[tradersky]

Has anybody use Wayne's System www.daytradewithwayne.com? I watched his videos and have no clue what indicators he is using.

[daedalus]

he appears to be just trading "price" but let me tell ya something... his entries are friggin SCARY.

I mean, hes shooting for a fixed target of 1pt each time in the ES, which is fine and dandy (and i'm sure it helps him keep his high win rate as 1pt is typical fuzz and pop in the ES) but look for example on his last day's example....

3 wins right? but the last one took at least 3 points of heat before coming back up to his target for a point... is this prudent? is he even using stops? what if it hadn't turned around at all? are you willing to tank your entire account on one trade?

Even his trade example video shows a move taking a 5-6pt adverse move before it comes back to his 1pt target. If you want to trade like that you might as well go to the roulette table in vegas. At least there you might be able to find a hooker after you lose all you're money.

he says he trades only in simulation (as to avoid any monetary bias for recommending the trade???) Really? Like himself and his band of merry men with their 1 lots are going to push the market in a given direction? maybe if they were chucking 2000 lots at the market.

He appears to have no money management in place and in most cases he isn't even getting 1:1 on his trades.

I'd be VERY wary.

[Austin_N]

That would be wary depending on the size of the account. If a trader decides to trade any systems less than $5000, that would be crazy (financial suicide). Trading futures market is a risky investment regardles stop or no stop order.

I am in wayne;s trial and I like what I see eventhough there is no stop. I havent seen any loss yet since my trial began last week wednesday. I must say, I am amaze in his system.

[brownsfan019]

I think dae gave you a great synopsis there.

Trading w/o stops or trading w/ huge stops and going for small gains is great until you get a loser. Then it takes a massive amount of wins to get back that 1 loss.

[jonbig04]

Ha I think I started a thread once about inverse risk/reward or whatever, and mathematically we can't say it's any better or worse than a standard R/R. But you should absolutely be aware that anyone can hit huge numbers of small winners in a row by taking huge risks. Its just eventually the big loss comes in. I'm not saying thats a negative per se because the person could still be well in the green when that big loss comes, but a high win rate is a given and means nothing until you see the PnL after a few inevitable losses.

It's kinda like the difference between buying out of the money options and selling them with no edge in either. In buying them, you lose, lose, lose, lose and then hit a big winner ( which may or may not put you in the green). In selling them you win, win, win, win and then take a huge loss (which may or may not put you in the red). Neither is better or worse than the other per se, but you shouldn't take the high win rate as a positive all on its own.

[DugDug]

didn't someone say "its like picking up pennys in front of a steamroller, its easy until you fall over and get flattened"

[ekshay]

Guys, give him some credit ... atleast he is not averaging down.

[tradersky]

So far since my trial started last week, I had 5 wins and no loss during the pre-market hours which is not bad. Anybody has the same results?