|
Quote: |
|
 |
|
|
Hi all,
Alot of people say that you should only trade one market and become an expert at that market and nothing else. I guess this makes sense if you are starting out and need to focus to develop your skills as a trader. But if you are trading a consistent systematic method, then surely by applying to it multiple uncorrelated markets can only help your performance? For example, as I understand it, Opening Range breakouts used to work very well on the S&P 500 for a while but then stopped working. However, they continued working on other markets with volatility such as currencies etc. So if you were trading a basket of markets (say one currency, one commodity, one fixed income and one equity index), the other markets would make up for the S&P 500 and your equity curve would be smoother and more consistent. And you don't have to suffer through large periods of drawdown.
Does this make sense to people, or am I missing something obvious?
By the way, if anyone know where to get hold of correlations between markets on the net somewhere that would be very helpful.
Thanks |
|
|
|
|
I was taught the same thing and though I agree to some point I disagree as well. Studying one market is good as you can learn the personality of the market. However, when there are minimal opportunities throughout the day... you will be in a situation where you will be forcing trades hoping for a move. As a result this could lead to overtrading.
It would be advisable to look at a few markets that share the same personality as the one you are studying now. Preferably similar tick size so you wont make mistakes on position sizing and risk management.
I learned something interesting today talking to a employee from a FCM (former currency trader) The big boys that trade the Nikkei here discuss their positions and trades over dinner. In other words buy/sell decision are made on the tables. Hence, traditional technical analysis does not work in this market. I always felt this was the case and had to adapt a different approach with this market. However, I found it very interesting to hear this.