Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

bronxterp

Range Trading

Recommended Posts

99.9% of systems and methods that I see posted on trading message boards are trend or breakout related. Does anyone actually attempt to trade a range? Given that markets range most of the time, wouldn't it make sense to try to capitalize on a ranging market?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The real question Bronx then is, who is in fact trading during ranges and making money? Since it's not these systems you see on the internet... I wonder...

 

;)

 

I think you have a very strong argument for developing a trading system that makes mega-money during ranges and takes minimal hits during trends since we KNOW that the markets range more than they trend...

 

At least, that's the path I took in my trading career... You see all these wonderful systems and ideas that make money when it's trending, but what you see in real-time is A LOT of up and down, \/\/\/\/\ type moves. So if you KNOW this, why only trade trends or think that the trend is coming that day, at that particular time?

 

The key is to not get run over during a strong trending move. If you can minimize losses during a strong trend and make some nice coin during ranges, I would argue that you would make MUCH more trading this way vs. a break-out / trend trader; at least on the index futures. Cannot comment on individual stocks.

 

My personal trading plan profits largely during range bound movements, but has a hint of trend trading with it. Primary goal is to maximize return in range bound or 'choppy' conditions and secondary goal is to minimize losses during trends or with a little luck, come out ahead (usually not that much).

 

I would like to nominate Bronx's post for post of the year. I don't think TL has a post of the year, but I would like to suggest we have a post of the year contest since the end of this year is soon and then I'd like to nominate Bronx's post for that honor. Why you might ask? B/c this thread has the potential to be the most thought provoking thread on TL. Ever. It could also fall to the waste side as Bronx and I debate the merits of the post.

 

If you are reading this thread thinking it's a waste of time, you are not there in your trading yet to 'get it'. Hopefully you will. Just do not throw this post aside with the many others floating around TL.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
99.9% of systems and methods that I see posted on trading message boards are trend or breakout related.

 

I wouldn't say it is 99.9%. Not even close. I have seen quite a few techniques covered here that are range-related or so-called mean reversion techniques: (1) Jperl's VWAP and Standard Deviations, (2) Market Profile's fading Previous day's high, low, VAH, VAL, (3) Fibonacci Retracement Clusters , (3) Harmonic Patterns such as Gartley, Butterfly, (4) ABC retracement pattern, (5) Andrew's Pitchfork , (6) MACD, RSI Oscillator Divergence, (7) Double Top and Bottom, Head and Shoulder formations, and lastly (8) Most of the candlestick formations are reversal and not continuation patterns.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Apologies for the long post here--

Trending and Ranges is completely in the eye of the beholder. Timeframe, price range, etc.

 

I don't think it's worthy of a lengthy discussion about it? If we just look at the most commonly traded US E-mini Index Futures; we all know how important the big money is. The 'institutions' as a group - hedge funds, banks, large proprietary houses - without doubt do not trade a 'trend' system, or a 'range' system. They are (broadly) using (not limited to) quant. models, directional-based, event-based, marcro-economic, long/short, stat. arb, etc. From what I've read of this forum, the calibre of the general forum community know this already.

 

I think its too easy to get 'caught up' in the world of "little guy" trading. We all have particular ways of getting into and exiting the market - OEC just mentioned plenty.

 

In my humble view, whatever you trade in whatever way, just understand that. Make it your world - Trade what you see, understand and have experience in. Avoid trying to put things into categories.

 

as an example, an experience that stuck in my mind:

 

I remember working with a bank a while back, with an FX desk. They were predominantly proprietary, but their core function included managing risk / exposure for the bank's currency risk, forward positions, sales trades, etc. As far as size, not uncommon to see the desk execute trades at the 100mln Euros level.

 

Most people have heard of front-running, or have seen it in the markets. I remember the head of the desk explaining, when they had "nothing better to do" they might see a rival bank come in to buy. Not only do they know they bank (they can see the counterparty), they know the guys working in the bank. Similar to seeing Goldman step up to buy in the S&P Pits, but often even more personal. They can usually take a good guess of if it will be a big or small trade. Even if they had a short bias, they will buy up big-time to front run the other bank, before flipping it once the other bank's stopped buying. The other (really amusing) scenario is when the other bank already anticipated this, and never actually wanted to buy in the first place, and reverses short at 10x the size. :roll eyes: Anyway..

 

The point is - - these guys could not care LESS whether we just made a higher lower, etc. It's about knowing your market, and who trades it, and how.

 

I think a good general 'rule' to new traders would be: imagine asking your query, or telling your 'market information' to someone like the guys detailed above.

 

In my opinion:

 

Range bound markets, trending markets, etc -- no.

demand and supply, liquidity, "real" price action -- yes.

 

There are endless setups out there, but many of them (or the ones that actually work, anyway) boil down to very very similar, core concepts. So when we try and design a trading style, system or methodology - it needs to start with a) Your market b) apply core concepts to it.

 

 

SMW

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bronx : I personally make good range trades using this methods on this threads : http://www.traderslaboratory.com/forums/f34/the-false-break-trade-1994.html http://www.traderslaboratory.com/forums/f34/the-lazy-trade-1942.html

 

they seriously capitalize on the coils that market create permanently...

 

my favorite is the false break... because the market just doesnt have any intention of going outside the boundaries he already created... hope helps.. cheers Walter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

If you are reading this thread thinking it's a waste of time, you are not there in your trading yet to 'get it'. Hopefully you will.

 

I hear you. We all need a repertoire of various tools to adapt to constantly changing market conditions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would have to agree with Brownsfan, when you are day trading then most of it is range bound in some way. There are various ways to trade this but most people don't even have a clue how to do it. I would agree that you should know who trades your market, when they are trading, and basically figure out what the big institutions.

 

But the fact is most people can't even afford the draw down those major institutions can. Why trade like a bank when you have a $100,000 account? If I ran a large fund I would understand and my trading plan would be different. In fact I would definitely want to use quants for part of my business. But if my style of trading consists of trades lasting less than two minutes then I don't really care about what the major banks are doing. I'm more concerned with "reading the tape" and knowing the path of least resistance. If the banks come in and make a big move, chances are I will see it and go along for the ride. I don't care if it's Brownsfan with his money making the move or Goldman Sachs, if the trade fits my plan then I better be in it regardless. Also most smaller traders don't have the knowledge, time, or capital to do quant trading to an extent any bank or fund does (let alone even understand the math behind it). I'll let them write their quants and I'll stick to my 1ES point trades.

 

Let's look at Friday for example, I would call this a choppy day. We did close up (70 pts I think?) but the simple fact is no one has a trading plan that says buy at the open and sell at the close and actually makes money. If you traded a simple moving average crossover you would have probably 3 good trades and the rest you would have been stopped out. But if you have a plan set up for range bound trading, as you can see in the chart, you would have walked away with a lot more money while the guy trying to find the trend is losing his shirt.

 

So the questions still stick around, how do you trade the range? Do you buy at support? Well how do you know it's even going to hold, and what is a realistic target? What happens if that support or resistance line breaks, do we switch to a trending setup? Even then, how do we know it's a trend and not a false breakout?

 

Sorry smwinc if it seemed like I was discounting what you were saying, I wasn't. I'm just saying for a small trader like myself with a very small time frame I think knowing how to trade rangebound vs trend is very important. When I swing trade, that's completely different.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=4299&stc=1&d=1196666556

rangebound.thumb.jpg.2d4b32033bd1ab125b7c491658978e36.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's funny that as I became much more involved in active trading from years of investing, my targetted system was to trade ranges occuring over days and weeks in stocks that were consolidating. I felt I could better play "between the sheets" than breakouts. Using mostly fib retracements for the trades, I filtered those with heavy volume and consolidating with stockfetcher. The system was profitable, but risk to reward was hard to determine and many trades ended up lasting 2 to 3 days longer than anticipated which made for some uneasy nights.

 

As I reviewd the 700 plus trades over a few months, one thing became clear. I was calling tops and bottoms and those that brokeout (or down) seriously hampered my gains.

 

So, my sytem has since been refined to trending stocks. I do trade range bound swings intra-day as they present themselves with fib retracements. That remains profitable, but only with very tight mental stops.

 

My $.02

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I would have to agree with Brownsfan, when you are day trading then most of it is range bound in some way. There are various ways to trade this but most people don't even have a clue how to do it. I would agree that you should know who trades your market, when they are trading, and basically figure out what the big institutions.

 

But the fact is most people can't even afford the draw down those major institutions can. Why trade like a bank when you have a $100,000 account? If I ran a large fund I would understand and my trading plan would be different. In fact I would definitely want to use quants for part of my business. But if my style of trading consists of trades lasting less than two minutes then I don't really care about what the major banks are doing. I'm more concerned with "reading the tape" and knowing the path of least resistance. If the banks come in and make a big move, chances are I will see it and go along for the ride. I don't care if it's Brownsfan with his money making the move or Goldman Sachs, if the trade fits my plan then I better be in it regardless. Also most smaller traders don't have the knowledge, time, or capital to do quant trading to an extent any bank or fund does (let alone even understand the math behind it). I'll let them write their quants and I'll stick to my 1ES point trades.

 

Let's look at Friday for example, I would call this a choppy day. We did close up (70 pts I think?) but the simple fact is no one has a trading plan that says buy at the open and sell at the close and actually makes money. If you traded a simple moving average crossover you would have probably 3 good trades and the rest you would have been stopped out. But if you have a plan set up for range bound trading, as you can see in the chart, you would have walked away with a lot more money while the guy trying to find the trend is losing his shirt.

 

So the questions still stick around, how do you trade the range? Do you buy at support? Well how do you know it's even going to hold, and what is a realistic target? What happens if that support or resistance line breaks, do we switch to a trending setup? Even then, how do we know it's a trend and not a false breakout?

 

Sorry smwinc if it seemed like I was discounting what you were saying, I wasn't. I'm just saying for a small trader like myself with a very small time frame I think knowing how to trade rangebound vs trend is very important. When I swing trade, that's completely different.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=4299&stc=1&d=1196666556

 

I apologise, perhaps my point wasn't clear.

 

When you talk about a market range trading, or trending, it doesn't make sense unless we give a little more imformation. I'm not trying to be picky or pull on little details here- it completely depends on your trading timeframe.

 

If you execute typically off a 1 minute timeframe / 5 minute anchor you can be trading the (intraday) trend, while the guy next to you is trading off a 60minute, trading the same market as a box ('range') play.

 

Some people will see the chart you mentioned above as a range bound day.

 

Others may sell the open, cover at lunch and "count" it as a trending day.

 

On their own, 'range' and 'trending' don't give enough information.

 

We all have completely different trading styles, and view things differently. As an example, I'm generally quite short-term in the DAX. This morning I made 142 round-turns in the DAX futures. That's not good or bad, it's just my method, and my way of seeing things.

 

The point I was trying to make about about some of the strategies institutions use, is that (I think) it's important to remember (and apply it when necessary) that the logic and reasoning for why many enter and exit trades, may often work and produce profits, but for 'many' methods, its not a cause and effect.

 

I.e. If your strategy is:

Sell when x line crosses over y line, it might work great, but no ones going to argue the 'crossing of the lines' caused price to move in your direction.

Or

Sell when "supply" (however you measure it) exceeds "demand (again, however you measure it), this is arguably a much more X causes Y relationship. Price really WILL move down if your analysis is true, if supply really does overtake demand.

 

Why do fading range breakouts often make a good trade? Some might say: Because Average Joe puts his stop above/below prior highs/lows, Smart money moves the market enough to hit the stops, get that inflow of liquidity to close out their current positions, and reverse the market.

 

Just because fading a range 'often' works, everyone knows of times when we DON'T want to do that.

 

It's about just remembering the logic behind why your strategy works, and knowing when it doesn't apply.

 

Big institutions aren't anything special - they are just focusing on volume and liquidity, just as many other individuals like you and me are doing.

 

The example I gave about them front running another bank, is exactly what many people do when listening to Pit Audio. You hear Goldman is buying, so naturally you join them, and ride the trade. That information and understanding is an edge - if your strategy is an MA cross-over, it might not know yet that Goldman is standing in the big S&P Pit trying to buy.

 

Often the 'best' trades are when the market does something different. We all have bread and butter trades in whatever method we trade in, but (in my opinion) having the understanding to be dynamic, to notice when the standard things don't apply and adapt, can not only save you getting your head ripped off, but also give you those 'big fish' trades.

 

SMW

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Date: 29th March 2024. GBPUSD Analysis: The Pound Trades Higher But For How Long? The global Stocks Markets are closed due to Easter Friday (Good Friday). The NASDAQ continued to follow the sideways trend while other indices again rose. The SNP500 reaches an all-time high, but the NASDAQ remains under pressure from Tesla, Meta and Apple. The Euro continues to trade lower against all major currencies including the US Dollar, Euro and Japanese Yen. The British Pound is the best performing currency during this morning’s Asian session. However, investors are largely fixing their attention on this afternoon’s Core PCE Price Index. GBPUSD – The Pound Trades Higher but For How Long? The GBPUSD is slightly higher than the day’s open and is primary due to the Pound’s strong performance. At the moment, the British Pound is increasing in value against all major currencies. However, the US Dollar Index is also trading 0.10% higher and for this reason there is a slight conflict here. If investors wish to avoid this conflict, the EURUSD is a better option. This is because, the Euro depreciating against the whole currency market avoiding the “tug-of-war” scenario. The GBPUSD is trading slightly lower than the 2-month’s average price and is trading at 49.10 on the RSI. For this reason, the price of the exchange is at a “neutral” level and is signalling neither a buy nor a sell. The day’s price action and future signals are possibly likely to be triggered by this afternoon’s Core PCE Price Index. Analysts expect the Core PCE Price Index to read 0.3% which is slightly lower than the previous month but will result in the annual figure remaining at 2.85%. The PCE rate is different to the inflation rate and the Fed aims for a rate between 1.5% to 2.00%. Therefore, even if the annual rate remains at 2.85%, as analysts expect, it would be too high for the Fed. If the rate increases, even if only slightly, the US Dollar can again renew bullish momentum and the stock market can come under pressure. This includes the SNP500. Investors are focused on the publication of data on the UK’s gross domestic product (GDP) for the last quarter of 2023: the quarterly figures decreased by 0.3%, and 0.2% over the past 12-months. This confirms the state of a shallow recession and the need for stimulation. The data, combined with a cooling labor market and a steady decline in inflation, increase the likelihood that the Bank of England will soon begin interest rate cuts. In the latest meeting the Bank of England representatives did not see any members vote for a hike. USA500 – The SNP500 Rises to New Highs, But Cannot Hold Onto Gains! The price of the SNP500 rises to an all-time high, before correcting 0.33% and ending the day slightly lower than the open price. Nonetheless, the index performs better than the NASDAQ which came under pressure from Tesla, Meta and Apple which hold a higher weight compared to the SNP500. For the SNP500, these 3 stocks hold a weight of 9.25%, whereas the 3 stocks make up 14.63% of the NASDAQ. The SNP500 is also supported by ExxonMobil’s gains due to higher energy prices. The market will remain closed on Friday due to Easter. However, the market will reopen on Monday for the US and investors can expect high volatility. Investors will also need to take into consideration how the PCE Price Index and the changed value of the US Dollar is likely to affect the stock market next week. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business. Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar. Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding on how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE! Click HERE to READ more Market news. Michalis Efthymiou Market Analyst HFMarkets Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in FX and CFDs products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • MT4 is good and will be good until their parent company keep updating the software, later mt4 users will have to switch to mt5.
    • $SOUN SoundHound AI stock at 5.91 support area , see https://stockconsultant.com/?SOUN
    • $ELEV Elevation Oncology stock bull flag breakout watch , see https://stockconsultant.com/?ELEV
    • $AVDX AvidXchange stock narrow range breakout watch above 13.32 , see https://stockconsultant.com/?AVDX
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.