Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

onesmith

Chocolate or Vanilla

Recommended Posts

GRAND OPENING! never ending flavors of the truth.

 

My Mom (smaj ymmij ton) says there are rumors that I choose can instead of can't (but I have always chosen can't). So I said NOT TRUE Lefty (in part) because that's the easiest of my Mom's [missing link] personality splits to reason with and in part too because second my Mom Lefty understands indisputable proof of choosing can't verses unsupported speculation to start rumors about me choosing can.

 

Can or can't?

 

I choose can't. I have chosen can't from the beginning.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=36011&d=1367566922

5aa711dfe5634_Libel001.png.aa1351eda96bbdc64b0676db51195e8b.png

Edited by onesmith

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Onesmith,

 

If I consider anyone on here is worth my time, I tend to speak with them using PM. You know whether or not I speak to you through PM. You don't know whether I speak to Steve through PM. I will tell you whether I speak to Steve through PM in a PM to you, should you be one of those people with whom I speak via PM. If you're not one of those people then you'll never know whether I speak to Steve via PM, but you will know that I don't speak to you via PM, and therefore likely consider Steve's attack from last year to be accurate.

 

BlueHorseshoe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually, my post initially asks "how's that strategy looking now?"

 

I then offer my opinion on Onesmith (which hasn't changed)

 

Therefore (as Onesmith has so clearly shown in his post) my comment does in fact contain TWO (2) kinds of statements...one a question about a strategy, the other my opinion of the person's mental status...

 

As is usual for a narcissist, he simply ignores the part that doesn't fit his needs.

 

Clearly by the site standards, its not a violation of rules...and its clearly not libel

 

Once again, we are done here...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.