[romanus]

Originally Posted by Ezzy »

Today's chart. Medium weight gaussians are building (inside) the medium weight traverses.

I wonder why the 1540-1555 can't be considered as b2b2r2b on some super-extra-fast level?

[frenchfry]

Hi romanus,

as a beginner may I ask you about this in your chart... "...the gaussian lines should ALWAYS match the trendlines..." (or maybe it was the other way around.). How does this workout in your chart?

Thanks.

[romanus]

Originally Posted by frenchfry »

Hi romanus,

as a beginner may I ask you about this in your chart... "...the gaussian lines should ALWAYS match the trendlines..." (or maybe it was the other way around.). How does this workout in your chart?

Thanks.

In the chart that I posted for every line drawn in volume pane (gaussian) there exist a corresponding pair of lines (trendlines) drawn in price pane. The relationship between those two ( namely a pair of trendlines and gausisan line) can be described using the verb "match". Where do you see the contradiction between your premise ("...the gaussian lines should ALWAYS match the trendlines...") and what is drawn?

[TIKITRADER]

In this image is a lateral. This should be one that fits the the current topic.

Can the direction of this lateral exit be known with just the information shown ?

is there enough information here for . . .

1) Differentiation

2) Context

3) Order of events


This is for anyone who wants to answer any or all questions.

additionally . . . Spyder, could you just give a yes or no to each question here if possible ?

EDIT: All bars are finished, none are forming

[TIKITRADER]

One more lateral that meets current topic.


Differentiation

Context

Order of events

[ptunic]

I'm going to take a stab at this.

I would say yes to 1) and 3) but No to 2). There is a lack of needed context here.

Is this already inside some other lateral? Is that at the beginning or ending of day which might affect the volume bars?

However if we know this is middle of day, not in the FOMC or other unusual event, and not inside a bigger lateral itself, in other words in normal context if there is such a thing, then I think this would be sufficient to know where it exits in both of these examples.

I will just tackle the 2nd one for now since I'm studying those right now. In that case, I think it is a Dominant lateral, with black being the dominant direction. I believe this would BO to end the lateral in the dominant direction (black).

Attached is what I believe is a similar lateral as your 2nd one. My example is jan 24, 13:05.

[frenchfry]

Originally Posted by romanus »

In the chart that I posted for every line drawn in volume pane (gaussian) there exist a corresponding pair of lines (trendlines) drawn in price pane. The relationship between those two ( namely a pair of trendlines and gausisan line) can be described using the verb "match". Where do you see the contradiction between your premise ("...the gaussian lines should ALWAYS match the trendlines...") and what is drawn?

There is maybe no contradiction but probably more a knowledge gap on my side. I look at your chart and I see your blue channel. I see where you probably put your points 1, 2 and 3. Then I look at the the gaussians (the thicker ones) below. There I see b2b = point one to point two. The 2b part of this b2b is not where I see point two (which of course can be wrong). Then it goes 2r which should be point 3 of that channel. But it seems that point 3 comes later. I hope this description helps.

Greetings.

[PTVtrader]

I appreciate the renewed interest in the thread (very thought provoking), thought I'd post a chart.