Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

jperl

Trading with Market Statistics. IV Standard Deviation

Recommended Posts

Soultrader,

 

I used to track POC but I find that particularly for the S&P's, the VWAP is the key level to think about. the concepts are similar though.

 

I have spent a lot of time trying to fit PVP into something useful for me but I just don't think it adds much to my set-ups so I am not using this. my advice would be to start with just watching VWAP and learn to see how price reacts to it. there is a ton of good information by watching how it responds to a test of VWAP or a break away from VWAP. I find it fascinating to watch the action the S&Ps have relative to VWAP.

 

the one set-up that is very useful is that when PVP = VWAP in the middle of the day, think of it state of near-perfect 'balance'.

 

other than that, I only look at PVP in context of overall profile shape.

 

here are some notes from todays action.

5aa70e00b91bb_sep12ES.thumb.png.cc0083b53e60dc7023c7ad8599e0b89b.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the one set-up that is very useful is that when PVP = VWAP in the middle of the day, think of it state of near-perfect 'balance'.

 

This unfortunately is a misleading statement.

Near perfect balance would be price = PVP = VWAP.

 

Very often when PVP=VWAP, price action can be far from the PVP, even as far as the 3rd Standard Deviation. That's not a balanced market.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Jerry,

 

I am still a little confused on what VWAP, SD, and PVP you use. Is the PVP the previous day PVP? Or do you use the current day's PVP. Also is this also the case with the VWAP and SD?

 

If applying historical data in combination with todays VWAP, SD.... is this 2 days back? Or do you use a continous VWAP and SD for the entire contracts lifetime?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think I can answer that and I am sure I will be corrected if wrong but for everything except position trading (the very last thread) the developing profile for today is used. So basically you have nothing until the first tick at 9.30.

 

In the series on scalping Jerry suggests a way for jumping right in if you are keen for action!

 

Cheers,

 

P.S. are you in China yet Jerry? Hope you are enjoying yourself where ever you are.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

pretty clear that the vast majority of what jerry has written about has used current days pvp, vwap, sd.

 

so at the beginning of the day, you have an especially undeveloped data set. after that, the data set will gradually mature to the point where VWAP esentially gets to where its going - as incremental volume becomes less and less important to the VWAP calculation as the day goes on since you are building a larger and larger volume base on the past (ie, VWAP will change a fair bit from 10am to 1pm but will not change so much from 2pm on unless you are in a very, very strong trend). the idea is that it is profitable to make trades looking for statistical extensions/retracements based on the current data set -- while fully realizing that the data set is dynamic and will very often have different statistical characteristics as the day goes on.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I think I can answer that and I am sure I will be corrected if wrong but for everything except position trading (the very last thread) the developing profile for today is used. So basically you have nothing until the first tick at 9.30.

 

In the series on scalping Jerry suggests a way for jumping right in if you are keen for action!

 

Cheers,

 

P.S. are you in China yet Jerry? Hope you are enjoying yourself where ever you are.

 

Thanks Blowfish,

 

This will indicate that a trader using this methodology must wait until the VWAP, SD, and PVP becomes clear? The SD usually takes all morning before widening up for the Nikkei. This is why I was thinking of applying this technique for the afternoon only.

 

However, I am trying to figure out a way to play the open. For example, if price is below the previous day VWAP and PVP go short, etc.... Im curious to here any comments on such strategy. Perhaps add a few filters like candle patterns, etc...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

<<For example, if price is below the previous day VWAP and PVP go short, etc....>>

 

no idea how the nikkei trades but if it is the first down day after a series of up days, then I like this thinking. if price is below the previous day vwap but the last few days have all seen lower and lower VWAPs -- then price might be expected to start low (morning low) and trade to an afternoon high in a reversal day.

 

but in general, VWAP > VWAP[1] or VWAP < VWAP[1] is an important thing to monitor, in my opinion. if 'building higher value' --- look to go long after a downswing completes and vice versa... this can really keep you from fighting the markets theme for that particular day.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Dogpile, Im actually going to look into this behavior and jot down some notes and ideas on it.

 

I have another question regarding the SD. How narrow is narrow? It appears that Jerry would take trades with risk:reward ratios of slightly below 1.0. I personally do not take these type of trades even if Im scalping. If scalping the minimum I aim for is a 1:1.5 risk reward ratio. I understand that these risk:reward thinking is not entirely correct as it is geared for newer traders. However, I just never found myself worth taking a trade with so little reward opportunities.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

<<I have another question regarding the SD. How narrow is narrow?>>

 

I will let jerry answer that particular question since I don't use SD at all -- but here is a comment.

 

I use a set number of points from VWAP as kind of a ballpark number to consider -- and try to think more in terms of strength (momentum/volume) of that particular move more than anything purely statistical based on historical data. The market is dynamic and while statistics are crucial to understand -- I don't want to get TOO caught up in statistics as I think there are better ways to do it. but to each his own. jerry very likely has a ton of nuances to his approach such that when I see some of his trades --- I find that we are actually often making very similar trades -- but we are getting there in totally different ways. thus, jerry has figured out through experience how to get a ton of information looking purely at the statistical distribution -- stuff that I just can't see when looking only at a distribution of prices.

 

I know some traders where some combination of oscillators just speaks to them and I just don't get how they do it -- but they do. this is kind of how I think of jerrys approach. he is pulling more out of it then I can certainly see. he has likely been able to do this because he has learned all these little nuances that go along to his approach. kind of like in poker -- there are all those situations that you have seen many times if you have played a lot of hands but each particular situation is actually a very rare thing --- so you get good once you have seen enough hands to build up a library of all those rare but cumulatively important situations -- that is the difference between profit and loss.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thanks Blowfish,

 

However, I am trying to figure out a way to play the open. For example, if price is below the previous day VWAP and PVP go short, etc.... Im curious to here any comments on such strategy. Perhaps add a few filters like candle patterns, etc...

 

Both Blowfish and Dogpile have correctly stated when to use today's distribution and when to use yesterdays.

Since today's distribution has not developed yet at the open, use yesterdays distribution and simply add on to it as the morning price/volume data develops. I do this for position trades as described in [thread=2423]part X[/thread]. You can then switch to today's distribution at your convenience.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I have another question regarding the SD. How narrow is narrow? It appears that Jerry would take trades with risk:reward ratios of slightly below 1.0. I personally do not take these type of trades even if Im scalping. If scalping the minimum I aim for is a 1:1.5 risk reward ratio. I understand that these risk:reward thinking is not entirely correct as it is geared for newer traders. However, I just never found myself worth taking a trade with so little reward opportunities.

 

To restate this question, how large does the SD have to be before you enter a trade?

If you are only using today's distribution, then at the open, the SD is virtually zero. As more price/volume data is added, the SD grows. What's nice about watching this is you can see how the volatility is changing as the day continues. First growing, possibly leveling off, then growing again, then reaching some kind of stasis.

So when should you first consider taking a trade? My rule of thumb is, don't trade until the range of the bars on your chart are less than 1 standard deviation. If the high of a bar touches 1 SD level and the low of the bar touches a second SD level, then the bar range is too large to consider entering a trade on that time frame. You either need to wait until the bar range gets smaller, or go to a faster time frame.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Can somebody please advise me on this code.

I am a newbie to Easylanguage.

I am using this code on mullticharts

Comments appreciated

 

Naveen

 

 

vars: vwap(0),

pv(0),

Totalvolume(0),

Barfromstart(0),

Squareddeviations(0),

Probabilityweighteddeviations(0),

deviationsum(0),

standarddeviation(0);

If date > date[1]

then

begin

Barfromstart=0;

pv=AvgPrice*volume;

Totalvolume=volume;

vwap=pv/totalvolume;

end

else

begin

Barfromstart=Barfromstart[1]+1;

pv=pv[1] + AvgPrice*Volume;

Totalvolume=Totalvolume[1] + Volume;

vwap=pv/Totalvolume;

end;

deviationsum=0;

for value1= 0 to Barfromstart

begin

Squareddeviations=Square(vwap-avgprice[value1]);

Probabilityweighteddeviations=volume[value1]*Squareddeviations/Totalvolume;

deviationsum=deviationsum+Probabilityweighteddeviations;

end;

 

standarddeviation=SquareRoot(deviationsum);

plot1(vwap);

plot2(vwap+standarddeviation);

plot3(vwap+2*standarddeviation);

plot4(vwap-standarddeviation);

plot5(vwap-2*standarddeviation);

 

 

Hi,

that code works properly for me, I see we are all worried about VWAP to be plotted in Tradestation; but my real concern is how to plot PVP, if I use AVGprice function I never have "round" prices to work on so how can I say what price showed the maximum volume in the day?

Bye

Smodato

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
hi, check out the thread in Trading Indicators. Blowfish looks like he should have everything pretty much nailed down at some point as far as matching Jerry's videos.

Thanks for the suggestion, unfortunately I did not get the PVP code there, furthermore other codes I found are ELD format and using Prosuite 2000i I cannot read them, please see this attachment and maybe someone can read it and post it here in order for me to "transport" it into prosuite 2000i.

Thanks, bye

Smodato

MARKETPROFILE.ELD

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Howard Arrington just told me he is including SD as a built in study in ensign to be released today in the nov 8th beta.

 

Looking forward to seeing this.

 

In his words.....

 

"VWAP with standard dev band based on price-VWAP is now a built in study in the 11-08 beta to be released later today.

Enjoy. You can do away with the DYO for VWAP now."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Howard Arrington just told me he is including SD as a built in study in ensign to be released today in the nov 8th beta.

 

Looking forward to seeing this.

 

In his words.....

 

"VWAP with standard dev band based on price-VWAP is now a built in study in the 11-08 beta to be released later today.

Enjoy. You can do away with the DYO for VWAP now."

 

Glad to hear it. It was only a matter of time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Would it not make more sense to convert the VWAP bands into an oscillator. Here is essentially what it would look like:

 

http://www.charthub.com/images/2007/11/09/VWAP_Oscillator.png

 

This way, you have one histogram, instead of 5, 7, 9 lines overlaying your candles. The histogram tells you how many standard deviations price is above or below the VWAP. I'll add this oscillator option to our next release (I/RT 9.0).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Would it not make more sense to convert the VWAP bands into an oscillator. Here is essentially what it would look like:

 

http://www.charthub.com/images/2007/11/09/VWAP_Oscillator.png

 

This way, you have one histogram, instead of 5, 7, 9 lines overlaying your candles. The histogram tells you how many standard deviations price is above or below the VWAP. I'll add this oscillator option to our next release (I/RT 9.0).

 

That's fine for the forward candles, (the ones all the way to the right). However the oscillator gives the wrong impression about where price has been relative to the standard deviations in the past, due to the fact that the standard deviation lines are renormalizing with each added data point.

For example from 12:20 to 12:50, the lows of all the candles touched the 3rd standard deviation price which kept renormalizing to a lower price.

The oscillator on the other hand gives the impression that none of those candles touched the 3rd standard deviation until about 12:40

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thanks Blowfish,

 

This will indicate that a trader using this methodology must wait until the VWAP, SD, and PVP becomes clear? The SD usually takes all morning before widening up for the Nikkei. This is why I was thinking of applying this technique for the afternoon only.

 

However, I am trying to figure out a way to play the open. For example, if price is below the previous day VWAP and PVP go short, etc.... Im curious to here any comments on such strategy. Perhaps add a few filters like candle patterns, etc...

 

Hi Soultrader,

 

I used to use several current day volume based studies on the Nikkei but found that the opening print often ends up distorting the information for most of the morning as you have commented on above. I ended up changing the studies to tick based or time based. Maybe take a look at those for alternatives.

 

My best regards,

MK

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting you should say that MK. I have recently adjusted my Volume bars to self-scale for the last 20 bars but I exclude the opening bar and, for SPI, include all bars after the close of the cash market. This makes Wyckoff style volume use much more effective.

 

How are things going? (pm me :))

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi.

 

Sorry to bump this old thread but I've been reading this entire series of threads and am trying to follow along.

 

I'm using SierraChart and have loaded the VWAP but I can't figure out how to get the SDs loaded. When I add the SD study and base it off of VWAP, I get new lines that are very close to the VWAP. I've attached a pic to show what I'm talking about.

 

My options for the SD study are:

Top Band Input Data

Bottom Band Input Data

Length

Multiplication Factor

Moving Average Type

 

Any ideas on how to correctly set this (or code my own SD formula is this one is wrong) are appreciated. Thanks!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The default multiplication factor is 1.8, which is what was used in my screenshot above.

 

When I calculate the SD of the VWAP manually I get values like .05. Hardly useful when the YM moves in 1 point increments.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The problem is that in fact you don't want to calculate SD of the VWAP itself. You want to calculate SD of VWP (Volume Wiighted Price, i.e. a price distribution where probability of each price is defined by volume traded at that price). VWAP (Volume Wieghted Average Price) is the mean of such a distribution.

I don't use Sierra so I am unable to help you. But search Wikipedia for Standard Deviation, Variance and Mean.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • also ... and barely on topic... Winners (always*) overpay. Buying the dips is a subscription to the belief that winners win by underpaying - when in actuality winners (inevitably/always*) win by overpaying... it’s amazing the percentage of traders who think winners win by underpaying ... “Winners (always*) overpay.” ...  One way to implement this ‘belief’ is to only reenter when prices have emphatically resumed the 'trend' .   (Fwiw, While “Winners (always*) overpay.” holds true in most endeavors (relationships, business, sports, etc...) - “Winners (always*) overpay.”  is especially true for auctions... continuous auctions included.)
    • re:  "Does it make sense to always buy the dips?  “Buy the dip.”  You hear this all the time in crypto investing trading speculation gambling. [zdo taking some liberties] It refers, of course, to buying more bitcoin (or digital assets) when they go down in price: when the price “dips.” Some people brag about “buying the dip," showing they know better than the crowd. Others “buy the dip” as an investment strategy: they’re getting a bargain. The problem is, buying the dip is a fallacy. You can’t buy the dip, because you can't see the total dip until much later. First, I’ll explain this in a way that will make it simple and obvious to you; then I’ll show you a better way of investing. You Only Know the Dip in Hindsight When people talk about “buying the dip,” what they’re really saying is, “I bought when the price was going down.” " ... example of a dip ... 
    • Date: 19th April 2024. Weekly Commodity Market Update: Oil Prices Correct and Supply Concerns Persist.   The ongoing developments in the Middle East sparked a wave of risk aversion and fueled supply concerns and investors headed for safety. Hopes for imminent rate cuts from the Federal Reserve diminish while attention is now turning towards the demand outlook. The Gold price hit a high of $2417.89 per ounce overnight. Sentiment has already calmed down again and bullion is trading at $2376.50 per ounce as haven flows ease. Oil prices initially moved higher as concern over escalating tensions with the WTI contract hit a session high of $85.508 per barrel overnight, before correcting to currently $81.45 per barrel. Oil Prices Under Pressure Amid Middle East Tensions Last week, commodity indexes showed little movement, with Oil prices undergoing a slight correction. Meanwhile, Gold reached yet another record high, mirroring the upward trend in cocoa prices. Once again today, USOil prices experienced a correction and has remained under pressure, retesting the 50-day EMA at $81.00 as we moving into the weekend. Hence, despite the Israel’s retaliatory strike on Iran, sentiments stabilized following reports suggesting a measured response aimed at avoiding further escalation. Brent crude futures witnessed a more than 4% leap, driven by concerns over potential disruptions to oil supplies in the Middle East, only to subsequently erase all gains. Similarly with USOIL, UKOIL hovers just below $87 per barrel, marginally below Thursday’s closing figures. Nevertheless, volatility is expected to continue in the market as several potential risks loom:   Disruption to the Strait of Hormuz: The possibility of Iran disrupting navigation through the vital shipping lane, is still in play. The Strait of Hormuz serves as the Persian Gulf’s primary route to international waters, with approximately 21 million barrels of oil passing through daily. Recent events, including Iran’s seizure of an Israel-linked container ship, underscore the geopolitical sensitivity of the region. Tougher Sanctions on Iran: Analysts speculate that the US may impose stricter sanctions on Iranian oil exports or intensify enforcement of existing restrictions. With global oil consumption reaching 102 million barrels per day, Iran’s production of 3.3 million barrels remains significant. Recent actions targeting Venezuelan oil highlight the potential for increased pressure on Iranian exports. OPEC Output Increases: Despite the desire for higher prices, OPEC members such as Saudi Arabia and Russia have constrained output in recent years. However, sustained crude prices above $100 per barrel could prompt concerns about demand and incentivize increased production. The OPEC may opt to boost oil output should tensions escalate further and prices surge. Ukraine Conflict: Amidst the focus on the Middle East, markets overlooking Russia’s actions in Ukraine. Potential retaliatory strikes by Kyiv on Russian oil infrastructure could impact exports, adding further complexity to global oil markets.   Technical Analysis USOIL is marking one of the steepest weekly declines witnessed this year after a brief period of consolidation. The breach below the pivotal support level of 84.00, coupled with the descent below the mid of the 4-month upchannel, signals a possible shift in market sentiment towards a bearish trend reversal. Adding to the bearish outlook are indications such as the downward slope in the RSI. However, the asset still hold above the 50-day EMA which coincides also with the mid of last year’s downleg, with key support zone at $80.00-$81.00. If it breaks this support zone, the focus may shift towards the 200-day EMA and 38.2% Fib. level at $77.60-$79.00. Conversely, a rejection of the $81 level and an upside potential could see the price returning back to $84.00. A break of the latter could trigger the attention back to the December’s resistance, situated around $86.60. A breakthrough above this level could ignite a stronger rally towards the $89.20-$90.00 zone. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business. Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar. Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding on how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE! Click HERE to READ more Market news. Michalis Efthymiou Market Analyst HMarkets Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past perfrmance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in FX and CFDs products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • Date: 18th April 2024. Market News – Stock markets benefit from Dollar correction. Economic Indicators & Central Banks:   Technical buying, bargain hunting, and risk aversion helped Treasuries rally and unwind recent losses. Yields dropped from the recent 2024 highs. Asian stock markets strengthened, as the US Dollar corrected in the wake of comments from Japan’s currency chief Masato Kanda, who said G7 countries continue to stress that excessive swings and disorderly moves in the foreign exchange market were harmful for economies. US Stockpiles expanded to 10-month high. The data overshadowed the impact of geopolitical tensions in the Middle East as traders await Israel’s response to Iran’s unprecedented recent attack. President Joe Biden called for higher tariffs on imports of Chinese steel and aluminum.   Financial Markets Performance:   The USDIndex stumbled, falling to 105.66 at the end of the day from the intraday high of 106.48. It lost ground against most of its G10 peers. There wasn’t much on the calendar to provide new direction. USDJPY lows retesting the 154 bottom! NOT an intervention yet. BoJ/MoF USDJPY intervention happens when there is more than 100+ pip move in seconds, not 50 pips. USOIL slumped by 3% near $82, as US crude inventories rose by 2.7 million barrels last week, hitting the highest level since last June, while gauges of fuel demand declined. Gold strengthened as the dollar weakened and bullion is trading at $2378.44 per ounce. Market Trends:   Wall Street closed in the red after opening with small corrective gains. The NASDAQ underperformed, slumping -1.15%, with the S&P500 -0.58% lower, while the Dow lost -0.12. The Nikkei closed 0.2% higher, the Hang Seng gained more than 1. European and US futures are finding buyers. A gauge of global chip stocks and AI bellwether Nvidia Corp. have both fallen into a technical correction. The TMSC reported its first profit rise in a year, after strong AI demand revived growth at the world’s biggest contract chipmaker. The main chipmaker to Apple Inc. and Nvidia Corp. recorded a 9% rise in net income, beating estimates. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business. Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar. Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding on how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE! Click HERE to READ more Market news. Andria Pichidi Market Analyst HFMarkets Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in FX and CFDs products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • Date: 17th April 2024. Market News – Appetite for risk-taking remains weak. Economic Indicators & Central Banks:   Stocks, Treasury yields and US Dollar stay firmed. Fed Chair Powell added to the recent sell off. His slightly more hawkish tone further priced out chances for any imminent action and the timing of a cut was pushed out further. He suggested if higher inflation does persist, the Fed will hold rates steady “for as long as needed.” Implied Fed Fund: There remains no real chance for a move on May 1 and at their intraday highs the June implied funds rate future showed only 5 bps, while July reflected only 10 bps. And a full 25 bps was not priced in until November, with 38 bps in cuts seen for 2024. US & EU Economies Diverging: Lagarde says ECB is moving toward rate cuts – if there are no major shocks. UK March CPI inflation falls less than expected. Output price inflation has started to nudge higher, despite another decline in input prices. Together with yesterday’s higher than expected wage numbers, the data will add to the arguments of the hawks at the BoE, which remain very reluctant to contemplate rate cuts. Canada CPI rose 0.6% in March, double the 0.3% February increase BUT core eased. The doors are still open for a possible cut at the next BoC meeting on June 5. IMF revised up its global growth forecast for 2024 with inflation easing, in its new World Economic Outlook. This is consistent with a global soft landing, according to the report. Financial Markets Performance:   USDJPY also inched up to 154.67 on expectations the BoJ will remain accommodative and as the market challenges a perceived 155 red line for MoF intervention. USOIL prices slipped -0.15% to $84.20 per barrel. Gold rose 0.24% to $2389.11 per ounce, a new record closing high as geopolitical risks overshadowed the impacts of rising rates and the stronger dollar. Market Trends:   Wall Street waffled either side of unchanged on the day amid dimming rate cut potential, rising yields, and earnings. The major indexes closed mixed with the Dow up 0.17%, while the S&P500 and NASDAQ lost -0.21% and -0.12%, respectively. Asian stock markets mostly corrected again, with Japanese bourses underperforming and the Nikkei down -1.3%. Mainland China bourses were a notable exception and the CSI 300 rallied 1.4%, but the MSCI Asia Pacific index came close to erasing the gains for this year. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business. Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar. Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding on how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE! Click HERE to READ more Market news. Andria Pichidi Market Analyst HFMarkets Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in FX and CFDs products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.vvvvvvv
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.