[suriNotes]

Not quite sure if it meets all the WolfeWave rule-set I have for this chart...
But it may be close?

Regards,
Suri

[Tasuki]

Bubba, couple of questions:
1) your chart says, "Tradestation chart" but the symbol is wrong for it to be TS. It should be ESH09, not ES H9. Only reason I'm asking is to figure out what sort of charting you're using. Would that be Multicharts, perchance? Just curoius.
2) I've got a Gartley indicator on my Tradestation chart, and it's not picking up the Gartley that you're showing. I think that point C is too low for a traditional Gartley...but then again I'm no expert. BTW, I'm counting my points the "traditional" way for Gartleys (X-A-B-C-D). The attachment to this post shows the Inputs for my Gartley. Does yours look anything at all like this?

I just realized that my post is doubly off topic. Oh well. I won't make a habit of it.
Tasuki

[bubba]

Tasuki - i use tradestation 2000i. the symbol is the proper setting for my setup with IB data feed. that's the difference.

i suspect our gartley indicator is the same. here's my parameters. i'm even worse on these than i am w/ WWs.

[suriNotes]

Here are @YM Wolfe Waves (Not perfect but potential WW).. The first Chart (12.40p) I traded today (not because of WWs) but I watched it unfold in RT. I like certain aspects of WW and its predictability so far....

Regards,
Suri

[suriNotes]

Here is that trade from above post. It was ABC Bearish trade w/kTrend.. But I was also watching WW pattern unfold on @YM.

Regards,
Suri

[bubba]

here's what i think is a pretty classic WW.. but again, take it w/ a grain of salt

nice descending wedge w/ well proportioned swings.

(now, i better get out my "Trade Chart Patterns Like a Pro" and study that ABC.)

/just noticed i labeled point 3 as "2".. gawd, sry

[suriNotes]

I wrongly marked the first Two WW charts (@ES) in RT.
Didn't realize until it was complete...

I believe the third chart (@YM) follows WW rules.

Regards,
Suri

[bubba]

here's the follow up on last nights ww. text-book example maybe? maybe one of the seasoned WW'ers will comment..

/fixed the labels too