|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Market Analysis Fundamental outlook, intermarket analysis, and general market discussion. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack (2) | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|||||
|
Re: Wolfe
That's great! Now we have 3 theories that confirm this pattern, that means it's bound to have high probability of working!
__________________
"It's against human nature to succeed in the markets"-- Newbie Trader Lounge |
|
||||
|
Re: Wolfe
It really only works in a consolidation phase of the market. I believe point one is supposed to be the first pivot in the range, then point 2 is an attempt at a new high/low, which would fail (confirming range), then point 3 is a low below point 1 which also fails....
Basically it is a pattern whipsawing a lot of people, the more the better. When there is momentum in a market, like there is here, the range is broken and price inverts into a larger wave rather than staying in a range. |
|
||||
|
Re: Wolfe
Here's another one that just played out on YM. Point 1 took place at 8:05 PST. The fake-out and entry was at 10:16 PST.
Approx. 30pt return. |
|
||||
|
Re: Wolfe
Here's another one that I was watching in the RUT. Pretty shallow but effective.
There are some important rules for this trade, but if they are satisfied the % profitable is very good. Best used in a non trending market. #5 was the fakeout/failure Connecting a line between #1 and #4 gave the target |
|
||||
|
Re: Wolfe
Here's one I just took in ES. This is a 3 min chart.
The one point was a little tricky to notice. The important thing to note is that the 1 pt. occurred in congestion. It was actually an inverse point, the momentum that broke out of the contracting pattern started wave 1. The target line was drawn between pts. 1 and 4. The trigger line was drawn using pts. 1 and 3. Entry was near pt. 5. If you just took a breakout it was worth 2 pts. I took this trade because of a variety of factors; Lack of intraday trend, ER2 under-performance indicated that an uptrend was unlikely, range would continue. If you look at the volume on the bars I circled, you can tell the story and see where people got psyched out. Probably would have been good to watch the TICK or TIKI to look for extremes. Again, you had to have a trained eye to catch that pt. #1. Looking at balance and wave dynamics helps. |
|
|||||
|
Re: Wolfe
I think I have had a mini :lightbulb: moment. (Where's the bulb emoticon when you need it). Just kind of ties in with a couple of things that I had observed for myself and had even started to trade. I love market geometry its just so cool (when it works). Wouldn't mind seeing the odd failure too, lots to be leant from them.
Cheers. EDIT: Yes the 1 point is kind of tricky |
|
|||||
|
Re: Wolfe
Just for fun I drew a couple of lines from what to my eye where more obvious potential one points. (bear in mind I am a chanell man at heart) Both 'work' but give an overshoot on 5. Am I right in thinking overshooting 5 is allowable and actually quite desirable?
Any comments on the other potential 1's? Cheers. |
![]() |
| Tags |
| wolfe, wolfe wave |
LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.traderslaboratory.com/forums/f2/wolfe-2229.html
|
||||
| Posted By | For | Type | Date | |
| Christian Financial Radio Network: China Police Raid Vacation Bible School; Children | This thread | Refback | 08-17-2007 09:26 PM | |
| Traders Laboratory - forumdisplay | This thread | Refback | 08-12-2007 02:11 AM | |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|