02-25-2009, 06:43 PM
|
#4 |
Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Pennsylvania Thanks: 257
Thanked 326 Times in 111 Posts
| Re: Scale_up or Scale_down Personally, I don't like the idea of scaling up. If you get a good 5 point move, then you buy more, and then it moves against you back to where price started, then you're now losing instead of breaking even. By scaling up, you raise your average instead of lowering it (speaking in terms of going long). I don't like it.
Scaling down on the other hand, lowers your average, which makes sense, but I also think this traps people into not taking profits with a good trade. Say price goes against your position and you do buy lower. Then price gets back to your new average and you're at break even. Good advice given to me is when you're back at this break even mark, take off the position that you bought lower. Don't just say "okay I'm back to zero, so I can ride this higher with double the position." By taking off the "good trade" (i.e. the one bought at a better price), you are left with your original position, but now you didn't lose anything, even when price went against you.
Also, this depends on your market and your tolerance. I wouldn't suggest scaling down 5-6 times when trading a leveraged and volatile market like the futures markets. Really you have to assume that if you're scaling down, you made a mistake with the first position. How big of a hole would you like? |
| |