Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Soultrader

Different Position Sizing Methods

Recommended Posts

Position sizing is one of the key elements of money management and trading. Here are some models used to determine size.

 

1. Fixed Size: The number of contracts you trade is fixed at each trade. For example, 2 contracts per trade.

 

2. Fixed Dollar Amount Of Equity: The number of contracts you trade is determined by the amount of your trading capital. For example, you choose to trade 1 contract per $10,000.

 

3. Fixed Risk: Your position size depends on the percentage you are willing to risk. For example, if you are willing to risk 2% per trade on a $10,000 account, this is $200. This can be 4 YM contracts using a 10 point stop per trade or 2 YM contracts using a 20 point stop.

 

4. Generalized Ratio: This changes the rate of increase in the number of contracts or shares with increasing profits.

 

The latter 3 methods increases size as profit or account size increases. This is known as the antimartingale method. The antimartingale method takes advantage of a winning system or methodology. Any trader with an edge and a winning setup should use a antimartingale method.

 

A martingale method is a gamblers method. Decreasing the amount of risk after a win and increasing risk after a loss. Gamblers will tend to double up their betting stakes after a loss to break even. Traders should use a antimartingale method in their trading.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats interesting you mentioned the Martingale method.

 

I have a brief story about it. It involved my friend and online roulette.

 

His method involved just that, doubling each bet after each loss. He tested it out at home, made some "easy" money, they don't like to earn it. He had some success, he did some number crunching with a spreadsheet and came up with super low percentage of having X amount of losers in a row or the possibility of ruin.

 

He started pitching the idea to all of us and most of my friends do not trade, nor have any concept of risk management, so there is a differences of opinion, one who faces it every day and them. Now the moment he started running his mouth about how much money he made, it was a loss waiting to happen. Either way, 2 of them went in on the quick money maker so they though.

 

They started off good, betting 2 bets to net 1 possible win. What he was doing was betting on the thirds on the table. Then the trouble hit, loser, double the bet, lower, double the bet, next thing you know the account was at zero.

 

The look on his face like "this is not possible, having so many consecutive losers in a row."

 

The whole idea of risking more to make less is never a winning proposition in the long run.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.