Welcome to the Traders Laboratory Forums.
Market Profile Are you a market profile trader? Post here.

Reply
Old 04-21-2011, 05:09 AM   #9

BlowFish's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: In Da House
Posts: 3,292
Ignore this user

Thanks: 129
Thanked 1,054 Times in 702 Posts

Re: MD FootPrint Chart Comparison with Different Data Feeds

Quote:
Originally Posted by johnw »
Hate to mention this, but how much do you pay for your data.

Add that to the 90% of Retailers who never learned the Trading Industry and therefore fizzle out before they really start, and you can see that we all must have decent raw data if we are to outwit the odds.
Whilst I agree that a high percentage of retail traders fail I personally don't think it has much to do with the quality of their data.

Rithmic made substantial improvements to their infrastructure a few moths back and at the moment things are not bad at all. (they where great before the CME changed hw they reported trades thus increasing volume of data transmitted).

Also, because of the way they (Zen) deliver there data, UDP (User Datagram Protocol) and how they actually report trades (strange to say the least), it will probably not be as robust as IQFeed. Having said that it is absolutely possible to trade from Zenfires bid,last,ask data. Having said all that as John, says it is a tough enough endeavour so why put potential hurdles in your path?

One last thing occurs to me, it does rather depends how you are using delta, For example if you look at cumulative delta (which is absolute) over longer periods you might require greater accuracy than if you are looking at delta shifts (relative) whilst scalping. In the latter case a glitch in the data will quickly scroll out of the data that you are making decisions on and the chances are timeliness of data will be much more important than completeness. Just a bit of food for thought.
BlowFish is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to BlowFish For This Useful Post:
pbylina (04-21-2011)
Old 04-21-2011, 07:44 AM   #10

Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 104
Ignore this user

Thanks: 77
Thanked 16 Times in 14 Posts

Re: MD FootPrint Chart Comparison with Different Data Feeds

Quote:
Originally Posted by daVinciLite »
My Open E Cry has an accurate Footprint chart, only problem is that their Market Delta chart is like 5 years old.

Hope this Sierra Chart helps.
Thanks DaVinciLite. Unforntunatly I dont have historical Bid/ask data. Mine starts from when I turn on the program...

If I got IQFeed would I have the historical bid/ask data?
pbylina is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2011, 03:18 PM   #11

daVinciLite's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 65
Ignore this user

Thanks: 9
Thanked 24 Times in 20 Posts

Re: MD FootPrint Chart Comparison with Different Data Feeds

Quote:
Originally Posted by pbylina »
Thanks DaVinciLite. Unforntunatly I dont have historical Bid/ask data. Mine starts from when I turn on the program...

If I got IQFeed would I have the historical bid/ask data?
Yes, 30 days when the cash markets are closed and 7 days when they are open. Market Delta will save the data for you.

dVL
daVinciLite is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to daVinciLite For This Useful Post:
pbylina (04-21-2011)
Old 05-12-2011, 09:08 AM   #12

Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 3
Ignore this user

Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

Re: MD FootPrint Chart Comparison with Different Data Feeds

Quote:
Originally Posted by daVinciLite »
Yes, 30 days when the cash markets are closed and 7 days when they are open. Market Delta will save the data for you.

dVL
Correction. 120 calendar days when downloaded during non regular market hours. 8 calendar days during regular market hours..
DTN IQFeed is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2012, 08:21 PM   #13

Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 41
Ignore this user

Thanks: 12
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts

Re: MD FootPrint Chart Comparison with Different Data Feeds

Quote:
Originally Posted by daVinciLite »
I included a screen shot of my Sierra Chart with Iqfeed on a point and figure 6 tick swing. Keep in mind that Sierra Chart number bars are NOT 100% accurate, but it is close enough for me.


If you want accurate bid/ask data you are going to have to pay up for it: Iqfeed, Esignal, CQG…
So is DTN IQ Feed accurate or not? Seems like you contradict yourself..
mikew is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2012, 02:20 PM   #14

daVinciLite's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 65
Ignore this user

Thanks: 9
Thanked 24 Times in 20 Posts

Re: MD FootPrint Chart Comparison with Different Data Feeds

Quote:
Originally Posted by mikew »
So is DTN IQ Feed accurate or not? Seems like you contradict yourself..
I was talking about two things: The Sierra Chart number bars and IQ Feed data. The SC number bars are now 100% accurate and DTN IQ still has a very good reputation. Been using them for over two years now with no problems.

Sierra Chart and DTN IQ feed: a match made in heaven. I combine the IQ Feed data and my trading account all in one chart so I can have good data and place orders on the same chart.


Good Luck,

dVL
daVinciLite is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2012, 09:35 PM   #15

Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 41
Ignore this user

Thanks: 12
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts

Re: MD FootPrint Chart Comparison with Different Data Feeds

Thanks, I signed up for iqfeed demo and will also try Sierra Chart. I like that I can have MarketDelta functionality for 1/4 the price
mikew is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2012, 02:14 PM   #16

Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: New York
Posts: 16
Ignore this user

Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts

Re: MD FootPrint Chart Comparison with Different Data Feeds

esignal has live tick servers and historical tick servers

my live footprint charts will not exactly match the same chart if I request it from a new esignal data manager session and the data comes from a historical server

there are also small differences in data between different live tick servers (different users connected to different esignal servers) that can be seen in live chat rooms when a moderator projects their footprint chart and it doesn't exactly match yours - the differences are statistically insignificant, but could in different automatic trading executions if you were triggering on tick or volume bars instead of price bars

I know esignal does some quote consolidation (some sort of data reduction via aggregation).
My approximate datafeed quote-refresh to trade ratios are much smaller than the nanex numbers.

I'm not saying that all is lost, just that you need to accept a certain amount of fuzz with the data you receive.
AldPixto is offline  
Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes Help Others By Rating This Thread
Help Others By Rating This Thread:


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Different Data Feeds from Your Charting Platform Vs. Trading DOM marker Brokers and Data Feeds 7 07-04-2010 11:58 AM
High End Data Feeds... Anybody? maxima Trading and the Markets 24 03-25-2010 04:37 PM
non-Windows based data feeds and execution? sjatkins Beginners Forum 5 06-09-2009 10:13 PM
Paint Bar Comparison Robert2617 Technical Analysis 5 11-17-2008 07:00 AM
Footprint chart for stocks mister ed Stock Trading Laboratory 0 12-05-2007 11:24 AM

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:14 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
CS to VB integration by DeskLancer
©2006-2011 Traders Laboratory, All Rights Reserved.