Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Recommended Posts

James - I would suggest that any time a new vendor is posting on TL - whether by request of you or not - you introduce them to the forum. In this thread - http://www.traderslaboratory.com/forums/f37/afraid-of-failure-1993.html - I can see where the concern would come from when there's a new thread by a vendor, in this case Joe Ross. The immediate concern by many traders is what is the motive of this person posting here. It's a fine line obviously, but as TL grows, many more vendors will want in on the action. Not too mention, from your biz perspective, you should be monitoring all activities by such vendors on your forum. This site is not free to run, so if someone wants to 'advertise' here (directly or not) you should be compensated.

 

I would suggest some sort of intro from you regarding the vendor to the forum to help avoid threads becoming a discussion of what motive(s) this vendor may have, even if those motives are commercial. Let's just put the cards on the table and not create a smoke and mirrors environment.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I completely agree, however the post in question was never made to be a commercial type post from my perspective. I'd never heard of Joe Ross, so I figured it was just another trader giving some information that many of us have heard many times over.

 

If someone was to begin posting their website or other services, then by all means, the motive is known and if he's (or she) is not paying for advertising on the site then either get them to pay or have them be gone. I have since closed that thread, btw.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

tin - we won't always know every vendor on the site, but I think the concern was what the real motive behind posting. If Joe and/or James provided a brief disclaimer that while Joe is a vendor he is here to contribute, or he is here to market, that makes things easier. Of course it's easy for a vendor to say they are just here to participate when in reality they are here to market. I would guess that most reservations us 'regular' guys have with vendors on a board is that all of us have seen few (if any) that actually just want to be a 'regular' guy on a board. Of course, if that's what they wanted, they could just make an anonymous screen name.... ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Brown, I completely agree and understand your point. What I personally didn't know is that this guy had a "motive" behind his posting. For someone to read that post, not knowing this guy from your average "joe", there would be no inference of anything commercial in it. I guess that's where Im coming from with regards to it. If there was any hint of anything commercial in that post, then for sure....do away with it if he's not gonna pay for the advertising. I just think it could have easily been you or torero or jperl or anyone whos name couldve been atop that post and we wouldn't be having this discussion.

 

Hope that helps to clarify my points.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest cooter

Question is...

 

Do you know whether it is really that vendor or not?

 

Could be someone using his or her name to hawk the vendor's services via a referral link to their webpage, BTW.

 

I say this only because the writing style seems hauntingly similar to another vendor on the site.

 

Just my two ticks' worth...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Joe Ross signed up as a "Registered Trader" and provided an appropriate biography in his profile stating that he is an educator, etc. Isn't that an appropriate introduction? I believe he did the right thing by providing the disclaimer. He should be held to the same rules as everyone else. If he starts pushing his products and services without having the appropriate vendor status on TL, then the moderators should handle his posts accordingly.

 

My suggestion is to ask people if they are a vendor during the registration process, and if so, require them to include an appropriate biography/disclaimer like Joe Ross did. "Registered Traders" who are also vendors can then have their handle set a different color, or something like that, to make others aware of them. If a vendor lies during registration and (s)he is busted, then (s)he should be called out and put to shame. :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest cooter
Joe Ross signed up as a "Registered Trader" and provided an appropriate biography in his profile stating that he is an educator, etc. Isn't that an appropriate introduction? I believe he did the right thing by providing the disclaimer. He should be held to the same rules as everyone else. If he starts pushing his products and services without having the appropriate vendor status on TL, then the moderators should handle his posts accordingly.

 

My suggestion is to ask people if they are a vendor during the registration process, and if so, require them to include an appropriate biography/disclaimer like Joe Ross did. "Registered Traders" who are also vendors can then have their handle set a different color, or something like that, to make others aware of them. If a vendor lies during registration and (s)he is busted, then (s)he should be called out and put to shame. :D

 

 

I or anyone else could sign up as "Joe Schmoe", famous trader, with all the relevant info given. And I could use an affiliate link to a vendor website as my homepage.

 

Vendors should be vetted by the appropriate moderator or site admin prior to posting to ensure that it is they who are speaking in their own voice, and not just some affiliate impostor posing on their behalf.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I or anyone else could sign up as "Joe Schmoe", famous trader, with all the relevant info given. And I could use an affiliate link to a vendor website as my homepage.

 

Vendors should be vetted by the appropriate moderator or site admin prior to posting to ensure that it is they who are speaking in their own voice, and not just some affiliate impostor posing on their behalf.

 

 

Thats true cooter... it wil be very conveniant to validate his identity... anyway he deserves respect from our part.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good points guys. No easy solution I suppose.

 

You don't want to turn away a potential contributing member to the board and we also don't want to turn this into a trading sales forum either.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess this is a repetition from another thread but you have to give people the benefit of the doubt. He may sell something but until he commits that act, we shouldn't judge him. Indeed, if impersonate as someone else by another nickname, posting the same content, no one would say anything. We all judge too hastily. Wait for him to commit the act, then book him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I personally have paid over $150 for Joe Ross' books. However, I am more than pleased to have him on board with us. This place is about knowledge, improvement, and education. Any content and information that fall into this category is valued from my perspective.

 

Regarding vendors and educators, the tip on having to include this in the registration process is an excellent idea. Also please feel free to post any thoughts or recommendations regarding this topic. I will absorb these ideas and try to create an atmosphere accordingly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

James - along the lines of identifying vendors in the registration, it would be helpful if then there was some sort of unique identifier in their screenname that would tell everyone real quick this is a vendor. That could eliminate threads turning into a debate. If everyone easily knows (w/o having to click their profile and read thru it), that could help minimize concerns. It doesn't need to be gaudy, just a small icon or something that would symbolize this person is some sort of trading vendor.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
James - along the lines of identifying vendors in the registration, it would be helpful if then there was some sort of unique identifier in their screenname that would tell everyone real quick this is a vendor. That could eliminate threads turning into a debate. If everyone easily knows (w/o having to click their profile and read thru it), that could help minimize concerns. It doesn't need to be gaudy, just a small icon or something that would symbolize this person is some sort of trading vendor.

 

Great idea. Perhaps when a member points out that he/she is a vendor or educator they can be placed in a seperate usergroup for clarification purposes. Hence under their username a different label will appear. I will add this on my to-do-list. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Date: 25th April 2024. Investors Monitor a Potential Japanese Intervention, and upcoming Tech Earnings. Meta stocks top earnings expectations, but revenue guidance for the next 6 months triggers significant selloff. Meta stocks decline 15.00% and the Magnificent Seven also trade lower. Japanese Authorities are on watch and most market experts predict the Japanese Federal Government will intervene once again. The Japanese Yen is the day’s worst performing currency while the Australian Dollar continues to top the charts. The US Dollar trades 0.10% lower, but this afternoon’s performance is likely to be dependent on the US GDP. USA100 – Meta Stocks Fall 15% On the Next 6-Months Guidance The NASDAQ has declined 1.51% over the past 24 hours, unable to maintain momentum from Monday and Tuesday. Technical analysts advise the decline is partially simply a break in the bullish momentum and the asset continues to follow a bullish correction pattern. However, if the decline continues throughout the day, the retracement scenario becomes a lesser possibility. In terms of indications and technical analysis, most oscillators, and momentum-based signals point to a downward price movement. The USA100 trades below the 75-Bar EMA, below the VWAP and the RSI hovers above 40.00. All these factors point towards a bearish trend. The bearish signals are also likely to strengthen if the price declines below $17,295.11. The stock which is experiencing considerably large volatility is Meta which has fallen more than 15.00%. The past quarter’s earnings beat expectations and according to economists, remain stable and strong. Earnings Per Share beat expectations by 8.10% and revenue was as expected. However, company expenses significantly rose in the past quarter and the guidance for the second half of the year is lower than previous expectations. These two factors have caused investors to consider selling their shares and cashing in their profits. Meta’s decline is one of the main causes for the USA100’s bearish trend. CFRA Senior Analyst, Angelo Zino, advises the selloff may be a slight over reaction based on earnings data. If Meta stocks rise again, investors can start to evaluate a possible upward correction. However, a concern for investors is that more and more companies are indicating caution for the second half of the year. The price movements will largely now depend on Microsoft and Alphabet earnings tonight after market close. Microsoft is the most influential stock for the NASDAQ and Alphabet is the third. The two make up 14.25% of the overall index. If the two companies also witness their stocks decline after the earnings reports, the USA100 may struggle to gain upward momentum. EURJPY – Will Japan Intervene Again? In the currency market, the Japanese Yen remains within the spotlight as investors believe the Japanese Federal Government is likely to again intervene. The Federal Government has previously intervened in the past 12 months which caused a sharp rise in the Yen before again declining. The government opted for this option in an attempt to hinder a further decline. Volatility within the Japanese Yen will also depend on today’s US GDP reading and tomorrow’s Core PCE Price Index. However, investors will more importantly pay close attention to the Bank of Japan’s monetary policy. Investors will be keen to see if the central bank believes it is appropriate to again hike in 2024 as well as comment regarding inflation and the economy. In terms of technical analysis, breakout levels can be considered as areas where the exchange rate may retrace or correct. Breakout levels can be seen at 166.656 and 166.333. However, the only indicators pointing to a decline are the RSI and similar oscillators which advise the price is at risk of being “overbought”. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business. Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar. Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding on how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE! Click HERE to READ more Market news. Michalis Efthymiou Market Analyst HFMarkets Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in FX and CFDs products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • $ALVR AlloVir stock bottom breakout watch, huge upside gap, https://stockconsultant.com/?ALVR
    • $DIS Disney stock attempting to move higher off the 112.79 triple support area, https://stockconsultant.com/?DIS
    • $ADCT Adc Therapeutics stock flat top breakout watch above 5.31, https://stockconsultant.com/?ADCT
    • $CXAI CXApp stock local support and resistance areas at 2.78, 3.52 and 5.19, https://stockconsultant.com/?CXAI
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.