[Soultrader]

Hi Papa,

@ simply means value I think. So a -1 would indicate volume one bar back a -2 would indicate volume 2 bars back. You can change this in the toolbox area.

Also, in order to change the parameters.... simply highlight the line and hit the setup button. (see pic below)

[Papa Lazarou]

Hi,


Thanks, I found the param bit that was causing me grief!! :-)

I've come up with this now....

Sum((((Close(@)- Low(@))-(High(@)- Close(@)))/(High(@)- Low(@)))* Vol(@),period) / Sum(Vol(@),period)

It's strange. At times it seems to look like reasonable values (i.e. +0.30, -0.25 etc), but the you change the timeframe or look back into the past and the values go very wrong! +9,500 as an example.

It should literally be the Accumulation distribution / volume for the same lookback period. Really can't figure out why it's not working as it should. Any ideas?

Obviously I've done something wrong, just don't know what!!

Thanks
Papa

[Soultrader]

Hi Dave,

Let me get back to you on this tomorrow. Ill ask around and see I can come up with.

[Papa Lazarou]

It seems it was just a scaling issue. The scaling had gone a bit wild, ( i think that's what it is anyway!)



I've uploaded the pac for anyone to import and test.

If people have any other charting packages could they please test my CQG version of CMF against another package to see if the values are the same?

Thanks
Papa.

[Soultrader]

Hi Papa,

Would it be okay if you release this officially at the forum here? http://www.traderslaboratory.com/forums/f46/

Would appreciate it. Thanks.

[Papa Lazarou]

Yes of course. But I'm really not sure if it's correct!! I'd like some people to review / test it if possible!

:-)

Also, remember you published the other chaikin study, which isn't the CMF, i think it's the Chaikin Oscillator?