma smoothing). I have not compared the divergences yet.

 

By the way I have posted a message on " The Chimp`s "Forex Trades" " thread, that should interest you; heck it might keep you a little busy; :):)

 

 

Take care.

Unicorn.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you ask to Walter for this kind of example?

 

Yes Cattus, Thank you.

 

is that the accumulation-distribution_oscillator(14) at the bottom (ADL)? it is usually shaped a lot more like the BOP; sometimes it shows a better divergence. Need more time evaluating it though.

 

I think that would be great that you download the NinjaTrader, because with your knowledge you could help to evaluate this software...

 

I am not using NinjaTrader, but I do read the code, at least I understand it enough to notice the difference in indicator implementations.

 

Take care,

Unicorn.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yes Cattus, Thank you.

 

is that the accumulation-distribution_oscillator(14) at the bottom (ADL)? it is usually shaped a lot more like the BOP; sometimes it shows a better divergence. Need more time evaluating it though.

 

 

 

I am not using NinjaTrader, but I do read the code, at least I understand it enough to notice the difference in indicator implementations.

 

Take care,

Unicorn.

 

Hi Unicorn.

 

I attached a pic about the ADL box. And also, the text of the code. I can not find if the ADL is 14 or it have other number. May be you can distingue it better than me.

 

Cheers.

 

Cattus

ADL.thumb.png.3faae9d6c1d582d93e97ef798cb10596.png

ADL code.doc

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Unicorn : so far BOP outperforms ad and chaikin... remember to take care on momentum conditions, as they may diverge and then still keep going on the same direction... counter trend trades demand good momentum discernment skills... cheers Walter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I attached a pic about the ADL box. And also, the text of the code.

 

Hi Cattus;

 

this is the accumulation_distribution Line, a summation of the value since the beginning of the chart. It is not the oscillator; that's why it does not require the 14 bar input.

 

It is also a different from the BOP based computation because it uses

 

((Close- Low) - (High - Close)) / (High - Low) * Volume

 

instead of

 

(Close- Open) / (High - Low) * Volume

 

 

regards.

Unicorn.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi Walter.

 

I will read those threads.

 

Thanks.

 

Agustín

 

Cattus, thats what I actually trade live... I just dont post any more those so I can get my focus here on the forum into new stuff... cheers Walter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • also ... and barely on topic... Winners (always*) overpay. Buying the dips is a subscription to the belief that winners win by underpaying - when in actuality winners (inevitably/always*) win by overpaying... it’s amazing the percentage of traders who think winners win by underpaying ... “Winners (always*) overpay.” ...  One way to implement this ‘belief’ is to only reenter when prices have emphatically resumed the 'trend' .   (Fwiw, While “Winners (always*) overpay.” holds true in most endeavors (relationships, business, sports, etc...) - “Winners (always*) overpay.”  is especially true for auctions... continuous auctions included.)
    • re:  "Does it make sense to always buy the dips?  “Buy the dip.”  You hear this all the time in crypto investing trading speculation gambling. [zdo taking some liberties] It refers, of course, to buying more bitcoin (or digital assets) when they go down in price: when the price “dips.” Some people brag about “buying the dip," showing they know better than the crowd. Others “buy the dip” as an investment strategy: they’re getting a bargain. The problem is, buying the dip is a fallacy. You can’t buy the dip, because you can't see the total dip until much later. First, I’ll explain this in a way that will make it simple and obvious to you; then I’ll show you a better way of investing. You Only Know the Dip in Hindsight When people talk about “buying the dip,” what they’re really saying is, “I bought when the price was going down.” " ... example of a dip ... 
    • Date: 19th April 2024. Weekly Commodity Market Update: Oil Prices Correct and Supply Concerns Persist.   The ongoing developments in the Middle East sparked a wave of risk aversion and fueled supply concerns and investors headed for safety. Hopes for imminent rate cuts from the Federal Reserve diminish while attention is now turning towards the demand outlook. The Gold price hit a high of $2417.89 per ounce overnight. Sentiment has already calmed down again and bullion is trading at $2376.50 per ounce as haven flows ease. Oil prices initially moved higher as concern over escalating tensions with the WTI contract hit a session high of $85.508 per barrel overnight, before correcting to currently $81.45 per barrel. Oil Prices Under Pressure Amid Middle East Tensions Last week, commodity indexes showed little movement, with Oil prices undergoing a slight correction. Meanwhile, Gold reached yet another record high, mirroring the upward trend in cocoa prices. Once again today, USOil prices experienced a correction and has remained under pressure, retesting the 50-day EMA at $81.00 as we moving into the weekend. Hence, despite the Israel’s retaliatory strike on Iran, sentiments stabilized following reports suggesting a measured response aimed at avoiding further escalation. Brent crude futures witnessed a more than 4% leap, driven by concerns over potential disruptions to oil supplies in the Middle East, only to subsequently erase all gains. Similarly with USOIL, UKOIL hovers just below $87 per barrel, marginally below Thursday’s closing figures. Nevertheless, volatility is expected to continue in the market as several potential risks loom:   Disruption to the Strait of Hormuz: The possibility of Iran disrupting navigation through the vital shipping lane, is still in play. The Strait of Hormuz serves as the Persian Gulf’s primary route to international waters, with approximately 21 million barrels of oil passing through daily. Recent events, including Iran’s seizure of an Israel-linked container ship, underscore the geopolitical sensitivity of the region. Tougher Sanctions on Iran: Analysts speculate that the US may impose stricter sanctions on Iranian oil exports or intensify enforcement of existing restrictions. With global oil consumption reaching 102 million barrels per day, Iran’s production of 3.3 million barrels remains significant. Recent actions targeting Venezuelan oil highlight the potential for increased pressure on Iranian exports. OPEC Output Increases: Despite the desire for higher prices, OPEC members such as Saudi Arabia and Russia have constrained output in recent years. However, sustained crude prices above $100 per barrel could prompt concerns about demand and incentivize increased production. The OPEC may opt to boost oil output should tensions escalate further and prices surge. Ukraine Conflict: Amidst the focus on the Middle East, markets overlooking Russia’s actions in Ukraine. Potential retaliatory strikes by Kyiv on Russian oil infrastructure could impact exports, adding further complexity to global oil markets.   Technical Analysis USOIL is marking one of the steepest weekly declines witnessed this year after a brief period of consolidation. The breach below the pivotal support level of 84.00, coupled with the descent below the mid of the 4-month upchannel, signals a possible shift in market sentiment towards a bearish trend reversal. Adding to the bearish outlook are indications such as the downward slope in the RSI. However, the asset still hold above the 50-day EMA which coincides also with the mid of last year’s downleg, with key support zone at $80.00-$81.00. If it breaks this support zone, the focus may shift towards the 200-day EMA and 38.2% Fib. level at $77.60-$79.00. Conversely, a rejection of the $81 level and an upside potential could see the price returning back to $84.00. A break of the latter could trigger the attention back to the December’s resistance, situated around $86.60. A breakthrough above this level could ignite a stronger rally towards the $89.20-$90.00 zone. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business. Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar. Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding on how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE! Click HERE to READ more Market news. Michalis Efthymiou Market Analyst HMarkets Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past perfrmance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in FX and CFDs products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • Date: 18th April 2024. Market News – Stock markets benefit from Dollar correction. Economic Indicators & Central Banks:   Technical buying, bargain hunting, and risk aversion helped Treasuries rally and unwind recent losses. Yields dropped from the recent 2024 highs. Asian stock markets strengthened, as the US Dollar corrected in the wake of comments from Japan’s currency chief Masato Kanda, who said G7 countries continue to stress that excessive swings and disorderly moves in the foreign exchange market were harmful for economies. US Stockpiles expanded to 10-month high. The data overshadowed the impact of geopolitical tensions in the Middle East as traders await Israel’s response to Iran’s unprecedented recent attack. President Joe Biden called for higher tariffs on imports of Chinese steel and aluminum.   Financial Markets Performance:   The USDIndex stumbled, falling to 105.66 at the end of the day from the intraday high of 106.48. It lost ground against most of its G10 peers. There wasn’t much on the calendar to provide new direction. USDJPY lows retesting the 154 bottom! NOT an intervention yet. BoJ/MoF USDJPY intervention happens when there is more than 100+ pip move in seconds, not 50 pips. USOIL slumped by 3% near $82, as US crude inventories rose by 2.7 million barrels last week, hitting the highest level since last June, while gauges of fuel demand declined. Gold strengthened as the dollar weakened and bullion is trading at $2378.44 per ounce. Market Trends:   Wall Street closed in the red after opening with small corrective gains. The NASDAQ underperformed, slumping -1.15%, with the S&P500 -0.58% lower, while the Dow lost -0.12. The Nikkei closed 0.2% higher, the Hang Seng gained more than 1. European and US futures are finding buyers. A gauge of global chip stocks and AI bellwether Nvidia Corp. have both fallen into a technical correction. The TMSC reported its first profit rise in a year, after strong AI demand revived growth at the world’s biggest contract chipmaker. The main chipmaker to Apple Inc. and Nvidia Corp. recorded a 9% rise in net income, beating estimates. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business. Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar. Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding on how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE! Click HERE to READ more Market news. Andria Pichidi Market Analyst HFMarkets Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in FX and CFDs products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • Date: 17th April 2024. Market News – Appetite for risk-taking remains weak. Economic Indicators & Central Banks:   Stocks, Treasury yields and US Dollar stay firmed. Fed Chair Powell added to the recent sell off. His slightly more hawkish tone further priced out chances for any imminent action and the timing of a cut was pushed out further. He suggested if higher inflation does persist, the Fed will hold rates steady “for as long as needed.” Implied Fed Fund: There remains no real chance for a move on May 1 and at their intraday highs the June implied funds rate future showed only 5 bps, while July reflected only 10 bps. And a full 25 bps was not priced in until November, with 38 bps in cuts seen for 2024. US & EU Economies Diverging: Lagarde says ECB is moving toward rate cuts – if there are no major shocks. UK March CPI inflation falls less than expected. Output price inflation has started to nudge higher, despite another decline in input prices. Together with yesterday’s higher than expected wage numbers, the data will add to the arguments of the hawks at the BoE, which remain very reluctant to contemplate rate cuts. Canada CPI rose 0.6% in March, double the 0.3% February increase BUT core eased. The doors are still open for a possible cut at the next BoC meeting on June 5. IMF revised up its global growth forecast for 2024 with inflation easing, in its new World Economic Outlook. This is consistent with a global soft landing, according to the report. Financial Markets Performance:   USDJPY also inched up to 154.67 on expectations the BoJ will remain accommodative and as the market challenges a perceived 155 red line for MoF intervention. USOIL prices slipped -0.15% to $84.20 per barrel. Gold rose 0.24% to $2389.11 per ounce, a new record closing high as geopolitical risks overshadowed the impacts of rising rates and the stronger dollar. Market Trends:   Wall Street waffled either side of unchanged on the day amid dimming rate cut potential, rising yields, and earnings. The major indexes closed mixed with the Dow up 0.17%, while the S&P500 and NASDAQ lost -0.21% and -0.12%, respectively. Asian stock markets mostly corrected again, with Japanese bourses underperforming and the Nikkei down -1.3%. Mainland China bourses were a notable exception and the CSI 300 rallied 1.4%, but the MSCI Asia Pacific index came close to erasing the gains for this year. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business. Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar. Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding on how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE! Click HERE to READ more Market news. Andria Pichidi Market Analyst HFMarkets Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in FX and CFDs products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.vvvvvvv
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.