|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Technical Analysis The technical discussion forum for traders. Moderated by mister ed. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks | |||||||
del.icio.us
|
StumbleUpon
|
Google
|
Digg
|
Facebook
|
Furl
|
Reddit
|
Netscape
|
|
|
LinkBack (1) | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes | Language |
|
||||
|
Volume Moving Average
A Volume moving average; I like the idea so I know if the volume in the market is higher than average, indicating outside money flowing in/out and good potential for a trend move, or lower than average indicating the locals might spend the day playing with stops and we have a range sort of day. That’s the (simplified) theory, but the practical side of it is that volume varies depending on time of day so using a normal moving average calculation (take the last “x" periods, add them up, divide by “xâ€) will not give a reliable indication of what the average volume is for a particular time of day.
Better to take the volume for a certain period of time, say the 15 minutes between 8.30 and 8.45 am, and compare the volume during this period to the volume between 8.30 and 8.45 am for previous days. Maybe add up the volume for each of the 8.30 to 8.45 am time slots for the previous 20 days, and divide by 20 (20 is not carved on a stone tablet, use whatever number of periods suits; also this calculation is for a simple MA, could also use an exponential, weighted, or whatever suits). Do this for each 15 minute period during the trading session, and at a glance we can tell if the volume is above or below average for this time of day. I suppose plenty of software packages will do this sort of thing, I know Ensign does it, but I don’t have Ensign. So what I did was get the volume data for each 15 minute period of the ES from 8.30 to 3.15 (Chicago time), put it in Excel (if you don’t have Excel, you could use the Open office spreadsheet software – free download) and did the calculations, this is what I came up with for the average volumes (simple MA) every 15 minutes using the data for the dates between Sep. 19 and Oct. 17, 2007 inclusive: Chicago time: Average volume (15 mins ending…) (no. of contracts traded) 8.45 86,985 9.00 74,498 9.15 83,731 9.30 64,551 9.45 67,687 10.00 56,384 10.15 57,069 10.30 52,050 10.45 47,209 11.00 36,678 11.15 31,807 11.30 24,842 11.45 25,120 12.00 22,855 12.15 28,098 12.30 35,421 12.45 39,401 1.00 36,565 1.15 49,971 1.30 51,979 1.45 52,430 2.00 47,979 2.15 60,035 2.30 58,578 2.45 58,518 3.00 79,956 3.15 67,798 I don’t know how often I will have to update these figures, if they change dramatically each day then there would not seem to be much point to them, but I doubt they do. I might update them each day for a couple of weeks and see if there are any big swings in values; if, as I expect, there is not, then I will probably update them once a week, or even extend the period out to 30, 40, or more, days – it’s a simple matter of just adding more data. I have attached the spreadsheet I designed (ummm…. designed is too fancy a word for what I cobbled together) to do the calculations, for those who may find it useful. Any thoughts, suggestions, modifications ? es vol data.xls |
![]() |
LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.traderslaboratory.com/forums/f34/volume-moving-average-2663.html
|
|||
| Posted By | For | Type | Date |
| Traders Laboratory - forumdisplay | This thread | Refback | 10-17-2007 07:11 AM |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Which Moving Average on a 5min Chart? | Keys | Technical Analysis | 16 | 04-25-2008 10:01 PM |
| Screaming Fast Moving Average | Minetoo | Trading Indicators | 23 | 02-26-2008 01:49 PM |
| Trading With Market Statistics.II The Volume Weighted Average Price (VWAP). | jperl | Market Profile | 54 | 02-05-2008 04:56 PM |
| Hull Moving Average Strategy | Minetoo | Trading Indicators | 4 | 11-08-2007 08:10 AM |
| Average Volume Question | Soultrader | Technical Analysis | 18 | 03-15-2007 12:46 PM |