|
|||||||
| Forex Laboratory Discussion forum for Forex traders. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
markets are traded via an assortment of differing agenda’s…..l ong, medium & short term players contribute to the daily flow & liquidity which ensures opportunities present themselves according to the structures & objectives of said participants…†¦Ã¢â‚¬Â¦
it’s often daunting for newcomers to the markets to determine which style or timeframe best suits their execution mode…..however, the vast majority of non-commercial traders tend to veer towards a dominant technical bias……. whether one is looking to clip regular 20-50 pip raids from the ball park, or gun for the larger 200-300 pip moves, a basic awareness of the generic landscape is often helpful to best plan a suitable course of action – or to put it simply: construct their trade plan! I like to look at the trading map from a top-down approach…my main point of reference revolves around the use of Fibs, Pivots & perceived zones of longer range s&r levels…..I say perceived, because the market doesn’t really give a jot what I see…...these common area’s of reference are observed by a good majority of participants from each camp, therefore they’re the best I’ve got in order to lay down a base platform for the forthcoming session… whatever you use (providing it offers you an edge), it’s important to remain faithful to the plan-rules…that way, as conditions change & the market evolves from trend to range etc, you’re better prepared to alter course without too much stress or financial loss……… . i’ve found thru experience, the larger range technical zones tend to react more favorably as price approaches..…Whethe r I’m observing a 5 or 30m frame for a particular entry or trigger, the journey & reaction of the larger monthly/weekly/daily bars have a greater affect on the impending direction than their smaller timeframe cousins……â₠¬Â¦Ã¢â‚¬Â¦ therefore, I like to see where & when these longer range lines are coming into focus……we know that the big round numbers (00’s & to a lesser degree the 50’s) & the accompanying levels slightly beyond them (stop & profit zones) carry heavy psychological significance, for a multitude of reasons……..we also know that once a confluence of events surround these levels (be they Fib clusters/pivot lines/wave axis/channel boundaries etc) the emotive attraction is intensified…… . these key levels form the backbone of my analysis & execution planning…….of course, nothing works all the time & I’m sure as hell not going to beat the market to the plate on every occasion – but my priority is to seek value & reduce risk as often as possible……â⠂¬Â¦ time has also taught me that whatever technical model you choose to adopt, the emphasis on simplicity & common sense will bear the ripest fruits……..com plication leads to indecision…..or paralysis!! once the larger levels are constructed & mapped, they offer a guide to the smaller trigger frames…..and my favored patterns & price bar formations can then be observed as price gravitates to these key lines……†¦. it’s by no means a guaranteed atm receipt, but it affords me a workable template from which to construct my core strategies, dependant upon the current price environment (trend/range/consolidation)…â₠¬Â¦Ã¢â‚¬Â¦Ã¢â‚¬Â¦Ã¢â‚¬Â¦. to that end, Fridays closing level has earmarked a couple of lower & higher zones of interest which I’ll certainly be alert to observing as price decides where it’s intentions lie………. apologies for the ‘war & peace’ commentary……. .I promise, future posts will be infinitely more succinct!! ![]() the 60m focuses Cable upside resistance zones, which show the relevant markers from the bigger frames.......I'll attach the intraday pivots to the 60m & sub hourlies to guage price bar formations as they come into view around the important s&r levels........... ![]() Last edited by Buk; 01-06-2007 at 06:59 AM. Reason: insertion........ |
|
|||||||||||||||
I use timeframe blending (4hr-1hr-15m) as my core method of determining the current state of play......the 4hr is my base template which houses the relevant & pertinent info from the larger timeframe charts (main pivots/fibs etc)........ the 60 & 15m frames are my zoomed in observation references for triggering & managing the initial entry & eventual exit.......... I was reared on simple bar & pressure observation.....the ROUND NUMBERS are key (for me) in highlighting potential exhaustion-reversal behaviour in confluence with the BAR information they display at these levels........ rather archaic I know, given all the new age bells & whistles available nowadays - but I'm a firm believer in the old adage: "if it aint broke, don't meddle with it".......I might have to spend an hour or two more than other folks at the workstation, but there ya go....life's a bitch this methodology combined with my stake-sizing & trade management structure (scaling out-compounding back), fits well with the psychology & behaviour traits of the instruments I trade......... I suffer a bit when price flips from trend to consol/range behaviour (on these timeframes), mainly attempting to climb aboard the b/o etc.....but once it makes a run for it & I can get aboard at a fair value entry, it generally plays out ok........... i'll stick up the 4hr examples first (taken from back in Sept/Oct) to give you an idea.......& the 60m observations on the next post.......... hope they help shine some light on my train of thought ![]() |
|||||||||||||||
|
|||||
|
Re: week 2
Thank you for the clear explanation and charts Buk. I am also amazed at the power of the 00 psychological levels even with the futures market. The Dow especially respects these levels almost always. One pattern I like to trade around these 00 levels is a violation by a few ticks. For example, when the Dow violates the 00 by 5-7 ticks and then pushes back above the 00 level I like to establish longs for intraday trades.
Regarding your exit points, do you usually scale out of your positions? You mentioned the use of pivots and fibs in your methodology. Do you also use fibs and pivots for exit targets? Do you think if a trader enters a trade based on a certain indicator (whether it is pivots, fibs, indicator signals, etc...) that his exit should also be based on the same indicator?
__________________
James Lee TradersLaboratory.com ----------------------------- Empowering traders with knowledge. Please support TL by visiting our sponsors. Thanks! |
|
||||
|
I think any trade candidate hauling decent liquidity behind it will react to, & offer good opportunities at the major round numbers James.....the consistant bar prints mirroring the activity which occurs around these levels render them worthy of special note.......I'm not at all surprised you index guy's find them attractive too!
yes, I like to scale out wherever possible.....the prime objective for most of my initial (intraday) entries is to test the intent of price activity away from a key level....especially if that level offers the prospect of re-engaging a dominant trend after a possible? pullback shunt........ I like to reduce risk on a potential swing entry as quickly as possible to either give my stops breathing room (if I've had reason to tuck them farther away than normal), or cover costs.......it means I can then leave my stops where they are to properly test the genuine intent without being lulled into trailing too close on the first shunt away from a level.......... once/if price tells me it's looking to trot, I'll begin trailing to an appropriate hourly or 240m line. I certainly use the Fibs/pivots as guides for profit pares & compounding opportunities for sure........obviously, as with entries, they're merely guides.....it's the candle prints & where they form which carry the prime importance........I love doji's which form around hourly+ pivot-fib lines!!.....particularly if they print at a new high/low.....fantastic 'fade' opp's, if only for a quick 20-50 pips should price then further retreat to our favored 78.6 & show the slightest signs of weakness, we're all over it like a rash LOL......... regards your final question: hmmmm.......I can only speak for what I do, and I'm a big fan of STRUCTURE....especially if that structure is proven to work - for me, Fibs/pivots in conjunction with common bar formations work!....so yeah, I'm happy enough to enter/pare out/exit based on my entry criteria......... |
|
||||
|
Re: week 2
Traders, give this a good read and take it to heart. Buk and Texxas know exactly what they're talking about. I know these two from a couple of other boards and through their tutelage my trading has improved greatly.
What Buk says about keeping it simple using tried and true methods, though not whiz bang exciting, is the way to go. Torero, from what I've seen in his postings, uses much the same tried and true TA. Add to all of what Buk has said, a huge heap of patience to wait for setups that beg to be taken. |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Re: week 2
I also believe in the K.I.S.S. method. I also used to be apply fibs into my analysis but I have taken them off completely. I started using what makes sense to me and fibs are a little bit vodoo to me. I still do keep the 50% and 61.8% retracement areas in mind since price trends to bounce of these areas. Trading is simple but it sure aint easy. ![]()
__________________
James Lee TradersLaboratory.com ----------------------------- Empowering traders with knowledge. Please support TL by visiting our sponsors. Thanks! |
|||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
![]() seriously though, folks will tend to develop & progress if they're fortunate enough to find one or two templates which fit not only their personal 'comfort zone' but also harmonize with the markets they intend trading......... there are many ways to skin the market cat, the hardest part is finding the implement in which to attempt to skin it........ the most important factor when getting to work on that implement (strategy combo), is to devise it around the safety net of RISK management........too often folks focus on "how much can they make or win" from their strategies or systems, instead of concentrating their priorities on protecting the capital/trade executions thru sound risk & money management....... you can engineer a fantastic win/loss ratio strategy & test it to the hilt etc........but if the basic risk structure is weak & the sizing/management is suspect, you're pissing against the wind.......... |
|||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Re: week 2
1. Preservation of capital is number one 2. Looks are deceiving. Pocket queen's may actually be beat preflop. Even the best looking trading setups will have to pass at times. 3. The worst thing that can happen is to catch something on the flop with a mediocre hand. In other words, making profits with lucky mediocre setups will get me in a bad habit and hurt me in the long run. 4. Who cares if my opponent bluffs and wins a pot. Im not trying to prove him anything. In trading... divorce my ego. Trade to make money and not to be right. 5. "If you can't spot the sucker in the first 30 minutes.... you are the sucker". Have a professional mindset. Dont be the sheep. What would I do if I was a big shot floor trader? What price levels will I look at? etc... Just some rules and guidelines I live by. ![]()
__________________
James Lee TradersLaboratory.com ----------------------------- Empowering traders with knowledge. Please support TL by visiting our sponsors. Thanks! |
|||||||||||||||
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |