|
|
|
|
|||||||
| General Discussion Need to take a break? Talk politics, business, entertainment, etc... Anything goes! |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|||||
|
Re: 300
I saw it Sat night & thought it was great! I'd like to learn the 'real' story, so I will check the history channel out.
Here's the link to the history channel thing if interested: Last Stand of The 300 Last edited by brownsfan019; 03-25-2007 at 10:54 PM. |
|
|||||
|
Re: 300
Yea i downloaded the History chan show and watched it before the movie.
Strange to think how if that battle never happened, and those guys didn't give up their lives, that democracy might have never happened if ancient Greece were made slaves. Ok here's a question for you guys seein as we're talking bout the ancient times, who do you think was more superior, The Romans or the Han Empire Chinese? |
|
||||
|
Re: 300
|
|
||||
|
Re: 300
Nick1984, Actually from what I know, Quin Dynasty(one before Hun) has better military power and structure. But it did not last long after it unified Chinese into one country.
At its peak, it has 1 million troops. while Romans has 500K at its peak. (got this from a documentary). But I do think Roman has better war machine. |
|
|||||
|
Re: 300
Don't you just love Wikipedia? I read up on the Hannibal and his battles against the Roman Republic. Considered the best military tactician, created few battle maneuvers that routed the Romans 3 times,despite being outnumbered almost 2 to 1. They learned their mistakes and took his tactics and the rest was pretty much history.
__________________
"It's against human nature to succeed in the markets"-- Newbie Trader Lounge |
|
|||||
|
Re: 300
Yea Hannibal was awesome. Also loved Alexander the Great. His original army of like 40,000 destroyed the Persian Empire and made it to India of all places!
Intersting one weiwei. I think the difference between the Chinese army was that it didn't have as many professional soldiers as the Roman army had. Why waste a good soldier lol! I think what you find among all the best military commanders is that their force of conviction was always superior to all others. Hannibal marched his army through the most difficult mountain pass to attack the Romans from an area they never expeced it. Hitler's armies marched around the Maginot line to attack France (Poor Frenchies, they can't fight their way out of a paper bag, and no Napoleon was a Corsican not a Frenchman before anyone starts lol) and show them how to fight a war for the 2nd time! Tenacity and determination is often much more imporant than numbers. That applies for lots of things in life, not just fighting a war! |
|
|||||
|
Re: 300
I was amazed to read invasion of Normandy was more than 1 million soldiers. Not sure if it's the biggest count in a single battle but looking at the old pictures and of course the movie Saving Private Ryan make give total respect to all who were involved in the invasion. If you read battle of Hastings going down in history as a famous event, the troops were around 10,000s. Compared to WWII, it's short of a significant in human count.
__________________
"It's against human nature to succeed in the markets"-- Newbie Trader Lounge |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|