Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

treydog

ES to YM to NQ to ER2 Point Equivilents

Recommended Posts

Hi i am new to e mini futures trading. I was wondering what the tick or point equivalents are between the different contracts using 1 ES point or 4 ES ticks as the baseline. For example I heard that 10 YM points = 1 ES point. What are the other relationships like 1 ES point = how man NQ points or ER2 points. Thanks for your help

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

The relationship you're describing is fairly approximate. 1 ES point equals 10 YM points in the sense that those movements in each contract are both worth $50.

 

But this doesn't mean that when the ES moves 1 point the YM will make an identical movement of 10 points - they're based on diferent underlying indices, remember.

 

I've never traded the @NQ, and I can't remember what a tick is worth, but basically if you find out how many NQ ticks produce a price per contract change of $50 then this number of ticks is equivalent to one ES point.

 

I hope that makes sense and is helpful, and good look in your trading.

 

Bluehorseshoe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for the explanation it makes much more sense. I was sitting there trying to find the distance traveled in the instrument ratio like 10 pts in YM to 1pt in ES. But it was just about contract specifications I understand Thanks a lot just made me stop pulling my hear.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
thanks for the explanation it makes much more sense. I was sitting there trying to find the distance traveled in the instrument ratio like 10 pts in YM to 1pt in ES. But it was just about contract specifications I understand Thanks a lot just made me stop pulling my hear.

 

 

No worries. Instruments such as the YM, ES, NQ, DIA, SPY, QQQQ, do generally keep approximate pace with one another, partly because they share components, partly because they reflect long term macro-economics, and partly because there will be pairs trading and arbitraging between them. But there is no way that you can expect one to move by a certain precise amount whenever another does.

 

Bluehorseshoe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.