| Technical Analysis The technical discussion forum for traders. |
![]() | | Tweet | |
| | #73 | ||
![]() | Re: New Frontiers in Technical Analysis 1. Describe what points are connected by each line. 1) The only points i am interested in connecting are the OHLC .These 4 prices are connected either to each other or/and future OHLC prices.With traditional trendlines you can connect a series of highs/lows which gives you a trend.The problem is,imo,all those prices cannot be significant.While you are expecting price to obey those lines (for a while) or signal it is no longer obeying those lines, you are looking at something that looks different in each different time frame.The angle of those trendlines will also change according to chart scaling.The angle of my projected lines are constant.If they were not constant it would be useless to attempt to find a price at a future time.And,it is worth attempting to do that because these connections a far too numerous to be a coincidence.We now have enough examples in this thread bearing out this theory:the ohlc are connected geometrically by the same constant angels.This may not be news or interesting to anyone else but me,but i've never seen it demonstrated before (correct me if i'm wrong)There can only be one ohlc per day-very significant prices connected with the same constant angles.Leaving aside the problems of how best to use this information,the very fact this is happening merits further investigation. Last edited by mitsubishi; 06-24-2009 at 08:29 PM. Reason: spelling | ||
| |
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to mitsubishi For This Useful Post: | ||
HAL9000 (06-24-2009) | ||
| | #74 | ||
![]() | Re: New Frontiers in Technical Analysis | ||
| |
|
| | #75 | ||
![]() | Re: New Frontiers in Technical Analysis Quote:
| ||
| |
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to mitsubishi For This Useful Post: | ||
HAL9000 (06-24-2009) | ||
| | #76 | ||
![]() | Re: New Frontiers in Technical Analysis Quote:
(There was no question 4) 5)In real time,without the benefit of hindsite,you do not know if you are looking at the high/low.But, let us take today.We know 912 is resistance and we have a projected line from yesterdays high indicating 912 at 11.30. In fact the actual high was 910.8 at 11am. We should already be aware the market has gapped up a point at the open so we might be looking to get short for 2 reasons in this area.And third we are retracing the recent highs in a bear market,so we might be inclined to sell here rather than expect resistance to get broken -at the first time of asking at that. All of which we might be thinking without the projected line but... it's there. These projections can be used as price targets as well as possible reversals. I'll go into more detail later about what other things i am using with this model.But bear in mind i'm on a learning curve here myself! | ||
| |
|
| | #77 | ||
![]() | Re: New Frontiers in Technical Analysis 7. What does any part or the sum of any parts of these line(s) tell you about price action that has yet to occur? .[/QUOTE] 6&7) I would be looking at the lines which have not yet been connected.The high today was the most recent line at resistance and we closed at 900.9 and that is not connected so i would expect conections to be made tommorrow running from these 2 points.At this point in time,the path of least resistance is down.But in any event,if you are looking for a green light/red light indicator this is not it and i am not expecting to find something to incline it that way,only to increase probabilities that the projected target has been hit.As traders none of us can say that if A and B happens then C always comes next.But we do have some great things on our side,We know that if resistance cannot be broken then price will seek support and we can narrow down where support is.This model is not concerned where a minor 5 min/pivot/fib/is, it will connect somewhere to the intraday low.The low today was the open.We would have to have gone into negative territory to even be concerned with todays low.As i said before,we dont know where the market is going but we do know where it's been.This is early days,we may be able to further increase probability.Sometimes something that is incredibly difficult, looked at from outside the box,could turn out to be relatively simple purely because it is being seen/approached in a novel way.I know it's a big ask.But we don't have to know everything-just enough to make money. Besides something in this thread may trigger something that improves other traders results and that would be great.Also what i like is this model forces you to constantly consider the prev highs and lows which is the basic nature of price action;new highs,new lows Last edited by mitsubishi; 06-24-2009 at 10:10 PM. Reason: spelling | ||
| |
|
| | #78 | ||
![]() | Re: New Frontiers in Technical Analysis I would add this.We must also bear in mind that we can also work out what is highly improbable.The very wide divergence in the 2 angles from any given price means that some lines can be dismissed in terms of price being hit tomorrow in that area/time.Also with this scaling i am using(more about that later) the targets get hit so often and within a couple of days that there are far less outstanding unconnected lines to worry about,of which some are too far away from present price and can be eliminated.Probability must include considering what is not probable. | ||
| |
|
| | #79 | ||
![]() | Re: New Frontiers in Technical Analysis | ||
| |
|
| | #80 | ||
![]() | Re: New Frontiers in Technical Analysis For those who have not read the beginning of this thread.I discovered this model by reverse engineering a 1 min line chart (bigcharts) of the s&P500 cash that enabled me to connect all the intraday ohlc prices by a 60 or 30 deg angle.Had the scaling of the chart been different this would not of been possible .So i believe that something that was previously hidden was now in plain view and that this was a very fortunate,pure piece of luck. I had previously attempted to square price and time about 2 years ago by using graph paper and a 45 degree angle.But the scaling of my chart differed to this model.Although the width of a day was 6.5cm- the same as this model,the price axis was 0.5cm per 1 full index point (s&p500).Whereas this model has the price axis set at 0.7cm per 2 full index points. With the different angle and scaling the prev experiment had too many outstanding lines and took longer to hit targets.I gave up on it concluding that if you fired bullets at 45deg into a forest you would hit trees and all it would prove is that there's a forest over there.Although it did have some amazing results (in hindsite of course).But this is very different and it is all to do with scaling. I dont know if Gann invented squaring price with time but he is most commonly associated with it.And,again i am not certain,but i think he said that each instrument would need to be configured uniquely.So this scaling for the s&p may not work on another index or share commodity etc. | ||
| |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |
| ∧ Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| How valid is technical analysis? | Lopen | Technical Analysis | 14 | 09-12-2011 05:52 PM |
| Evidence-Based Technical Analysis | darthtrader | Books | 10 | 08-15-2011 08:18 PM |
| Creating Structure Around Technical Analysis | Shaun Downey | Technical Analysis | 6 | 02-10-2009 07:21 AM |
| Technical analysis in Excel | TheJudge | Beginners Forum | 2 | 11-06-2007 07:47 AM |
| technical analysis software | mandiuang | Technical Analysis | 9 | 10-26-2006 06:29 AM |