| The Candlestick Corner All about candlesticks. Moderated by brownsfan019. |
![]() | | Tweet | |
| | #337 | ||
![]() | Re: Futures I Trade Show & Brooks Book | ||
| |
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to BlowFish For This Useful Post: | ||
deanz (07-15-2009) | ||
| | #338 | ||
![]() Join Date: May 2009 Location: Chicago Posts: 570 Thanks: 207
Thanked 486 Times in 246 Posts
Blog Entries: 2 | Re: Futures I Trade Show & Brooks Book Quote:
It would be great if the thread was along the lines of this here Al Brooks thread, and contains real world practical examples day to day that everyone can relate to. | ||
| |
|
| | #339 | ||
![]() ![]() Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: USA Posts: 1,797 Thanks: 329
Thanked 3,475 Times in 830 Posts
Blog Entries: 31 | Re: Futures I Trade Show & Brooks Book Quote:
Why not determine today, after 1600 or so, what the support and resistance levels are for whatever it is you're trading, then post where you plan to enter and exit tomorrow if and when price reaches those levels, stops and all? Otherwise, it's just more shouldawouldacoulda. | ||
| |
|
| The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to DbPhoenix For This Useful Post: | ||
| | #340 | ||
![]() ![]() Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: USA Posts: 1,797 Thanks: 329
Thanked 3,475 Times in 830 Posts
Blog Entries: 31 | Re: Futures I Trade Show & Brooks Book Quote:
The TTTC setup came about because somebody noticed that price, after testing a certain level twice, would often break through that level after a third test. The fact that price often broke through the level after only two tests or on the fourth or fifth or tenth or failed to break through at all and instead reversed was pretty much ignored. TTTC sounded good. But what in terms of price action is going on here? Price tests, say, R. Buyers are turned back because sellers aren't done. So buyers regroup and try again, buying up more of what sellers have to offer. But the sellers aren't done, so price is turned back yet again. But buyers aren't done yet. They regroup yet again for another try. This time, however, when they reach R, they find that sellers have pretty much sold what they wanted to sell, making the "breakout" not only possible but relatively easy (which is why low "volume" often accompanies such breakouts). But does the "third time" have anything to do with it? Of course not. It may take four tries. Or five. The success of the breakout will depend entirely on how much supply buyers are willing and able to absorb and how much supply sellers want to hand off. If buyers just can't absorb what sellers want to sell, they're turned back, and you have a reversal. So how do you know what to do in real time in this situation? You work with people who are trading whatever it is you're trading in real time. If you can't follow it in real time, much less trade it in real time, then all the rules and chart examples and setups on the planet aren't going to be of much help. You guys have a room set up for this purpose. It's up to you to make use of it and learn from it. | ||
| |
|
| The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to DbPhoenix For This Useful Post: | ||
cegr (12-26-2010), Dinerotrader (07-09-2009), jovis (07-17-2011), mosley (07-26-2009), rangerdoc (07-09-2009), thalestrader (07-09-2009) | ||
| | #341 | ||
![]() | Re: Futures I Trade Show & Brooks Book Quote:
I think its a great idea for a thread. If people want to talk about how they might trade or coulda shoulda woulda traded, thats OK. But the lines should be fresh. | ||
| |
|
| | #342 | ||
![]() Join Date: May 2009 Location: Chicago Posts: 570 Thanks: 207
Thanked 486 Times in 246 Posts
Blog Entries: 2 | Re: Futures I Trade Show & Brooks Book Quote:
But seeing these actual examples is what I think will help those of us interested in the topic. As I mentioned earlier, a complete picture of the logic behind a trade would be helpful. For example, when I was trying to trade mainly based off S/R (this was on another forum), I would post the levels I had on my chart BEFOREHAND(see two pictures below, these are old levels so ignore the actual numbers), so all my levels were always cataloged. When I would post my examples, I would base my trades off these levels, and explain my rationale behind entry and exit for example. So it's not that I have not attempted to trade this way before, its simply that I wasn't able to make sense of HOW to properly trade this way. I think examples of HOW others that are successful at this would be helpful to those interested in it. Last edited by forrestang; 07-09-2009 at 03:17 PM. | ||
| |
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to forrestang For This Useful Post: | ||
szubaark (07-09-2009) | ||
| | #343 | ||
![]() ![]() Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: USA Posts: 1,797 Thanks: 329
Thanked 3,475 Times in 830 Posts
Blog Entries: 31 | Re: Futures I Trade Show & Brooks Book Quote:
For example, price drops off the bottom of your screen and after some time works its way back. Why? Where did it reverse? Was there support down there? Clearly there was or price wouldn't have reversed. But where was it, and why? Beyond that you have to decide how much risk you're willing to assume, what your target is, what signs of trouble you're going to look for that may signal that your target isn't going to be reached, etc, etc, etc. If you want buy here, put stop there, exit up there, it's unlikely that there will be enough hindsight charts to help you. Doing this in real time will more likely be of much greater help, but there are only three people in your room. How come? | ||
| |
|
| | #344 | ||
![]() Join Date: May 2009 Location: Chicago Posts: 570 Thanks: 207
Thanked 486 Times in 246 Posts
Blog Entries: 2 | Re: Futures I Trade Show & Brooks Book Quote:
![]() The picture that you see is truncated. It does not contain the entire picture that was in the post. I literally just used snagit to capture a picture of what I was doing (just now to explain it to you). I was not able to capture the entire picture. So let me explain....... I created a post, on that forum, where we could all post our significant levels, and WHY we thought they were significant. Each day it was updated. So what you saw was the latest levels that I had either added, or dismissed, FOR THAT DAY.... 4-11-09. I.e. if I had a level that I explained from a week ago, it was STILL level, I didn't re-explain it if nothing had changed. ----edit---- The Picture that you see, usually was only relevant to the new levels. So if I had levels from weeks back, and price was waaay away from it, I wouldn't try to fit levels in the picture that had already been explained, that's just not reasonable and it's too time consuming. But if for example I had a new level from the day prior, I would post a picture of what price had done in that area, and add it to the levels. Does that make sense? | ||
| |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |
| ∧ Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Futures Market: Possible to trade for a living? | streaming | Market Analysis | 15 | 05-21-2011 03:27 PM |
| Help with Simple Show Me | 9146894me | Coding Forum | 14 | 06-03-2010 10:36 AM |
| Anyone Trade Call/Put Spreads on Eurodollar Futures? | cborjon | Brokers and Data Feeds | 1 | 02-26-2008 03:56 PM |
| Show us your roots! | Nick1984 | General Discussion | 13 | 06-19-2007 12:41 AM |
| Newbies should trade futures!! | rwalkerx | Beginners Forum | 1 | 12-05-2006 08:48 PM |