|
Quote: |
|
 |
|
|
I honestly do not care what it's called - hammer, doji, spinning top (actually would probably be a spinning top more than a doji ) Point is, great trade there. |
|
|
|
|
Exactly. Understanding price action is the key. Is it not every bit as clear when portrayed as a bar? High/Ultra high volume that closed way up off the bottom. The close is what is key, Williams compares it with the previous close and the high/low of the bar, candle guys with the open no big difference intraday.
|
Quote: |
|
 |
|
|
And it was easy - high volume bullish candle signal. I see all this stuff in this thread making trading so much more difficult than it needs to be IMO. There's one post asking if this was a trade and then another that says it was textbook... Well, if it was 'textbook' shouldn't it be obvious? I mean, there are some patterns that require discretion regardless of the trading method, but to call something 'textbook' would indicate to me it should be incredibly obvious. |
|
|
|
|
Agree about overly complicating things. Candles have the illusion of simplicity imho. People, especially those new to the business, spend way too much time and energy on 'learning candles' when learning the underlying price action and what it represents is key. As I have said before there are often half a dozen candle formations that portray the same thing. Hows that easy? Also if you read Nihabashi Mark (who seems to know what he's talking about) he goes into great depth about how all hammers (or whatever) are not created equal and how many subtle variatons exist.
It's round about then that they either decide 'candles don't work' or think 'uh oh candles are training wheel but I want to learn to ride' and start the real voyage of discovery and try and understand the actual ebb and flow off the market. Later they also discover that the context is just as important as the pattern. One good thing that comes from candle study is that it often gets people into understanding the market rather than looking for better indicators.
|
Quote: |
|
 |
|
|
Not sure what was so unreliable about a spinner that produced +8 for me... I don't know, for me, that's reliable enough. It moved approx. 13.5 pts from the close, so if that's not reliable enough, then yes, candles are not good for someone that must get more. It works for me as +8 is a nice trade. |
|
|
|
|
Nice trade!

However I would say that whether it went +2 +4 or +16 was not a function of the spinner or the entry signal at all for that matter. Did you use a candle pattern to get out? I remember last time I was in the room you where shooting for simple +2's glad to see you have found a way to hold for longer anyway. I guess you where risking about +4 assuming your stop was under the hammer/spining top/Doji thing. Also where you happy to take 3 points of 'heat' before it went your way? FWIW I thought eiger's exit was decent for a quick trade, targeting the previous swing high and indeed there was a reaction there which could have easily gone into sideways action.
|
Quote: |
|
 |
|
|
My point was simple - to take something that took at least 3-4 pages of this thread to dissect that literally took about 1 minute analysis in the candlestick world. Result was the same - a long that worked well - but it did not require question after question to get there. |
|
|
|
|
Well actually it does

do you trade all spinning top/doji/daddy long leggs/Alabama slammers/whatever? (If they have 'high' volume of course). Are you suggesting that as a complete and viable method of determining entries? I'd like to hear the 1 minute analysis you go through (in the candle thread of course). I think you are overselling here, if only it where that easy. I would bet you are evaluating loads of information about what's happening without even being aware you are doing it.
|
Quote: |
|
 |
|
|
I guess I'm that voice that won't go away in this thread b/c I see so much effort being exerted here for the EXACT same thing that us candle traders are doing, yet it's as plain as day. In other words, I have yet to see ANY advantage that VSA provides that your standard candlestick analysis does not... Oh boy... here comes the hate mail now...  |
|
|
|
|
That's fine, each to their own. I'm still not sure why you label yourself a candle trader to be honest seems you are more a PA guy. I don't want to be provocative but it also appears you change slant fairly regularly. (though I know the basis remains the same). Guess that makes you versatile. Coming onto this thread to knock VSA is kinda out of order imho (even though you always do it in a courteous way). A better approach would be 'selling' your approach on the candle thread. To be honest I have not engaged much there as it seems completely discretionary which ones to take and which to pass. Much the same as VSA really
Cheers,
Nick.
P.S. Hope you take this in the spirit it was meant, always quite enjoyed locking horns with you in a friendly sorta way hehe
