| Technical Analysis The technical discussion forum for traders. |
![]() | | Tweet | |
| | #465 | ||
![]() | Re: The Price / Volume Relationship Quote:
Could you share your thoughts regarding bar 79 as point 2 of the first up Traverse? 1) In real time- How did you decide you had a point 2? 2) EOD - How did you decide you had a point 2? TIA | ||
| |
|
| | #466 | ||
![]() | Re: The Price / Volume Relationship Quote:
| ||
| |
|
| | #467 | ||
![]() | Re: The Price / Volume Relationship http://www.traderslaboratory.com/for...tion-6581.html | ||
| |
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Tams For This Useful Post: | ||
Spydertrader (08-17-2009) | ||
| | #468 | ||
![]() | Re: The Price / Volume Relationship Quote:
Bar 79 is the highest volume, the peak of the full Gaussian, confirmed by next day's double top on lower volume and a skinny r2r(2b2r) forming the missing medium R\. Insisting on a LTL that has this P2, projects the RTL far (?) into the future, depending on a soon (?) to be developed P3 that corresponds. There is only one geometrically possible point (7/17 bar 73). Based on volume (and geometry too), I get CH 2 before this geometric traverse P3 (I find this odd; 7/16 bar 76). If it is a tenet of the market that a P2 must exist after P3 of the faster fractal which builds this point, than I do have TR P3 on 7/16 bar 50, TR P2 being on 7/13 bar 28. | ||
| |
|
| | #469 | ||
![]() | Re: The Price / Volume Relationship Quote:
My original question was Is the first set of dates Spyder mentioned ( Beginning with 10:10 AM on 7-13-2009, and continuing through until 15:30 PM on 8-5-2009 the market has provided just such an event. In addition, beginning with the very same 15:30 PM Bar on 8-5-2009, move forward until 13:30 PM on 8-11-2009 in order to see the exact same event, but in the opposite direction. ) the equivalent to the second set of dates Spyder mentioned ? I still not have received an answer on this question although cnms2 directed me towards no gaps. That part is understood, thanks cnms2. I also understand the beginning date of the sequences on 7 / 13. I do not see the dates being completely equal in sequences. This is not directed NKhoi, he has posted good charts, just a question as to why these dates are equal in completes sequences. Unless it is nothing more than both timeframes, no matter what layers of fractals took place, have both had a Dom- non dom - Dom movement. image of DJI attached. this is up to date, as to when the original dates were referred to, there was even less daily bars to reference. Last edited by TIKITRADER; 08-17-2009 at 01:21 PM. Reason: imgae | ||
| |
|
| | #470 | ||
![]() | Re: The Price / Volume Relationship | ||
| |
|
| | #471 | ||
![]() | Re: The Price / Volume Relationship | ||
| |
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| channels, gaussian, pice volume relationship, trend lines, volume sequences |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Help Others By Rating This Thread |
| |
| ∧ Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Volume and Price Setups | Soultrader | Technical Analysis | 7 | 02-01-2012 10:52 AM |
| Basic Economic Theory Model to Explain the Volume and Price Relationship | zkreso | Technical Analysis | 4 | 07-12-2009 10:14 AM |
| Can Price Move Without Volume? | gabroo_munda | Beginners Forum | 25 | 06-28-2009 08:40 PM |
| Charts with Volume by Price | bertg | Beginners Forum | 28 | 03-31-2009 09:58 PM |
| [Volume Analysis at Key Price Levels] | Soultrader | Trading Videos | 4 | 03-12-2007 04:38 PM |