[darthtrader]

i've really been trying to get into learning easylanguage the past few weeks and had a post all typed up yesterday in the candlestick thread after seeing common candle patterns as reserved words in ez. The post was pretty unclear though so i deleted it. Surfing around then I found the data mining webinar on the tradestation site, which was basically i guess what i was going to ask if tradestation could do.
Has anyone ever done any type of data mining with tradestation? I was thinking something along the lines of mining for candle patterns around a setup.
I also think it would be interesting to mine for an optimal stop/profit target on a setup. I mean how do you know that a 22 or a 17 point stop is not actually better than a 20 point stop?
Anyone use this stuff or find that its a huge waste of time?
Also, anyone ever do anything with the probability maps in TS? Seems like that should be usefull somehow with market profile.

[waveslider]

Hi Darth,

Data mining is generally a waste of time. It is the same as curve fitting, and for most circumstances un-useable. The reason is that that market is dynamic and irrational, just like the human mind.

I have been around easy language for years, almost everything I have developed I have tossed. The reason most tools are not helpful is because nothing competes with the human eye.

If you are trading stocks it can be helpful to program in logic to call attention to certain conditions with easylanguage. My opinion is that easylanguage is useful to test very general ideas, but at all times runs the risk of distraction.

You can be sure that just about every worthwhile idea you could come up with is begin exploited - especially candles.

I think there are very few tools that you need - everything is really just an extraction of price and volume. Tools like market profile are a good way of organizing information, but the same information is available there to the naked eye.

The probability map seems to be garbage also.

I think I can speak for a large number of people who can look back and say they have spent way too much time programming, time that could better be used refining and practicing one approach.

hope that helps!

ws

[torero]

I'm torn on siding with or against ws' comments. It's true it takes alot of time to come up with something useful enough to even consider trading it real time. Even then, these are not suitable for daytrading (swing or higher). Having said that I've found a few systems through data mining but took me a 2 years drudging at it. So, if you have time and 2 years, then learning this side of trading is very valuable. These data mining finds have to be done with extreme care (ie. very skeptical) or it'll be your $$$ with a wrong assumptions or operating with full knowledge of the matter involved.

[darthtrader]

Interesting responses to think about guys.
The time involved with this isn't an issue, i took alot of programming classes in college and i'm finding it so much fun to actually be able to program something that actually does something.
I soppose it is something I will not exactly concentrate on but just explore when i have extra time.
Figured the probability maps were useless just being i've never found anything that uses them, shame because they do look cool.


thanks guys.

[waveslider]

Hey Darth, have fun - enjoy! It's great to have a program present the market to you the way you want to see it. My only point was that you shouldn't expect to find the key to the markets through data mining.
I agree 100% with Torero, there are some valid methods to be found using the daily time frame. I manage a fund that I trade only on daily signals, the system I developed to trade the fund is 90% mechanical.
Also, as he mentioned, you have to be very critical of any results you may come up with. Testing them on virgin data, un-correlated markets, etc.

ws

[torero]

Looking back, my first mistake when I first got involved with program trading was I got so excited seeing all these $$$ after running a few tests I put it on real trading right away. Took a week to realize what I saw and what I thought I saw was completely unrealistic. Lesson learned: if it looks good and easy, double-check, triple-check and test it from all angles and read the forums on program trading as much as you can before taking it for a real spin. There are tons of traps imaginable and unimaginable.

[darthtrader]

good stuff.
i guess in some sense though i'm less interested in finding a mechanical system and more so interesting in mining for information around a discretionary setup.
Thats where i thought the candle pattern stuff might be interesting, a full setup you would normally trade discretionary(without looking at candles) but then maybe mine to see if if there are any candle patterns that occured better than chance. Not that i would then make that mechanical but just something to look for. Or if volatility is X, mine to see what the average move was or the average loss was from the setup, more things like that.

did you guys use any kind of volatility measure in your systems? I've been trying to think what the best measure of volatility would be, implied volatility on the index options?

[torero]

I used a few things to measure volatility: price channels, ATR, Bollinger bands, and Keltner. They are useful in some ways but not in others.

About candlesticks, one thing I've done wrong with them was identifying setups based on a single or 2 candlesticks. These i found out led to alot of false signals. In mining, it's better to group the bars at least 5 or more and describe them in more details before the false signals are taken out. One or two bars cannot say much when 50-60 bars have already been voted, even if they are tops or bottoms.