[DAVT]

Today 1/10/12 a typical good day. See 4 posts. DI top tick sell and bottom tick buy. along with YM martix and TF PR. Yes, the method remains as tick accurate as the market from which it is derived. It is quite evident with the verified TS results of 1,967.85% net AROR from my current live trading chart from today. How can this be so, simply because the method is that accurate, precise and profitable in fact.
Now there still seems to be "Pompous Fool" comments here..................... ......................... ........

""I would expect astrologist/meteologist type of talk.... ie no commitments and no liabilities.
... Eclipse season is here, and surprising events are popping up everywhere. Fortunately, these solar and lunar events are due to be somewhat easier for you to experience than the ones that occurred last year....
... it will be sunny tomorrow, with a chance of shower.
... if the buying volume does not come in the next few ticks, the market will turn.
Since I cannot see what he is talking about with his one-candle screen caps, and he won't explain it, I can not comprehend it. And yet, it is staring me in the face...
So maybe his point is that there is nothing there at all, and if I look to him for a Holy Grail, I am in fact, a fool.
Thank you Master, you have helped me achieve enlightenment! that is probably the funniest thing i have ever seen on this site."".................. ......................... ......................... ......................... ..................

or is it actually deliberate babble to misinform/misdirect and mislead? I wonder.
Surely, I can not be the only one here that has figured out how the market is run to the tick. All the tick accurate lines and signals that the method shows are merely a manifestation of the programming of the market moving computers. Since all this market movement is programmed and someone has to be doing all the programming, obviously someone (worst than a mere pompous fool) would not want others to know this.
So I wonder if the babble above is mere "Pompous fool" babble or much more sinister babble. I wonder.
In any case I can see how those espousing such babble have been able to effect 93% of all traders not to be profitable. On the other hand, this method has not given me a losing day since it was created. Room still needs committed administrators. New Friends Wanted.

[UrmaBlume]

Originally Posted by DAVT »

..........Yes, 1 ES contract played 31 times 11/24/11 for $8,605 NET profit for the day. More than 172 ES points in 1 day NET. .........

WOW - 172 ES Points in 31 successful trades in holiday trading on Thanksgiving day.

Originally Posted by Tams »

. Actually you don't need to reply any further... I have got the message in your answer. It is not cash you are talking about.Thank you very much. ;-).

I had almost an hour on the phone with this guy and given that conversation and the non sequitur/disjointed nature of his verbage both here and in that conversation my opinion/best guess that it is much more a matter of meds or the lack of them than it is a matter of cash/not cash.


cheers

[steveh2009]

Originally Posted by UrmaBlume »

WOW - 172 ES Points in 31 successful trades in holiday trading on Thanksgiving day.




I had almost an hour on the phone with this guy and given that conversation and the non sequitur/disjointed nature of his verbage both here and in that conversation my opinion/best guess that it is much more a matter of meds or the lack of them than it is a matter of cash/not cash.


cheers

UB, could there have really been any other simple and obvious answer? Occam's Razor strikes again.

Heck, "TheRumpledOne" is now posting youtube videos of his ramblings and so it all makes sense why 1 + 1 = "not 2" in his world as well.

[UrmaBlume]

Originally Posted by steveh2009 »

UB, could there have really been any other simple and obvious answer? Occam's Razor strikes again. Heck, "TheRumpledOne" is now posting youtube videos of his ramblings and so it all makes sense why 1 + 1 = "not 2" in his world as well.

Steve,

I think you are absolutely right. I had about an hour on the phone with the guy who claims to be an MD. I googled up the name he gave me and it showed an MD by that name but both his writing and his conversation lend doubt to that claim.

Still I gave him and his outrageous claims the benefit of the doubt until non sequitur after non sequitur and the lack of any cogent explanation has left me believing that you are right when you say the simplest and most obvious answer is probably the right answer.


cheers