Traders Laboratory - View Single Post - Wisdom From Various Classic Books
View Single Post
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 04-26-2008, 12:48 PM
idaxtrader's Avatar
idaxtrader idaxtrader is offline
idaxtrader has no status.

Trader Specs
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Prague
Posts: 49
Thanks: 10
Thanked 65 Times in 34 Posts
Blog Entries: 42
Phantom of The Pits

I am going to express the importance of doing the right thing from the beginning of a trade and at the right time.

Everything they did was based on their thoughts of how much they could take out of the market today. Their trades are designed to lose but not because of the good traders or the way the market works but by their own hand.

Why does it happen? Mostly because a trader's plan doesn't consider, "What if I am wrong?" Their thoughts are always expecting to be right.

Most traders plan only for the probability side and that, to them, is always what they consider the winning side. This is the biggest mistake you can make in trading. Instead, you must plan for the losing side.

The big mistake made by traders is thinking and expecting trading to be a favorable game.

The market spends much time in an unpredictable mode.

The correct way to control positions is to only hold them once they prove to be correct. Let the market tell you your position is proven correct, but never let the market tell you that your position is wrong. You, as a good trader, must always be in command of knowing and telling yourself when your position is bad.

The market will tell you when your position is a good one to hold. Most traders do the opposite of what is correct by removing positions only when proven wrong. Think about that. Your exposure and risk is much higher if you let the market prove you wrong instead of your actions removing positions systematically unless or until the market proves your position correct.

If that position did not prove you correct, you must remove it to reduce your risk. You decide what is correct
according to your plan. Your exit is a better exit when you exit right away when the market tells you the position is wrong instead of waiting to be confirmed that it was wrong.

When you remove the position because the market proved you wrong, it is always a higher loss, and with stops it also is usually with higher slippage.

By making the market prove you correct in order to hold a position is acknowledging that trading is a losers'
game and not a winners' game. If you only remove your position because the market proves you wrong, you are acknowledging that trading is a winners' game.

In a losing game such as trading, we shall start against the majority and assume we are wrong until
proven correct! (We do not assume we are correct until proven that we are correct.) Positions established must be removed if the situation becomes foggy! (We allow the market to verify correct positions.)

It is important to understand that we are saying the one criteria for removing a position is because it has not been proven correct. We at no time use as criteria for removing a position the fact that the market proved the position incorrect. (don't wait for a stop out také preemptive action)

There is a big difference here as to how we treat all positions from what most traders use. If the market does not prove the position correct, it is still possible the market has not proven the position wrong. If you wait until the market proves the position wrong, you are wasting time, money and effort in continuing to hope it is correct when it isn't.

What makes this strategy more comfortable is that you must take action without exception if the market does not prove the position correct. Most traders do it the opposite by doing nothing unless they get stopped out, and then it isn't their decision to get out at all -- it is the market's decision to get you out.

Most traders keep their position until it proves to be wrong for them. I say don't keep any position unless it proves to be correct.

My Rule Number 1 is to address the swiftness needed in keeping your losses as small and quick as possible. It won't always prove to be correct, but you will stay in the game this way.

He who loses best will win in the end!

I was staying in not because the price action "confirmed" my position but because the price action did not "confirm" my stop-loss chart signal. I was thinking this is what Phantom means. I have to tell you that with this strategy I was keeping my losses small, just by the nature of my plan. But I was unwittingly violating Phantom's Rule Number 1. I thought I had modified my behavior but, in reality, I was "behaving" incorrectly. It's a very subtle thing, I believe.

Then I realized that is what Phantom means. My position was not confirmed in those first 15 minutes! It wasn't violated according to the nuances of my plan, but it also was NOT confirmed. Get out.

The theorem now is to assume your position is wrong until the market proves what you positioned is correct. Keep your losses quick and small. Don't ever let the market tell you you're wrong. Always let the market tell you when your position is correct.

It is your job to know you are wrong and not the market's job.

The other side of the coin is that you will get positions that are correct. You must be bigger at that time. This will require a Rule Number 2, which is designed around adding to winners in an unfavorable game to come out ahead in the long run. When you are correct, you must continue to use Rule 1 to keep losses small. It's okay to be wrong small but never okay to be wrong big if you expect to trade in the long run.

Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to idaxtrader For This Useful Post:
JBWTrader (06-21-2008), stillstanding (06-06-2008)