[rs5]

Friday 7 August 2009

[romanus]

Friday, August 7, 2009.

[rs5]

Friday 7 August 2009 revised

[TIKITRADER]

Spyder

Are these non dominant lateral traverses accurate as how they would be annotated currently, if this example was todays data ?
I am aware of your take on past annotations.
10/17/08 example.

[NYCMB]

Originally Posted by romanus »

Friday, August 7, 2009.

Hi romanus,

Is it possible to place 2b from 10:55 to 11:05? 11:40 bar is lower than 11:05 bar. TIA

[NYCMB]

Hi Spydertrader,

I'm aware of that IBGS and Lateral Movement are wordings used no more. Is the post (see the attachment) still effective for Lateral Formation? TIA

[Spydertrader]

Originally Posted by TIKITRADER »

Spyder

Are these non dominant lateral traverses accurate as how they would be annotated currently, if this example was todays data ?

The attached chart shows annotations titled Lateral Traverses. The Lateral Differentiation Drill focuses on Lateral Formations.

- Spydertrader

[Spydertrader]

Originally Posted by NYCMB »

I'm aware of that IBGS and Lateral Movement are wordings used no more.

I don't recall suggesting that an Intra-Bar Gaussian Shift no longer exists. Perhaps, you could link to the comment where I indicated not to use the acronym IBGS.

Originally Posted by NYCMB »

Is the post (see the attachment) still effective for Lateral Formation?

Find a lateral which provides an example. From the point in time where the market provides the indicator desired, annotate two ways: one where the Lateral Formation ends, and the other where the Lateral Formation continues. Which method does the market determine as true and accurate?

- Spydertrader