Welcome to the Traders Laboratory Forums.
Tools of the Trade Discussion forum for software, hardware, and computer related topics.

Reply
Old 05-15-2008, 11:29 AM   #17
forsearch

Status: Guest
Posts: n/a
Ignore this user


Re: Custom Computers Vs. Best Buy

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sledge »
I'm still running Windows 2000 Pro as every other Microsoft OS since it has been shit.
I have to agree here. Even though I'm running XP, I've found Windows 2000 to be the most stable build of Windows, as it closely adhered to the NT kernel it was built upon.

-fs
 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2008, 02:11 PM   #18

Join Date: May 2008
Location: albuquerque , new mexico
Posts: 13
Ignore this user

Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

Re: Custom Computers Vs. Best Buy

Macs the bomb.
I've had an ibook for a few years and it has had a hard life. In and out of my truck, freezing cold to blasting covered in sawdust, dirt and dog hair and it's never missed a beat. Add to that that I never even think about viruses.
That being said man are they expensive and I would think that running vista on a mac would eliminate the virus protection.
jay bird is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2008, 06:37 PM   #19

fifty2aces's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Edinburgh
Posts: 18
Ignore this user

Thanks: 6
Thanked 8 Times in 4 Posts

Re: Custom Computers Vs. Best Buy

Quote:
Originally Posted by jay bird »
Macs the bomb.
I've had an ibook for a few years and it has had a hard life. In and out of my truck, freezing cold to blasting covered in sawdust, dirt and dog hair and it's never missed a beat. Add to that that I never even think about viruses.
That being said man are they expensive and I would think that running vista on a mac would eliminate the virus protection.
No, the operating system is what leaves you vulnerable to viruses - unfortunately since most people use Windows, most virus creators make viruses for windows. I'd get ESET nod32, as I mentioned before - it's seriously fast, and rated very highly. The modern macs running windows are basically just (expensive) branded PCs - same parts inside, same operating system, shiny packaging.

For what it's worth, I've been running Vista for a few months now without any problems, although I understand that people may feel safer on XP, so might be worth sticking with that for peace of mind. Most of the complaints about Vista seem to be either people who hate change (everyone hated XP when it came out), or people who try to install it on old computers which aren't powerful enough to run it properly.

Also, the 2 hard drives for vista thing is rubbish - you can run it on a single hard drive without a problem - either the HP guys are giving you a hard sell, or don't know what they're talking about (most likely both.

And yeah, Windows ME was awful, wish I'd never experienced that.
fifty2aces is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2008, 06:37 PM   #20

Kiwi's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: the zone
Posts: 988
Ignore this user

Thanks: 248
Thanked 847 Times in 393 Posts

Re: Custom Computers Vs. Best Buy

Quote:
Originally Posted by jay bird »
I am thinking about going with a customized Dell XPS M1730 with the following components. A buddy of mine has a 20% business discount with Dell so the total purchase will run me about $2650. What do you think.

Intel® Core™ 2 Duo T8300 (2.4GHz/800Mhz FSB/3MB cache)
Genuine Windows® XP Professional
4GB Shared Dual Channel DDR2 SDRAM at 667MHz
RAID Performance: 400GB (2x200GB) 7200RPM Free Fall Sensor
CD / DVD Burner (DVD+/-RW Drive)
NVIDIA®SLI™Dual GeForce®8700MGT with 512MB GDDR3 Memory
Intel® PRO/Wireless 4965a/g/n Mini Card
85 WHr Lithium Ion Battery (9-cell)
High Definition Audio 2.0
My Software & Accessories
McAfee SecurityCenter 15-months
Microsoft Works
My cut fwiw.

Most of the XPSP3 upgrade problems came from HP computers because of the way they put the os image on - HP was once a great company. Dells are ok but many are built to a price spec so its not as good as you could do building it yourself.

On Jay bird's spec.
1. I've got an 8500 but I'd get an 8400 because they are the sweet spot for price/performance (but the shop was out of 8400, and when I want to upgrade I upgrade NOW).
2. Yes to XP. No to Vista. If you get 4G of ram you can put a nice big ram disk in there and run your trading apps on the ramdisk (I run TWS, SierraChart and Firefox on the ramdisk for max speed and minimum disk wear (max reliability)).
3. They put 667M ram in! Yetch! 800M is very cheap now and 1000+ if you want real performance. Why get a good new core2 and be cheap or ram (unless you're dell and building to a price spec).
4. Why bother with raid for a trading machine but maybe you have some very specific needs.
5. That graphics card is way overspec except for gamers. If you want to trade then a 7300GS with passive cooling will be much cheaper and do base games (7900 for more gaming).
6. Don't use wireless anywhere in your trading - it adds latency in a big way. Fixed wire connections to your trading machine.
7. McAfee = rubbish; so's Norton except for Ghost. But if its free. If I was paying I'd get Nod32. If not AVG is pretty reasonable as is Comodo for firewalls.

So, drop the raid and you can probably save enough to upspec your processor to an 8400 and get 800Mhz ram. Drop the expensive fast graphics card if you're not a hard core gamer and you can reduce noise, save the environment and your pocket all in one step.

One view
Kiwi is offline  
Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes Help Others By Rating This Thread
Help Others By Rating This Thread:


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Custom Scalper Buy/Sell biegea Trading Indicators 14 04-23-2009 09:16 AM
Custom Indicators for Open E Cry strtedat22 Technical Analysis 2 03-24-2008 07:23 PM
New Computers! TinGull General Discussion 19 12-05-2006 11:21 PM

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:25 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
CS to VB integration by DeskLancer
©2006-2011 Traders Laboratory, All Rights Reserved.